Categories
Featured

I love my Amazon Kindle but foldable phones have convinced me its time is up – here’s why

[ad_1]

Smartphones have replaced a truly astounding number of things in everyday life, from cameras to calculators, and alarm clocks to wallets; and, based on the current state of foldables, ereaders – such as Amazon‘s ever-popular Kindle line – could be next.

The ereader is a great product in its own right, able to store an entire library’s worth of literature. What’s more, advancements in the category have lead to higher-resolution displays, tonal backlights for easier-on-the-eye late-night reading, longer battery life, faster charging, and even water resistance – ensuring that your poolside progress through that steamy new romance novel remains unimpeded when the noisy kids two sun-loungers down try to outdo one another in a game of ‘cannonball’.

But as innovative as such ereader advancements might seem in a vacuum, smartphones – even though they lack the same specializations – are otherwise already several steps ahead on a technical level, and closing the gap on the traits that define Kindles and the like as the superior reading gadgets.

OnePlus Open vs Kindle Oasis alternate angle

When it comes to legibility in bright conditions, smartphone screen tech is catching up with ereaders (Image credit: Future | Alex Walker-Todd)

I first came to this realization when the original iPad launched. Being able to see comics in full color on a large-but-portable high-fidelity backlit LCD was a truly revelatory experience at the time, and one that made me question my Kindle loyalty, even then. More recently, however, it’s the OnePlus Open which has been the device to show me a viable ereading future beyond my trusty Kindle Oasis.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Computers

Nothing Ear and Nothing Ear (a) Review: Third Time, Still Charming

[ad_1]

Not everything needs to reinvent the wheel. Iterating on products year over year has produced some of the best wireless headphones money can buy, and that’s precisely the route Nothing is going with its latest earbuds, the Nothing Ear and Nothing Ear (a). Sure, at its founding the company vowed to do so much more than make headphones and smartphones—it hasn’t quite followed up on that promise yet—but at least we get affordable earbuds that don’t look the part.

The new Ear and Ear (a) are Nothing’s third generation of AirPod clones, resulting in a pair of mature products with competitive sound, pricing, and user experience. From good-looking cases that easily fit in your pocket to smaller, more thoughtful design touches, these are some great wireless earbuds to consider if you’re hunting for a pair under $150.

Neither are groundbreaking audio products—there are better headphones if you spend a little more and plenty of comparable models—but they’ll more than satisfy just about anyone. They work well and look great; what more can you ask for?

What’s the Difference?

The Nothing Ear costs $150 and the Nothing Ear (a) is $100—following the “a” designation Nothing uses on its cheaper Nothing Phone (2a) versus the Nothing Phone (2). The company started with the Nothing Ear (1) in 2021 and followed up with the Nothing Ear (2) last year, so why the latest Nothing Ear isn’t called the Ear (3) is confusing.

The biggest physical difference between the Nothing Ear and the Nothing Ear (a) is the size of the earbuds, and the pricier model includes wireless charging support in its carrying case. The Ear is identical in looks to 2023’s Ear (2), but they’re a tiny bit larger and heavier. The Ear (a) are smaller and lack some of the fancy processing in its pricier sibling, but it comes with fun bright yellow accents (or white or black, depending on your preference) on the case and headphones.

Left Two yellow inear buds on a wooden surface. Right Hand holding one inear bud showing the panel that extrudes.

Nothing Ear (a)

Photograph: Parker Hall

Both wireless earbuds come with three sizes of ear tips, with the medium installed as standard. They fit me just fine for my extremely average ear size, with the Ear feeling a bit snugger and probably less suited for anyone with smaller ears. The Ear (a) reached Goldilocks’ porridge territory in size, stability, and long-term comfort. I don’t dislike wearing the larger, more feature-rich Ear, but if I had to choose based on comfort alone, the Ear (a) would get my money.

Inside the Ear (a) you get a less powerful chipset, but the earbuds still boast the same level of noise canceling, the same driver, and the same number of microphones for better calls as the Ear. The weaker chipset does have one benefit—longer battery life. The Ear (a) can hit up to 5.5 hours with active noise canceling turned on, whereas the pricier Ear lasts 5.2 hours. One other change? The Nothing Ear employ a different driver material—a form of ceramic, which is unusual for earbuds— whereas the Ear (a) have more traditional polymers. I go into more detail on what this entails further below.

Left Two white inear buds on a wooden surface. Right Hand holding one inear bud showing the panel that extrudes.

Nothing Ear

Photograph: Parker Hall

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Humane AI Pin review roundup: an undercooked flop that’s way ahead of its time

[ad_1]

The Humane AI Pin is a fascinating little device for gadget fans. If you missed its reveal in November 2023, it’s a tiny wearable computer with a built-in AI assistant, camera, and a little projector that blasts its UI onto your hand. Unfortunately, it’s also pretty terrible, according to the internet’s first reviews, which have landed in the past few days.

It’s rare for tech reviews, from both traditional media and YouTubers, to be so unanimous in their criticism of a much-hyped product. “The worst product I’ve ever reviewed… for now” concluded Marques Brownlee. Ouch. Meanwhile, Engadget branded it “the solution to none of technology’s problems”, while The Verge simply said that the AI Pin was “not even close”.

Naturally, these scathing verdicts create some added fascination about a $699 device that also requires a $ 24-a-month subscription. Yet few of the reviews think the AI Pin is completely without merit. Many praise its hardware design, which is solid aluminum and clips to your chest thanks to a magnetic ‘battery booster’ that goes inside your clothing. On the few occasions that it did work seamlessly, it also gave reviewers a little glimpse of a refreshingly screen-less future.

A person wearing the Humane AI Pin on a camouflaged jacket

(Image credit: Humane)

But beyond the specific features – many of which don’t seem to work reliably enough yet – the most interesting thing about these Humane AI Pin reviews is their broad conclusions about AI gadgets. In short, our phones aren’t going anywhere for a long time, and, as Bloomberg’s review concluded, “the AI device revolution isn’t going to kill the smartphone”. We haven’t yet reviewed the Rabbit R1, but that will probably hold true for a while yet.  



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Is this the best time ever for iPhone deals at Verizon? Multiple devices are free without the need for an annoying trade

[ad_1]

If you’ve been eying up an iPhone at Verizon, right now is a great time to consider picking up a deal. As well as several large trade-in rebates from the carrier, there are also an increasing number of promotions not tied to that usual criteria.

For example, right now, you don’t need a trade-in to get the standard iPhone 15 for free alongside a new line on a Verizon Unlimited Ultimate plan. If you pick one up on this admittedly pricey plan you’ll be entitled to a full $829 saving, which will cover the entire cost of the device over 36 months.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Frase review: empowering content creators one user at a time

[ad_1]

Having the best website in the world is useless if people can’t find it. SEO (Search Engine Optimization) tools are digital platforms or utilities designed to improve websites’ visibility in search engine results. These tools optimize your website’s content for search engines using techniques such as keyword research, backlink analysis, and site audits. 

Modern digital marketing strategies heavily rely on SEO tools to enhance the performance of your website and achieve the best results from your online presence. Using these tools boosts your website’s visibility and keeps you informed about the latest trends and strategies in the digital marketing world.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

AirPower Prototype Seen Charging Apple Watch for First Time

[ad_1]

A prototype of Apple’s ill-fated AirPower wireless charger has been seen charging an Apple Watch for the first time.

airpower
‌AirPower‌ was an Apple-designed charging mat designed to charge Qi-based iPhones, the Apple Watch, and ‌AirPods‌ that the company announced in September 2017 alongside the iPhone X. ‌AirPower‌ was designed so that users could place an ‌‌iPhone‌‌, ‌AirPods‌, and Apple Watch on any part of the mat to charge them, which meant that multiple overlapping charging coils had to be included.

It would have prompted devices to display a unique on-screen iOS animation when they were placed on the charging mat, as seen in Apple’s early marketing materials. An ‌iPhone‌ on the ‌AirPower‌ charger would also have shown the charge of all of the devices that were placed on the pad. ‌AirPower‌ missed its original 2018 launch date goal, and after a large number of issues with its development, Apple outright canceled the AirPower project in March 2019.

Images depicting ‌AirPower‌ prototypes first surfaced on social media in August 2020, showing a multi-coil design and the device’s internal circuitry, and the first video footage of the device emerged in August 2021. Multiple other AirPower prototypes have appeared since then, but most are no longer functional.

A new video from the X user “Apple Demo,” who has showcased various Apple prototypes in the past, demonstrates the ‌AirPower‌’s ability to charge an Apple Watch. The device features 16 coils and can charge a DVT prototype Apple Watch Series 4, but it apparently gets quite warm. Late last year, a functional AirPower prototype from early on in its development exhibited some of the severe thermal problems, including burning or melting devices placed on the charging pad, that ultimately led Apple to abandon the project.

‌AirPower‌’s ability to charge an Apple Watch would have been special because Apple’s smartwatch is only able to charge via its magnetic charging puck and does not support Qi. Simply placing an Apple Watch anywhere on the ‌AirPower‌ pad with no magnetic alignment would have been a unique charging experience.

Rumors in subsequent years about Apple’s work on a smaller wireless charger seem to have been related to MagSafe or the ‌MagSafe‌ Duo charger, rather than ‌AirPower‌. Nevertheless, a report from Bloomberg‘s Mark Gurman in 2022 said that Apple is still looking into AirPower-like charging solutions for the future.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Samsung’s not coming out with a smart display any time soon, but still wants “screens everywhere” in your home

[ad_1]

With screen fatigue at an all-time high, the prospect of a smart home with even more screens might sound counterintuitive – but I think Samsung is onto something with its new ‘screens everywhere’ approach to smart appliances. 

During its global launch event on 3 April, Samsung demonstrated a host of new smart appliances, including some featuring a new seven-inch LCD AI screen to “realize the idea of screens everywhere”.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Entertainment

NASA has to make a time zone for the Moon

[ad_1]

The White House has published a policy memo asking NASA to create a new time standard for the Moon by 2026. Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC) will establish an official time reference to help guide future lunar missions. The US, China, Japan, India and Russia have space missions to the Moon planned or completed.

NASA (and the White House) aren’t the only ones trying. The European Space Agency is also trying to make a time zone outside of Earth’s… zone.

Given the Moon’s weaker gravity, time moves slightly faster there. “The same clock we have on Earth would move at a different rate on the Moon,” NASA space communications and navigation chief Kevin Coggins told Reuters.

You saw Interstellar, right? Er, just like that. Exactly like that. No further questions.

— Mat Smith

The biggest stories you might have missed

Meta’s AI image generator struggles to create images of couples of different races

Our favorite cheap smartphone is on sale for $250 right now

OnePlus rolls out its own version of Google’s Magic Eraser

How to watch (and record) the solar eclipse on April 8

​​You can get these reports delivered daily direct to your inbox. Subscribe right here!

The most error-free quantum solution yet, apparently.

What if we could build a machine working at the quantum level that could tackle complex calculations exponentially faster than a computer limited by classic physics? Despite all the heady dreams of quantum computing and press releases from IBM and Google, it’s still a what-if. Microsoft now says it’s developed the most error-free quantum computing system yet, with Quantinuum. It’s not a thing I can condense into a single paragraph. You… saw Interstellar, right?

Continue reading.

Still not that good, though.

Stability AI just unveiled Stable Audio 2.0, an upgraded version of its music-generation platform. With this system, you can use your own text to create up to three minutes of audio, which is roughly the length of a song. You can hone the results by choosing a genre or even uploading audio to inspire the algo. It’s fun — try it out. Just don’t add vocals, trust me.

Continue reading.

EVs schmee vees.

Apple, hunting for its next iPhone / Apple Watch / Vision Pro (maybe?), might be trying to get into robots. According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, one area the company is exploring is personal robotics — and it started looking at electric vehicles too. The report says Apple has started working on a mobile robot to follow users around their home and has already developed a table-top device that uses a robot to move a screen around.

Continue reading.

Not like this.

TMATMA

Warner Bros.

Whoa.

Continue reading.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Entertainment

The White House tells NASA to create a new time zone for the Moon

[ad_1]

On Tuesday, The White House published a policy memo directing NASA to create a new time standard for the Moon by 2026. Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC) will establish an official time reference to help guide future lunar missions. It arrives as a 21st-century space race emerges between (at least) the US, China, Japan, India and Russia.

The memo directs NASA to work with the Departments of Commerce, Defense, State, and Transportation to plan a strategy to put LTC into practice by December 31, 2026. International cooperation will also play a role, especially with signees of the Artemis Accords. Established in 2020, they’re a set of common principles between a growing list of (currently) 37 countries that govern space exploration and operating principles. China and Russia are not part of that group.

“As NASA, private companies, and space agencies around the world launch missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond, it’s important that we establish celestial time standards for safety and accuracy,” OSTP Deputy Director for National Security Steve Welby wrote in a White House press release. “A consistent definition of time among operators in space is critical to successful space situational awareness capabilities, navigation, and communications, all of which are foundational to enable interoperability across the U.S. government and with international partners.”

Einstein’s theories of relativity dictate that time changes relative to speed and gravity. Given the Moon’s weaker gravity (and movement differences between it and Earth), time moves slightly faster there. So an Earth-based clock on the lunar surface would appear to gain an average of 58.7 microseconds per Earth day. As the US and other countries plan Moon missions to research, explore and (eventually) build bases for permanent residence, using a single standard will help them synchronize technology and missions requiring precise timing.

“The same clock that we have on Earth would move at a different rate on the moon,” NASA space communications and navigation chief Kevin Coggins told Reuters. “Think of the atomic clocks at the U.S. Naval Observatory (in Washington). They’re the heartbeat of the nation, synchronizing everything. You’re going to want a heartbeat on the moon.”

Photo of the Moon, captured by NASA, in exquisite detail.Photo of the Moon, captured by NASA, in exquisite detail.

NASA

The White House wants LTC to coordinate with Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the standard by which all of Earth’s time zones are measured. Its memo says it wants the new time zone to enable accurate navigation and scientific endeavors. It also wants LTC to maintain resilience if it loses contact with Earth while providing scalability for space environments “beyond the Earth-Moon system.”

NASA’s Artemis program aims to send crewed missions back to the Moon for the first time since the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s. The space agency said in January that Artemis 2, which will fly around the Moon with four people onboard, is now set for a September 2025 launch. Artemis 3, which plans to put humans back on the Moon’s surface, is now scheduled for 2026.

In addition to the US, China aims to put astronauts on the Moon before 2030 as the world’s two foremost global superpowers take their race to space. Although no other countries have announced crewed missions to the lunar surface, India (which put a module and rover on the Moon’s South Pole last year), Russia (its mission around the same time didn’t go so well), the United Arab Emirates, Japan, South Korea and private companies have all demonstrated lunar ambitions in recent years.

In addition to enabling further scientific exploration, technological establishment and resource mining, the Moon could serve as a critical stop on the way to Mars. It could test technologies and provide fuel and supply needs for eventual human missions to the Red Planet.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

Time to sound the alarm about the hidden epidemic of kidney disease

[ad_1]

Coloured 3D computed tomography scan of healthy human kidneys.

Kidney disease is growing worldwide. The secretariat of the World Health Organization has welcomed the call to include it as a non-communicable disease that causes premature deaths.Credit: Vsevolod Zviryk/SPL

A quiet epidemic is building around the world. It is the third-fastest-growing cause of death globally. By 2040, it is expected to become the fifth-highest cause of years of life lost. Already, 850 million people are affected, and treating them is draining public-health coffers: the US government-funded health-care plan Medicare alone spends US$130 billion to do so each year. The culprit is kidney disease, a condition in which damage to the kidneys prevents them from filtering the blood.

And yet, in discussions of priorities for global public health, the words ‘kidney disease’ do not always feature. One reason for this is that kidney disease is not on the World Health Organization (WHO) list of priority non-communicable diseases (NCDs) that cause premature deaths. The roster of such NCDs includes heart disease, stroke, diabetes, cancer and chronic lung disease. With kidney disease missing, awareness of its growing impact remains low.

The authors of an article in Nature Reviews Nephrology this week want to change that (A. Francis et al. Nature Rev. Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-024-00820-6; 2024). They are led by the three largest professional organizations working in kidney health — the International Society of Nephrology, the American Society of Nephrology and the European Renal Association — and they’re urging the WHO to include kidney disease on the priority NCD list.

This will, the authors argue, bring attention to the growing threat, which is particularly dire for people in low- and lower-middle-income countries, who already bear two‑thirds of the world’s kidney-disease burden. Adding kidney disease to the list will also mean that reducing deaths from it could become more of a priority for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals target to reduce premature deaths from NCDs by one-third by 2030.

As of now, rates of chronic kidney disease are likely to increase in low- and lower-middle-income countries as the proportion of older people in their populations increases. Inclusion on the WHO list could provide an incentive for health authorities to prioritize treatments, data collection and other research, along with funding, as with other NCDs.

Kidney disease often accompanies other conditions that do appear on the NCD list, such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes — indeed, kidney-disease deaths caused specifically by diabetes are on the list. But the article authors argue that “tackling diabetes and heart disease alone will not target the core drivers of a large proportion of kidney diseases”. Both acute and chronic kidney disease can have many causes. They can be caused by infection or exposure to toxic substances. Increasingly, the consequences of global climate change, including high temperatures and reduced availability of fresh water, are thought to be contributing to the global burden of kidney disease, as well.

Light micrograph of the kidney glomerulus

The kidney glomerulus filters waste products from the blood. In people with damaged kidneys, this happens through dialysis.Credit: Ziad M. El-Zaatari/SPL

The WHO secretariat, which works closely with the nephrology community, welcomes the call to include kidney disease as an NCD that causes premature deaths, says Slim Slama, who heads the NCD unit at the secretariat in Geneva, Switzerland. The data support including kidney disease as an NCD driver of premature death, he adds.

The decision to include kidney disease along with other priority NCDs isn’t only down to the WHO, however. There must be conversations between the secretariat, WHO member states, the nephrology community, patient advocates and others. WHO member states need to instruct the agency to take the steps to make it happen, including providing appropriate funding for strategic and technical assistance.

Data and funding gaps

Three reports based on surveys by the International Society of Nephrology since 2016 highlight the scale of data gaps (A. K. Bello et al. Lancet Glob. Health 12, E382–E395; 2024). In many countries, screening for kidney disease is difficult to access and a large proportion of cases go undetected and therefore uncounted. For example, it is not known precisely how many people with kidney failure die each year because of lack of access to dialysis or transplantation: the numbers are somewhere between two million and seven million, according to the WHO. Advocates must push public-health officials in more countries to collect the data needed to monitor kidney disease and the impact of prevention and treatment efforts.

Even with better data, treatments for kidney disease are often prohibitively expensive. They include dialysis, an intervention to filter the blood when kidneys cannot. Dialysis is often required two or three times weekly for the remainder of the recipient’s life, or until they can receive a transplant, and it is notoriously costly. In Thailand, for example, it accounted for 3% of the country’s total health-care expenditures in 2022, according to the country’s parliamentary budget office.

These costs could come down if people who have diabetes or high blood pressure, for example, could be routinely screened for impaired kidney function, because they are at high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. This would enable kidney damage to be detected early, before symptoms set in, opening the way for treatments that do not immediately require dialysis or transplant surgery.

New drugs that boost weight loss and treat type 2 diabetes could also help to prevent or reduce stress on the kidneys, but these, too, are too expensive for many people in need. That is why something needs to be done to make drugs more affordable. The pharmaceutical industry, which has become extremely profitable, has a crucial role. In Denmark, for example, the industry’s profits helped to tip the national economy from recession into growth in 2023, according to the public agency Statistics Denmark. The COVID-19 pandemic showed that making profits and making drugs available, and affordable, to a wide population need not be mutually exclusive. Similarly innovative thinking is now needed. “The whole world needs to reckon with this kidney problem,” says Valerie Luyckx, a biomedical ethicist at the University of Zurich in Switzerland.

The WHO adding kidney disease to its priority list could also attract funding for treatment, research and disease registries. That could jump-start the development of new treatments and help to make current treatments more affordable and accessible.

NCDs are responsible for 74% of deaths worldwide, but the world’s biggest donors to global health currently devote less than 2% of their budgets for international health assistance to NCD prevention and control, and not including kidney disease. Drawing more attention to the quiet rampage of kidney disease among some of the most vulnerable people would be one important step in turning these statistics around.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link