Categories
Life Style

Judge dismisses superconductivity physicist’s lawsuit against university

[ad_1]

A judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by superconductivity physicist Ranga Dias against his employer, the University of Rochester in New York. In February, a university investigation found that he had committed scientific misconduct by, among other things, fabricating data to claim the discovery of superconductors — materials with zero electrical resistance — at room temperature. Dias filed the lawsuit against the university for allegedly violating his academic freedom and conducting a biased investigation into his work.

On 19 April, Monroe County Supreme Court justice Joseph Waldorf denied Dias’s petitions and dismissed the lawsuit as premature. The matter “is not ripe for judicial review”, Waldorf wrote (see Supplementary information), because, although Rochester commissioned an independent review that found Dias had committed misconduct, it has not yet finished taking administrative action. The university provost has recommended that Dias be fired, but a final decision is still forthcoming.

A spokesperson for the university said Rochester was “pleased” with the justice’s ruling, and reiterated that its investigation was “carried out in a fair manner” and reached a conclusion that it thinks is correct.

Dias did not respond to requests for comment. His lawyer, Morgan Levy, referred Nature’s news team to documents filed with the lawsuit in which Dias responded to the university’s investigation.

Nature’s news team reported on Rochester’s investigation previously: three scientists external to the university conducted a 10-month probe into 16 allegations against Dias and determined that the physicist had committed plagiarism, and data fabrication and falsification related to four scientific papers, including two published in Nature1,2. (Nature’s news team is editorially independent of its journals team.) Normally, the details of the investigation would probably have remained confidential. But in response to Dias’s lawsuit, the university submitted the entire report as a court exhibit, making it public.

Other documents and e-mails from Dias made public owing to the lawsuit reveal more details about the physicist’s attempts to halt the investigation and to cast doubt on former graduate students from his laboratory who had shared concerns with investigators about data in one of the blockbuster Nature papers2, and who later requested its retraction. Nature’s news team spoke about the lawsuit to four of Dias’s former students, who requested anonymity because they were concerned about the negative impact on their careers. They disagree with Dias’s characterization of events in the e-mails submitted to the court. One student described Dias’s attitude as “it’s not me that’s wrong, it’s everyone around me”.

Toxic environment

In March 2023, the National Science Foundation (NSF), which funds US academic research — including much of Dias’s — ordered Rochester to investigate allegations that Dias committed scientific misconduct when he claimed to have discovered room-temperature superconductivity in a material made of carbon, sulfur and hydrogen at room temperature1. This order followed three internal ‘inquiries’ into Dias’s work by the university, which did not evidence of misconduct. Prompted by the NSF, Stephen Dewhurst, the then-interim vice-president for research at Rochester, organized a committee of three external experts to undertake the investigation.

Dias initially appeared pleased with the investigators. After his first interview with them, he sent Dewhurst an e-mail on 16 June 2023, writing that he welcomed the university’s “comprehensive neutral unbiased independent investigation into all the allegations”. Later, his opinion of the investigation would change.

When the investigators interviewed Dias’s graduate students the next month, serious issues came to light, according to court documents: the students said that Dias dismissed their concerns about the veracity of certain data and that he had created a culture of fear in the lab. Speaking to Nature‘s news team, one student says that Dias apparently retaliated against them for reporting concerns to another faculty member at Rochester. The news team reviewed a memo written by the student immediately after the incident. The student recorded Dias as saying that “an adviser is like your parents — you can’t remove them, you’re stuck with them”.

In a 3 August 2023 e-mail to Dias, Wendi Heinzelman, dean of Rochester’s engineering school, told the physicist that his students would be moved to new advisers. Dias objected and expressed concern that the decision would affect the ongoing investigation. “Reassignment of my students has inadvertently conveyed a perception of wrongdoing on my part,” he responded. In that e-mail, Dias blamed the decision on two students he said were biased against him, alleging that one created a toxic environment in the lab and that the other was “a distraction to other students”.

Nature’s news team showed the e-mail to other former graduate students, who said that the toxic environment was caused by Dias. The students he accused of being biased against him “were not the issue in the group, and they tried their hardest to make it work”, says one of the former students.

In September 2023, five of Dias’s former students decided to ask for a retraction of a Nature paper that claimed that the team had observed room-temperature superconductivity in a lutetium-based material at relatively low pressures2. Dias found out and sent them each a cease-and-desist letter, as previously reported by Nature’s news team. At the same time, the physicist sent his first formal concerns about the investigation committee to the NSF, court documents show.

He alleged bias, conflicts of interest and a lack of expertise on the part of the investigators. Rochester administrators reviewed the claims and, in a letter to the NSF, concluded that the investigation was fair.

Legal trouble

Dias sued the university in December last year, alleging that his academic freedom was violated when he was stripped of his students. He filed another lawsuit in February, first attempting to stop the investigation, then to prevent it from becoming public. A judge denied both requests.

The case was eventually moved to a new justice, Waldorf, who heard arguments from lawyers representing Dias and Rochester in early April. In his decision to dismiss Dias’s lawsuit, Waldorf cited a previous ruling that “absent extraordinary circumstances, courts are constrained not to interject themselves into ongoing administrative proceedings”. These proceedings will determine whether Dias, who does not yet have tenure, will be fired. The final decision rests with Rochester’s board of trustees.

Nature’s news team spoke with scholars about Waldorf’s ruling, which was based on a cut-and-dry precedent. “The decision is unassailable,” says Matthew Finkin, a labour law and academic-freedom scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Scott Gelber, a historian of education at Wheaton College in Norton, Massachusetts, summed up his thoughts: “Academic freedom doesn’t protect academic misconduct.”

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

University of Cambridge Dawn Phase 1 Supercomputer powers-up

Intel Dell Technologies and University of Cambridge Dawn Supercomputer

In a major milestone for the UK’s technological capabilities, Dell Technologies, Intel, and the University of Cambridge have announced the deployment of the Dawn Phase 1 supercomputer, currently the fastest AI supercomputer in the country. This groundbreaking machine, designed to combine artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC), is expected to address global challenges and bolster the UK’s position as a technology leader.

Dawn Phase 1 is more than just a supercomputer; it’s a crucial component of the recently launched UK AI Research Resource (AIRR). The AIRR is a national facility designed to investigate the feasibility of AI-related systems and architectures, and Dawn Phase 1 will play a pivotal role in this exploration. The deployment of this supercomputer not only represents a significant technological achievement but also brings the UK closer to the exascale computing threshold, equivalent to a quintillion floating point operations per second.

The supercomputer is currently operational at the Cambridge Open Zettascale Lab, where it utilises Dell PowerEdge XE9640 servers and the Intel Data Center GPU Max Series accelerator. This state-of-the-art technology, combined with the supercomputer’s liquid cooling system, makes it uniquely suited for handling AI and HPC workloads.

The deployment of Dawn Phase 1 is the result of a strategic co-design partnership between Dell Technologies, Intel, the University of Cambridge, and UK Research and Innovation. This collaboration is a testament to the importance of partnerships and investments in technology for the UK’s AI growth potential. It’s a clear demonstration of how innovative collaborations can lead to technological breakthroughs.

One of the most exciting aspects of Dawn Phase 1 is its potential applications across a wide range of sectors. The supercomputer is poised to support large workloads in academic research and industrial domains, including healthcare, engineering, green fusion energy, climate modelling, and frontier science. This broad application potential underscores the transformative power of AI and HPC when harnessed effectively.

Looking ahead, a Phase 2 supercomputer, expected to deliver ten times the performance of Dawn Phase 1, is planned for 2024. This next phase of development will further strengthen the UK’s technological capabilities and its position as a global leader in AI and HPC.

Other articles you may find of interest on the subject of supercomputers :

In addition to the upcoming Phase 2, the integration of Dawn Phase 1 and the Isambard AI supercomputer will form the AIRR. This integration will create a national facility designed to help researchers maximise the potential of AI, further enhancing the UK’s AI research capabilities.

The construction of Dawn Phase 1 is based on Dell PowerEdge XE9640 servers with liquid cooling technology. Each server combines two 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors and four Intel Data Center GPU Max accelerators. This powerful combination of hardware is complemented by an AI- and simulation-optimised cloud supercomputing software environment provided by Scientific OpenStack from UK SME StackHPC.

While the technical details and performance numbers for Dawn Phase 1 will be released in mid-November at the Supercomputing 23 (SC23) conference in Denver, Colorado, it’s clear that this supercomputer represents a significant leap forward for the UK’s AI capabilities. By harnessing the power of AI and HPC, Dawn Phase 1 has the potential to drive transformative change across a range of sectors and place the UK at the forefront of global technological innovation.

Dawn Phase 1 Supercomputer 2023

The Dawn Supercomputer at the University of Cambridge is distinct from the one at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. This particular Dawn Supercomputer is a part of the Cambridge Service for Data Driven Discovery (CSD3), a state-of-the-art data analytics supercomputing facility. It caters to a wide range of computational and data-intensive research across various disciplines.

CSD3 is notable for its focus on supporting research that requires handling and analysis of large datasets, high-performance computing (HPC), and machine learning. The facility is designed to be highly flexible and scalable, meeting the needs of different research communities. It’s a collaborative project, involving not just the University of Cambridge but also partners from the wider research community.

The Dawn Supercomputer specifically, within this context, is known for its high-performance capabilities, particularly suited for tasks involving data analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Its architecture, combining traditional CPU-based computing with more recent GPU-based approaches, makes it well-suited for a variety of computational tasks. This includes scientific simulations, data processing, and the training of complex machine learning models.

The integration of the Dawn Supercomputer into CSD3 represents the University of Cambridge’s commitment to advancing research in data-intensive fields. It provides researchers with the necessary computational tools to tackle some of the most challenging and important questions in science and technology today.

A previous supercomputer also called Dawn was a high-performance computing system hosted at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the United States. It served as a precursor and testing platform for the more advanced Sequoia supercomputer, part of the IBM Blue Gene series of supercomputers. Dawn was operational in the late 2000s and early 2010s.

Filed Under: Technology News, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

The Real World (Hustlers University) Review: Is It Worth It?

Are you ready to go into a world that could provide you with financial success and real-life billionaire mentors? People are asking if The Real-World Tate online school lives up to its reputation and if they will profit from the real-world hustler’s university. You are in the right place to get all the answers to this question. This highly extensive post will address all your questions regarding the real world, Andrew Tate, and how to make money online.

What is The Real-World Andrew Tate?

The Real World (TRW) is an online school created by Andrew Tate to educate people on how to make money using more than ten online business models taught by 12 millionaire professors. It is a resource for novices and experts seeking new strategies for making money online. The real world is structured so that you can always find a business model that fits your status, financial resources, and even schedule.

The real world vs. Hustlers University: what happened?

The Real World is also known as The Hustlers University since Andrew Tate went from a course named Hustlers University that was housed on a Discord server to a course called The Real World that is now hosted by them and has more features. Andrew Tate has since pushed his Hustlers University students to enter the real world. Hustlers University 2.0, Hustlers University 3.0, and Hustlers University 4.0 were all released at some point.

History of The Real World

Initially known as Hustlers University, the initiative began as a discord server with multiple sections dedicated to a particular aspect of online earning. However, after Andrew Tate was canceled, the discord moderators withdrew this server entirely, forcing Andrew Tate’s team to construct an independent web app for education.

Individuals are equipped with all the resources they need for rapid wealth creation and execution through making money online, thanks to step-by-step lessons and access to various profitable business models such as e-commerce, copywriting, freelancing, and more, as well as advanced education mentorship from multi-millionaire experts.

The Core Concept Behind the Real World

Many people find an idea central to The Real-World inspiring. Andrew Tate’s program offers students a curriculum centered on various company concepts and coaching from real-life millionaires to guarantee they have the resources they need for financial success. The Real World’s comprehensive introduction would benefit those willing to invest $50 monthly in learning these income-generating skills.

Courses Offered in The Real World

The Real World offers students a comprehensive course selection of over 100 videos and painstakingly created lessons that teach students modern money-making fundamentals. They are as follows:

  • Copywriting
  • Freelancing
  • Freelancing arbitrage
  • Content creation
  • UGC campus
  • Crypto
  • Nfts and Defi
  • E-commerce
  • Dropshipping
  • Amazon FBA
  • Business and Finance
  • Artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Affiliate marketing
  • Fitness

Real Worlds provides a variety of courses with carefully designed programs to help you quickly acquire the skills needed for financial success.

The Real-World pros and cons

Pros:

  1. Excellent course content that can lead to wealth.
  2. Very affordable compared to other financial courses.
  3. Fast and responsive support team.
  4. There are numerous business models from which to gain insight.
  5. There is a community of people ready to chat with you and answer your questions.
  6. There is no BS your results will depend on the work you put in.
  7. Live conversations for particular campuses’ students

Cons:

  • No free trial
  • No refund once you sign up
  • No PayPal payment method; only card and crypto payment
  • Info overload and feeling overwhelmed by the numerous campuses.

Is The Real World (Hustlers University) legit?

The real world is a great platform and has many positive reviews online. The platform is best for beginners looking to make money online. It is also very affordable compared to the thousands of dollars charged for courses in the same industry.

How to Join the Real World

The Real World (Formerly Hustlers University) is an ideal educational opportunity for those seeking to improve their financial future. The only requirements are internet access and a desire to learn. Prepare for exploration after purchasing a subscription through the official website and receiving an email confirmation.

The Real-World professors, community, and support team

In the Real World, there are more than ten professors who are subject matter experts. Andrew Tate chose them because they have amassed millions of dollars using the business model they teach. In addition, a support team is available to address all of your questions. You will also have access to a community of over 300,000 students who are all learning.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the real world a pyramid scheme?

The real world is not a pyramid scheme, because it teaches you a distinct business model.

Can I join the real world from anywhere in the world?

Yes, it is possible to join the actual world from anywhere in the world, and it is also possible to profit from what you are taught from anywhere in the world.

Do I need capital after joining the real world?

For some business models, capital is required, whereas for others, it is not.

Does age really matter?

Andrew Tate advises those under the age of 18 to obtain parental or guardian permission.