Hash browns don’t always get enough credit for just how versatile they can be. They’re a rare food that can be easily enjoyed at breakfast, lunch and dinner, or even as a snack. I’ve tried various different ways to air fryer a potato but in all my years testing the best air fryers, I’ve never tried to make air fryer hash browns – until now.
Inspired by the classic McDonald’s hash browns, this recipe uses just three main ingredients and air fries in 20 mins. Below, I show how easy and cheap it is to make your own hash browns at home, no matter what time of day you want to enjoy them.
A quick note to American readers: these are what we’d call hash browns in Britain – namely, a grated potato mix that’s molded into a puck shape and fried (or in this case, air fried). Traditionally, we’d eat these for breakfast, but really they’re delicious any time.
Air fryer hash browns
The air fryer hash browns recipe I have followed is from @chef_bimecruz via his TikTok channel. It’s already been watched by 390k people, and counting.
This recipe is super simple and you can use any type of potato. My favorite are russets but any starchy potato, like a maris piper or King Edward if you’re in the UK, will also work well.
White potatoes
1 Tbsp Cornstarch
1 small egg, or vegan alternative (whisked)
1/2 tsp salt
1/2 tsp pepper
Garlic powder (optional)
(Image credit: Future)
To make air fryer hash browns you will need the following:
Air fryer hash browns: method
Step 1: Peel the potatoes and add them to a pot of water.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
Step 2: Bring the water to the boil and boil for seven minutes.
Step 3: Remove them from the water and leave them to cool slightly.
(Image credit: Future)
Step 4: Once cooled, grate the potatoes into a medium-sized bowl.
Step 5: Add the whisk and cornstarch and mix well. The mixture should be sticky enough to form into balls. If the mixture is too wet, add small amounts of cornstarch and mix until it comes together.
(Image credit: Future)
Step 6: Make small balls of hash brown mixture and flatten into your desired shape and thickness. The thinner the hash browns, the crunchier they’ll be.
(Image credit: Future)
Step 6: Set the air fryer to 375°F / 190°C and cook the hash browns for 20 minutes.
Step 7: After 10 minutes, flip the hash browns over.
(Image credit: Future)
Step 8: Once the 20 minutes are up, check the hash browns are cooked all the way through and serve.
If the hash browns are thick, the potato can take a little longer to soften in the center. If this happens, you may need to return them to the air fryer for an five extra minutes at a time until you’re happy with them.
Air fryer hash browns: verdict
For someone who loves hash browns at any time of day, at any time of year, I’m surprised it’s taken me this long to try making air fryer hash browns at home. But I’m so glad I did because these are almost close to perfect.
Boiling the potatoes at the beginning not only speeds up the air fryer cooking time, but as they cool the potato becomes starchy and sticky. This helps the hash browns keep their shape.
The original recipe added garlic powder but I’m a traditionalist and prefer them with just salt and pepper. I also like them when they’re thin and crispy, although my children like them thicker so it depends on your personal tastes.
Granted they don’t taste exactly like McDonald’s hash browns because they haven’t been deep fried, but they’re remarkably close.
(Image credit: Future)
Air fryer deals
If you’re wondering whether to buy an air fryer, you may want to read our article to decide whether air fryers are worth it? And if you do decide to go for it, here are the best deals on our top-rated air fryers:
While the focus of Apple’s May 7 special event was mostly hardware — four new iPads, a new Apple Pencil, and a new Magic Keyboard — there were mentions of AI with the M2 and M4 chips as well as new versions of Final Cut Pro and Logic Pro for the tablets.
The latter is all about new AI-infused or powered features that let you create a drum beat or a piano riff or even add a warmer, more distorted feel to a recorded element. Even neater, Logic Pro for iPad 2 can now take a single recording and split it into individual tracks based on the instruments in a matter of seconds.
It’s a look behind the curtain at the kind of AI features Apple sees the biggest appeal and affordance with. Notably, unlike some rollouts from Google or OpenAI, it’s not a chatbot or an image generator. With Logic Pro, you’re getting features that can be genuinely helpful and further expand what you can do within an app.
A trio of AI-powered additions for Logic Pro for iPad
Stem Splitter can separate a single track into four individual ones split up by instrument. (Image credit: Apple)
Arguably the most helpful feature for musicians will be Stem Splitter, which aims to solve the problem of separating out elements within a given track. Say you’re working through a track or giving an impromptu performance at a cafe; you might just hit record in Voice Memos on an iPhone or using a single microphone.
The result is one track that contains all the instruments mixed. Logic Pro 2 can now import that track, analyze it, and split it into four tracks: vocals, drums, bass and other instruments. It won’t change the sound but essentially puts each element on a separate track, allowing you to easily modify or edit it. You can even place plugins, something that Logic is known for, on iPad and the Mac.
The iPad Pro with M4 will likely be mighty speedy when tackling this thanks to its 16-core neural processing unit, but it will work on any iPad with Apple Silicon through a mixture of on-device AI and deep learning. For musicians big or small, it’s poised to be a simple, intuitive way to convert voice memos into workable and mixable tracks.
AI-powered instruments to complete a track
A look at the Bass Session Player within Logic Pro for iPad 2. (Image credit: Apple)
Building on Stem Splitter is a big expansion with Session Players. Logic Pro has long offered Dummer — both on Mac and iPad — as a way to easily add drums to a track via a virtual player that can be customized by style and even complexity. Logic Pro for iPad 2 adds a piano and bass player to the mix, which are extremely adjustable session players for any given track. With piano, in particular, you can customize the individual left or right hand’s playing style, pick between four types of piano, and use a plethora of other sliding tools. It’s even smart enough to recognize where on a track it is, be it a chorus or a bridge. It only took a few seconds to come up with a decent-sized track as well on an iPad Pro.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
If you’re only a singer or desperately need a bass line for your track, Logic Pro for iPad 2 aims to solve this with an output that plays with and complements any existing track.
Rounding out this AI expansion for Logic Pro on the iPad is a Chromaglow effect, which takes a common, expensive piece of hardware reserved for studios and places it on the iPad to add a bit more space, color, and even warmth to the track. Like other Logic plugins, you can pick between a few presets and further adjust them.
Interestingly enough, alongside these updates, Apple didn’t show off any new Apple Pencil integrations for Logic Pro for iPad 2. I’d have to imagine that we might see a customized experience with the palette tool at some point.
It’s clear that Apple’s approach to AI, like its other software, services, and hardware, is centered around crafting a meaningful experience for whoever uses it. In this case, for musicians, it’s solving pain points and opening doors for creativity further.
Stem Splitter, new session players, and Chromaglow feel right at home within Logic Pro, and I expect to see similar enhancements to other Apple apps announced at WWDC. Just imagine an easier way to edit photos or videos baked into the Photos app or a way to streamline or condense a presentation within Keynote.
Pricing and Availability
All of these features are bundled in with Logic Pro for iPad 2, which is set to roll out and launch on May 13, 2024. If you’re already subscribed at $4.99 a month or $49 for the year, you’ll get the update for free, and there is no price increase if you’re new to the app. Additionally, you can get a one-month free trial of first-time Logic Pro for iPad users.
Getting to work an hour late because your iPhone alarm didn’t go off is one of life’s cruelest tricks, but it’s one that an uncomfortably large number of iPhone owners think they’ve fallen victim to in recent weeks.
As reported by US news outlet Today, many iPhone users have taken to social media to complain of iPhone alarm failures, with many of these instances resulting in missed engagements. “I’ve noticed for the past week or so that my alarm just wasn’t waking me up,” says TikTok user @charkaylotte, who owns an iPhone 11, while @elizabethannswenson, in a separate TikTok video, complains of the same issue with their iPhone 15.
Apple has told us that it’s aware of an issue causing some iPhone alarms to not play as expected, and the company is already working on a fix, but we suspect that at least some of the blame can be placed at the door of a little-known iPhone setting that can erroneously cause alarms to play at a lower volume. Allow us to explain.
Introduced with iOS 17 – which, it’s worth noting, is compatible with the iPhone XR upwards – the ‘Attention Aware’ setting allows your iPhone to detect whether you’re paying attention to it and will lower alert sounds if it registers that you are (presumably because Apple thinks you don’t want to be subjected to the Radar tone at full volume while looking down the barrel of your iPhone, which is fair).
Some affected users have reported that turning the Attention Aware setting off has solved their silent alarm woes – perhaps because it’s causing their iPhones to mistakenly sense a face during the night – so to do this yourself, head to Settings, Face ID & Passcode, then toggle the Attention-Aware Features tab off.
(Image credit: Future)
Apple itself has also encouraged affected users to double-check their selected alert tones under Sounds & Haptics in Settings and clarified that any iPhones in StandBy mode should remain stationary through the night to function correctly.
Reddit users have previously noted that reducing the number of alarms you’ve got set to go off in quick succession can limit the risk of no-shows, as can switching any custom alarm sounds to default ones (which isn’t a bad thing in our book, since the iOS 17 alarm tones are so damn good).
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
Incidentally, activating Do Not Disturb, the Ring/Silent switch or Silent mode has no impact on the Alarm app, so you needn’t subject yourself to the constant ‘ding!’ of notifications when you’re trying to get a good night’s sleep.
Ideally, though, Apple will soon roll out an update that improves the functionality of the ‘Attention Aware’ setting, which appears to be enabled by default.
That’s because the VR version of the video-sharing platform now supports 8K video playback on Quest 3 – up from the previous max of 4K.
To turn it on make sure you’re running YouTube VR app version 1.54 or later, then boot up a video that supports 8K, tap on the gear icon, and where it says Quality you want to change the resolution to 4320p – or 4320p60 if you want 8K at 60fps instead of the usual 30fps. If 4320p isn’t an option in this list unfortunately the video you want to watch isn’t streaming in 8K.
There are a few extra caveats. First, you’ll want a strong internet connection, because even if the video supports 8K playback you’ll struggle to stream it over weak WiFi – unless you like waiting for it to buffer. Oh, and one other important detail; the Quest 3 doesn’t have 8K displays. But that’s not as big a problem as it might seem.
Method in the 8K madness
The Quest 3 has two displays (one for each eye) that boast 2,064 x 2,208 pixels each; 8K resolution is 7,680 × 4,320 pixels. Even if we combine the two displays they still boast only just over 25% as many pixels as an 8K display.
So is 8K streaming pointless? Well, not entirely.
Spatial video is 3D, but not as immersive as 360 video (Image credit: Meta)
For flat YouTube videos, playing them in 8K probably is worthless on Quest hardware. The only advantage you might find is that you’ll be seeing a downscaled video – the opposite of upscaled, where a higher resolution source is played at a lower resolution – which can sometimes lead to a more detailed image than simply streaming a video at the lower resolution.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
The real improvement can be found instead with immersive 360-degree videos.
To explain things simply: when you see a flat video you see the whole resolution in that 16:9 frame. In 360 videos the resolution is spread across a much larger image, and you only see portions of that image based on where you’re looking. That’s why – if you’ve watched 360 videos in VR – 4K content can look more like HD, and HD content can look like blurry messes.
By bumping things up to 8K you’ll find that immersive 3D video should look a lot more crisp – as the sections you’re looking at are now effectively 4K. So while you’re not seeing 8K, you’re still getting a higher resolution.
This update may also be a good future-proofing update for the next Meta hardware. With rumors that a Meta Quest Pro 2 could up the display game for Quest hardware, there’s a chance that it’ll get closer to having actual 8K displays, though we’ll have to wait and see.
Wegovy, Ozempic and similar weight-loss drugs have become some of the most popular medications in the world. But legions of people are also quitting them. About two-thirds of those in the United States who started taking a drug of this class, known as GLP-1 agonists, in 2021 had stopped using them within a year, according to an industry analysis.
Researchers and clinicians often view GLP-1 agonists as lifelong treatments. But myriad factors can force individuals off the medications. People might lose the means to pay for the costly drugs, experience brutal side effects, be affected by continuing shortages or be offered limited-term prescriptions. The UK National Health Service (NHS), for instance, provides only two years of coverage for people taking the drugs for weight loss.
As the number of people with obesity continues to rise — the World Health Organization estimates that more than one billion people, or one-eighth of the global population, now have obesity — researchers have been answering a few key questions about what happens when people stop taking these medications for weight management.
What happens to weight and health when people quit?
Ozempic and Wegovy are both brand names for the drug semaglutide, which has been prescribed for several years to treat type 2 diabetes (Ozempic) and, since 2021, to those who are overweight or have obesity (Wegovy). The treatment’s aim is to reduce the risk of health complications posed by a large amount of excess body fat, such as heart and liver disease and certain cancers. The drug curbs hunger and food intake by mimicking a hormone, released by the gut after eating, that affects brain regions involved in appetite and reward.
Research has shown what happens when people stop taking GLP-1 agonists. Many regain a substantial amount of what they lost with the help of the medications. The body naturally tries to stay around its own weight point, a pull that obesity specialist Arya Sharma likens to a taut rubber band.
If you take a medication to alter your biology, “the tension of the rubber band is a lot less”, he explains. “But when I take away the medication, that tension is going to come back,” says Sharma, who is based in Berlin and consults part-time for several companies that have an interest in obesity.
For instance, in a trial that studied the effects of withdrawing from the drug, about 800 participants were given weekly injections of semaglutide — as well as making dietary changes, doing exercise and receiving counselling — and lost, on average, 10.6% of their body weight in about 4 months1. Then, one-third of the participants were switched to placebo injections for nearly a year. Eleven months after the switch, those on the placebo had regained almost 7% of their body weight, whereas participants who kept taking semaglutide continued to lose weight. Similarly, participants in an extended semaglutide trial, who lost an average of 17.3% of their body weight after more than one year of receiving the drug and making lifestyle changes, regained about two-thirds of that lost weight after one year without any clinical-trial interventions2.
And an observational study posted in January found that of nearly 20,300 people in the United States and Lebanon who lost at least 2.3 kilograms using semaglutide and who later stopped taking the drug, 44% regained at least 25% of their lost weight after one year (see go.nature.com/3u7nxmj). The work was posted by Epic Research, a journal based in Verona, Wisconsin, that uses an electronic health-record database to rapidly share medical knowledge. The study has not been peer reviewed.
Obesity drugs have another superpower: taming inflammation
But weight wasn’t the only health risk factor that rebounded. In the withdrawal study1, those taking semaglutide beyond four months continued to lower their waist circumferences, says physician-scientist Fatima Cody Stanford at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, who consults for several companies developing anti-obesity medications. But “those switched to placebo start to regain in that central region, which is around the key organs where we develop issues like fatty liver disease”, she says.
Other metabolic problems, such as heart disease and insulin resistance, are also linked to excess body fat in the midsection: a larger waistline usually means excess visceral fat, which wraps around organs deep in the abdominal cavity and is more metabolically active than fat that sits under the skin. These health risks, too, can revert to previous levels once the drug is stopped. People who came off semaglutide in clinical trials1,2 often saw a rebound in blood pressure and levels of blood glucose and cholesterol, which had improved while on the medication. (However, some of those measures remained better than those of clinical-trial participants who had never received semaglutide.)
Some people who have lowered their weight with the medication can maintain their new physique through diet and exercise alone, says Sharma. However, these individuals are at high risk of weight rebound if they return to old habits or undergo a stressful situation, he adds.
Still, researchers say, it’s important to acknowledge that not everyone responds to GLP-1 agonists. In one clinical trial, nearly 14% of participants did not lose a clinically meaningful amount of body weight — at least 5% — after more than one year of taking semaglutide3. Some health guidelines recommend stopping the treatment if that threshold has not been met after taking the medication for a few months.
What’s making people stop?
It can be hard to keep taking the medications. Some people experience side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation, that are so extreme that they have to quit. Almost 75% of participants taking semaglutide in the aforementioned clinical trial3 experienced gastrointestinal distress, although most instances were considered mild to moderate. About 7% of participants on the drug quit the trial because of adverse events, gastrointestinal or otherwise.
The drug’s manufacturer, Novo Nordisk in Bagsværd, Denmark, has also had trouble keeping up with the demand for semaglutide. Since 2022, the company has announced shortages of both Wegovy and Ozempic; the latter is sometimes prescribed off-label for weight loss.
Some people lose health-insurance coverage for the drugs, leaving them the choice of paying pricey premiums or stopping the treatment, says clinician-scientist Jamy Ard at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston–Salem, North Carolina, who consults for and receives research funding from several companies that have obesity-drug-related programmes. Some of his patients, who paid for the drugs through their private health insurance, could no longer afford them when they retired and switched to the standard US federal health insurance for people aged 65 or older, which does not cover anti-obesity medications for weight-loss management. In the United States, Wegovy’s list price is US$1,350 for one month’s supply.
In some places, the availability of Wegovy and Ozempic has at times lagged behind demand.Credit: Carsten Snejbjerg/Bloomberg via Getty
And in the United Kingdom, where Wegovy was launched last September, those relying on the NHS for semaglutide treatment face a two-year time limit. Guidance issued last March by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) states that the time constraint comes from a lack of evidence for long-term use and limited access to specialized weight-management services.
That two-year rule “doesn’t make any clinical sense”, says clinician-researcher Alex Miras at Ulster University’s Derry–Londonderry Campus, UK, who receives research and financial support from several companies with an interest in obesity. But he acknowledges that the NICE decision came from cost-effectiveness calculations and the data the decision committee had at the time.
Semaglutide and other anti-obesity medications are available as NHS-funded treatments only at a tier of weight-care management that often requires hospital support and that typically lasts for only two years. Although Miras suspects that most doctors will abide by the time limit on semaglutide use, either to adhere strictly to NICE guidance or because of health-service capacity issues, some might make exceptions depending on disease severity.
Still, he urges the NHS to alter the system so that these medications are available at a lower tier of weight-management services, making the drugs accessible to community-level clinics and lowering the costs for the NHS.
As information about the use of GLP-1 agonists continues to come in, Miras hopes to see “changing policy and changing practice based on our learnings”.
What’s the best way to quit?
Treatment with a GLP-1 agonist requires starting with the smallest dose and gradually increasing the dosage over a few months. This escalating-dose schedule helps to minimize side effects. And, although physicians consider these drugs a lifelong treatment, there’s no biological harm in suddenly stopping.
“There’s not a withdrawal issue or anything like that, like other medications where you have to titrate off,” Stanford says. She advises people to inform their health-care providers of discontinued treatment so that they can keep medical records up to date.
But Ard has encountered anecdotal evidence that suggests otherwise. After quitting GLP-1 agonists, some people have reported higher levels of hunger than before they started treatment. Slowly tapering off the medication, rather than an abrupt stop, he says, “might help with decreasing that sense of rebound hunger”.
The ‘breakthrough’ obesity drugs that have stunned researchers
Sharma also recommends monitoring appetite and weight regained for those who willingly stop the drugs. “Don’t wait till you put 30 pounds back on,” he says. “If you stop and you regain five pounds, maybe that’s when you’ve got to jump back in.” Restarting the medication after time off does require working your way up from the smallest dose again, he says.
For people who have to stop taking GLP-1 agonists for the foreseeable future, continued dietary changes, exercise and mental-health counselling — which should already be in place while on the medication — are a must, Stanford says. People can also try anti-obesity medications that work in other ways, such as orlistat, which reduces how much dietary fat gets absorbed by the body.
But “by the time we’ve gotten to the GLPs, we’ve often unfortunately tried a lot of those”, Stanford says. Another option might be bariatric surgery.
One of the most common reasons that people stop taking their medications is that their weight plateaus, Sharma says, leading them to think that the drugs no longer work. He says that each person will respond to a dose in a different way, and that the dosage might need to be increased to lose more weight.
And many people want to stop once they have reached their goal weight, Ard says. Crossing that finish line gives a sense of completion, he says, especially because weight journeys celebrate milestones. But obesity is a chronic disease that requires lifelong maintenance, including medication, just like high blood pressure or heart disease do. “All we’ve done is modify their physiology,” he notes. “We haven’t cured the disease.”
So much work has gone into developing GLP-1 agonists and getting the medications to people who need them, Ard says. But “we need just as much — if not more — work to be done on what happens after people reach that goal in that weight-reduced state for the rest of their lives”
Less than four months after debuting its mid-range Accentum headphones, Sennheiser revealed another version at CES that remains more affordable than its flagship Momentum set. Dubbed the Accentum Plus, this more-expensive model swaps the physical buttons for touch controls while offering revised active noise cancellation (ANC), wear-detection and other conveniences the first version didn’t. All of the additions come at a price, though, as the Plus ($230) costs $50 more than the regular Accentum. For a set of headphones that mostly looks the same, are internal updates enough to justify a bigger investment?
Design
It’s difficult to tell the Accentum Plus and Accentum apart at first glance. That lack of physical controls on the older model is what primarily distinguishes the two. The Plus version still has one button which manages power, pairing and voice assistants, but all of the audio and call controls are touch-based and located on the outside of the right ear cup. They work well, from taps for playback to swipes for volume, but depending on your preferences, ditching the physical controls for touch may be a turn off. The other difference is that the Plus has a 3.5mm aux jack along with a USB-C connection whereas the first Accentum only has the latter.
Sennheiser
Despite changes to ANC and a few new features, the Accentum Plus isn’t a significant upgrade over the regular Accentum that debuted last year.
A nearly identical design means Sennheiser didn’t address my key criticism of the first Accentum. The headphones remain almost entirely made out of plastic, which gives them a cheap look and feel. Plus, it doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence in the build quality for a set of $230 headphones. The company introduced its new design style on the Momentum 4 in 2022, which it continued with the overall look on the Accentum line. But, the latest Momentums are a bit more polished than these two more recent models.
Software and features
For the most part, the Sennheiser Smart Control App offers the same features for the Accentum Plus as it does for the Accentum. Almost everything you’d need is on the main screen, with battery percentage at the top. Below that sit connection management for multipoint Bluetooth and My Sound audio customization. There, you can adjust a five-band EQ, select a prebuilt sound preset or make your own. The company also offers Sound Personalization that calibrates the audio based on your responses to a few samples in the app.
Sennheiser’s Sound Zones are here as well, giving you the ability to configure specific audio settings based on your location. You can create up to 20 of these for places like home, work, gym and more. Of course, you have to give the app permission to track your location, which could be a nonstarter for some users.
The last item on the main interface of the app is ANC control. Here, you can disable the automatic “adaptive” adjustment to the Accentum Plus’ noise cancellation and leave “regular” noise cancellation on. There’s a slider to blend of ANC and transparency as you see fit. You can cycle between ANC and transparency mode with a double tap on the right ear cup, but that action doesn’t allow you to activate any preferred blends. Instead, it only turns on full ANC or complete transparency.
Sound quality
Photo by Billy Steele/Engadget
Sennheiser’s flagship earbuds and headphones have consistently offered the best sound quality among all of the products I’ve tested. The company has a knack for a well-tuned audio profile that’s dynamic, but not overbearing, and that offers plenty of fine detail thanks to excellent clarity across the EQ. That trademark crispness returns on the Accentum Plus, but it’s at its best at around 65-75 percent volume. Knock that level down to around 50 percent and sound quality begins to suffer.
There’s a pleasant airy, atmospheric quality to tracks on Fever Ray’s Radical Romantics on the Accentum Plus, enveloping you the way the sound on more expensive headphones would. However, when you decrease the volume to about 50 percent, bass begins to overpower some of the details and the audio profile begins to muddy. The clarity that makes Sennheiser’s headphones so good is gone at this point, which is a bummer for those of us who don’t always desire louder listening.
While there’s ample bass that’s offset by crisp highs throughout most genres, more chaotic styles like metal can be a mixed bag. Boomy bass is still there on Texas In July’s Without Reason and Better Lovers’ God Made Me An Animal, but finer details in guitars and drum textures start to get lost. The overall performance is a bit flat with all of the instruments coming across compressed compared to other sets. Switch over to something more mellow like Charles Wesley Godwin’s Live From Echo Mountain and it’s like you put on different headphones. It feels much more like you’re in the room where this was recorded.
ANC performance
Sennheiser says the Accentum Plus has hybrid adaptive ANC where the Accentum just has hybrid ANC. This means that the Plus model adjusts to changes in environmental noise while the regular model has just one level of blocking ability. During my tests, I struggled to tell a big difference between the two, even when switching quickly from one set to the other. The overall ANC performance is solid in most circumstances, but it’s far from what you’d get on the best that Bose, Sony and even Sennheiser have to offer. And since the Plus version is more expensive, I expected an obvious improvement.
Call quality
Photo by Billy Steele/Engadget
Like most over-ear headphones, the Accentum Plus is just fine for calls. The audio quality isn’t pristine, but it’s certainly passable for most uses. That includes work calls, although I’d suggest something with a better mic if you’re actually leading the presentation. Overall, the voice quality comes across compressed and a bit tinny. It’s not the worst, but it’s also probably not what you want when how you sound really matters. You can choose to have the headphones automatically switch to transparency mode when you take a call. However, the Accentum Plus doesn’t pipe in your voice, so the overall audio isn’t as natural as more-expensive options like the AirPods Max.
Battery life
The Plus’ battery life remains unchanged from the regular Accentum at 50 hours. That’s definitely not a bad thing. In fact, I exceeded that figure during my tests, notching 57 hours of use with ANC enabled. This included a mix of listening and calls, and during the latter I switched to transparency mode instead of noise cancellation. There were also a few days in between sessions where the headphones sat unused. When you do find yourself out of juice, you can get five hours of listening time after plugging in for only 10 minutes.
The competition
Given that the upgrades on the Plus are marginal, it’s hard to recommend them over the cheaper Accentum. Both carry Sennheiser’s crisp, clear sound that performs well most of the time. The ANC improvements aren’t enough to justify spending more and the only thing you may truly benefit from is automatic pausing that wear-detection brings. The company’s Momentum 4 would definitely be an upgrade over either Accentum, but that costs around $300. Plus, Sennheiser’s flagship headphones still have its newer, more-boring design – albeit with a few refinements.
If you’re in the market for affordable noise-canceling headphones that don’t cut too many corners, consider the Sony’s WH-CH720N. Currently available for $105, this budget option won’t win any design awards as it’s also all-plastic, but it’s more comfortable and has great audio for the price. Noise cancellation is just okay, though Adaptive Sound Control allows you to automate audio settings based on activity or location and there’s support for Sony’s 360 Reality Audio.
Wrap-up
Sennheiser’s attempt to improve on its initial mid-range Accentum offering is a mixed bag. For all of its updates, the Accentum Plus isn’t the massive improvement you’d expect with its higher price. Sure, the sound is great at times and the ANC will get the job done, but the best thing about this Plus version is the better-than-expected battery life. However, you can get that same play time on the regular Accentum for $50 less. Some small design refinements and a more-obvious step up in terms of audio quality and ANC performance would’ve made a larger impact. But, as it stands, the Accentum Plus isn’t a significant upgrade over last year’s model.
1 / 9
Sennheiser Accentum Plus review
Sennheiser Accentum Plus headphones sitting on a table, propped up by two books with an iPhone playing music to the left.
Spotify dominates the music industry. This becomes really obvious if you don’t use Spotify: You end up being sent, and inevitably clicking on, Spotify links all the time. It happens on social media, yes, but also in text exchanges with friends, in emails, and in DMs. The thought is a good one; someone enjoyed a piece of music and wanted to share it with you. The problem, though, is that the Spotify link is mostly useless if you don’t use Spotify.
What if you use other streaming apps, such as those offered by Apple, Amazon, and YouTube, to listen to music? Are you doomed to search for the track, album, or artist on those services manually? Is that forever your fate? Absolutely not. Here are a few tools that can help you turn Spotify links into links for your preferred music service. (Just note, these tools will work to locate songs, artists, and albums across platforms, but since playlists are usually unique to each platform, these methods won’t work with custom playlists.)
Google Chrome: An Extension to Automatically Redirect Links
If you use Google Chrome or a compatible browser like Microsoft Edge, the browser extension Music Link can automatically open all Spotify links in whatever music app you like. Just install the extension and click its icon to configure it. Choose which music service you prefer and you’re done: Any Spotify link you get from now on will redirect to your app of choice.
You can optionally uncheck whatever services you’re fine with getting links to. SoundCloud, for example, tends to let you play music regardless of whether you have an account, and a lot of its offerings aren’t on other platforms, so you might as well not redirect those links. For the most part, though, this is the kind of extension you can install and never think about ever again.
iPhone and iPad: Song.link for Apple Shortcuts
Chrome extensions may not always work on iPhones or iPads, but thankfully there’s an Apple shortcut for redirecting Spotify links. Just copy any Spotify URL to the clipboard then launch the shortcut Song.Link. This will find the URL in your clipboard and offer you links to the song on other platforms. There’s even a YouTube link, which is helpful if you don’t subscribe to any streaming service.
Fighting off rising seas without reducing humanity’s carbon emissions is like trying to drain a bathtub without turning off the tap. But increasingly, scientists are sounding the alarm on yet another problem compounding the crisis for coastal cities: Their land is also sinking, a phenomenon known as subsidence. The metaphorical tap is still on—as rapid warming turns more and morepolar ice into ocean water—and at the same time the tub is sinking into the floor.
An alarming new study in the journal Nature shows how bad the problem could get in 32 coastal cities in the United States. Previous projections have studied geocentric sea-level rise, or how much the ocean is coming up along a given coastline. This new research considers relative sea-level rise, which also includes the vertical motion of the land. That’s possible thanks to new data from satellites that can measure elevation changes on very fine scales along coastlines.
With that subsidence in mind, the study finds that those coastal areas in the US could see 500 to 700 square miles of additional land flooded by 2050, impacting an additional 176,000 to 518,000 people and causing up to $100 billion of further property damage. That’s on top of baseline estimates of the damage so far up to 2020, which has affected 530 to 790 square miles and 525,000 to 634,000 people, and cost between $100 billion and $123 billion.
Overall, the study finds that 24 of the 32 coastal cities studied are subsiding by more than 2 millimeters a year. (One millimeter equals 0.04 inches.) “The combination of both the land sinking and the sea rising leads to this compounding effect of exposure for people,” says the study’s lead author, Leonard Ohenhen, an environmental security expert at Virginia Tech. “When you combine both, you have an even greater hazard.”
The issue is that cities have been preparing for projections of geocentric sea-level rise, for instance with sea walls. Through no fault of their own—given the infancy of satellite subsidence monitoring—they’ve been missing half the problem. “All the adaptation strategies at the moment that we have in place are based on rising sea levels,” says Manoochehr Shirzaei, an environmental security expert at Virginia Tech and a coauthor of the paper. “It means that the majority—if not all—of those adaptation strategies are overestimating the time that we have for those extreme consequences of sea-level rise. Instead of having 40 years to prepare, in some cases we have only 10.”
Subsidence can happen naturally, for instance when loose sediments settle over time, or because of human activity, such as when cities extract too much groundwater and their aquifers collapse like empty water bottles. In extreme cases, this can result in dozens of feet of subsidence. The sheer weight of coastal cities like New York is also pushing down on the ground, leading to further sinking.
Several people are typing, and they’re all saying Netflix’s Leave the World Behind is wildly prescient. The movie, directed by Sam Esmail, opens on a world where communication has been knocked out following a cyberattack. And earlier this week, when nearly all of Meta’s platforms—Facebook, Instagram, Threads—went down, people took to (other) social media platforms to post and hand-wring about the apocalypse.
Most of the posts, per usual, were jokes: wry observations to help soothe the agita that comes with being alive when everything feels unstable. “Another dry run for Leave the World Behind,” wrote one X user. “I fear we are moving close to a Leave the World Behind scenario,” wrote another. “These tech glitches are increasingly [sic] with regularity.”
But there was also a more conspiratorial undercurrent. For those who don’t know, Leave the World Behind was produced by Barack and Michelle Obama through their company Higher Ground Productions. Ever since the movie’s release, a conspiracy theory has persisted online that the film is somehow a warning about the widespread disorder to come.
This same thread emerged late last month when an AT&T network outage wreaked havoc on US cellular networks. “The predictive programming of the Obama’s [sic] movie, Leave the World Behind, is becoming a little too real right now,” one user wrote on X. “I wouldn’t put it past our own federal government to institute a terrorist or cyber attack, just to blame it on foreign countries like China and Russia.”
Odds are that nothing of the sort happened. Leave the World Behind is based on a 2020 book by Rumaan Alam and, according to the film’s director Sam Esmail, the former US president came on as a production partner only after the script was pretty much done. “I would just say [the conspiracy theorists] are pretty wrong in terms of his signaling,” he told Collider. “It had nothing to do with that.”
Not that facts have ever gotten in the way of an online conspiracy before. Case in point, this week’s big trailer drop: Civil War. When the first trailer for Alex Garland’s next film dropped in December, online right-wing pundits speculated that it was also predictive programming, something meant to prepare the populace for events already planned by those in power. When the new trailer dropped this week, people on Reddit and elsewhere seemed to be fretting that the film will become, as The Hollywood Reporter put it, “MAGA fantasy fuel.”
Ultimately, reactions like these to Leave the World Behind and Civil War merely serve as proof that they’re effective as works of fiction. They’re not part of some psyop to placate the public—they’re reactions to a political era that is fraught at best. Comfort is not a prerequisite for good filmmaking; movies are supposed to be unsettling sometimes. Concerns about a movie being too real are just signs that the filmmakers have tapped in to the collective psyche. Rather than think that Esmail or Garland—or Obama, for that matter—are trying to send some warning, perhaps consider the circumstances for why you’re worried that they might.