Tag: Trust

Categories
Featured

Información del archivo de registro de Zero Trust: lo que necesita saber

[ad_1]

El acceso Zero Trust es un paradigma de seguridad estricto que se está convirtiendo cada vez más en el estándar para empresas y gobiernos. Se aleja de la seguridad tradicional basada en el perímetro para cuestionar, verificar y autorizar constantemente la identidad de los usuarios y dispositivos antes de otorgar acceso, incluso al director ejecutivo, que ha trabajado allí durante veinte años. Luego, a los usuarios se les otorga solo los permisos mínimos necesarios para realizar sus tareas, lo que limita el daño potencial que pueden causar y al mismo tiempo garantiza que aún puedan realizar su trabajo.

Un área donde falta de confianza Puede resultar eficaz con la inteligencia de archivos de registro. Esto se debe a que, si bien son muy importantes para la seguridad de la información y la detección de amenazas, los archivos de registro también pueden ser una vulnerabilidad en el sistema. Como tal, debe estar protegido en todo momento y accesible para quienes lo necesiten.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Trust Adya USB PC Headset review

[ad_1]

The Trust USB Headset is a good and honest, plain and simple, salt-of-the-earth wired headset. If you or your staff are joining a few video calls a day and need an inexpensive pair of headphones and mic, this pretty much fits the bill in every way. 

You could call the wired USB headset basic. It is. That’s not a bad thing here. This is about making video calls as easy as possible. No switches and flashing lights, no pressing and holding buttons to perform a series of convoluted tasks. Just plug it into your computer – it’s compatible with Windows, macOS, and ChromeOS – and you’re done. 

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Trust Ody II Silent Wireless Keyboard and Mouse review

[ad_1]

The Ody II is a budget wireless keyboard from Trust that promises a quiet typing experience. If, like us, you’re coming from the clacking and clattering of a cheap full-sized keyboard, the difference is immediately noticeable. Smooth, near-silent, spill-proof, this is an impressive unit for the price. 

We’ve tested out plenty of office keyboards, keyboards for programmers, spent decades hammering on wired and wireless and cheap and expensive and full-sized and compact models. If  you spend a lot of time writing reports, essays, code, your latest screenplay and you don’t want to disturb those around you, and you don’t want to break the bank, the trust Ody II is worth checking out. 

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

Wild women and restoring public trust: Books in brief

[ad_1]

The Rich Flee and the Poor Take the Bus

Troy Tassier Johns Hopkins Univ. Press (2024)

An adage in epidemiology states that, if you’ve seen one epidemic, you’ve seen one epidemic. However, argues economist Troy Tassier in his thoughtful history, in almost every epidemic, the rich escape and survive while the poor stay and suffer. Take the London plague of 1625 — the wealthy fled, food prices soared and the poor starved, until eventually King Charles I taxed the rich refugees. To avoid future epidemic catastrophes, nations must support “universal access to high-quality health care” and “living wages for all workers”.

Write Cut Rewrite

Dirk Van Hulle & Mark Nixon Bodleian Library Publishing (2024)

The Bodleian Library in Oxford, UK, stores draft manuscripts, including one of philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921). The last line translates to “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent”, followed by his handwritten “Schluss!” (‘The End!’). Another, ‘The Mole & the Water Rat’ by writer Kenneth Grahame, was published as The Wind in the Willows (1908). Both are illustrated in this varied book about how authors compose and revise, by historian Dirk Van Hulle and literature researcher Mark Nixon.

The Incarcerations

Alpa Shah William Collins (2024)

India is a democracy, but between 2018 and 2020, its government imprisoned, so far without trial, 16 Indian academics, lawyers, poets and journalists, notable for defending human rights. It accused them — on fraudulent evidence — of being Maoist terrorists plotting to kill Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The case is a “bellwether for the collapse of democracy in India”, argues anthropologist Alpa Shah, in her deeply researched and frequently shocking account of how Hindu nationalism has created “an Indian form of fascism”.

Wild Woman

Philippa Forrester Bloomsbury Wildlife (2024)

A prime-time TV presenter and producer of science documentaries, Philippa Forrester holds degrees in English literature and ecology. In 2015, she moved from the United Kingdom to Wyoming, where she encountered wolves, grizzly bears and moose, before returning home. In this personal and readable account of women working in nature over several centuries, Forrester calls herself “a hybrid of scientist and storyteller”, belonging to no “wild” female archetype — neither a practical “nurturer” nor a spiritual “crazy crone”.

Paranoia

Daniel Freeman William Collins (2024)

There needs to be a public discussion about trust, argues Daniel Freeman, the world’s leading paranoia researcher: on both “the forces that undermine it, and the measures we can take to restore it”. Some 1–3% of the population have severe paranoia. Such mistrust might be why conspiracy theories flourished during the COVID-19 pandemic. But there is hope, Freeman concludes, if world leaders work together, as US president Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev did during the cold war.

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

I’m a laptop expert, so trust me when I say you should not miss this Asus Chromebook Plus deal from Amazon

[ad_1]

I’ve been reviewing laptops for years, and if someone asks me what laptop they should buy for under £300, I always say the same thing: get a Chromebook. If you’re looking for a super-cheap laptop, then Amazon’s Spring Sale event has a great offer for the Asus Chromebook Plus, which is now just £249.99 (down from £399).

• Shop all Amazon Spring Sale deals

Why do I recommend Chromebooks to people looking for cheap laptops? While there are laptops running Windows 11 out there for under £300, they often aren’t worth paying for; even at those low prices. This is because they usually come with underpowered or outdated hardware, which makes using Windows 11 a chore.

However, Chromebooks use the much more lightweight Chrome OS software, which runs really well on less powerful hardware, so you end up getting a much better experience on a Chromebook of the same price or less.

That’s especially true of the Asus Chromebook Plus CX3402CBA Amazon has on sale here. With an Intel Core i3 processor, 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 128GB storage, it comes with specs that are actually pretty powerful for a Chromebook, and they wouldn’t look out of place powering a Windows 11 laptop.

With Chrome OS, you’ll get a fantastically smooth and snappy experience, and while the Chromebook Plus CX3402CBA can’t run Windows 11 apps, there are a huge library of Chrome OS apps available. And you can run Android apps as well. For most day-to-day tasks, this Chromebook will be ideal – plus you get a huge 10 hour battery life as well, and with this £150 price cut, this is an absolutely brilliant cheap laptop deal.

If this isn’t quite right for you, you can find more deals in our full Amazon Spring Sale hub.

(Not in the UK? Scroll down for the best deals in your region).

Today’s best Asus Chromebook Plus deal

Chromebook Plus laptops are a new category of Chromebook that offer more powerful components, while keeping a lot of the things we love about traditional Chromebooks, such as their low prices and long battery lives.

Because of the more powerful hardware, Chromebook Plus devices can often be more expensive than regular Chromebooks, which is one of the reasons why I love this deal so much. Even at its original price of £399, this is a great value, but at £249.99, it’s easily one of the best laptop deals we’ll see until Black Friday at least.

While it won’t be a laptop for everyone, the Asus Chromebook Plus CX3402CBA is ideal for day-to-day use. It’ll be especially good for students looking for an affordable laptop they can use throughout the day without needing a charge.

More Asus Chromebook Plus deals

Looking for more Asus Chromebook Plus deals? You’ll find all the lowest prices from around the web right here, with offers available in your region.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

Why scientists trust AI too much — and what to do about it

[ad_1]

A robotic arm moves through an automated AI-run laboratory

AI-run labs have arrived — such as this one in Suzhou, China.Credit: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg/Getty

Scientists of all stripes are embracing artificial intelligence (AI) — from developing ‘self-driving’ laboratories, in which robots and algorithms work together to devise and conduct experiments, to replacing human participants in social-science experiments with bots1.

Many downsides of AI systems have been discussed. For example, generative AI such as ChatGPT tends to make things up, or ‘hallucinate’ — and the workings of machine-learning systems are opaque.

In a Perspective article2 published in Nature this week, social scientists say that AI systems pose a further risk: that researchers envision such tools as possessed of superhuman abilities when it comes to objectivity, productivity and understanding complex concepts. The authors argue that this put researchers in danger of overlooking the tools’ limitations, such as the potential to narrow the focus of science or to lure users into thinking they understand a concept better than they actually do.

Scientists planning to use AI “must evaluate these risks now, while AI applications are still nascent, because they will be much more difficult to address if AI tools become deeply embedded in the research pipeline”, write co-authors Lisa Messeri, an anthropologist at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and Molly Crockett, a cognitive scientist at Princeton University in New Jersey.

The peer-reviewed article is a timely and disturbing warning about what could be lost if scientists embrace AI systems without thoroughly considering such hazards. It needs to be heeded by researchers and by those who set the direction and scope of research, including funders and journal editors. There are ways to mitigate the risks. But these require that the entire scientific community views AI systems with eyes wide open.

To inform their article, Messeri and Crockett examined around 100 peer-reviewed papers, preprints, conference proceedings and books, published mainly over the past five years. From these, they put together a picture of the ways in which scientists see AI systems as enhancing human capabilities.

In one ‘vision’, which they call AI as Oracle, researchers see AI tools as able to tirelessly read and digest scientific papers, and so survey the scientific literature more exhaustively than people can. In both Oracle and another vision, called AI as Arbiter, systems are perceived as evaluating scientific findings more objectively than do people, because they are less likely to cherry-pick the literature to support a desired hypothesis or to show favouritism in peer review. In a third vision, AI as Quant, AI tools seem to surpass the limits of the human mind in analysing vast and complex data sets. In the fourth, AI as Surrogate, AI tools simulate data that are too difficult or complex to obtain.

Informed by anthropology and cognitive science, Messeri and Crockett predict risks that arise from these visions. One is the illusion of explanatory depth3, in which people relying on another person — or, in this case, an algorithm — for knowledge have a tendency to mistake that knowledge for their own and think their understanding is deeper than it actually is.

Another risk is that research becomes skewed towards studying the kinds of thing that AI systems can test — the researchers call this the illusion of exploratory breadth. For example, in social science, the vision of AI as Surrogate could encourage experiments involving human behaviours that can be simulated by an AI — and discourage those on behaviours that cannot, such as anything that requires being embodied physically.

There’s also the illusion of objectivity, in which researchers see AI systems as representing all possible viewpoints or not having a viewpoint. In fact, these tools reflect only the viewpoints found in the data they have been trained on, and are known to adopt the biases found in those data. “There’s a risk that we forget that there are certain questions we just can’t answer about human beings using AI tools,” says Crockett. The illusion of objectivity is particularly worrying given the benefits of including diverse viewpoints in research.

Avoid the traps

If you’re a scientist planning to use AI, you can reduce these dangers through a number of strategies. One is to map your proposed use to one of the visions, and consider which traps you are most likely to fall into. Another approach is to be deliberate about how you use AI. Deploying AI tools to save time on something your team already has expertise in is less risky than using them to provide expertise you just don’t have, says Crockett.

Journal editors receiving submissions in which use of AI systems has been declared need to consider the risks posed by these visions of AI, too. So should funders reviewing grant applications, and institutions that want their researchers to use AI. Journals and funders should also keep tabs on the balance of research they are publishing and paying for — and ensure that, in the face of myriad AI possibilities, their portfolios remain broad in terms of the questions asked, the methods used and the viewpoints encompassed.

All members of the scientific community must view AI use not as inevitable for any particular task, nor as a panacea, but rather as a choice with risks and benefits that must be carefully weighed. For decades, and long before AI was a reality for most people, social scientists have studied AI. Everyone — including researchers of all kinds — must now listen.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

Building Trust in Coaching Relationships

Trust, often considered the bedrock of meaningful human interactions, holds a pivotal role in coaching relationships. It’s a delicate, intangible bond that, once established, can greatly amplify the effectiveness and outcomes of coaching sessions. All coaches, from Tony Robbins, to Fitness coaches like Sam Miller, all need to establish this to help their clients. Without trust, the very foundation of coaching becomes shaky, preventing open communication and genuine transformation. In the realm of coaching, whether life, executive, fitness, or any other niche, understanding and fostering trust is paramount to facilitating genuine breakthroughs and sustainable progress.

Understanding the Importance of Trust in Coaching

Trust isn’t merely a soft skill or an abstract concept; it’s deeply rooted in our psychological makeup. Humans inherently seek trust as it creates a sense of security, understanding, and alignment. When an individual trusts their coach, they’re more likely to:

Open Communication Channels: Trust paves the way for open, honest dialogue. Coachees feel safe to share their deepest fears, aspirations, and challenges without the fear of judgment or backlash.

Embrace Vulnerability: Brene Brown, a renowned researcher on vulnerability, posits that vulnerability is the birthplace of innovation, creativity, and change. In a coaching context, trust enables coachees to show their vulnerable side, revealing areas they want to work on or beliefs they wish to challenge.

Enhanced Motivation and Commitment: Trust in the coach’s expertise, methods, and intentions can bolster a coachee’s motivation to act on advice and stick to action plans. They believe that the coach has their best interests at heart, which fuels commitment.

Improved Responsiveness to Feedback: When trust is present, feedback, even if it’s critical, is perceived in a constructive light. Coachees are more receptive, seeing feedback as a tool for growth rather than criticism.

In essence, trust forms the invisible threads that weave the tapestry of a successful coaching relationship. Without these threads, the relationship lacks depth, strength, and the capacity to foster meaningful transformation. 

Initial Impressions: Laying the Foundation for Trust

Trust, while it develops over time, often takes root in the initial interactions. A coach’s approach during the first meeting can set the tone for the entire coaching relationship.

First Impressions Matter: Just like in any interaction, first impressions play a critical role in coaching. This encompasses everything from punctuality to preparedness, and from attire to attentiveness. Showing professionalism, genuine interest, and understanding can quickly foster a sense of trust.

Establishing Credibility: Sharing qualifications, past experiences, and success stories can help. But more than the accolades, it’s about showcasing genuine intent, passion, and commitment to the coachee’s journey.

Setting Clear Boundaries and Expectations: From the outset, it’s essential to outline the coaching process, define roles, and set mutual expectations. This clarity minimizes potential misunderstandings and reinforces trust.

Active Listening and Demonstrating Empathy

To truly trust, one needs to feel understood. This is where the art and skill of active listening come into play in the coaching relationship.

The Power of Being ‘Heard’: Active listening involves fully concentrating, understanding, and responding to what the coachee is saying. It’s not just about hearing words but understanding the emotions and motivations behind them.

Techniques to Cultivate Active Listening: Implementing techniques like mirroring (reflecting back what’s been said), validation (acknowledging the feelings and perspectives of the coachee), and asking open-ended questions can facilitate deeper understanding and demonstrate genuine interest.

Displaying Empathy: Empathy goes beyond simply understanding the coachee’s viewpoint. It’s about resonating with their emotions, showing genuine care, and assuring them they’re not alone in their journey. An empathetic coach can bridge gaps, heal doubts, and solidify trust.

Maintaining Confidentiality

The coaching space is sacred. It’s often a sanctuary where individuals divulge personal, sensitive information, hopes, and fears. Thus, ensuring confidentiality is non-negotiable.

The Sacred Nature of Shared Information: Recognizing the trust a coachee places in a coach when sharing intimate details is crucial. It’s not just about professional ethics but also about honoring and respecting that trust.

Setting and Communicating Clear Confidentiality Guidelines: Right from the outset, coaches should articulate their stance on confidentiality. Whether it’s in the form of a formal agreement or a verbal assurance, this clarity can greatly ease a coachee’s concerns.

Handling Sensitive Information with Discretion: Even in scenarios where a coach might discuss cases with peers (for learning or feedback), it’s essential to keep identities and personal details anonymous, preserving the integrity of the trust bestowed upon them.

Ensuring that the coachee feels safe, both emotionally and in terms of their shared information, is a linchpin in nurturing and maintaining trust in the coaching relationship.

Consistency and Reliability

One of the fastest ways to erode trust is through inconsistency. A steady, reliable approach fosters a stable environment conducive to trust and growth.

Consistent Behavior Over Time: This is not just about punctuality for sessions, but also about consistently being present, attentive, and providing a predictable quality of support. Inconsistencies can create doubt and uncertainty, which can hinder the coaching process.

Following Through on Commitments: When coaches set tasks or promise resources, it’s vital they follow through. A coach’s reliability in small tasks can translate into trust in broader aspects of the relationship.

Stability During Challenges: A coach’s behavior during difficult times can profoundly influence the trust quotient. A steadfast, calm, and solution-focused approach during setbacks or crises can reinforce trust, showcasing the coach’s commitment to the coachee’s journey irrespective of challenges.

Handling Mistakes and Setbacks

Even with the best intentions, mistakes can happen. How they are addressed can significantly impact the trust factor in the coach-coachee relationship.

Owning Up to Errors: Authenticity and humility in acknowledging mistakes can go a long way. Avoiding defensiveness and instead taking responsibility can solidify trust, as it shows the coach prioritizes the relationship over their ego.

Open Dialogue: Mistakes or misunderstandings offer opportunities for open discussions. Addressing issues head-on, seeking feedback, and understanding the coachee’s perspective can lead to deeper trust and an even stronger bond.

Using Setbacks as Growth Points: Rather than seeing mistakes as failures, they can be reframed as growth opportunities. Discussing what both parties can learn and how they can improve ensures that the relationship becomes more resilient and trust deepens.

Both consistency and the manner in which challenges are addressed play vital roles in the trust-building process. By showing up reliably and navigating setbacks with grace and openness, coaches can fortify the trust they’ve established, ensuring a productive and supportive coaching journey.

The journey of coaching is as much about skill and knowledge as it is about the intricate dance of human connection. Trust stands at the forefront of this dance, guiding the steps, rhythms, and depths of the relationship. Without trust, the most sophisticated techniques or profound insights may fall flat. But with it, even the simplest interactions can lead to profound transformation.

To truly be effective, coaches must prioritize building, maintaining, and deepening trust throughout the entirety of the coaching relationship. This involves consistent introspection, an openness to feedback, and a genuine commitment to the coachee’s well-being and success. The trust established then becomes the invisible yet sturdy bridge, enabling the coachee to traverse their challenges, embrace their potential, and achieve their goals with confidence.

In essence, trust is the heartbeat of coaching, infusing life, energy, and possibility into every session. For coaches seeking meaningful impact and lasting results, understanding and nurturing trust is not just beneficial; it’s indispensable.