Boston Dynamics all but trade-marked jaw-dropping robot videos with its hydraulics-power Atlas robot’s dancing and parkouring videos. Now it’s upped the ante and I’m scraping my jaw off the floor again after watching the brief introduction video for its all-electric and completely redesigned Atlas robot.
The All New Atlas is Boston Dynamic’s first all-electric humanoid robot and the robotics firm claims it’s stronger and more agile than all previous iterations. What jumps out at me in the video, though, is the robot’s far more human-like body.
Where the hydraulics-based Atlas always looked charmingly like a mash-up between a line-backer and some scaffolding, the new Atlas is much more in the vein of Tesla’s Optimus, and Figure AI’s Figure 01, quickly shifting the legendary robotics company back into a pole position in the growing humanoid robotics race. What stuns here, though, is not just the robot’s looks, it’s how the New Atlas moves.
The clip starts with the new Atlas motionless and splayed out on the floor. It lifts its two legs up and rolls them back until they’re in a position no human who is not a contortionist could easily match. With both feet planted on the ground, the new Atlas rises up from the floor but with its chest, head, and legs facing away from the camera. First, the head, which has a circular glass panel for a face, spins around, and then each leg rotates at the hip to face the camera as Atlas effortlessly walks forward. Finally, the torso spins around under the head until the entire New Atlas is facing the camera.
As Boston Dynamics notes in the release, “Atlas may resemble a human form factor, but we are equipping the robot to move in the most efficient way possible to complete a task, rather than being constrained by a human range of motion. Atlas will move in ways that exceed human capabilities.”
Giving Atlas super-human capabilities that include more strength and the ability to move in ways we can’t is all about efficiency. Humans are constrained by their physiology in ways that robots don’t have to be. We joke about people “keeping their heads on a swivel” to remain aware of their environment, but robots can literally do this.
Boston Dynamics continues to focus on bi-pedal robots because it believes it’s a useful form factor in building robots to work “in a world designed for people.” It’s unclear if the shift to all-electric augurs a similar change for its popular SPOT robot (the one that looks a bit like a dog), which currently uses battery power and hydraulic actuators.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
Just the start
Even though Atlas now looks more human, it’s still a long way from commercial or consumer availability. Its initial test bed, according to Boston Dynamics, will be with company investor Hyundai. “In the months and years ahead, we’re excited to show what the world’s most dynamic humanoid robot can really do—in the lab, in the factory, and in our lives,” notes the company in the release.
On the back end, the New Atlas will be powered by, among other things, the company’s latest AI and machine learning. When it places robots in factories, Boston Dynamics ensures that the programming knows as much about the factory as possible so the robots can work independently and safely.
The dawn of a New Atlas does mean the sunsetting of the beloved hydraulic-based robot. Boston Dynamics gave the original Atlas a sweet sendoff with a video recounting its successes and numerous gaffes. For every time that Atlas successfully completed a parkour routine, it also tipped over, face-planted, and spectacularly burst a hydraulics line. The video is a funny and loving tribute to a robot that’s captured the imaginations of millions of viewers.
It’s a fitting way to end one chapter and launch this new one with the all-electric Atlas. Sure, we’ve only seen 30 seconds of movement, but I’m sure we’ll soon see this more personable robot dancing with SPOT, back-flipping off ledges, and parkouring its way into our hearts.
A cubic millimetre is a tiny volume — less than a teardrop. But a cubic millimetre of mouse brain is densely packed with tens of thousands of neurons and other cells in a staggeringly complex architectural weave.
Reconstructing such elaborate arrangements requires monumental effort, but the researchers affiliated with the Machine Intelligence from Cortical Networks (MICrONS) programme pulled it off. It took US$100 million and years of effort by more than 100 scientists, coordinated by 3 groups that had never collaborated before. There were weeks of all-nighters and a painstaking global proofreading effort that continues even now — for a volume that represents just 0.2% of the typical mouse brain. Despite the hurdles, the core of the project — conceived and funded by the US Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) — is complete.
Human brain mapping
The resulting package includes a high-resolution 3D electron microscopy reconstruction of the cells and organelles in two separate volumes of the mouse visual cortex, coupled with fluorescent imaging of neuronal activity from the same volumes. Even the coordinators of the MICrONS project, who describe IARPA’s assembly of the consortium as a ‘shotgun wedding’ of parallel research efforts, were pleasantly surprised by the outcome. “It formed this contiguous team, and we’ve been working extremely well together,” says Andreas Tolias, a systems neuroscientist who led the functional imaging effort at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. “It’s impressive.”
The MICrONS project is a milestone in the field of ‘connectomics’, which aims to unravel the synaptic-scale organization of the brain and chart the circuits that coordinate the organ’s many functions. The data from these first two volumes are already providing the neuroscience community with a valuable resource. But this work is also bringing scientists into strange and challenging new territory. “The main casualty of this information is understanding,” says Jeff Lichtman, a connectomics pioneer at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “The more we know, the harder it is to turn this into a simple, easy-to-understand model of how the brain works.”
Short circuits
There are many ways to look at the brain, but for connectivity researchers, electron microscopy has proved especially powerful.
In 1986, scientists at the University of Cambridge, UK, used serial-section electron microscopy to generate a complete map of the nervous system for the roundworm Caenorhabditiselegans1. That connectome was a landmark achievement in the history of biology. It required the arduous manual annotation and reconstruction of some 8,000 2D images, but yielded a Rosetta Stone for understanding the nervous system of this simple, but important, animal model.
The rise of digital twins
No comparable resource exists for more complex animals, but early forays into the rodent connectome have given hints of what such a map could reveal. Lichtman recalls the assembly he and his colleagues produced in 2015 from a 1,500-cubic-micron section of mouse neocortex — roughly one-millionth of the volume used in the MICrONS project2. “Most people were just shocked to see the density of wires all pushed together in any little part of brain,” he says.
Similarly, Moritz Helmstaedter, a connectomics researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research in Frankfurt, Germany, says that his team’s efforts3 in reconstructing a densely packed region of the mouse somatosensory cortex, which processes sensations related to touch, in 2019 challenged existing dogma — especially the assumption that neurons in the cortex are randomly wired. “We explicitly proved that wrong,” Helmstaedter says. “We found this extreme precision.” These and other studies have collectively helped to cement the importance of electron-microscopy-based circuit maps as a complement to techniques such as light microscopy and molecular methods.
Bigger and better
IARPA’s motivation for the MICrONS project was grounded in artificial intelligence. The goal was to generate a detailed connectomic map at the cubic-millimetre-scale, which could then be ‘reverse-engineered’ to identify architectural principles that might guide the development of biologically informed artificial neural networks.
Tolias, neuroscientist Sebastian Seung at Princeton University in New Jersey, and neurobiologist Clay Reid at the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle, Washington, had all applied independently for funding to contribute to separate elements of this programme. But IARPA’s programme officers elected to combine the 3 teams into a single consortium — including a broader network of collaborators — issuing $100 million in 2016 to support a 5-year effort.
A Martinotti cell, a small neuron with branching dendrites, with synaptic outputs highlighted.Credit: MICrONS Explorer
The MICrONS team selected two areas from the mouse visual cortex: the aforementioned cubic millimetre, and a much smaller volume that served as a pilot for the workflow. These were chosen so the team could investigate the interactions between disparate regions in the visual pathway, explains Tolias, who oversaw the brain-activity-imaging aspect of the work at Baylor. To achieve that, the researchers genetically engineered a mouse to express a calcium-sensitive ‘reporter gene’, which produces a fluorescent signal whenever a neuron or population of neurons fires. His team then assembled video footage of diverse realistic scenes, which the animal watched with each eye independently for two hours while a microscope tracked neuronal activity.
Probing fine-scale connections in the brain
The mouse was then shipped to Seattle for preparation and imaging of the relevant brain volumes — and the pressure kicked up another notch. Nuno da Costa, a neuroanatomist and associate investigator at the Allen Institute, says he and Tolias compressed their groups’ schedules to accommodate the final, time-consuming stage of digital reconstruction and analysis conducted by Seung’s group. “We really pushed ourselves to deliver — to fail as early as possible so we can course-correct in time,” da Costa says. This meant a race against the clock to excise the tissue, carve it into ultra-thin slices and then image the stained slices with a fleet of 5 electron microscopes. “We invested in this approach where we could buy very old machines, and really automate them to make them super-fast,” says da Costa. The researchers could thus maximize throughput and had backups should a microscope fail.
For phase one of the project, which involved reconstructing the smaller cortical volume, sectioning of the tissue came down to the heroic efforts of Agnes Bodor, a neuroscientist at the Allen Institute, who spent more than a month hand-collecting several thousand 40-nanometre-thick sections of tissue using a diamond-bladed instrument known as a microtome, da Costa says. That manual effort was untenable for the larger volume in phase two of the project, so the Allen team adopted an automated approach. Over 12 days of round-the-clock, supervised work, the team generated almost 28,000 sections containing more than 200,000 cells4. It took six months to image all those sections, yielding some 2 petabytes of data.
The Allen and Baylor teams also collaborated to link the fluorescently imaged cells with their counterparts in the reconstructed connectomic volume.
A network of thousands of individual neurons from a small subset of cells in the Machine Intelligence from Cortical Networks project data set.Credit: MICrONS Explorer
Throughout this process, the Allen team relayed its data sets to the team at Princeton University. Serial-section electron microscopy is a well-established technique, but assembly of the reconstructed volume entails considerable computational work. Images must be precisely aligned with one another while accounting for any preparation- or imaging-associated deformations, and then they are subjected to ‘segmentation’ to identify and annotate neurons, non-neuronal cells such as glia, organelles and other structures. “The revolutionary technology in MICrONS was image alignment,” Seung says. This part is crucial, because a misstep in the positioning of a single slice can derail the remainder of the reconstruction process. Manual curation would be entirely impractical at the cubic-millimetre scale. But through its work in phase one, the team developed a reconstruction workflow that could be scaled up for the larger brain volume, and continuing advances in deep-learning methods made it possible to automate key alignment steps.
To check the work, Sven Dorkenwald, who was a graduate student in Seung’s laboratory and is now a research fellow at the Allen Institute, developed a proofreading framework to refine the team’s reconstructions and ensure their biological fidelity. This approach, which verified the paths of neuronal processes through the connectome, carved the volumes into ‘supervoxels’ — 3D shapes that define segmented cellular or subcellular features, which can be rearranged to improve connectomic accuracy — and Dorkenwald says the final MICrONS data set had 112 billion of them. The system is analogous to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia in some ways, allowing many users to contribute edits in parallel while also logging the history of changes. But even crowdsourced proofreading is slow going — Dorkenwald estimates that each axon (the neuronal projections that transmit signals to other cells) in the MICrONS data set takes up to 50 hours to proofread.
Charting new territory
The MICrONS team published a summary5 of its phase one results in 2022. Much of its other early findings still await publication, including a detailed description of the work from phase two — although this is currently available as a preprint article4. But there are already some important demonstrations of what connectomics at this scale can deliver.
FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics
One MICrONS preprint, for example, describes what is perhaps the most comprehensive circuit map so far for a cortical column6, a layered arrangement of neurons that is thought to be the fundamental organizational unit of the cerebral cortex. The team’s reconstruction yielded a detailed census of all the different cell types residing in the column and revealed previously unknown patterns in how various subtypes of neuron connect with one another. “Inhibitory cells have this remarkable specificity towards some excitatory cell types, even when these excitatory cells are mixed together in the same layer,” says da Costa. Such insights could lead to more precise classification of the cells that boost or suppress circuit activity and reveal the underlying rules that guide the wiring of those circuits.
Crucially, says Tolias, the MICrONS project was about more than the connectome: “It was large-scale, functional imaging of the same mouse.” Much of his team’s work has focused on translating calcium reporter-based activity measurements into next-generation computational models. In 2023, the researchers posted a preprint that describes the creation of a deep-learning-based ‘digital twin’ on the basis of experimentally measured cortical responses to visual stimuli7. The predictions generated by this ‘twin’ can then be tested, further refining the model and enhancing its accuracy.
One surprising and valuable product of the MICrONS effort involves fruit flies. Early in the project, Seung’s team began exploring serial-section electron-microscopy data from the Drosophilamelanogaster brain produced by researchers at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Janelia Research Campus in Ashburn, Virginia8. “I realized that because we had developed this image-alignment technology, we had a chance to do something that people thought was impossible,” says Seung. His team — including Dorkenwald — used the Janelia data as a proving ground for the algorithms that had been developed for MICrONS. The result was the first complete assembly of the fruit-fly brain connectome — around 130,000 neurons in total9.
Given that the wiring of the nervous system is generally conserved across fruit flies, Dorkenwald is enthusiastic about how these data — which are publicly accessible at http://flywire.ai — could enable future experiments. “You can do functional imaging on a fly, and because you can find the same neurons over in the connectome, you will be able to do these functional-structure analyses,” he says.
The mouse connectome will not be so simple, because connectivity varies from individual to individual. But the MICrONS data are nevertheless valuable for the neuroscience community, says Helmstaedter, who was not part of the MICrONS project. “It’s great data, and it’s inspiring people just to go look at it and see it,” he says. There’s also the power of demonstrating what is possible, and how it could be done better. “You’ve got to do something brute force first to find out where you can make it easier the next round,” says Kristen Harris, a neuroscientist at the University of Texas at Austin. “And the act of doing it — just getting the job done — is just spectacular.”
Terra incognita
Even as analysis of the MICrONS data set proceeds, its limitations are already becoming clear. For one thing, volumes from other distinct cortical regions will be needed to identify features that are broadly observed throughout the brain versus those features that are distinct to the visual cortex. And many axons from this first cubic millimetre will inevitably connect to points unknown, Lichtman notes, limiting researchers’ ability to fully understand the structure and function of the circuits within it.
Scaling up will be even harder. Lichtman estimates that a whole-brain electron-microscopy reconstruction would produce roughly an exabyte of data, which is equivalent to a billion gigabytes and is 1,000 times greater than the petabytes of data produced by the MICrONS project. “This may be a ‘Mars shot’ — it’s really much harder than going to the Moon,” he says.
Still, the race is under way. One major effort is BRAIN CONNECTS, a project backed by the US National Institutes of Health with $150 million in funding, which is coordinated by multiple researchers, including Seung, da Costa and Lichtman. “We’re not delivering the whole mouse brain yet, but testing if it’s possible,” da Costa says. “Mitigating all the risks, bringing the cost down, and seeing if we can actually prepare a whole-mouse-brain or whole-hemisphere sample.”
In parallel, Lichtman is working with a team at Google Research in Mountain View, California, led by computer scientist Viren Jain — who collaborated with MICrONS and is also part of the BRAIN CONNECTS leadership team — to map sizable volumes of the human cortex using electron microscopy. They’ve already released data from their first cubic millimetre and have plans to begin charting other regions from people with various neurological conditions10.
NatureTech hub
These efforts will require improved tools. The serial-section electron-microscopy strategy that MICrONS used is too labour-intensive to use at larger scales and yields relatively low-quality data that are hard to analyse. But alternatives are emerging. For example, ‘block-face’ electron-microscopy methods, in which the sample is imaged as a solid volume and then gradually shaved away with a high-intensity ion-beam, require less work in terms of image alignment and can be applied to thick sections of tissue that are easier to manage. These methods can be combined with cutting-edge multi-beam scanning electron microscopes, which image specimens using up to 91 electron beams simultaneously, thus accelerating data collection. “That’s one of the leading contenders for scale up to a whole mouse brain,” says Seung, who will be working with Lichtman on this strategy.
Further automation and more artificial-intelligence tools will also be assets. Helmstaedter and his colleagues have been looking into ways to simplify image assembly with an automated segmentation algorithm called RoboEM, which traces neural processes with minimal human intervention and can potentially eliminate a lot of the current proofreading burden11. Still, higher-quality sample preparation and imaging are probably the true key to efficiency at scale, Helmstaedter says. “The better your data, the less you have to worry about automation.”
However they are generated, making sense of these connectome maps will take more than fancy technology. Tolias thinks “it will be almost impossible” to replicate the coupling of structure and activity produced by MICrONS at the whole-brain scale. But it’s also unclear whether that will be necessary and to what extent functional information can be inferred through a better understanding of brain structure and organization.
For Lichtman, the connectome’s value will ultimately transcend conventional hypothesis-driven science. A connectome “forces you to see things you weren’t looking for, and yet they’re staring you in the face”, he says. “I think if we do a whole mouse brain, there will be just an infinite number of ‘wow, really?’ discoveries.”
Tech company Western Digital breaks new ground as they have created the world’s first 4TB microSD card for laptops and cameras, the SanDisk Extreme PRO SDUC UHS-1 memory card. The company says the upcoming SanDisk model is set to release next year “and will be showcased at NAB 2024” in Las Vegas.
We can infer much about the upcoming card’s performance by looking at its name. UHS-1 refers to the Ultra High Speed-1 interface, which boasts a maximum data transfer rate of 104 MB/s, according to AnandTech. High transfer speeds don’t really matter to the average person, as slower cards can meet most people’s needs, but speed matters greatly to photographers.
Photographers who take a ton of pictures in rapid succession using a camera’s burst mode need SD cards that can keep up with them. Plus, the SanDisk 4TB card reportedly meets Video Speed Class V30, allowing it to support write speeds of 30MB/s. AnandTech states that level of speed is “good enough for 8K video recording.” If you’re going to shoot footage in 8K, you’ll need all the space you can get.
Speculation
Besides that, very little is known about the SanDisk 4TB card, but its name does offer more interesting tidbits. SDUC, for example, stands for Secure Digital Ultra Capacity, which is a storage standard enabling drives of up to a theoretical maximum of 128TB.
AnandTech speculates the device could “support the off-spec DDR200/DDR208 mode” to push transfer rates beyond what UHS-1 can do normally. Speeds can get as high as 170 MB/s, as seen with the SanDisk Extreme Pro SDXC 1TB card. We wouldn’t be surprised if this new card has the same level of performance, if not a better. Of course, that’s assuming Western Digital decides to implement it in the first place.
For what it’s worth, the 1TB Extreme Pro card retails for $140 on Amazon at the time of this writing. The 4TB SanDisk card will likely retail for several hundred dollars more.
Be sure to check out TechRadar’s list of the best SD cards for 2024. Spoiler alert: SanDisk shows up three times.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
The cost of ditching Windows 10 at your business and upgrading to the latest software might end up being a rather expensive process, Microsoft has revealed.
Microsoft is ending support for Windows 10 on October 14, 2025, with businesses then needing to pay out for its Extended Security Updates (ESU).
The company has now unveiled details on how much businesses will need to have to pay if they want to keep using Windows 10 after its official end of support deadline without being left open to security attacks.
Costly Windows 10 upgrade
In a blog post explaining the changes, Microsoft reminded businesses that will need to keep using Windows 10 after support ends that they will need to enroll those PCs in the ESU program.
There will be three paid options for businesses looking to extend their support, Microsoft said – the traditional 5-by-5 activation key method, a cloud-based activation method, and activation included with your Windows 365 subscription.
The former is the base license package, costing $61 per device for Year 1, with users simply downloading an activation key and applying it to whichever individual Windows 10 devices they have selected for the ESU program.
Companies will also be able to access ESU through their existing Windows 365 subscription at no extra cost, with devices automatically be activated to receive security updates without any additional steps.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Finally, Microsoft also has a “special offer” for organizations using a Microsoft cloud-based update management solution such as Microsoft Intune or Windows Autopatch, who can access a 25% discount, meaning their ESU will cost $45 per user for up to five devices for Year 1.
“ESUs allow you to receive critical and/or important security updates for Windows 10 PCs when you need extra time to move to Windows 11,” the company noted.
“Organizations that run legacy software are at a higher risk of security breaches and potential compliance violations. While Windows 10 PCs will continue to function after they reach end of support, they will no longer receive security updates, bug fixes, feature improvements, or security issue resolutions. Upgrading to Windows 11 or transitioning to a new Windows 11 PC will help you deliver the best, most secure computing experience to your employees—and help protect your organization.”
Ranga Dias, the physicist at the centre of the room-temperature superconductivity scandal, committed data fabrication, falsification and plagiarism, according to a investigation commissioned by his university. Nature’s news team discovered the bombshell investigation report in court documents.
The 10-month investigation, which concluded on 8 February, was carried out by an independent group of scientists recruited by the University of Rochester in New York. They examined 16 allegations against Dias and concluded that it was more likely than not that in each case, the physicist had committed scientific misconduct. The university is now attempting to fire Dias, who is a tenure-track faculty member at Rochester, before his contract expires at the end of the 2024–25 academic year.
Superconductivity scandal: the inside story of deception in a rising star’s physics lab
The investigation report (see Supplementary information) and numerous other documents came to light as the result of a lawsuit that Dias filed against the university in December last year. Dias submitted a grievance to Rochester over its decision to remove his students last August, but the university refused to hear the grievance on the grounds that it did “not relate to academic freedom”. The physicist’s lawsuit claims that this response was unreasonable. A university spokesperson declined to comment on the specifics of ongoing litigation and personnel matters, but emphasized that Rochester is “vigorously defending its course of action”.
In March, Nature’s news team uncovered details about how Dias distorted data to make claims about room-temperature superconductivity in two now-retracted papers published in Nature1,2, and how he manipulated his students to keep them in the dark about those data. (Nature’s news and journal teams are editorially independent.) Soon after, the Wall Street Journal reported that Rochester’s investigation found evidence of misconduct.
Now, Nature’s news team can reveal the details of that investigation. Documents filed by Rochester with the Monroe County Supreme Court show that the investigation was ordered by the National Science Foundation (NSF), a major funder of US academic research that in 2021 awarded Dias a prestigious US$790,000 CAREER grant. The NSF Office of Inspector General declined to comment to Nature’s news team on the investigation’s findings or the agency’s future actions.
The 124-page investigation report is a stunning account of Dias’s deceit across the two Nature papers, as well as two other now-retracted papers — one in Chemical Communications3 and one in Physical Review Letters (PRL)4. In the two Nature papers, Dias claimed to have discovered room-temperature superconductivity — zero electrical resistance at ambient temperatures — first in a compound made of carbon, sulfur and hydrogen (CSH)1 and then in a compound eventually found to be made of lutetium and hydrogen (LuH)2.
Capping years of allegations and analyses, the report methodically documents how Dias deliberately misled his co-authors, journal editors and the scientific community. A university spokesperson described the investigation as “a fair and thorough process,” which reached the correct conclusion.
Dias did not respond to requests for comment. His lawyer referred Nature’s news team to documents filed with the lawsuit. In one of those, Dias said: “It is imperative to reassert the foundational integrity and scientific validity of our work amidst the criticisms and accusations.”
A trio of inquiries
The NSF-ordered investigation wasn’t the first time Rochester examined possible problems in Dias’s laboratory. Between 2021 and 2022, the university conducted three preliminary ‘inquiries’ into the CSH Nature paper1 — some details of which are now revealed by the investigation report. Any of the inquiries could have decided that a full misconduct investigation was warranted, but none of them did.
The first inquiry was initiated after Jorge Hirsch, a condensed-matter theorist at the University of California, San Diego, sent complaints to Rochester. The university asked three unnamed internal reviewers, and Dias contacted one external reviewer to examine Hirsch’s claims. Information in the report suggests that the external reviewer is Maddury Somayazulu, a physicist at Argonne National Laboratory in Lemont, Illinois.
Hirsch alleged that there were problems with the paper’s magnetic susceptibility data — evidence crucial to Dias’s claim that CSH is a room-temperature superconductor. The inquiry came to the conclusion on 19 January 2022 that there was “no credible evidence to warrant further investigation”.
Students on campus at the University of Rochester in New York.Credit: Libby March/Bloomberg via Getty
The second inquiry was prompted by Dirk van der Marel, editor-in-chief of Physica C, a journal for superconductivity research. Van der Marel sent Rochester his own concerns about the same CSH data on 20 January 2022 — just a day after the first inquiry ended. Another reviewer took up the case and judged no formal investigation was warranted on 6 April of that year. Their work was checked by a second reviewer, who appears to be Russell Hemley, a physicist at the University of Illinois Chicago, based on identifying information in the report. Although the reviewers did not support an investigation, they said that the paper was “verging on misleading due to omission of details”. They recommended that an erratum be applied (none was).
Rochester’s investigation notes that two reviewers — apparently Somayazulu and Hemley — have collaborated with Dias on several papers, including a study5 in 2021 about the properties of CSH. Rochester’s academic misconduct policy states that “no individual who has an unresolved personal, professional or financial conflict of interest … should participate in the proceedings” of an inquiry.
A spokesperson for Argonne denied that Somayazulu was an inquiry reviewer, but did not respond when asked why a footnote in the investigation refers to “Report of Somayazulu_Review of NSF 2020 (CSH) Paper”. Hemley did not clarify whether he was an inquiry reviewer.
Nature‘s journals team conducted its own investigation into the CSH paper using independent reviewers, two of whom found evidence that the magnetic susceptibility data were probably fabricated. When the journal indicated that it would retract the CSH paper, and in response to another complaint from Hirsch, the university conducted a third inquiry. Despite having access to Nature’s findings, the single reviewer assigned to this inquiry — the same anonymous reviewer from the second inquiry — concluded on 19 October 2022 that any oddities in the data could be attributed to how they were processed, and that no investigation was needed.
Rochester’s inquiries “should be ‘Exhibit A’ about how not to run one of these things,” says Peter Armitage, a condensed-matter experimentalist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.
Under investigation
Rochester was finally forced to launch a full investigation to determine misconduct by the NSF. In October 2022, James Hamlin, a physicist at the University of Florida in Gainesville, submitted concerns about Dias’s work to the NSF. These included “data discrepancies that cannot be attributed to data processing”, according to a 16 March 2023 letter from the NSF to Stephen Dewhurst, the then-interim vice-president for research at Rochester.
Within weeks, Dewhurst assembled a committee of three physicists external to Rochester “to ensure that this investigation would be credible”: Marius Millot and Peter Celliers, both at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California; and Marcus Knudson, at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by embattled physicist
Nature’s news team asked several superconductivity researchers to review the investigation report. At first, they were concerned by the university’s choice of committee members. The three physicists are specialists in shock-wave physics, not in superconductivity. Millot and Celliers were also co-authors with Dias on a 27-author review paper published earlier this year6.
However, those doubts evaporated when the researchers read the report. “I couldn’t help but be incredibly impressed,” Armitage says. Paul Canfield, a physicist at Iowa State University in Ames, says: “There should be a good German word that’s 50 letters long and is simultaneously ‘impressive’ and ‘depressing’” to describe the report. Brad Ramshaw, a physicist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, concurs. “This is a great sacrifice of their time,” he says. “The whole community should be grateful that we have colleagues who are willing to go to these lengths.”
The three investigators did not respond to requests for comment.
The investigation committee secured records, including data on computer hard drives, e-mails and physical notebooks, in the course of their work. They also conducted interviews with 10 individuals connected with the case, including Dias and some of his former students, and met at least 50 times to deliberate.
‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction imminent for controversial physicist
Notably, the investigators confirmed previous analyses by van der Marel, Hirsch, Hamlin and Ramshaw — all of whom found apparent evidence that Dias fabricated magnetic susceptibility data in the CSH paper.
The report clarifies the extent of this misconduct: first Dias fabricated CSH data and published it. Then, when its origins came under scrutiny, Dias and his collaborator and co-author Ashkan Salamat, a physicist at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), released a set of fabricated raw data.
Questions about discrepancies between the raw and the published data continued to mount, so Dias crafted an explanation — he claimed to have used an elaborate data-processing method for the published data. This provided “a veneer of plausibility, by focusing critics’ attention on background subtraction methods” instead of on the raw data, the investigation committee wrote.
Salamat did not respond to a request for comment.
Fact finding
At any time throughout the investigation, Dias could have dispelled many allegations if he had provided genuine raw data — data taken directly from a measuring instrument and containing details such as timestamps. “The absence of certain raw data files does not inherently indicate their non-existence or suggest any misconduct on my part,” Dias wrote in response to the investigation findings. Yet he promised to deliver raw data multiple times and never did, according to the report.
In several instances, the investigation found, Dias intentionally misled his team members and collaborators about the origins of data. Through interviews, the investigators worked out that Dias had told his partners at UNLV that measurements were taken at Rochester, but had told researchers at Rochester that they were taken at UNLV.
Dias also lied to journals. In the case of the retracted PRL paper4 — which was about the electrical properties of manganese disulfide (MnS2) — the journal conducted its own investigation and concluded that there was apparent fabrication and “a deliberate attempt to obstruct the investigation” by providing reviewers with manipulated data rather than raw data. The investigators commissioned by Rochester confirmed the journal’s findings that Dias had taken electrical resistance data on germanium tetraselenide from his own PhD thesis and passed these data off as coming from MnS2 — a completely different material with different properties (see ‘Odd similarity’). When questioned about this by the investigators, Dias sent them the same manipulated data that was sent to PRL.
Source: James Hamlin
How exactly Dias distorted data was clearest in the report’s findings about the LuH paper2. With the aid of Dias’s former students, the investigation committee pinpointed raw data on the lab’s hard drives. These data showed that Dias frequently made selective omissions to conceal “erratic drops and jumps in the resistance data, the presence of which would undermine the claim of superconducting behavior in LuH”, the investigation committee wrote.
Dias, the investigation committee found, “repeatedly lied” about data during Nature’s review of the paper after concerns came to light. But perhaps the most egregious instance of misconduct, which the report refers to as involving “profuse manipulations” of data, occurred when Dias inverted a set of LuH data so that it demonstrated the Meissner effect — a sharp change in the magnetic properties of a material that is a hallmark of superconductivity. On 27 August 2022, Sachith Dissanayake, a co-author who was then a faculty member working with Dias at Rochester, explained to Dias that the data had been improperly manipulated, but Dias ignored the warning, according to the report. In his response to the report, Dias claimed Dissanayake misunderstood the data. Dissanayake did not respond to a request for comment.
These manipulated data were key to the LuH paper’s acceptance. And the investigation committee concluded that Dias fabricated data “to convince Nature editors and pre-publication referees that LuH exhibits superconductivity at room temperature”.
Previous stories in Physics Magazine and Science reported allegations of serial plagiarism by Dias, including that he copied more than 20% of his 2013 thesis from other sources. The Rochester investigators uncovered another, more recent instance: on 30 July 2020, researchers, including Dias’s colleagues at Rochester, submitted a scientific manuscript7 to the preprint server arXiv. Twelve days later, Dias submitted an NSF grant proposal that included paragraphs copied from that manuscript, as well as two identical figures. That proposal later won Dias the CAREER grant from the agency. In his response to the investigation, Dias admits to “instances where references are inadvertently missed”.
Closing arguments
The investigation committee sent Dias a draft copy of its report on 22 December last year. In a two-part response totalling hundreds of pages, which was revealed in the lawsuit, Dias attacks the expertise and integrity of the investigators. The physicist asserts that the investigators’ approach displays “traits that could sometimes be seen in the realm of conspiracy theories” and that it is “lacking a robust logical foundation”. Dias also claims that Salamat convinced Dias’s former students to oppose him when they sent a letter to Nature asking to retract the LuH paper. The opposite is true: Nature’s news team previously reported that it was the students who initiated the letter.
Why superconductor research is in a ‘golden age’ — despite controversy
Nowhere in the response does Dias provide the raw data requested by the committee. In their final report, the investigators respond to Dias’s accusations, saying that the “invocation of baroque explanations to interpret, and therefore justify, the omission of these data does not alter the Investigation Committee’s reasoning or findings”.
Ultimately, the committee found that the Rochester students and Dissanayake were not culpable, but victims. The committee did not have access to resources at UNLV to clear those researchers, including Salamat, from blame, but it concluded that those parties too were deceived, and did not find “substantial evidence of wrongdoing”.
As a result, the investigators recommended that Dias should not be permitted to teach or to carry out public or privately funded research. They added: “Evidence uncovered in this investigation shows that [Dias] cannot be trusted”.
The way that users get information from the web has evolved over the years. People used to rely on news sites and Google to keep abreast of what was going on in the world, but then Twitter arrived and cemented itself as an alternative (and often inaccurate) source of news. Although it’s facing the threat of being banned in the US, TikTok has become a major source of information for younger users, and AI chatbots have really come into their own as a valuable tool for delivering tailored, instant information.
The rise of voice-activated AI assistants like Amazon‘s Alexa and Google Assistant has also revolutionized the way we access information, allowing users to simply ask for what they want to know, rather than having to search for it manually. However, with this evolution comes the responsibility of discerning reliable sources from misinformation, a skill that is becoming increasingly important in the AI age.
Recent surveys by Applause and Forrester indicate a significant shift in consumer behavior, with users increasingly favoring AI chatbots over traditional search engines for both research and basic queries.
Similar findings
Applause‘s 2024 Generative AI Survey reveals that 91% of respondents use chatbots for research, and 81% prefer them over search engines for basic queries. However, as is perhaps to be expected, concerns about data privacy, bias, and performance persist.
Applause found ChatGPT is the most popular chatbot, used by 91% of users, ahead of Google Gemini (63%) and Microsoft Copilot (55%). Despite worries about providing private information to chatbots, with 89% of respondents expressing concern, the practical applications of Gen AI are now widely acknowledged. However, only 19% of users believe that chatbots understand their prompts every time, indicating room for improvement.
Forrester‘s State of Consumer Usage of Generative AI 2024 echoes these findings, noting that GenAI has made AI more visible in consumers’ daily lives. While companies race to incorporate AI, consumer adoption is still in its infancy due to concerns about its ethical implications. The report also highlights the demographic differences in GenAI adoption, with younger, male, and more highly educated consumers more likely to have used the technology. The report states that almost half of Millennial and Gen Z adults in the US, UK and France have used GenAI, compared with only 12% of Baby Boomers.
Forrester also found 34% of US consumers used GenAI, compared to 27% in the UK and 25% in France.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Work still needed
Despite widespread concerns, the benefit of GenAI is widely recognized. Among online adults who had heard of GenAI, 50% agreed that it would make it easier to find information online. However, 45% agreed that GenAI posed a serious threat to society, indicating a split in consumer attitudes towards the technology.
The surveys reveal that the golden era of search engines might be coming to an end, as consumers increasingly turn towards AI chatbots for their information needs. However, as Chris Sheehan, SVP Strategic Accounts and AI at Applause sums up, “Chatbots are getting better at dealing with toxicity, bias and inaccuracy – however, concerns still remain. Not surprisingly, switching between chatbots to accomplish different tasks is common, while multimodal capabilities are now table stakes. To gain further adoption, chatbots need to continue to train models on quality data in specific domains and thoroughly test across a diverse user base to drive down toxicity and inaccuracy.”
Samsung has revealed it expects to triple its HBM chip production this year.
“Following the third-generation HBM2E and fourth-generation HBM3, which are already in mass production, we plan to produce the 12-layer fifth-generation HBM and 32 gigabit-based 128 GB DDR5 products in large quantities in the first half of the year,” SangJoon Hwang, EVP and Head of DRAM Product and Technology Team at Samsung said during a speech at Memcon 2024.
“With these products, we expect to enhance our presence in high-performance, high-capacity memory in the AI era.”
Snowbolt
Samsung plans a 2.9-fold increase in HBM chip production volume this year, up from the 2.5-fold projection previously announced at CES 2024. The company also shared a roadmap detailing its future HBM production, projecting a 13.8-fold surge in HBM shipments by 2026 compared to 2023.
Samsung used Memcon 2024 to showcase its HBM3E 12H chip – the industry’s first 12-stack HBM3E DRAM – which is currently being sampled with customers. This will follow Micron’s 24GB 8H HBM3E into mass production in the coming months.
According to The Korea Economic Daily, Samsung also spoke of its plans for HBM4 and its sixth-generation HBM chip which the company has named “Snowbolt,”. Samsung says it intends to apply the buffer die, a control device, to the bottom layer of stacked memory for enhanced efficiency. It didn’t provide any information on when that future generation of HBM will see the light of day, however.
Despite being the world’s largest memory chipmaker, Samsung has lagged behind archrival SK Hynix in the HBM chip segment, forcing it to invest heavily to boost production of what is a crucial component in the escalating AI race due to its superior processing speed.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
SK Hynix isn’t going to make things easy for Samsung however. The world’s second largest memory chip maker recently announced plans to build the largest chip production facility ever seen at Yongin Semiconductor Cluster in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea.
A first look at iOS 18’s rumored visionOS-style redesign may have been revealed by a new image of the Camera app.
Alleged iOS 18 design resource.
MacRumors received the above iPhone frame template from an anonymous source who claims they obtained it from an iOS engineer. It will allegedly be included as part of the Apple Design Resources for iOS 18, which helps developers visually design apps using software like Sketch and Photoshop. We cannot attest to the authenticity of the image, but believe it is worth sharing because it is consistent with previous rumors.
In February, Israeli website The Verifier claimed that iOS 18 and iPadOS 18 will feature visionOS-inspired design elements. The Vision Pro headset’s OS features a high level of depth translucency with glass-like buttons that have reflective edges.
visionOS design elements.
For example, the Apple TV app on iPadOS 18 will apparently feature the same translucent navigation bar that was introduced in the tvOS 17.2 version of the app last year. The design of this menu has clear similarities to visionOS. Apple also plans to redesign various other system menus and built-in apps on iOS 18, including Safari, according to the report.
The Verifier has a mixed track record with Apple rumors over the years, but Bloomberg‘s Mark Gurman subsequently said that Apple is working to update the design of iOS as “early as this year.” He agreed that iOS could take some design cues from visionOS going forward, but Gurman does not expect a “total overhaul that mirrors visionOS.” The extent of the potential redesign is therefore still unknown.
While Gurman implied that the redesign may not emerge this year, he was more firm about iOS 18 being redesigned in a November edition of his newsletter, when he said Apple’s senior management had described iOS 18 as “ambitious and compelling,” with “major new features and designs.”
The purported iOS 18 Camera app design resource seemingly lines up with these reports, showing a substantial rethinking of Apple’s visual elements in line with visionOS, but it may not be legitimate. Apple is expected to preview iOS 18 at its annual developers conference WWDC on June 10. The first beta should be available shortly after the announcement. The update should be released to all users in September alongside the iPhone 16 lineup. For more details about the upcoming software update, see our comprehensive iOS 18 roundup.
Apple’s WWDC 2024 dates have been announced, giving us timing for the unveiling of the company’s next round of major operating system updates and likely some other announcements. This week also saw some disappointing news on the iPad front, with update timing for the iPad Pro and iPad Air pushed back from previous rumors. We did hear some new tidbits about what might be coming in iOS 18 and…
Apple will introduce new iPad Pro and iPad Air models in early May, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. Gurman previously suggested the new iPads would come out in March, and then April, but the timeline has been pushed back once again. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Apple is working on updates to both the iPad Pro and iPad Air models. The iPad Pro models will…
Apple today added a handful of devices to its public-facing vintage and obsolete products list, including some older iPhone and iPad models. Apple now considers the iPhone 6 Plus to be “obsolete” worldwide, meaning that Apple Stores and Apple Authorized Service Providers no longer offer repairs or other hardware service for the device. Apple says it considers a product “obsolete” once seven…
Apple has yet to release the first beta of iOS 17.5 for the iPhone, but two changes are already expected with the upcoming software update. iOS 17.5 will likely allow iPhone users in the EU to download apps directly from the websites of eligible developers, and the update might include some changes to how Apple ID recovery contacts work. More details about these potential changes follow. W…
Thieves in Montreal, Canada have been using Apple’s AirTags to facilitate vehicle theft, according to a report from Vermont news sites WCAX and NBC5 (via 9to5Mac). Police officers in Burlington, Vermont have issued a warning about AirTags for drivers who recently visited Canada. Two Burlington residents found Apple AirTags in their vehicles after returning from trips to Montreal, and these…
Nearly one year after it launched in the U.S., the Apple Card’s high-yield savings account will be receiving its first-ever interest rate decrease. Starting on April 3, the Apple Card savings account’s annual percentage yield (APY) will be lowered to 4.4%, according to data on Apple’s backend discovered by MacRumors contributor Aaron Perris. The account currently has a 4.5% APY. 4.4% will …
In November, Apple announced that the iPhone would support the cross-platform messaging standard RCS (Rich Communication Services) in the Messages app starting “later” in 2024, and Google has now revealed a more narrow timeframe. In a since-deleted section of the revamped Google Messages web page, spotted by 9to5Google, Google said that Apple would be adopting RCS on the iPhone in the “fall…
In November 2023, Apple announced that it would bring Rich Communications Service (RCS) to iPhones “later next year,” suggesting that the new messaging standard would arrive in iOS with iOS 18. However, the company hasn’t offered any update on the matter since then, and as such, there was no information available on the exact timeframe for the arrival of the new feature to iOS. Fortunately, that’s changing today.
While Apple hasn’t offered an update on the arrival of RCS in iOS, surprisingly, Google has. According to the landing page of Google Messages on the Android website, RCS is coming to iOS in the fall of 2024 (via 9To5Google). The website says “Apple has announced it will be adopting RCS in the fall of 2024. Once that happens, it will mean a better messaging experience for everyone.”
That means we are only 6-9 months away from seeing RCS on the iPhone. Once that happens, Android users will be able to chat with iPhone users using Google Messages or Samsung Messages and enjoy many features, including typing indicators, quote replies, and message reactions, without using a third-party application, which is currently available only between iPhone-to-iPhone and Android-to-Android chats.
In November, Apple announced that the iPhone would support the cross-platform messaging standard RCS (Rich Communication Services) in the Messages app starting “later” in 2024, and Google has since revealed a more narrow timeframe.
In a since-deleted section of the revamped Google Messages web page, spotted by 9to5Google, Google said that Apple would be adopting RCS on the iPhone in the “fall of 2024.” This timeframe suggests that RCS support will be added to the iPhone with iOS 18, which should be available in beta in June and released in September. At the latest, support should be added in iOS 18.1, which is likely to be released in October.
RCS support should result in the following improvements in the Messages app for conversations between iPhones and Android smartphones:
Higher-resolution photos and videos
Audio messages
Typing indicators
Read receipts
Wi-Fi messaging
Improved group chats, including the ability for iPhone users to leave a conversation that includes Android users
These modern features are already available for iMessage, and in many third-party messaging apps, such as WhatsApp and Telegram. RCS support on the iPhone will extend the features to green bubbles in the Messages app.
Phishing attacks taking advantage of Apple’s password reset feature have become increasingly common, according to a report from KrebsOnSecurity. Multiple Apple users have been targeted in an attack that bombards them with an endless stream of notifications or multi-factor authentication (MFA) messages in an attempt to cause panic so they’ll respond favorably to social engineering. An…
Apple will introduce new iPad Pro and iPad Air models in early May, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. Gurman previously suggested the new iPads would come out in March, and then April, but the timeline has been pushed back once again. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Apple is working on updates to both the iPad Pro and iPad Air models. The iPad Pro models will…
At least some Apple software engineers continue to believe that iOS 18 will be the “biggest” update in the iPhone’s history, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. Below, we recap rumored features and changes for the iPhone. “The iOS 18 update is expected to be the most ambitious overhaul of the iPhone’s software in its history, according to people working on the upgrade,” wrote Gurman, in a r…
Apple today announced that its 35th annual Worldwide Developers Conference is set to take place from Monday, June 10 to Friday, June 14. As with WWDC events since 2020, WWDC 2024 will be an online event that is open to all developers at no cost. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. WWDC 2024 will include online sessions and labs so that developers can learn about new…
Apple may be planning to add support for “custom routes” in Apple Maps in iOS 18, according to code reviewed by MacRumors. Apple Maps does not currently offer a way to input self-selected routes, with Maps users limited to Apple’s pre-selected options, but that may change in iOS 18. Apple has pushed an iOS 18 file to its maps backend labeled “CustomRouteCreation.” While not much is revealed…
Apple on late Tuesday released revised versions of iOS 17.4.1 and iPadOS 17.4.1 with an updated build number of 21E237, according to MacRumors contributor Aaron Perris. The updates previously had a build number of 21E236. The revised updates are available for all iPhone and iPad models that are compatible with iOS 17 and iPadOS 17, but they can only be installed via the Finder app on macOS…
With the App Store and app ecosystem undergoing major changes in the European Union, The Wall Street Journal today shared a profile on App Store chief Phil Schiller, who is responsible for the App Store. Though Schiller transitioned from marketing chief to “Apple Fellow” in 2020 to take a step back from Apple and spend more time on personal projects and friends, he is reportedly working…