There’s no shortage of startups pushing technology that could one day prove pivotal in AI computing and memory infrastructure.
Celestial AI, which recently secured $175 million in Series C funding, is looking to commercialize its Photonic Fabric technology which aims to redefine optical interconnects.
Celestial AI’s foundational technology is designed to disaggregate AI compute from memory to offer a “transformative leap in AI system performance that is ten years more advanced than existing technologies.”
Lower energy overhead and latency
The company has reportedly been in talks with several hyperscale customers and a major processor manufacturer, about integrating its technology. Though specific details remain under wraps, that manufacturer is quite likely to be AMD since AMD Ventures is one of Photonic Fabric’s backers.
As reported by The Next Platform, the core of Celestial AI’s strategy lies in its chiplets, interposers, and optical interconnect technology. By combining DDR5 and HBM memory, the company aims to significantly reduce power consumption while maintaining high performance levels. The chiplets can be used for additional memory capacity or as interconnects between chips, offering speeds comparable to NVLink or Infinity Fabric.
“The surge in demand for our Photonic Fabric is the product of having the right technology, the right team and the right customer engagement model”, said Dave Lazovsky, Co-Founder and CEO of Celestial AI.
“We are experiencing broad customer adoption resulting from our full-stack technology offerings, providing electrical-optical-electrical links that deliver data at the bandwidth, latency, bit error rate (BER) and power required, compatible with the logical protocols of our customer’s AI accelerators and GPUs. Deep strategic collaborations with hyperscale data center customers focused on optimizing system-level Accelerated Computing architectures are a prerequisite for these solutions. We’re excited to be working with the giants of our industry to propel commercialization of the Photonic Fabric.”
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
While Celestial AI faces challenges in timing and competition from other startups in the silicon photonics space, the potential impact of its technology on the AI processing landscape makes it a promising contender. As the industry moves towards co-packaged optics and silicon photonic interposers, Celestial AI’s Photonic Fabric could play a key role in shaping the future of AI computing.
The built-in USB-cable can charge the power bank or other devices. Plus you get a USB-C port for charging gadgets. Photo: Anker
Accessories powerhouse Anker released a new hybrid power bank and wall charger this week that covers a lot of gadget-charging needs. The 30-watt device is called Anker 3-in-1 Power Bank Fusion.
This post contains affiliate links. Cult of Mac may earn a commission when you use our links to buy items.
Anker 3-in-1 Power Bank Fusion
Anker makes a lot of chargers and power banks. Now it adds a new hybrid to the lineup. The new Anker 3-in-1 Power Bank Fusion powers gadgets like iPhone on the go, or uses a built-in USB-C cable and a USB-C port to power devices when plugged in.
The device packs a 5000mAh battery with 22.5W output as a power bank. And when you plug it in with its folding prongs, it outputs 30W to attached devices even as it recharges its own battery.
On the device you’ll find the built-in USB-C cable plus a USB-C port on top. So that’s a 2-in-1 design for juicing up two devices at once. And it’s a 3-in-1 when you plug it in to charge the device itself while you charge other gadgets.
And Anker 3-in-1 Power Bank Fusion lets you know how it’s battery is doing. An LED display states the current battery capacity as a percentage of full.
Fusion features:
3-in-1 charging lets you transition between devices (includes USB-C port, an integrated USB-C cable and a foldable AC plug).
Built-in USB-C cable
Two-way fast charging: Plug in for a 30W charge to power your devices quickly, or switch to battery mode for a consistent 22.5W charge.
Power bank recharging options: an AC plug or the built-in USB-C cable
Here’s what comes in the box: the power bank/wall charger (30W, built-in USB-C cable), welcome guide and an 18-month warranty.
Power Bank Fusion comes with a launch discount. That’s not unusual for Anker. So you can buy the $40 for $33.99 while the discount lasts. And that’s in effect at Anker as well as Amazon.
This 3-in-1 power bank and wall charger includes a 5,000mAh battery, a built-in USB-C cable and a foldable AC Plug. When plugged in, it delivers 30 watts to iPhone 15 and other devices.
Battery life always limits a drone’s ability to perform tasks and get anywhere. So why not let it slurp from nearby power lines? (Well, there are reasons.)
Researchers at the University of Southern Denmark attached a gripper system to a Tarot 650 Sport drone, which they customized with an electric quadcopter propulsion system and an autopilot module. An inductive charger pulls current from the power line, enabling it to recharge five times over two hours during tests. The benefit here is that power lines already exist (duh), but there is the real concern that a drone could damage a line and knock out electricity for thousands.
You can get these reports delivered daily direct to your inbox. Subscribe right here!
It challenged Apple and lost almost immediately.
WordPress and Tumblr owner Automattic has bought Beeper, the maker of the Beeper Mini app, which challenged Apple with iMessage tricks on Android phones, late last year. Although it ultimately lost its only USP when Apple blocked the exploit — mere days later — the incident gave the DOJ more ammunition in its antitrust suit against Apple. Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that Automattic paid $125 million. It’s a lot of money, especially when Automattic already owns a messaging app, Texts. No, I hadn’t heard of it either.
There’s a thriving black market for satellite-based internet providers.
Reuters
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, Russian forces in Ukraine are using Starlink satellite internet terminals to coordinate attacks in eastern Ukraine and Crimea as well as to control drones and other forms of military tech. The Starlink hardware is reaching Russian forces via a complex network of black-market sellers. After reports in February that Russian forces were using Starlink, US House Democrats demanded Musk act, noting Russian military use of the tech is “potentially in violation of US sanctions and export controls.” Starlink can disable individual terminals.
The Motion Picture Association will work with politicians.
The Motion Picture Association chair and CEO Charles Rivkin has revealed a plan to make “sailing the digital seas,” so streaming or downloading pirated content, harder. Rivkin said the association is going to work with Congress to establish and enforce site-blocking legislation in the United States. He added that almost 60 countries use site-blocking as a tool against piracy.
Apple plans to use new low-energy OLED panel technology in the next Apple Watch to further reduce the power consumption of its always-on display, claims a new report out of Korea.
According to The Elec, Apple will adopt new low-temperature polycrystalline oxide (LTPO) thin-film transistor (TFT) technology for its upcoming Apple Watch, which is scheduled to be released in the second half of this year.
LPTO TFT is a method of applying oxide on the driving TFT and the switching transistors behind each pixel. Switching transistors control the voltage applied to the liquid crystal cells, allowing precise control of the amount of light that passes through each pixel.
Existing Apple Watch OLED displays use LPTO TFT in only a few switching transistors, and rely on low-temperature polycrystalline silicon (LTPS) technology for the majority of transistors as well as the driving TFT.
Using oxide instead of LTPS for the driving TFT and more of the switching transistors means that oxide alone is responsible for the current running through the majority of transistors that connect directly to the OLED pixel. In the new LTPO OLED application, increased use of oxide means lower leakage current and more stable operation at low refresh rates, resulting in overall power savings.
The downside is that the technique means more complication in the manufacturing of the TFT substrates. According to the report, LG Display is expected to take the lead in the development of the new LPTO OLED technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is participating in a development project that should see it join Apple’s LPTO OLED supply chain in time for next year’s Apple Watch.
This has led to industry speculation that Apple is planning to expand the use of LPTO OLED technology to other products such as the iPhone. The current iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus use LTPS panels, while Apple’s iPhone 15 Pro models use the more advanced LTPO panels, which support variable refresh rates.
Apple is expected to retain the use of the less advanced LTPS panels in this year’s iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus to maintain differentiation between its standard and Pro models. However, next year’s iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Plus are expected to adopt the same technology, which would mean Apple’s 2025 iPhone series will be the first of its kind to feature ProMotion and always-on displays across the lineup.
More than three months into 2024, politicians in Brazil are still at odds about how much money the country’s research institutes and federal universities will receive this year. Scientists say that unless more funding is found, they won’t have enough money to cover basic expenses such as water, electricity and financial aid for students.
On one side of the bargaining table is the National Congress. In December, it imposed cuts to the 2024 budget for the country’s research and higher-education institutions, which have already had their funding slashed several times in the past decade.
On the other side is the administration of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, which is fighting to reverse some of the congressional cuts. Lula, as the leader of the leftist Workers’ Party is popularly known, took office in 2023 pledging to make science a priority, increase Brazil’s spending on research and eliminate deforestation.
“We should be doing research to support conservation policies, but now we are in a situation where we don’t know if we will be able to cover our routine activities,” says Nilson Gabas Júnior, director of the Emílio Goeldi Museum in the Amazonian city of Belém, whose studies provide data that feed into the management of the Amazon rainforest.
Although the cuts affect the entire country, the Amazon institutions argue that they are the hardest hit because their federal support is already disproportionately low.
Temporary reprieve
Lula managed to increase the budget for science and technology in 2023, compared with the levels in 2022, and scientists had hoped that funding would at least remain stable in 2024. Instead, Congress, which is controlled by a conservative majority, slashed the 2024 budget of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, which funds Brazil’s 16 federal research institutes, by 6.8% compared with that in 2023. Congress also reduced the budget for higher education from 6.3 billion reais (US$1.24 billion) in 2023 to 6.0 billion reais in 2024.
After the budget was passed, an organization that represents the interests of the 69 Brazilian universities supported by the federal government published an open letter calling for more funding. Scientists’ allies in Congress have also tried to persuade legislators to reconsider their decision.
In March, the government and Congress reached an agreement to restore 250 million reais to federal universities’ funding. But Sylvio Mário Puga Ferreira, dean of the Federal University of Amazonas in Manaus, who was involved in the negotiations, points out that “it would take a funding increase of 2.5 billion reais just to bring the universities’ budget closer to 2017 levels”.
Winner take all
The paltry funding for federal universities and research institutes is likely to exacerbate an already-grim situation for science in Brazil’s Amazon. Data from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil’s largest government agency for research funding, indicate that only 4% of the money invested in research projects in 2023 was directed to institutions in the seven states classified as the North region, which encompasses 87% of the Brazilian Amazon.
“Scientific activity in Brazil is heavily concentrated in a few education and research institutions in the South and Southeast” regions, says Odir Dellagostin, president of the Brazilian National Council of State Funding Agencies. “They boast the best graduate programs, produce and publish more research and offer the best job opportunities” — and receive the most funding.
‘We are killing this ecosystem’: the scientists tracking the Amazon’s fading health
The problem extends to biodiversity research. A study1 analysing CNPq’s investments in projects in botany, zoology, ecology and limnology (the study of freshwater ecosystems) between 2016 and 2022 found that research groups from the North region received only 2.57 million reais during this period. “This situation leaves the region with a very limited capacity to respond to the threats the forest faces,” says Lis Stegmann, one of the study’s authors and a biologist at the Eastern Amazon branch of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), in Belém. CNPq did not respond to Nature’s request for comment.
Institutions in the North region produce fewer — and lower-quality — research outputs than do those in the South and Southeast regions, in part because they have difficulty training and attracting highly qualified personnel, and getting funding. In 2022, the seven Amazon states accounted for 3.9% of Brazil’s scientific production, whereas the state of São Paulo alone accounted for 28.9%, according to an unpublished study by Dellagostin.
Funding feedback loop
This leads to a self-perpetuating problem: decisions about who gets research funding in Brazil are based heavily on quantitative assessments. Scientists who produce more research and publish in high-impact journals have better chances of acquiring funding.
“Amazon research institutions are caught in a vicious circle,” says Emmanuel Zagury Tourinho, dean of the Federal University of Pará. “They don’t have enough funding because they lack robust scientific production, but they also cannot develop their research capacity because they don’t have enough funding.” This has led to a situation in which researchers from São Paulo (around 3,000 kilometres away from the Amazon) receive more public funding to study Amazon biodiversity than do researchers who are actually located in the Amazon.
Some scientists are still hopeful that they will get some extra funds this year. “We are talking to the [science] minister Luciana Santos about the possibility of additional budget allocations for the upcoming months,” Gabas says. The most likely scenario, however, is that this discussion will be postponed until the next budget, because some of the funds that were earmarked for science and education in 2024 have already been redirected.
The compact and slim Torras Ostand Power Bank is a second battery for your iPhone, providing 15-watt fast charging whenever and wherever you need it. It also serves as an iPhone stand and can charge other devices, like iPad, too.
Torras sent me a 5000mAh Ostand Power Bank to try. And it did not disappoint. Doing exactly what it claims to do, the device offers good value — especially while it’s discounted for the Amazon Big Spring Sale (see below).
This post contains affiliate links. Cult of Mac may earn a commission when you use our links to buy items.
Torras Ostand Power Bank (5000mAh)
Torras Ostand Power Bank is a wireless magnetic charger designed primarily for iPhones, although it can also be used with other devices. Its high capacity, sleek design and solid features make it a good choice for anyone who needs some extra juice whenever and wherever you can’t find a power outlet.
The bank sports a clean, functional design. Torras sent me a white one, though it appears to be available on the company’s website and at Amazon in black.
As always, the first thing I did was charge the device via its USB-C cable. LED indicator lights clearly showed it was about half full out of the box, so I simply waited for all four lights to shine, indicating full capacity at 5000 milliamp hours (mAh). The device comes in 5000mAh and 10000mAh versions.
Small but potent power bank
The power bank is small and light enough to slip in a pocket. Photo: David Snow/Cult of Mac
Despite its solid power capacity, the Ostand Power Bank is surprisingly compact and lightweight, and only 11mm thick and 4.6 ounces in weight. It is slightly wider than an iPhone but not as heavy, making it easy to carry around.
You can even slip it in a pocket. However, when it’s magnetically attached to my iPhone, I find the pair a little thick for a pants pocket (but fine for a coat pocket or a knapsack’s small pocket).
And yet the device’s compact design does not compromise its capacity. At 5000mAh, it can provide multiple charges to devices like my iPhone 13 Pro, and it does so at a fast-charging MagSafe rate of 15W (not the 7.5W many third-party chargers provide).
Useful kickstand
Charging on the power bank in landscape orientation, iPhone goes into Standby Mode. Photo: David Snow/Cult of Mac
One of the standout features of the Ostand Power Bank is its built-in, 360-degree rotatable kickstand. You can use it to turn the power bank into a stand for iPhone, which helps for watching videos or making FaceTime calls.
The adjustable kickstand held my iPhone 13 Pro at any angle I wanted. The ring-shaped kickstand can also act as a grip when attached magnetically to an iPhone. The way it rotates all the way around makes it more adjustable, helping when I needed just the right angle with my handset in either portrait (vertical) or landscape (horizontal) mode.
In landscape mode, iPhone switches to Standby Mode and whatever widgets, photos and clock settings you’ve set for it.
Magnetic charging means no cables (but it also does wired charging)
Another highlight of the Ostand Power Bank is its magnetic charging capability. Neodymium magnets firmly attach the device to the back of my iPhone in its leather MagSafe case. As soon as the handset snaps in place, charging commences. Ostand took my iPhone from 33% capacity to 50% in 20 minutes and up to 80% in one hour. Had it been running on empty with no charger in site, the power bank would have been a godsend.
And at no time did I think the power bank might pop off the back of my iPhone. Torras said the Halbacy magnets’ 12N force is rated to hold a weight of 1.2kg (about 2.65 pounds, heavier than any iPhone).
Using a USB-C cable, I used the power bank to charge my iPad Air 5. Photo: David Snow/Cult of Mac
In addition to magnetic charging for iPhone and other smartphones, I found I could plug my iPad Air (5th generation) into the power bank’s USB-C port for charging via cable. It took my tablet from 30% capacity to 52% capacity in 20 minutes, but that seemed to take about half the bank’s power reserve. And it warmed up, but it didn’t become hot to the touch.
You can plug in any device that charges via USB-C to the Ostand bank, though of course bigger devices will drain its battery faster.
Safety features
Torras said it goes to great lengths to ensure Ostand Power Bank is safe to use. Its premium battery pack and a high-quality chip extend its lifespan. It also includes a temperature control system and protection against overcharges and short circuits. Graphene provides heat dissipation.
Considering its high capacity, advanced features and sleek design, the Ostand Power Bank offers excellent value. I’ve seen plenty of chunkier, heavier 5000mAh power banks. I’d rather have this one.
Get a discount on Torras Ostand Power Bank
Note that the Torras Ostand Power Bank nets a 4.4 star rating on Amazon, with 86% of reviews giving it either 4 or 5 stars. And right now it’s part of the Amazon Big Spring Sale, priced at $59.99 $49.99 (17% off).
This slim and compact 5000mAh power bank and MagSafe portable charger features a 360-degree rotating stand for iPhone 15/15 Pro/15 Pro Max/14/13/12, Samsung smartphones and more.
The smartphone market is not competitive. Whether or not Apple holds an anti-competitive monopoly is a matter for the courts to decide, but it seems clear that the smartphone market is designed to lock buyers into one brand, and that is bad for everyone.
Take a look at the list of the best phones published by many tech websites, like CNET. There is usually a best iPhone and a best Android phone, and never the two shall meet. Our own TechRadar list of the best phones you can buy in the US includes a best overall phone, but we may not bother with that superlative for much longer.
After all, if you have an iPhone now and you come to our list of best phones, would you really consider switching to a Samsung phone just because I said it was the best? Would you drop-kick your Apple Watch and your Apple AirPods Pro and trade in your iPhone 14 Pro Max for a Galaxy S24 Ultra? Probably not.
Apple doesn’t want your Samsung phones, switcher! (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Apple doesn’t think anybody is switching, that’s for sure. If you try to buy a new Apple iPhone 15 Pro and trade in your old Samsung phone, the latest Samsung phone that Apple includes on its drop-down trade-in list is the Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G. That phone is two years old. Apple hasn’t felt the need to update its trade-in list for two years. There is not a single Galaxy Z Fold or Galaxy Z Flip on Apple’s list, not even the Galaxy S23 Ultra.
Measuring competition in the US smartphone market
The market is entrenched. While Apple can make disclaimers about holding only a small portion of the global market, in fact, the way an economist measures market competition, Apple is excruciatingly dominant.
When the US government is considering whether or not to allow a corporate merger, it looks at the HHI
When economists measure market competition, they start with a simple measure called the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). The HHI gives every market a score. To find that score, you take the market players and you square their market share. Then you add them all together.
If there is only one company in a market, that company has a 100% share of the market. The square of 100% is 10,000, and therefore a 10,000 score on the HHI is the absolute maximum.
If there are ten companies and each company has an equal 10% market share, that means each company adds 100 to the HHI, and the total HHI for the market is 10 X 100 = 1,000.
When the US government is considering whether or not to allow a corporate merger, it looks at the HHI for the competitive market. If the HHI for a market is 1,500 or lower, it is considered competitive. A market with ten companies that each held an equal share would be very competitive.
If the HHI reaches 2,500, the market is considered highly concentrated. In a highly concentrated market, the government is more likely to challenge a corporate merger, especially if that merger would move the HHI score by 200 points or more.
General Motors, the #1 car brand, has the same market share as Samsung (Image credit: Chevrolet)
Look at the US car market. General Motors has the top spot with 17% of the market, and among the top ten automakers, Volkswagen lands near the bottom with just under four percent of the market. The HHI for the total US auto market is approximately 1,100, making it a competitive market.
The US smartphone market? A very different picture. Apple holds more than 60% of the market, while the number two phone maker, Samsung, sits at around 17%. Computing the HHI for US smartphones gives us an index of more than 4,200. This is not a competitive market in any way. Apple controls the US smartphone market.
To be fair, Apple argues that its share of the global market is much more competitive, and this is absolutely true. Accounting for the top ten global smartphone makers, the entire market scores around 1,700 on the HHI. The problem is that list includes phone makers like Xiaomi, Oppo (apart from OnePlus), Realme, and Huawei, which don’t sell phones in the US.
More importantly, though, the US Department of Justice is responsible for the US market, not the global market.
A monopoly is about power, not percentage
Is Apple a monopoly? That’s a tough question, but before you can answer it, you must understand how the Department of Justice defines a monopoly.
A company approaches monopoly status when it holds “substantial market power that is durable rather than fleeting,” according to the DoJ. Market power means “the ability to raise prices profitability above those that would be charged in a competitive market.”
In other words, the DoJ says that if a company is so powerful in a market that it can charge whatever it wants, knowing you won’t ever leave and go to a competitor, it is a monopoly. In a healthy market, we have competition. New things get better. Old things get cheaper.
As the Department of Justice states, “competition spurs companies to reduce costs, improve the quality of their products, invent new products, educate consumers, and engage in a wide range of other activity that benefits consumer welfare.”
In a competitive market, this iPhone 13 should be much cheaper by now (Image credit: TechRadar)
It is hard to look at the current smartphone market and believe that all of this is happening. We are not seeing cost reductions in smartphones, even on older phones that remain on sale after the newer model is launched. The prices just don’t drop as much as they should.
We’re not seeing major cost reductions. If we were, I’d be able to buy an old iPhone right now at a reduced price. In a normal market, I would expect a one-year-old phone to cost 10% less than a brand-new phone, and a two-year-old phone should be even cheaper. If I buy a TV, or a car, or other major appliances, that’s the savings I will get for buying leftover older models.
A two-year-old leftover phone should cost 20% less than a new phone. But look at the iPhone. Apple sells the iPhone 13, from 2021, for $599, when it originally cost $799 brand new. That means Apple only cuts prices by less than 8% every year. That’s not competitive. That’s control over the market.
In a competitive market, not every phone would copy the iPhone
If a phone veers too far from the iPhone formula, it won’t find space on carrier store shelves
We aren’t seeing consumer education about new phone technologies. With cars, people are learning about hybrid versus electric options. In home appliances, people are learning about the differences between heat pumps and air conditioning. Where is the education in phones? We aren’t seeing that wide range of activity that you’d expect from a mature market.
We have so many different types of cars, from the type of internal powertrain and the fuel it uses, to the body size and shape, to the levels of luxury. In the phone market we have the iPhone, and phones that try to imitate the iPhone. If a phone veers too far from the iPhone formula, it won’t find space on carrier store shelves. It won’t find developers to support its platform.
I wish I could use Check In with my family, but they use Galaxy phones (Image credit: Future | Alex Walker-Todd)
It won’t be compatible with the phone all of your friends use, because Apple has made sure that other phones don’t work properly with the iPhone. Apple has a great safety check in feature that lets my Dad know I’ve gotten home safely after my long drive home. Except I can’t use it with my Dad because he has an Android phone, not an iPhone.
Apple does not have an obligation to help its competitors or lose its competitive advantage. The US government, on the other hand, has an obligation to recognize when a market is no longer competitive, and one company is using its dominance to stifle evolution. That’s not the way it’s supposed to work. A company doesn’t win by holding back the market, it wins by making its own products better and more affordable.
Qualcomm has been busy. But then again, when is it ever idle? Today (March 25) the company famous for its wireless solutions, software, and semiconductors has introduced two next-generation Snapdragon Sound offerings to improve the audio experience not just at the premium end of the market, but also to mid-tier earbuds (and possibly even the best budget wireless earbuds), headphones and speakers – namely, the S5 Gen 3 and S3 Gen 3 Sound platforms.
The big headlines? Let’s start with the more premium S5 Gen 3, which promises “almost 50x more AI power” (more on this later), a better digital-to-analog converter with improved signal-to-noise ratio and a 40% lower noise floor (to boast 24-bit/48kHz better-than-CD-quality sound using the more efficient Bluetooth LE Audio), and Qualcomm’s 4th-generation adaptive active noise cancellation.
S5 Gen 3 also boasts 50% more memory than the Qualcomm S5 Gen 2 Sound Platform it succeeds and, says Qualcomm, “dedicated cores for audio curation, including hearing loss compensation, ANC, transparency and noise management”. Yes, we’re looking at a future where your listening gear will not only support Auracast audio sharing (using Bluetooth 5.4), but can then tailor said broadcast to various degrees of hearing loss with ultra-low latency, in real-time.
What of that heavy uptick in AI capabilities? John Turner, Qualcomm’s Senior Director of Product Management at Qualcomm Technologies International, told me it’s hard to give precise user-case improvements because that’ll largely depend on what manufacturers want their products to do (Qualcomm offers solutions, engineers get to work harnessing them), but aside from the plethora of noise cancellation filters it affords, “A big advancement we’ve spoken about is getting on-device microphones to intelligently hear your voice in the office, not the voices of those around you”.
It’s something I’d truly love from my earbuds.
Plenty to get excited about in the mid-tier arena, as well as in high-end headphones (Image credit: Qualcomm)
Entry-level headphones are set to get a lot better too
On to Qualcomm’s S3 Gen 3 proposition and here in the mid-tier arena, the firm has added support for its own Qualcomm Voice & Music Extension Program, which has been around for some time within its S5 tier but is now being made available at S3 level – for the first time.
What does this mean for buyers on a budget? Developers will be able to add perks such as fit- and hearing tests, spatial audio solutions, heart-rate monitoring, and other health-tracking options within more affordable earbuds and wireless headphones, that’s what.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
Furthermore, we know that this particular S3 Gen 3 platform will initially be adopted by Vivo with announcements on incoming devices expected in the next couple of weeks. It’s a company whose smartphones have received extensive coverage from TechRadar, but its (very affordable) earbuds haven’t – yet…
Since launching its premium Snapdragon Sound S7 and S7 Pro Gen 1 platforms last October, Qualcomm tells us its extensive customer research has proven that 69% of buyers are willing to spend more to get better quality audio, 70% actively want lossless audio, 73% of customers make sure they’re getting better audio every time they buy, and – perhaps most interestingly – 68% of people want to use the same product for every use case scenario. Could this be the end to the best running headphones, when the very best wireless earbuds should be good enough for the job thank you very much? Quite possibly – because if even your most affordable earbuds can monitor your health, why would you need another pair?
You may already be familiar with the brand Anker if you’ve purchased power banks or other battery-charging devices for your favorite electronics in recent years. Did you know that this popular brand for charging smart devices can also power your entire home? Anker’s SOLIX line of portable power stations and accessories are versatile and affordable while providing a higher cost-performance ratio than similar power stations from the competition.
Portable power stations can be useful for providing access to electrical connectivity during camping trips, help you reduce the cost of your utility bills by embracing solar power, or providing potentially life-saving battery backup in emergencies. Anker has a solution to fit your power output needs.
Going off-grid with Anker SOLIX
When we think of going off-grid, most of us think of rugged living in the woods, surviving off the land without modern utilities and amenities. While some of that is true for some off-grid folks, others prefer to keep amenities like hot showers and internet connectivity. Those things require an electrical current, though. The most common way to overcome the need for electricity without shelling out big bucks to join your neighborhood power grid is to utilize solar power.
(Image credit: Anker)
With the Anker SOLIX F3800 portable power station, tapping into the natural resource of sunlight to power your home has never been easier or more affordable. Anker SOLIX portable power stations are designed to be a plug-and-play power solution for your home. When combined with Anker SOLIX portable solar panels, the portable power station is capable of 2400W of solar input, charging from 0 to 80% with as little as 1.5 hours of sunlight. Anker even offers an additional expansion battery, capable of pushing the SOLIX F3800 unit from its standard 3,840Wh up to an impressive 7,680Wh of power for your off-grid home.
Because the Anker SOLIX is portable, it’s also an excellent generation solution for camping trips and RVs. Traditional gas-powered generators are loud and unsafe to use near your campsite. They exhaust smoke and fumes and overall can lessen the enjoyment of a quiet retreat to nature. The SOLIX power station, on the other hand, is significantly quieter when in use, and provides clean, sustainable energy without fumes or reliance on fossil fuels.
Disaster preparedness with Anker SOLIX
Sometimes nature is a wonderful and relaxing escape from the daily grind, but some days nature has an ax to grind. When nature flares up, dangerous storms can cause troublesome power outages that can vary from inconvenient to life-threatening. You’ll want a powerful generator that can take over from the grid and continue to supply your home with the electricity you need to get through the storm. The SOLIX F3800 power station is strong enough to provide all the electricity you need for your entire home. Yes, that even includes your 240v electronics like stoves and dryers.
(Image credit: Anker)
Anker utilizes advanced GaNPrime technology and pairs it with LiFePO4 batteries so that SOLIX F3800 power station is a reliable, long-lasting, and easy-to-use power supply solution when you find yourself in an emergency. With the SOLIX, you are in control and can choose to manually convert to your stored energy when the lights go out. Or, set it and forget it with the powerful and customizable app. The SOLIX F3800 can seamlessly transition between the power grid and backup power solutions during outages.
Buy now and save even more
(Image credit: Anker)
Paired with expandable battery banks and solar power panels, the Anker SOLIX F3800 power station can save you money on your utility bills in the long term. You don’t have to wait to start saving with the SOLIX F3800, however. You can save an additional $100 on your new power backup system by using the code ASSF3800 when you purchase a SOLIX F3800 Portable Power Station from Anker. That makes the price for peace of mind and disaster preparedness security just $2999 with free shipping.
Baseus Blade 2 Ultra-Thin Laptop Power Bank is loaded with great features, including two USB-C ports, 12,000 mAh of capacity, a max of 65W output and a built-in status display.
But what sets it part from the pack is its design. It’s slim enough to go easily into bags designed for MacBook and iPad. And it’s relatively lightweight, too.
I tested the Baseus Blade 2 with my gear. Here’s how well the accessory lived up to its promise.
March 25 only: Baseus is offering $30 off the regular cost. But the deal ends TODAY.
Baseus Blade 2 Ultra-Thin Laptop Power Bank review
Whenever I travel or just work remotely, I bring an external battery for my laptop. Whether I’m working or watching video, I don’t want to take even a chance of running out of juice. And I’ve learned through painful experience I can’t depend on finding a power socket when I need one.
I wish I didn’t have to because these power banks were always so bulky. I put my iPad Pro with a Magic Keyboard Case in a small messenger bag, and adding an external battery with enough juice to make a real difference feels like adding a brick.
But that’s not what the Baseus Blade 2 feels like. Rather than the usual blocky shape, it’s wide and thin — like a notebook.
But there’s room for not just the necessities like two USB-C ports, but a useful and cool status display screen.
Thinner is better in a portable power bank
Thin is in … in your laptop bag. Photo: Ed Hardy/Cult of Mac
If it isn’t obvious already, the reason I love Baseus’ newest power bank is its 6.4-inch by 5.2-inch by 0.4-inch design. For comparison, my previous favorite is almost three times that thick.
To be clear, Blade 2 doesn’t actually take up less room than other high-capacity power banks. But its slim shape makes it fit better in bags designed to hold notebooks.
Also, the weight comes in at 0.75 pounds. That’s not feather light, but it’s low enough that I don’t really feel it in my gear bag.
Just the right ports
Two USB-C ports are ready for your MacBook, iPad or iPhone. Photo: Ed Hardy/Cult of Mac
We are finally, finally putting the USB-A port behind us. You’ll find on one edge of Blade 2 a pair of USB-C ports, just the number you need to charge up your MacBook and iPhone at the same time.
And that seems to be Baseus’ plan because one of these ports can deliver 40W while the second tops out at 25 W. Or the accessory can deliver up to 65W to one device if only its first USB-C port is used.
Either port can be used to recharge the power bank itself at up to 60W. Some rival external batteries support charging through only one of their USB-C ports.
And a status screen, too
Something else that helps Baseus Blade 2 stand out from the pack is a small screen that displays exactly how much of a charge remains and how much power is flowing to each device. It’s a premium feature, and one I very much appreciate. I like to be sure my gear is really getting charged, and how quickly.
Beyond that, the notebook power bank makes predictions about how soon it will run out of power, or how long it will take to recharge. My testing shows these are somewhat accurate, but can’t take into account the fact that the batteries in Apple devices take in less power as they approach 100%.
Activate the screen with a button on one edge of the accessory.
Good performance from the laptop power bank
Blade 2 can keep a couple of Apple gadgets going for many hours. Photo: Baseus
Baseus Blade 2 Ultra-Thin Laptop Power Bank holds 12,000mAh. To be fair, many other premium external batteries hold 20,000mAh or more, which helps make this one thinner.
But it nevertheless holds enough power to be quite useful. Battery sizes vary between Apple devices, of course, but I tested it with my usual computers.
Blade 2 raised the battery level in my iPad Pro by 85%, almost doubling the useful time. The tablet was charging at approximately 35W, the most it can take.
As for my iPhone 15 Plus, Baseus’ power bank was able to raise the battery level 150% over successive charging cycles. That’s enough for a whole weekend of use.
I actually got the opportunity to use the charging accessory on an overnight trip. When I woke up the second day, the iPad battery was at a little under 50% while the iPhone battery was about two-thirds empty. I plugged them into Baseus’ product and 45 minutes later they both had roughly 90% charges while the Blade 2 had given all the power it could. That’s a nice result for an accessory this portable.
When I got home, recharging it took roughly an hour using my best wall charger, which was sending over 50W.
Baseus promises that the battery is good for 20,000 recharging cycles.
Baseus Blade 2 Ultra-Thin 65W Laptop Power Bank final thoughts
The Blade 2 is super-thin for portability. Photo: Baseus
This product should be a wake-up call to makers of other laptop power banks: thin is in. A slender accessory fits in the cases we use for our notebook computers far better than a blocky one does.
Baseus went for 12,000mAh, which is of mid-range size. But there’s still enough to add hours of use to a MacBook. Or days of use to an iPhone. And dual USB-C ports are just right.
The price is decent for a premium power bank from a reputable company.
★★★★★
I really couldn’t find any negatives in the product, and I always look for downsides.
Pricing
Baseus Blade 2 Ultra-Thin 65W Laptop Power Bank goes for $99. But today only, March 25, get $30 off by using code 30OFFBLADE from either:
If you prefer a laptop power bank with many of the same premium features but much more storage capacity, I recommend the HyperJuice 245W USB-C Battery Pack. It’s not as thin but holds a whopping 27,000mAh. My review gives the details.