Categories
Entertainment

My quest for the perfect productivity mouse

[ad_1]

When you buy a new laptop or PC, it’s easy to only focus on the big three: Processor, graphics and RAM (sorry storage fans, that’s a close fourth). It’s the little things that are simple to overlook. The rig I recently upgraded to is solid, and I had a nice keyboard already — but oh boy did I really need to find the best productivity mouse. Mice may not be sexy peripherals, but if you spend hours a day in front of a computer screen, they could help make things more comfortable for you in the long run. My old Magic Mouse could have made the move from MacOS to Windows, but I was already negotiating some pretty bad RSI and the internal battery was starting to waiver. Not least of all, I wanted something that I could charge and use at the same time — the temerity, I know.

Not to mention, since the advent of devices such as the Stream Deck and the Loupedeck Live I have developed a taste for physical, assignable controls. Also, as a recent convert to the world of mechanical keyboards, I was hoping there was a similar world of boutique, bespoke options. It turns out that productivity mice are still a largely off-the-shelf affair, but I was determined to get through some of the more promising options and find something I could live with, possibly for another decade. So I set out to find the best productivity mouse for me by testing a number of the most popular wireless mice available today; these are my favorites.

The obvious candidates

Mouse buyer's guide.Mouse buyer's guide.

James Trew / Engadget

Google around for “the best PC mouse” or “the best productivity mouse” and you’ll find one answer: Logitech’s MX Master 3. You might see a few mentions of others — like the Razer Pro Click and Microsoft’s Surface Precision mouse — but the reviews are clear that the MX 3 Master is the one. Since we first published this guide, Logitech has released the MX Master 3S which improves on the already popular device with a sharper sensor and quieter buttons. We’ve updated this guide accordingly.

I looked at all three of these, and honestly, there’s not a lot in it. All of them cost $100 and all of them meet my basic requirements of decent ergonomics, configurable buttons and solid battery life. The latter is the hardest to quantify thanks to how each manufacturer likes to define “time.” For Logi’s MX Master 3S it’s “70 days.” Razer on the other hand touts the Pro Click as lasting between 200 and 400 hours depending on whether you use their USB dongle or Bluetooth respectively (that’s 8-16 “days” but it’s not clear if this is “in use”).

Microsoft’s Surface Precision is listed as “up to 3 months” which I somehow read with an implied shrug on their part. It’s hard to know whether those are active use or “the mouse is on and it’s on your desk.” The better news is that all of them can be charged while you use them. In practice, I found the MX Master 3S to last the longest, but also needing a charge way sooner than its 70 days claim, in my experience it’s more like every 5-6 weeks.

Of this trio, the Pro Click offers the most configurable buttons (8). The MX Master 3S is a close second (7) but has the advantage of a second scroll wheel near the thumb. In reality, two of Razer’s “buttons” are side-clicks on the scroll wheel — typically these default to sideways scroll, the same as Logi’s thumb dial does. The net result is that I found the MX Master 3S slightly more configurable for my use cases. The thumbwheel is perfect for switching between desktops — something I do a lot, which would occupy two slots on the Razer meaning, effectively, the MX Master 3S has one more spare button in this setup.

Mouse buyer's guide.Mouse buyer's guide.

James Trew / Engadget

While we’re on the topic of buttons, the new MX Master 3S wireless mouse has almost no click sound at all. It makes almost every other mouse seem quite conspicuous by comparison. It also means the click motion feels a little smoother which all adds up to a much nicer experience.

Lastly, there’s a programmable button on the MX master 3S located just under where your thumb rests. This can be used for almost anything, but by default, it activates something called “gesture control,” which lets you assign certain tasks to, you guessed it, different gestures. I gave the gesture controls a spin and they seemed pretty helpful, but the usefulness soon dissolved when I found I wasn’t always able to ace the gesture on the first attempt.

For its part, Microsoft’s Surface Precision mouse offers six buttons and includes left/right clicks on the scroll wheel, putting it about on par with Razer and a shade under the MX Master 3S for configuration dorks like me.

All three companies offer companion software — Microsoft’s is built right-in to Windows. It’s worth noting that Logitech makes a distinction between its office mice and its gaming mice which I’ll get to later (basically, different software with different configuration options). The short version is each gets its own software and what you can do there differs which will be a key factor if considering a variety of their models..

I found Logitech’s Options software the most straightforward with a deep selection of Windows commands, media controls, shortcuts and navigation tools on offer. You can also assign keystroke combinations if something you need isn’t listed. On top of that there are options for app-specific buttons which means you can, for example, have right-click do one thing in Photoshop but something totally different in Chrome. Logitech doesn’t offer full macros in Options though, so more complex commands are off the table via the native software.

Mouse buyer's guide.Mouse buyer's guide.

James Trew / Engadget

Razer’s Synapse also offers app-specific controls alongside a wealth of predefined media and OS shortcuts, but perhaps less comprehensive than those found in Options. That said, you do also have full macro support: Simply hit record and whatever you do next can be converted into a single click of the mouse. There’s even “HyperShift” which means you can add a second layer of commands while holding down an allocated button.

Microsoft’s Mouse and Keyboard Center is no slouch either with some decent shortcuts on offer and support for both macros and app-specific controls. Though, overall, it’s perhaps less in-depth than both Logitech and Razer’s companion apps.

On a more minor note. During my time with MacOS I joined the dark side of “natural scroll.” It’s not a deal-breaker for me, as I don’t mind regular scroll, but Logitech and Microsoft both offer reverse scrolling as a setting, Razer doesn’t appear to — though you can work around this in other ways of course.

All the above mice offer the flexibility of both Bluetooth and 2.4Ghz wireless connectivity, can be used while cabled and support multi-device (at the same time) modes, if that’s your thing.

Winner: MX Master 3S.

Gaming mice for everyday use

Just because a mouse has a gaming focus, it doesn’t mean it’s no good for productivity. That was my reasoning when I looked at things like the Logitech G502 Lightspeed and the G Pro X Superlight. From Razer, the Viper Ultimate looked like another strong option.

There are a few things that change once you go gamer it seems. First: Things get much much lighter. The heaviest I tried was the G502 which, at 114g is a hair heavier than the Razer Pro Click (106g). But 26g lighter than the MX Master 3S. The G Pro X Superlight and the Viper Ultra are much more svelte however, weighing in at 63g and 74g respectively. This puts the G Pro X at under half the weight of its Logitech productivity sibling.

The Logitech G502 has a lot of configurable options, especially aimed at gamers.The Logitech G502 has a lot of configurable options, especially aimed at gamers.

James Trew / Engadget

The next thing to consider is the form factor. Gaming mice are much more likely to have either a neutral or ambidextrous design. This isn’t a no-no for my RSI concerns (especially when offset against the lighter weight) but it was something I was cautious about. Of the ones I am testing here, the G502 Lightspeed is the most “ergonomic.”

Lastly, gamers want speed and even 2.4GHz is a bit too laggy for some, so Bluetooth connectivity is rare to find in this category. That’s not a deal-breaker for me, but worth knowing in case it is for you.

I actually had high hopes for the G502 Lightspeed. Not only is it lighter and a similar form factor to the MX Master 3S, it offers a whopping 11 configurable buttons. What’s more you’re able to assign full macros along with a slew of deep keyboard commands to those buttons. From a customization standpoint, it’s pretty comprehensive. The G502’s office-bound rival has most of what you need, but macros aren’t there and the keyboard commands on offer aren’t as extensive as in Logitech’s gamer-focused G Hub software.

I should mention the G Pro X Superlight here, too, given it uses the same software as the G502. The G Pro X is semi ambidextrous (you can palm it with either hand, but the extra buttons are only on one side). There are only five buttons total, too.

The issue for me was really all in the handling. I liked that both of these were lighter, that’s a solid plus. But the wealth of buttons on the G502 meant things were a little more cramped. For example, there are two right alongside the left-click button and then another two just above where your thumb rests. They aren’t hard to locate without looking, but overall not as naturally placed as those on the MX Master 3S, at least in my opinion. Also, the scroll wheel on both the G502 and the G Pro X protrudes more than any of the other mice on this list which, again, takes some getting used to. Neither was as fluid or comfortable to me as those in the MX Master 3S or Razer Pro click.

Moreover, the G502 has a button to switch between smooth and ratchet scroll (fast, free gliding versus clicky slow, basically). The MX Master 3S offers both types of scrolling but with a setting where ratchet mode will seamlessly become smooth mode which is much more apt for browsing and navigating lists. I found scrolling on the G502 a bit annoying. Much bigger “clicks” and finding the button to switch to smooth seemed to kill my flow. I am guessing it’s better for gamers though.

The G Pro X, for its part, is a really nice option if you want something light with a couple of extra buttons. But with just two additional ones over the standard two-plus-clickwheel it wasn’t quite up to my requirements.

Razer's Viper is a surprisingly good mouse for general productivity.Razer's Viper is a surprisingly good mouse for general productivity.

James Trew / Engadget

Razer’s Viper Ultimate, literally on the other hand, is a surprisingly competent all-purpose mouse. For one, as alluded to, it’s truly ambidextrous. At 74g it glides across the desk making it a pleasure to use for extended periods. With a 70 hour battery life it was joint first with the G Pro X for longevity in this category (the G502 offers around 50 hours).

The main nitpick for me with the Viper is that the two buttons near your ring finger and pinkie take a little getting used to if you palm a mouse like I do. I had to train myself to click with the side of my finger rather than the tip. The net result is that I was surprised to find myself gravitating toward the Viper Ultimate most out of this category, despite the G502 being closer to what I had in mind when setting out on this test.

Thanks to gamery specs that I’m not going to make use of, such as 20,000+ DPI sensors and 1000Hz polling rates, all of the gaming mice do cost more than the “productivity” options. In fact all three cost the same: $150.

Winner: Razer Viper Ultimate

  • Razer Viper Ultimate Hyperspeed

    Best wireless mouse for gaming

Mobile mice

Let’s be clear, there’s almost no chance any of the mobile mice on offer would make a great full-time desktop replacement. That said, it’s also one of the more interesting categories thanks to being free from the burden of having to do everything. A mobile mouse can get a little wackier and do one or two things really well.

There’s also the fact that many of us are working at home on the company laptop, so pairing that with a mouse can make the transition back to the office a little smoother (and not everyone is a fan of trackpads anyway). As such, a straight head-to-head feels less appropriate, but here’s a rundown of five contenders.

Logitech Pebble

Logitech’s Pebble is a mobile mouse in the purest form. At 100g it’s not the lightest on this list, but that does give it a reassuring feel in use. There are only three buttons: The standard left click, right click and click wheel. You also have the choice between Bluetooth and 2.4GHz dongle connectivity. A nice touch is that you can stow the USB dongle under the top plate as that’s also where you’ll change the (AA) battery.

The Pebble has a slight angle to it which felt like my hand was arching forward when in use. The ambidextrous design is welcome but I do have my concerns about how comfortable it is for extended use. The two aces up the Pebble’s sleeve, however, are its epic battery life: A claimed 18 months (though this will obviously depend on what batteries you use) and the $25 price tag, making it the cheapest on this list.

Logitech MX Anywhere 3

As the name suggests, the MX Anywhere 3 is the mobile version of the MX Master 3S Bluetooth mouse. Unlike its bigger brother, the Anywhere has a semi-ambidextrous design. It’s perhaps a shade too small to cut it as desktop replacement, but in the mobile realm it feels premium, complete with the auto-switching between ratchet and free-flowing scroll wheel — which at $80, it should.

With six buttons, it’s pretty configurable for something so small and at 99g it won’t overstay its welcome under your palm. Though for the life of me I cannot understand why there is no option to stow the USB dongle inside the mouse somewhere. Given its mobile nature this seems like a no-brainer. You can, of course, just use Bluetooth if, like me, USB dongles seem to vanish into thin air unless they have a home.

Razer Orochi V2

The winner of the most forgettable-looking option in this nest of mice goes to the Orochi V2. Or maybe it’s just understated? Especially for a Razer product. Looks aside, the Orochi V2 is a very capable mobile mouse with six buttons, Bluetooth or dongle connectivity and it works with Razer’s Synapse software, so any macros you might already have can be assigned here (or make your own!).

At 425 (2.4Ghz) or 950 hours (BLE) you get a decent amount of time out of each battery and you can use either a single AA or AAA. It weighs just 60g, so it’s also pretty nimble. At $70, it’s edging into full-desktop mouse territory, but given that it’s big enough to actually use this full time, that seems less surprising. Especially given that you can stow the dongle under the top cover, which is more than can be said for the MX Anywhere 3 (or even the MX Master 3S).

Microsoft Surface Arc

Who was betting on Microsoft having the most stylish mouse on this list? The Surface Arc is a delight with a “transforming” design that pops into shape (an “arc” no less). Once you’re done simply snap it flat again for easy storage in a pocket of your laptop bag. You don’t even need to turn it on as “snapping” it also acts as a power switch. Oh, and did I mention that the touchpad area does double duty as left/right click and vertical or sideways scroll (Magic Mouse style)? There’s even the option for a “triple” click to give the Surface Arc an extra, assignable button. All that, and it’s only around $55.

As satisfying as it is to click into shape, the hollow area under the arc does mean that your thumb and little finger don’t have anywhere to naturally rest. I also found the curve of the arc led me more into a claw position over my usual palm, which might be okay for you but gave me pause about using this for longer periods. As a purely mobile mouse, though, it’s one of the more pleasing, especially if you like its semi-trackpad nature.

Microsoft Modern Mobile mouse

The Modern Mobile mouse is Microsoft’s answer to the Pebble. Streamlined, lightweight and with a focus on the basics. There’s no 2.4GHz option here though; it’s Bluetooth only. At $35, compared to the Pebble’s $25 it might seem a foregone conclusion but there’s a lot to like about Microsoft’s take on a portable mouse.

For one, its build quality feels far superior. It also looks more stylish (if that matters). More importantly, it has a more neutral position that feels really comfortable for a smaller mouse and doesn’t feel like it’s craning my hand forward. Throw in the fact that you can still assign app-specific controls via Microsoft’s Mouse and Keyboard center and you end up with something that’s smarter than it first seems.

Conclusion

Mouse buyer's guide.Mouse buyer's guide.

James Trew / Engadget

If nothing else, I was surprised by the diversity of options despite my initial concern to the contrary. Who knew that Microsoft had such style, at least in the mobile category? Likewise, Razer, it turns out, makes surprisingly adept productivity mice despite its true-green gamer aesthetic. Logitech, on the other hand, is a steady hand across all categories.

Predictably, the MX Master 3S does seem to do most of the things I want. BUT, only really thanks to that thumbwheel. It is particularly suited for what I need. That said, I find myself quite taken by the Pro Click, and despite lacking a second scroll wheel, it pretty much matches the MX Master 3S in every other manner. It’s also lighter which is a small positive in its favor.

For those that prefer lightweight options (something that became more appealing to me the more I tested), then the Viper Ultimate from Razer impressed me with its balance of function and form. If you don’t need as many buttons then Logitech’s Pro X Superlight lives up to its name. I could happily live with either of these mice full time.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Meta Quest 3 Lite: everything we know about the rumored cheap VR headset

[ad_1]

Based on the leaks and rumors it seems increasingly likely that Meta is working on a cheaper version of the Meta Quest 3 – expected to be called the Meta Quest 3 Lite or Meta Quest 3s. 

It’s not yet been confirmed, but the gadget is expected to be a more affordable version of the Quest 3 – at a price closer to the Quest 2 – that would see the Meta fully phase out its last-gen VR hardware. The trade-off would be the device wouldn’t have all the capabilities of the Quest 3 – likely sporting lower-resolution displays, less RAM, a worse chipset, or dropping mixed reality support (though that last point seems unlikely).



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Entertainment

The Meta Quest 2 VR headset is on sale for a low of $199

[ad_1]

The Meta Quest 2 may not be Meta’s latest and greatest virtual reality headset, but it remains a strong value for those who want to give VR a try without spending a ton of cash. Now, it’s even more affordable: A new deal has dropped the headset down to $199 at several retailers, including Walmart, Amazon, Best Buy, Target and Meta’s own online store. That’s $50 below the device’s standard going rate (after a permanent price cut earlier this year) and the largest discount we’ve seen.

Photo by Devindra Hardawar / Engadget

This deal marks the best price we’ve seen for Meta’s entry-level VR headset, and it comes with a $50 store credit for no extra cost.

$199 at Walmart

At Walmart, the discount comes with a $50 credit to the Meta Quest Store. The retailer says that you’ll need to redeem the credit in VR within 90 days of activating the headset, but it’s still a nice way to save on any games or apps you plan on using first. Best Buy, meanwhile, is throwing in Logitech’s Chorus add-on speaker for no extra cost. (Though we haven’t tested that accessory.) There are no special bonuses at Amazon as of this writing, but the deal comes as part of the company’s wider Big Spring Sale event.

We gave the Quest 2 a review score of 89 when it was released back in 2020, and it’s now the top budget pick in our guide the best VR headsets. To be clear, if you can afford the newer Meta Quest 3, you should still buy that instead: It has better screens, a faster processor, more RAM and a modicum of mixed reality functionality. Its full-color passthrough makes it easier to interact with the real world while keeping the headset on, and the whole thing should hold up better with new games going forward.

But it costs $500. For far less cash, the Quest 2 can still run just about all of the platform’s best games and apps, from Asgard’s Wrath 2 to Walkabout Mini Golf. It’s still completely wireless and relatively comfortable — insofar as a VR headset can be comfortable — and it gets around the same two to three hours of battery life. Compared to the Quest 3, its LCD screens aren’t as sharp (with a 1,832 x 1,920 resolution per eye instead of 2,064 x 2,208) and have a narrower field of view, but they should still be sufficient for most people getting into VR for the first time. With a link cable, it can still hook up to a gaming PC and play VR games like Half-Life: Alyx as well. If you’ve been curious about VR but aren’t sure if you’ll use your headset as anything more than a toy for occasional gaming, the Quest 2 should be enough, and this deal makes the upfront investment a little less daunting.

Your Spring Sales Shopping Guide: Spring sales are in the air, headlined by Amazon’s Big Spring sale event. Our expert editors are curating all the best spring sales right here. Follow Engadget to shop the best tech deals from Amazon’s Big Spring Sale, hear from Autoblog’s car experts on the best spring auto deals on Amazon, and find spring sales to shop on AOL, handpicked just for you.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

We may have our first look at the more affordable Meta Quest 3 Lite

[ad_1]

Open up our Meta Quest 3 review and you’ll see the virtual reality headset has a not-unreasonable starting price of $499.99 / £479.99 / AU$799.99 – certainly way below the $3,499 (or higher) you’ll pay for the Apple Vision Pro. However, it seems an even more affordable Meta headset is on the way.

After teasing what’s being called the Meta Quest 3 Lite earlier this month, VR Panda (via Android Authority) has posted a picture of the rumored device on social media. As you might have expected, it looks a lot like the Meta Quest 3.



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

Apple Vision Pro vs Meta Quest compared in interview with Mark Zuckerberg

Interview with Mark Zuckerberg comparing Apple Vision Pro vs Meta Quest 3

Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg has stepped into the spotlight to discuss the company’s latest endeavors and the competitive landscape of virtual reality and augmented reality, with the release of Apple’s Vision Pro. As a main competitor to the  Meta’s Quest 3 Zuckerberg explains why the headset is a strong competitor that offers exceptional value and quality in an interesting interview with the Morning Brew Daily team.

Zuckerberg’s vision for Meta is not limited to outdoing rivals like Apple. He is steering the company toward a future where computing is redefined, embracing an open and collaborative approach that differs from the closed-off systems some competitors use. This strategy is not just about Meta; it’s about fostering a spirit of cooperation across the industry to drive collective progress.

Interview with Mark Zuckerberg

The integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and neural interfaces into Meta’s future products is a key part of Zuckerberg’s strategy. Imagine wearing smart glasses or wristbands that allow you to interact with technology in a natural and intuitive way, potentially transforming how you go about your daily life and work. Zuckerberg’s direct involvement in these decisions keeps Meta at the forefront of technological innovation.

Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of Apple Vision Pro :

The potential for AI to reshape the job market is another area where Zuckerberg sees significant opportunities. He envisions a future where AI helps people pursue their passions more freely, changing the nature of work itself. His support for open-source AI projects reflects a commitment to making technology accessible to all and preventing any single company from dominating the field.

Looking ahead, Zuckerberg predicts that smart glasses will become the main mobile device for many people, complementing the use of headsets at home. This shift points to a major change in how we interact with technology, aiming for a more integrated and natural experience in our daily lives.

Apple Vision Pro vs Meta Quest

When comparing the Apple Vision Pro vs Meta Quest 3, there are several dimensions to understand As well as the impact on the virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) landscape. This quick comparison draws upon details from the recent interview with Mark Zuckerberg.

Technological Specifications

Apple Vision Pro is positioned as a high-end mixed reality headset, blending AR and VR capabilities. It’s notable for its advanced display technology, offering high resolution and a wide field of view. The device integrates seamlessly with the Apple ecosystem, promising a user-friendly experience and incorporating spatial audio for immersive sound. Apple’s emphasis on privacy and data security is also a key component of its design philosophy.

Meta Quest 3, on the other hand, is primarily a VR headset with some AR capabilities through pass-through technology. It emphasizes affordability while still delivering high-quality VR experiences. The Quest 3 features a lightweight design, high-resolution displays, and a robust tracking system without the need for external sensors. Meta focuses on making VR accessible to a broader audience, with a strong emphasis on social connectivity and an open ecosystem for developers.

Market Positioning and Price

The Apple Vision Pro is targeted at the premium segment of the market, with a price point reflecting its high-end specifications and the broader Apple ecosystem integration. It’s aimed at professionals, creators, and users seeking premium mixed reality experiences. The device’s pricing reflects its positioning as a luxury product within the Apple lineup, potentially limiting its accessibility to a wider audience.

Meta Quest 3 is designed with mass market adoption in mind, priced competitively to appeal to a broad range of consumers, from gamers to educators. Meta’s pricing strategy for the Quest 3 underlines its goal to democratize VR, making it more accessible to people who are interested in VR but cautious about the investment.

Content Ecosystem

Apple’s approach with the Vision Pro is expected to leverage its strong developer relationships and ecosystem, encouraging the creation of high-quality AR and VR applications. The integration with existing Apple services and platforms could offer a seamless user experience, with a potential focus on professional applications, education, and premium entertainment.

Meta Quest 3 benefits from Meta’s established presence in the VR space, boasting a wide array of games, social experiences, and educational content. Meta has cultivated a large community of developers and content creators, ensuring a diverse and vibrant ecosystem. The emphasis is on social VR experiences and making development accessible to a wide range of creators.

Implications for Consumers and Developers

For consumers, the choice between the Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 3 comes down to prioritizing premium experiences and ecosystem integration versus affordability and a broad content library. Apple’s offering is likely to appeal to those already invested in its ecosystem, seeking the latest in mixed reality technology. In contrast, the Quest 3 targets a more diverse audience, emphasizing value and the social aspects of VR.

Developers face a decision between focusing on a premium, possibly more lucrative Apple user base versus the larger, more diverse audience of Meta’s platform. Apple’s strict ecosystem may offer advantages in terms of user spending and engagement, while Meta’s more open approach could allow for greater creative freedom and innovation.

Zuckerberg’s insights into Meta’s direction highlight the company’s focus on leading the charge in new technologies, the value of competition in the market, and the strategic role of AI and the metaverse in the company’s future. As the technological landscape continues to evolve, Meta’s Quest 3 virtual reality headset and other upcoming innovations are poised to redefine our connection with the digital world.

Filed Under: Hardware, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

Enshrouded beginners tips and quest progression improvements

Enshrouded beginners tips and quest progression improvements
The popular online game Enshrouded has recently undergone significant updates to its quest system, all thanks to the feedback from its dedicated players. These changes are set to enhance the gaming experience by making it more personalized and keeping the excitement alive for every type of player. Whether you’re someone who enjoys playing solo or as part of a team, these updates are tailored to improve your journey through the game.

One of the key updates is the introduction of personal quest completion. This means that players can now complete quests at their own pace, independent of the server’s progress. This is a big shift from the previous system where players had to follow the server’s timeline. The updated Quest Log is another feature that will help players keep track of their individual achievements without getting mixed up with the server’s overall progress.

For those who have felt the frustration of waiting for bosses to respawn, there’s good news. The developers have listened and have now reduced the respawn times to just 30 minutes. This change is aimed at keeping the momentum going and ensuring that players are not left waiting around, but rather spending more time engaging in the action-packed parts of the game.

Enshrouded beginners tips

Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of role-playing games :

Team players have something to look forward to as well. The update has been carefully designed to maintain the benefits of cooperative play. Players who team up can expect better loot odds and will face enemies that adjust in difficulty based on the size of the group. This means that playing with others will not only be more rewarding but will also provide the right level of challenge to keep things interesting.

But the updates don’t stop at quests. The developers have also improved server management tools and introduced new options for non-player characters (NPCs) within players’ bases. These enhancements are meant to give players more control over their in-game environment and to make the experience feel more immersive.

The team behind Enshrouded has shown a strong commitment to its community by implementing these changes. They have made it clear that they are listening to player feedback and are willing to make adjustments to improve the game. And while these updates are substantial, the developers are already hinting at more to come. They promise to keep the community informed and involved in the ongoing development of the game.

For those who are just starting out in Enshrouded, the developers have put together some beginner tips to help new players find their footing. These tips are designed to make the initial experience in the game as enjoyable as possible.

Overall, the recent updates to Enshrouded represent a significant step forward in the game’s development. By focusing on both individual and cooperative play, the developers have found a way to cater to different playstyles and preferences. As the game continues to grow and evolve, these changes will serve as a foundation for a more personalized and captivating gaming experience. Players can look forward to more updates as the developers and the community work together to shape the future of Enshrouded.

Filed Under: Gaming News, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

What it’s like coding in VR using the Meta Quest 3?

What it's like coding in VR using the Meta Quest 3

If you have ever wondered whether you would be able to code effectively in a virtual reality environment or virtual studio you might be interested in a quick overview created by Software engineer Chris P. With a decade and a half of coding experience under his belt, Chris decided to test out whether the Meta Quest 3 one of the latest virtual reality headset that’s trying to push virtual reality into the mainstream can be used to effectively code in VR.

His journey into the realm of virtual reality offers us a glimpse into the potential of VR in professional settings, particularly for developers and programmers that might be considering how they can use the new Apple Vision PRO spatial computing headset that will be available to preorder in a few days time from Apple with shipping commencing on February 2, 2024

Chris’s initial impressions of the Meta Quest 3 were positive, noting its comfortable fit and light weight, which are crucial for extended use. However, he did encounter some issues, such as the design of the head strap, which could be improved. One of the most significant features of the Quest 3 is its wireless capability, which eliminates the mess of cables that often accompanies traditional VR setups.

Coding in VR using the Meta Quest 3 headset

When it came to integrating the Quest 3 into his coding routine, Chris found the process to be straightforward. The headset connects to a PC with ease, thanks to the Quest Link feature, which is vital for developers who rely on powerful PC software. But Chris’s venture into VR coding wasn’t without its challenges. For instance, not being able to see his physical keyboard and mouse was a hurdle, and the bright white background of the virtual environment was more of a distraction than a help.

Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of coding :

To address these issues, Chris turned to the Virtual Desktop application. This service, which requires a fee, allows users to create a personalized virtual workspace. Chris discovered that being able to change his virtual surroundings could actually improve his mood and productivity. However, he also experienced some latency with the app, which can be a significant disruption when coding. He emphasized the need for a strong Wi-Fi or wired ethernet connection to minimize these issues.

Chris also experimented with the Meta Workrooms app but found it fell short of providing a seamless VR office experience. He believes, though, that VR holds a lot of promise for the future of coding, even if it’s not quite ready for prime time, especially for tasks that require a high degree of precision.

For those who are skeptical about virtual reality, Chris suggests keeping an open mind and giving it a try. While the technology may have its shortcomings now, experimenting with it can offer insights into what the future of computing might hold and could even lead to new ways of digital interaction.

The Meta Quest 3, with its comfort and wireless design, represents a step forward in VR technology. However, applying this technology to coding presents some significant challenges. As VR and augmented reality (AR) continue to evolve, we can expect more refined solutions that will address these issues, paving the way for more immersive and effective computing experiences.

Filed Under: Guides, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

Meta Quest 3 games emulation performance tested

Meta Quest 3 games emulation performance tested

The Meta Quest 3 VR headset is more than just another virtual reality device on the market. It’s a comprehensive gaming platform that merges emulation technology, wireless connectivity, and a powerful mobile processor to deliver an immersive gaming experience that stands out. If you’re interested in learning more about the gaming performance of the Meta Quest 3 especially in the field of games emulation you’ll be pleased to know that ETA Prime has released a new video providing a hands-on demonstration. Enabling anyone interested to learn more about the various aspects of the Quest 3, from its impressive emulation capabilities to its standalone VR gaming potential, providing a thorough understanding of this advanced technology.

At the core of the Quest 3 is the Snapdragon xr2 Gen 2, a mobile processor that boasts up to 50% more GPU power than its predecessor. This substantial increase in GPU power significantly boosts the headset’s emulation performance, allowing it to run games from a variety of consoles with remarkable ease and efficiency.

The Quest 3’s emulation technology is a key feature. The headset can run a broad range of gaming emulators, including Ether SX2 for PS2 games, Dolphin Emulator for GameCube and Wii games, PPSSPP for PSP games, Redream for Dreamcast games, and Yuzu for Switch games. Each of these emulators has been thoroughly tested, with the performance of different games on each emulator being a primary focus to ensure an optimal gaming experience.

Gaming emulation on the Meta Quest 3 VR headset

Other articles you may find of interest on the latest VR headset from Meta, the Quest 3 :

Bluetooth Connectivity

Beyond its impressive emulation capabilities, the Quest 3 also supports Bluetooth connectivity. This feature allows you to connect an external controller, such as an Xbox controller, for gameplay. This significantly enhances the gaming experience by providing a more traditional control scheme for those who prefer it, offering a mix of modern and traditional gaming experiences.

Gaming Emulation Limitations

However, the Quest 3 does have some limitations. For example, the Yuzu emulator for Switch games has been found to have certain restrictions. While these limitations exist, they do not significantly detract from the overall gaming experience, and the Quest 3 remains a strong gaming platform. The Quest 3 also includes the Quest Link feature, which allows you to run emulators on a PC and play them on the headset. This feature greatly expands the range of games you can play on the Quest 3, as it lets you harness the power of a PC for more demanding games, thereby broadening your gaming experience.

VR Gaming

One of the standout features of the Quest 3 is its standalone VR gaming capabilities. The headset can run VR games directly on the unit without the need for a powerful PC. This feature, coupled with the headset’s impressive emulation capabilities, makes the Quest 3 a versatile gaming platform that caters to a wide range of gaming preferences.

Screen casting to a PC

The Quest 3 also supports sideloading apps from unknown sources, screen casting to a PC for recording, and screen resizing for different applications. These features further enhance the versatility of the headset, allowing you to tailor your gaming experience to your preferences, offering a personalized gaming experience.

The Meta Quest 3 VR headset is a robust and versatile gaming platform. Its strong emulation capabilities, enhanced by the Snapdragon xr2 Gen 2 and increased GPU power, allow it to run a broad range of games from various consoles. Its Bluetooth connectivity, Quest Link feature, and standalone VR gaming capabilities further enhance its versatility, making it a comprehensive gaming solution for both casual and hardcore gamers. The Quest 3 is more than just a VR headset; it’s a comprehensive gaming platform that offers a unique and immersive gaming experience not only for recently launched games but also retro games emulation.

Filed Under: Gaming News, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

Meta Quest 3 VR headset teardown

Meta Quest 3 VR headset teardown

The Meta Quest 3 virtual reality headset is now available to purchase and if you would like to know more about its internal workings and hardware. You will be pleased to know that the team over at iFixit have already taken its toolkit to the VR headset and disassembled it.

The teardown of the Meta Quest 3 VR headset reveals a host of features and specifications that set it apart from its predecessors, the Quest 2 and the Quest Pro. This article provides a detailed overview of the Quest 3’s hardware components and design, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses.

Depth sensor

The Quest 3 features a depth sensor or time of flight sensor, a notable addition that was absent in the Quest Pro. This sensor is instrumental in enhancing the headset’s capabilities in spatial mapping and object recognition, thereby providing a more immersive and interactive VR experience.

In terms of physical attributes, the Quest 3 is thinner than the Quest 2 but weighs 10g more. However, it is still 200 grams lighter than the Quest Pro, making it more comfortable for extended use. The headset is covered with a rubberised layer to block light leakage, but the clips securing it can be difficult to remove without causing damage.

One significant difference between the Quest 3 and the Quest Pro is the absence of eye-tracking in the former. This means the Quest 3 lacks the infrared emitters or sensors found in the premium headset, which could potentially affect user interaction in certain VR applications.

Meta Quest 3 VR headset teardown

Other articles we have written that you may find of interest on the subject of Meta Quest VR headsets :

Meta Quest 3 Specifications

The Quest 3’s mainboard is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 SoC, the XR2 Gen 2. This chipset is touted to offer better performance and power efficiency than the XR2+ found in the Quest Pro. The headset also features 8GB of RAM, which is more than the Quest 2’s 6GB but less than the Quest Pro’s 12GB.

The Quest 3 uses 2064×2208 LCD panels running at 120 Hz, an improvement over the Quest Pro but not quite as impressive as the micro-OLED panels anticipated in the Vision Pro. This high-resolution display, coupled with a full-color passthrough capability, delivers a visually stunning VR experience.

Battery replacement

The headset’s battery is replaceable but difficult to access, similar to the Quest 2’s battery. It has a capacity of 19.44 Wh, slightly less than the Quest Pro’s 20.58 Wh but more than the Quest 2’s 14 Wh. The Quest 3’s controller design is simpler than the Quest Pro’s, suggesting a move towards less complex controllers in future VR headsets. This could potentially make the controllers more user-friendly and cost-effective.

Repairability

Despite these impressive features, the Quest 3’s design is not without its flaws. It is more repairable than the Quest Pro but still complicated to dismantle. The difficulty in accessing the battery and the lack of repair manuals add to this complexity. Moreover, the unavailability of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) spare parts poses a significant challenge for users seeking to repair or upgrade their headsets.

The Quest 3 surpasses the Quest Pro in terms of display resolution, passthrough capability, and processor power, but lacks eye tracking. Its design is more repairable than the Quest Pro but still complicated to dismantle, and the battery is difficult to access. Due to these factors, and the lack of repair manuals and unavailability of OEM spare parts, the Quest 3 receives a repairability score of 4 out of 10. The Meta Quest 3 VR headset offers a unique blend of advanced features and hardware improvements, but its repairability and lack of certain features like eye tracking may leave some users wanting more. Despite these drawbacks, it remains a compelling choice for those seeking a high-quality, mid-range VR experience.

Filed Under: Hardware, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

Breaking Free: How Fernando Raymond’s Quest for Meaning Birthed a Digital Empire

In the bustling heart of London, where the constant thrum of life echoes in every corner, Fernando Raymond faced an existential conundrum.

Fresh out of college, like many graduates, he was caught in the traditional 9-to-5 grind, laboring hours on end, only to feel unfulfilled. It wasn’t just about the paycheck; it was about the purpose. Or rather, the absence of it.

But the universe has a peculiar way of leading restless souls towards their true calling.

In 2013, a new trend began surfacing online. Digital nomads, armed with just a laptop, were living the dream — working from scenic spots worldwide and savoring a lifestyle that blended work and wanderlust.

The promise of this digital, location-independent life captivated Fernando. It wasn’t just about escaping the drudgery of a conventional job; it was about finding meaningful work that resonated with his passion and ambitions.

Thus began Fernando’s quest. In the vast digital universe, he stumbled upon Search Engine Optimization (SEO) — a crucial skill that could elevate businesses on Google’s rankings. SEO was more than just a skill; it was an art. It blended creativity with strategy, understanding the algorithms while also recognizing the human element behind every search. Fernando wasn’t just looking to learn; he was aiming to master.

As he delved deep into the world of SEO, his entrepreneurial spirit kindled a fire. He didn’t just become an SEO expert; he became London’s top SEO consultant. But the journey wasn’t easy. Like every entrepreneur, he faced challenges and setbacks. However, his vision for a meaningful life propelled him forward. His dedication bore fruit as he birthed ClickDo, an SEO agency that would soon earn acclaim not just in London but beyond.

But Fernando’s aspirations weren’t limited to one venture. Recognizing the symbiotic relationship between SEO and web hosting, he founded SeekaHost. Today, it stands tall as one of the leading web hosting companies worldwide.

Yet, amidst these successes, the core essence remained unchanged. It was never just about building companies; it was about creating a lifestyle that echoed his values and dreams.

For Those At The Crossroads:

If Fernando’s story resonates with you, if you find yourself staring at your cubicle walls wondering, “Is this it?”, then here’s a message for you — change is possible.

  1. Discover Your Passion: Dive deep into the digital realm. Explore different avenues, from content creation to digital marketing, from coding to graphic designing. The internet is a gold mine of opportunities.
  2. Invest in Learning: Like Fernando invested time in mastering SEO, find your niche and become the best at it. There are myriad online courses, webinars, and resources to guide you.
  3. Start Small, Dream Big: Every empire begins with a single step. Start as a freelancer, build a portfolio, network with others in the industry, and slowly climb the ladder.
  4. Believe in Yourself: Entrepreneurship is fraught with challenges. There will be naysayers, setbacks, and moments of doubt. In those times, remember your purpose and push forward.
  5. Build a Support System: Connect with like-minded individuals. Today’s digital age is teeming with communities of digital nomads, entrepreneurs, and enthusiasts. They can offer advice, share experiences, and sometimes, just lend a listening ear.
  6. Seek Balance: While work is vital, it’s equally essential to savor the experiences life offers. Take breaks, travel, read, and cherish every moment. Remember, the goal isn’t just financial prosperity but a rich life.

To those yearning for a change, for a life brimming with passion and purpose, Fernando Raymond’s journey serves as a beacon. It’s a testament to the fact that with perseverance, belief, and a dash of audacity, one can craft a life of their dreams.

In the age of the internet, the world is truly your oyster. So, gear up, embrace the digital tide, and let it lead you to shores you’ve only dreamt of. Remember, your cubicle isn’t a cage unless you let it be.