Categories
Business Industry

Meta AI experience in WhatsApp gets better

[ad_1]

Last updated: April 16th, 2024 at 14:31 UTC+02:00

Last month, Meta updated the beta version of WhatsApp for Android with the ability for people to access Meta AI using the search bar. Well, the company has polished the feature even further and is making the new experience available in many countries across the globe.

According to a new report from WABetaInfo, the search bar in the latest beta version of WhatsApp for Android and iOS now shows the Meta AI icon and says “Ask Meta AI or search.” The icon as well as the tagline lets people know that they can use the search bar to access Meta AI in addition to searching for contacts, messages, and media. That’s not all though. The app now shows the Meta AI button at the top-right corner of the display. Once you click on it, the app will open the conversation with the chatbot.

Redesigned Search Bar For Meta AI In WhatsApp

Reportedly, WhatsApp is rolling out the redesigned search bar and the Meta AI button in many countries around the globe, including India. Unfortunately, there’s no information about the version of the app with which these changes are arriving. If you are on the beta channel, try updating the app to the latest version to enjoy the new features.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Computers

Review: DJI Avata 2 Drone

[ad_1]

If I need to stop suddenly, I can tap the brake button and it’ll bring the drone back to a safe hover. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible to crash, and I managed to bring the drone down once by steering it directly into the post of the aforementioned fence. It dropped about 8 feet onto the stones of a beach, but was fine to resume flying, without a visible mark on it. This thing is impeccably built, and while I don’t doubt repeated high-speed crashes will damage it eventually, it’s clearly designed to withstand some punishment.

But what of those mind-bending aerial stunts on YouTube? Sadly, you can’t really pull them off with the motion controller. The drawback to its user-friendly simplicity is that it doesn’t work in the same way as a twin-stick controller. Think of it as a controller with training wheels. If you stop flying—to dive for instance—it will eventually stop moving and hover in place. Clever, but limiting.

For those that want to graduate to trickier manual flight, DJI sells the $199 console-style Remote Controller 3, which allows you to fly the drone in manual mode. Here, the training wheels are off and the slightest error can result in an embarrassing and potentially costly crash. You can also perform incredible tricks, if you know how.

For me, who’s keen to return the Avata 2 sample back to DJI in one piece, the RC Motion 3 feels like enough for now. It’s allowed me to capture some wonderful footage using the Avata 2’s electronically stabilized camera, which records video at 4K/60 fps or 2.7K/120 fps. There’s also the option to use a 10-bit D Log M color profile for more postproduction color grading too. The drone comes with 46 GB of built-in storage for videos and 12 MP photos, plus a microSD slot for those requiring more space.

My First FPV

Ultimately, the Avata 2 is the latest in a long line of DJI drones that makes it easy for amateurs to achieve great results. In this case, it makes FPV flying incredibly simple and intuitive, and its camera allows you to create some thrilling, smoothly cinematic sequences with very little effort.

There’s also very little in the way of comparable products on the market, with most FPV drones being kits built by enthusiasts, rather than consumer-friendly designs. As a result, the main alternative to the Avata 2 is the original DJI Avata. And for those who own the first-generation model, I’d say, aside from the Goggles 3, which aren’t retro-compatible, the improvements here don’t really warrant an upgrade.

Goggle headset for controlling an aerial drone. Left Top view. Right top Back view. Right bottom Side view.

Photograph: DJI

But if you’re new to the FPV game, I strongly advise you to choose the latest version. It is only $179 more, but there are improvements across the board, with enhanced flight performance, longer flight time, intelligent flight modes, and advanced safety features. If you’re looking for a gateway to FPV fun, they don’t come any more accessible than the Avata 2.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Ransomware attack hits top chipmaker Nexperia, huge hoard of data set to be leaked

[ad_1]

Top chipmaker Nexperia suffered a ransomware attack last month which saw threat actors get away with a terabyte of sensitive corporate data. 

“Nexperia has become aware that an unauthorized third party accessed certain Nexperia IT servers in March 2024,” the company said in a statement shared with BleepingComputer. “We promptly took action and disconnected the affected systems from the internet to contain the incident and implemented extensive mitigation.”

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Entertainment

Google Nest Wi-Fi Pro 6E packs are up to $60 off

[ad_1]

A mesh router system can be a great option for those with a large home or those with multiple floors or walls in a row. They can help mitigate Wi-Fi dead zones and help make sure that you have internet coverage throughout your entire residence. The Google Nest Wi-Fi Pro 6E is one of our and our top pick for newcomers who want something that just works more or less out of the box. Right now, you can save on packs at Wellbots thanks to our exclusive discount code. A bundle of three nodes is with the code ENGADGET60. You’ll get free shipping too.

Google

The Google Nest Wi-Fi Pro 6E is our top pick for mesh router newcomers.

$400 at Wellbots

Each router can cover up to 2,200 square feet, so three of them can cover as much as 6,600 square feet — perhaps enough to reach the furthest edge of a large garden. If you don’t need quite that much coverage, you can opt for . That bundle typically costs $300, but by using the code ENGADGET50, you can save $50.

Wi-Fi 6E routers deliver speeds that are up to twice as fast as Wi-Fi 6. That’s because they use a newer and less-congested radio band that directs a signal along a more direct route to the most dependable internet connection — as long as the devices connecting to the network support Wi-Fi 6E too.

Google claims that it uses ongoing optimization and network performance analysis to minimize network congestion. The Nest Wi-Fi Pro will also be aware when you’re streaming video or on a video call, and it will you more bandwidth.

We gave the Nest Wi-Fi Pro 6E . While there are faster and more powerful Wi-Fi 6E mesh systems, Google’s offering is easy to set up and use. It also integrates with Google Assistant (and has support for Matter and Thread). So, if you’re already entrenched in the Google smart home ecosystem and have other compatible products, the Nest Wi-Fi Pro 6E might be a logical solution for you.

Follow @EngadgetDeals on Twitter and subscribe to the Engadget Deals newsletter for the latest tech deals and buying advice.



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Motorola’s new Moto Buds Plus offer Bose quality ANC and tuning for a budget price

[ad_1]

Motorola has launched two new wireless earbuds that bring Bose’s audio tuning and best-in-class active noise cancellation for very competitive prices. It’s calling the new earbuds: the Moto Buds and Moto Buds Plus. 

The Moto Buds Plus are the more attention-grabbing earbuds of the two, as they sport some impressive features that you’d find in the best wireless earbuds for a budget price of just £129 (roughly $160 and AU$250 but we have yet to get pricing for other regions). There’s hi-res audio support along with active noise cancellation and Dolby Atmos with Head Tracking tech to provide dynamic directional audio when listening to compatible continents.  

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

Structure peer review to make it more robust

[ad_1]

In February, I received two peer-review reports for a manuscript I’d submitted to a journal. One report contained 3 comments, the other 11. Apart from one point, all the feedback was different. It focused on expanding the discussion and some methodological details — there were no remarks about the study’s objectives, analyses or limitations.

My co-authors and I duly replied, working under two assumptions that are common in scholarly publishing: first, that anything the reviewers didn’t comment on they had found acceptable for publication; second, that they had the expertise to assess all aspects of our manuscript. But, as history has shown, those assumptions are not always accurate (see Lancet 396, 1056; 2020). And through the cracks, inaccurate, sloppy and falsified research can slip.

As co-editor-in-chief of the journal Research Integrity and Peer Review (an open-access journal published by BMC, which is part of Springer Nature), I’m invested in ensuring that the scholarly peer-review system is as trustworthy as possible. And I think that to be robust, peer review needs to be more structured. By that, I mean that journals should provide reviewers with a transparent set of questions to answer that focus on methodological, analytical and interpretative aspects of a paper.

For example, editors might ask peer reviewers to consider whether the methods are described in sufficient detail to allow another researcher to reproduce the work, whether extra statistical analyses are needed, and whether the authors’ interpretation of the results is supported by the data and the study methods. Should a reviewer find anything unsatisfactory, they should provide constructive criticism to the authors. And if reviewers lack the expertise to assess any part of the manuscript, they should be asked to declare this.

Other aspects of a study, such as novelty, potential impact, language and formatting, should be handled by editors, journal staff or even machines, reducing the workload for reviewers.

The list of questions reviewers will be asked should be published on the journal’s website, allowing authors to prepare their manuscripts with this process in mind. And, as others have argued before, review reports should be published in full. This would allow readers to judge for themselves how a paper was assessed, and would enable researchers to study peer-review practices.

To see how this works in practice, since 2022 I’ve been working with the publisher Elsevier on a pilot study of structured peer review in 23 of its journals, covering the health, life, physical and social sciences. The preliminary results indicate that, when guided by the same questions, reviewers made the same initial recommendation about whether to accept, revise or reject a paper 41% of the time, compared with 31% before these journals implemented structured peer review. Moreover, reviewers’ comments were in agreement about specific parts of a manuscript up to 72% of the time (M. Malički and B. Mehmani Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/mrdv; 2024). In my opinion, reaching such agreement is important for science, which proceeds mainly through consensus.

I invite editors and publishers to follow in our footsteps and experiment with structured peer reviews. Anyone can trial our template questions (see go.nature.com/4ab2ppc), or tailor them to suit specific fields or study types. For instance, mathematics journals might also ask whether referees agree with the logic or completeness of a proof. Some journals might ask reviewers if they have checked the raw data or the study code. Publications that employ editors who are less embedded in the research they handle than are academics might need to include questions about a paper’s novelty or impact.

Scientists can also use these questions, either as a checklist when writing papers or when they are reviewing for journals that don’t apply structured peer review.

Some journals — including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the PLOS family of journals, F1000 journals and some Springer Nature journals — already have their own sets of structured questions for peer reviewers. But, in general, these journals do not disclose the questions they ask, and do not make their questions consistent. This means that core peer-review checks are still not standardized, and reviewers are tasked with different questions when working for different journals.

Some might argue that, because different journals have different thresholds for publication, they should adhere to different standards of quality control. I disagree. Not every study is groundbreaking, but scientists should view quality control of the scientific literature in the same way as quality control in other sectors: as a way to ensure that a product is safe for use by the public. People should be able to see what types of check were done, and when, before an aeroplane was approved as safe for flying. We should apply the same rigour to scientific research.

Ultimately, I hope for a future in which all journals use the same core set of questions for specific study types and make all of their review reports public. I fear that a lack of standard practice in this area is delaying the progress of science.

Competing Interests

M.M. is co-editor-in-chief of the Research Integrity and Peer Review journal that publishes signed peer review reports alongside published articles. He is also the chair of the European Association of Science Editors Peer Review Committee.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Entertainment

Samsung is, once again, shipping the most phones in the world

[ad_1]

Samsung reportedly shipped 60.1 million smartphone units worldwide in Q1, representing 20.8 percent of the global market share — and first place. Meanwhile, Apple shipped 50.1 million units for 17.3 percent of the market share. Both companies, however, saw a decrease from Q1 2023. Apple saw an almost 10 percent drop, while Samsung’s hit was less than one percent.

Apple nudged Samsung out briefly in 2023, but it’s back to business as usual. The IDC’s takeaway is that the world of smartphones is strengthening (what does that mean?), with a boost to higher-priced phones—true for both Samsung and Apple.

Xiaomi rounded out the top five brands with 40.8 million units, Transsion with 28.5 million units and OPPO with 25.2 million units shipped. Never heard of Transsion? It’s a global smartphone powerhouse based in China, responsible for phone brands including Tecno, Itel and Infinix.

— Mat Smith

The biggest stories you might have missed

Rode’s $90 MagSafe mount lets you attach pro lights and mics to your iPhone

Threads is testing real-time search results

Tesla is reportedly laying off more than 10 percent of its workforce

​​You can get these reports delivered daily direct to your inbox. Subscribe right here!

Sonic 3 gets another actor.

TMATMA

Sega

Keanu Reeves will play the broody, tortured Shadow the Hedgehog. The antihero, both an arch-rival and an ally to Sonic, will be created by Jim Carrey’s Dr. Robotnik after the events of Sonic 2. Whoa.

Continue reading.

The social media app goes offline April 29.

Meta is shutting down Threads in Turkey on April 29 after an interim injunction from the Turkish Competition Authority (TCA) against automatic data sharing with Instagram. The TCA ruled that linking Threads and Instagram without user opt-in “will lead to irreparable harm” and that Meta “abused its dominant position” in the industry with the practice. This isn’t the first regulatory battle between Meta and Turkey. Back in 2022, the country fined Meta $18.6 million for sharing data across its apps.

Continue reading.

Dismantling an HDD in as little as eight seconds.

Garner Products’ DiskMantler uses a mix of shock, harmonics and vibration to shake apart a hard drive. The process loosens screws and other fasteners to free up parts like circuit boards, drive assemblies, actuators and rare-earth magnets. The process reportedly takes between eight and 90 seconds for most hard drives and around two minutes for welded helium drives. Only a fifth or so of the planet’s e-waste is recycled at the moment, so anything that can improve that share would be welcome.

Continue reading.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Business Industry

Vivo’s X100 Ultra to use Samsung’s upcoming 200MP HP9 camera

[ad_1]

Vivo’s current flagship smartphone, the X100 Pro, is one of the most advanced phones on the market. However, the company seems to working on offering something even better. Reportedly, Vivo is developing the X100 Ultra, a more advanced version of the X100 Pro, offering upgraded hardware, better specifications, and more features.

According to various reports, the X100 Ultra will feature four cameras at the rear instead of three on the X100 Pro. Interestingly, one of them will be a 200MP unit with a 35mm-equivalent focal length of 100mm (4.3x optical zoom over the primary camera). Seemingly, this is an upcoming camera sensor from Samsung with model number HP9, and it can be used as a primary as well as a secondary camera (with a telephoto or ultrawide lens).

Samsung ISOCELL HP9 In Vivo X100 Ultra

At the moment, there’s no information on the improvements the Samsung ISOCELL HP9 offers over the latest 200MP sensor from the South Korean tech giant, the ISOCELL HP2. The company offers three more 200MP camera sensors, HPX, HP1, and HP3. Could we see the upcoming sensor on the Galaxy S25 Ultra? Well, only time will tell.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

SoundMagic is back with E80D wired cheap USB-C earbuds – and there’s a DAC inside

[ad_1]

In tech, the terms “hotly anticipated” and “long-awaited” are often bandied around with little research into how invested anyone really is over the return of a brand or product. When it comes SoundMagic however, a wired in-ear homecoming is worthy of either phrase. 

Why? Because the 2018-issue SoundMagic E11C raised the affordable IEMs bar at the time, quickly becoming the audiophile-on-a-budget go-to. They’re still sitting pretty in our best wired headphones and best earbuds for small ears guides to this day – and the 2019 SoundMagic E11BT built on that, but without the wires. 

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

Obesity drugs aren’t always forever. What happens when you quit?

[ad_1]

Wegovy, Ozempic and similar weight-loss drugs have become some of the most popular medications in the world. But legions of people are also quitting them. About two-thirds of those in the United States who started taking a drug of this class, known as GLP-1 agonists, in 2021 had stopped using them within a year, according to an industry analysis.

Researchers and clinicians often view GLP-1 agonists as lifelong treatments. But myriad factors can force individuals off the medications. People might lose the means to pay for the costly drugs, experience brutal side effects, be affected by continuing shortages or be offered limited-term prescriptions. The UK National Health Service (NHS), for instance, provides only two years of coverage for people taking the drugs for weight loss.

As the number of people with obesity continues to rise — the World Health Organization estimates that more than one billion people, or one-eighth of the global population, now have obesity — researchers have been answering a few key questions about what happens when people stop taking these medications for weight management.

What happens to weight and health when people quit?

Ozempic and Wegovy are both brand names for the drug semaglutide, which has been prescribed for several years to treat type 2 diabetes (Ozempic) and, since 2021, to those who are overweight or have obesity (Wegovy). The treatment’s aim is to reduce the risk of health complications posed by a large amount of excess body fat, such as heart and liver disease and certain cancers. The drug curbs hunger and food intake by mimicking a hormone, released by the gut after eating, that affects brain regions involved in appetite and reward.

Research has shown what happens when people stop taking GLP-1 agonists. Many regain a substantial amount of what they lost with the help of the medications. The body naturally tries to stay around its own weight point, a pull that obesity specialist Arya Sharma likens to a taut rubber band.

If you take a medication to alter your biology, “the tension of the rubber band is a lot less”, he explains. “But when I take away the medication, that tension is going to come back,” says Sharma, who is based in Berlin and consults part-time for several companies that have an interest in obesity.

For instance, in a trial that studied the effects of withdrawing from the drug, about 800 participants were given weekly injections of semaglutide — as well as making dietary changes, doing exercise and receiving counselling — and lost, on average, 10.6% of their body weight in about 4 months1. Then, one-third of the participants were switched to placebo injections for nearly a year. Eleven months after the switch, those on the placebo had regained almost 7% of their body weight, whereas participants who kept taking semaglutide continued to lose weight. Similarly, participants in an extended semaglutide trial, who lost an average of 17.3% of their body weight after more than one year of receiving the drug and making lifestyle changes, regained about two-thirds of that lost weight after one year without any clinical-trial interventions2.

And an observational study posted in January found that of nearly 20,300 people in the United States and Lebanon who lost at least 2.3 kilograms using semaglutide and who later stopped taking the drug, 44% regained at least 25% of their lost weight after one year (see go.nature.com/3u7nxmj). The work was posted by Epic Research, a journal based in Verona, Wisconsin, that uses an electronic health-record database to rapidly share medical knowledge. The study has not been peer reviewed.

But weight wasn’t the only health risk factor that rebounded. In the withdrawal study1, those taking semaglutide beyond four months continued to lower their waist circumferences, says physician-scientist Fatima Cody Stanford at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, who consults for several companies developing anti-obesity medications. But “those switched to placebo start to regain in that central region, which is around the key organs where we develop issues like fatty liver disease”, she says.

Other metabolic problems, such as heart disease and insulin resistance, are also linked to excess body fat in the midsection: a larger waistline usually means excess visceral fat, which wraps around organs deep in the abdominal cavity and is more metabolically active than fat that sits under the skin. These health risks, too, can revert to previous levels once the drug is stopped. People who came off semaglutide in clinical trials1,2 often saw a rebound in blood pressure and levels of blood glucose and cholesterol, which had improved while on the medication. (However, some of those measures remained better than those of clinical-trial participants who had never received semaglutide.)

Some people who have lowered their weight with the medication can maintain their new physique through diet and exercise alone, says Sharma. However, these individuals are at high risk of weight rebound if they return to old habits or undergo a stressful situation, he adds.

Still, researchers say, it’s important to acknowledge that not everyone responds to GLP-1 agonists. In one clinical trial, nearly 14% of participants did not lose a clinically meaningful amount of body weight — at least 5% — after more than one year of taking semaglutide3. Some health guidelines recommend stopping the treatment if that threshold has not been met after taking the medication for a few months.

What’s making people stop?

It can be hard to keep taking the medications. Some people experience side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation, that are so extreme that they have to quit. Almost 75% of participants taking semaglutide in the aforementioned clinical trial3 experienced gastrointestinal distress, although most instances were considered mild to moderate. About 7% of participants on the drug quit the trial because of adverse events, gastrointestinal or otherwise.

The drug’s manufacturer, Novo Nordisk in Bagsværd, Denmark, has also had trouble keeping up with the demand for semaglutide. Since 2022, the company has announced shortages of both Wegovy and Ozempic; the latter is sometimes prescribed off-label for weight loss.

Some people lose health-insurance coverage for the drugs, leaving them the choice of paying pricey premiums or stopping the treatment, says clinician-scientist Jamy Ard at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston–Salem, North Carolina, who consults for and receives research funding from several companies that have obesity-drug-related programmes. Some of his patients, who paid for the drugs through their private health insurance, could no longer afford them when they retired and switched to the standard US federal health insurance for people aged 65 or older, which does not cover anti-obesity medications for weight-loss management. In the United States, Wegovy’s list price is US$1,350 for one month’s supply.

Ozempic injection pens move along a conveyor at the Novo Nordisk A/S production facilities in Hillerod, Denmark.

In some places, the availability of Wegovy and Ozempic has at times lagged behind demand.Credit: Carsten Snejbjerg/Bloomberg via Getty

And in the United Kingdom, where Wegovy was launched last September, those relying on the NHS for semaglutide treatment face a two-year time limit. Guidance issued last March by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) states that the time constraint comes from a lack of evidence for long-term use and limited access to specialized weight-management services.

That two-year rule “doesn’t make any clinical sense”, says clinician-researcher Alex Miras at Ulster University’s Derry–Londonderry Campus, UK, who receives research and financial support from several companies with an interest in obesity. But he acknowledges that the NICE decision came from cost-effectiveness calculations and the data the decision committee had at the time.

Semaglutide and other anti-obesity medications are available as NHS-funded treatments only at a tier of weight-care management that often requires hospital support and that typically lasts for only two years. Although Miras suspects that most doctors will abide by the time limit on semaglutide use, either to adhere strictly to NICE guidance or because of health-service capacity issues, some might make exceptions depending on disease severity.

Still, he urges the NHS to alter the system so that these medications are available at a lower tier of weight-management services, making the drugs accessible to community-level clinics and lowering the costs for the NHS.

As information about the use of GLP-1 agonists continues to come in, Miras hopes to see “changing policy and changing practice based on our learnings”.

What’s the best way to quit?

Treatment with a GLP-1 agonist requires starting with the smallest dose and gradually increasing the dosage over a few months. This escalating-dose schedule helps to minimize side effects. And, although physicians consider these drugs a lifelong treatment, there’s no biological harm in suddenly stopping.

“There’s not a withdrawal issue or anything like that, like other medications where you have to titrate off,” Stanford says. She advises people to inform their health-care providers of discontinued treatment so that they can keep medical records up to date.

But Ard has encountered anecdotal evidence that suggests otherwise. After quitting GLP-1 agonists, some people have reported higher levels of hunger than before they started treatment. Slowly tapering off the medication, rather than an abrupt stop, he says, “might help with decreasing that sense of rebound hunger”.

Sharma also recommends monitoring appetite and weight regained for those who willingly stop the drugs. “Don’t wait till you put 30 pounds back on,” he says. “If you stop and you regain five pounds, maybe that’s when you’ve got to jump back in.” Restarting the medication after time off does require working your way up from the smallest dose again, he says.

For people who have to stop taking GLP-1 agonists for the foreseeable future, continued dietary changes, exercise and mental-health counselling — which should already be in place while on the medication — are a must, Stanford says. People can also try anti-obesity medications that work in other ways, such as orlistat, which reduces how much dietary fat gets absorbed by the body.

But “by the time we’ve gotten to the GLPs, we’ve often unfortunately tried a lot of those”, Stanford says. Another option might be bariatric surgery.

One of the most common reasons that people stop taking their medications is that their weight plateaus, Sharma says, leading them to think that the drugs no longer work. He says that each person will respond to a dose in a different way, and that the dosage might need to be increased to lose more weight.

And many people want to stop once they have reached their goal weight, Ard says. Crossing that finish line gives a sense of completion, he says, especially because weight journeys celebrate milestones. But obesity is a chronic disease that requires lifelong maintenance, including medication, just like high blood pressure or heart disease do. “All we’ve done is modify their physiology,” he notes. “We haven’t cured the disease.”

So much work has gone into developing GLP-1 agonists and getting the medications to people who need them, Ard says. But “we need just as much — if not more — work to be done on what happens after people reach that goal in that weight-reduced state for the rest of their lives”

[ad_2]

Source Article Link