Categories
Life Style

Las estrellas de “Industry” Mihala y Marissa Abella interrumpen la gran pelea entre Harper y Jasmine

[ad_1]

industria tercera temporadaEl episodio seis termina no solo con una explosión, sino con una explosión total entre Yasmine Cara Hanane (Marisa Abella) y Harper Stern (Mihala).

La historia comienza cuando Yasmine se da cuenta de que Harper se ha aprovechado de ella en sus intentos de reducir su participación en el banco de inversión Pierpoint, pero es mucho más que eso. Yasmine no puede aceptar el hecho de que Harper, quien la ayudó a encubrir su participación en la muerte de su padre depredador, Charles (Adam Levy), se aprovechó de ella de esta manera: ¡el día que Yasmine identificó su cuerpo, nada menos!

La lucha que siguió fue extremadamente intensa: no quedó ningún insulto sin decir ni piedra sin remover. Jasmine ataca a Harper por explotar su dolor, llamándola narcisista y metiéndose en sus heridas más profundas, como su relación con su hermano separado. Harper responde con su propio fuego. Le recuerda a Jasmine lo ordinaria que es sin el barniz de privilegio que la proteja. Más tarde, en un eco de la discusión final entre Charles y Yasmine, ella la llama puta.

“No hay forma de que se recuperen de esto”.

-Mihala

“Realmente pensé: 'Este es el final para ellos'”, le dijo Mihala a Mashable sobre su primera reacción al leer el argumento. “No hay manera de que puedan volver de esto”.

Hablando con Mashable en una llamada conjunta de Zoom, la dinámica de Myha'la y Abela estaba lejos de ser enemigos espinosos. industria Los espectadores han llegado a conocer a Harper y Jasmine. Son el epítome de la tranquilidad, el tipo de comodidad que se obtiene al trabajar en estrecha colaboración durante cinco años. Dado que Harper y Jasmine comparten menos escenas esta temporada, debido a que Harper ya no trabaja en Pierpoint, coinciden en que estaban entusiasmados por la oportunidad de tener esta conversación seria.

“Puede que haya algunos episodios más [this season] “No hay interacción entre los dos personajes”, dijo Abella. “Entonces, cuando tenemos esos momentos, también hay una cierta cantidad de adrenalina. Ya sabes, 'Estoy emocionado de hacer esta escena'.

Mihala añadió: “Más que nada, vivimos para esos momentos. Los actores dicen: 'Finalmente podré permitirme esto y ser asqueroso'. Siento que todos han estado esperando este momento”. [between Yasmin and Harper]”Lo prueban al final de la temporada 1. Pero eso no es nada comparado con lo que obtienen en esa escena”.

La escena es la culminación de la tensión que se ha ido acumulando a lo largo de tres temporadas entre estos personajes, con todo, desde problemas de clase hasta el triángulo amoroso siempre latente entre Harper y Jasmine. Robert Spearing (Harry Luty) Finalmente, el espectáculo va con fuerza. “Gran parte del programa es subtexto, por lo que es fantástico cuando el subtexto se convierte en texto”. industria “De repente, no hay más mentiras en esa escena”, dijo el cocreador de la serie Conrad Kaye a Mashable en una llamada separada con el cocreador de la serie Mickey Down. “No hay más evasión”.

Harper y Jasmine están conversando en la mesa de un café al aire libre.

Mihala y Marissa Abella en “Industria”.
Copyright: Nick Strasburg/HBO

Como muestra cada gramo de resentimiento y enojo de Jasmine y Harper, los dos continúan intercambiando insultos en un intento desesperado de demostrar que no les importa lo que diga o haga la otra parte. Pero, por supuesto, les importa lo que la otra parte dice o hace, y comprender este dolor fue clave para que Mihala y Abela comprendieran la escena.

Noticias destacadas sobre Mashable

“Tuvimos conversaciones con Mikey y Conrad sobre lo que les dolió específicamente de lo que pasó”, dijo Abella. “Es algo muy personal cuando hablas de cómo alguien te lastimó y nos permite desarrollarnos con estos personajes tanto como podamos. Lo sabemos mejor que nadie”. “¿Qué le gusta a Jasmine de la relación con Harper y por qué se siente como una traición?”

Otro tema de conversación entre los actores y productores fue el doble golpe que terminó la escena, cuando Yasmine abofeteó a Harper y Harper le devolvió el golpe. Originalmente, Harper no iba a abofetear a Yasmine, pero Mihala insistió en que le devolvió el golpe.

“Pensé: 'No hay manera de que esta perra pueda ponerme las manos encima y yo no le devolveré el golpe'”, se rió Mihala.

Ella continuó: “Estaba muy agradecida de que Mickie y Conrad me dejaran hacerlo, porque fue una conversación seria que duró unos días y en la que dije: 'Chicos, por favor, sólo quiero abofetearla'. Por favor”. Hay mucha cultura en ello. Porque alzamos la voz y decimos las peores cosas, pero una vez que se rompe la barrera física, levantamos las manos. Punto. Honestamente. Y si se supone que Harper es de Nueva York, ¿De qué estamos hablando?”

Sin embargo, las dobles bofetadas constituyen un argumento sólido. industria La intensidad de la escena va un paso más allá al terminar el episodio con un flashback de Harper y Jasmine en las horas posteriores a la muerte de Charles. Harper consuela a Jasmine entre lágrimas y los dos se ríen a expensas de Charles. Cuando Harper rodea a Yasmine con su brazo, vemos a este dúo en su punto más cercano, pero sabemos que solo faltan unos meses para la tragedia. Es un eco desgarrador del comienzo del episodio, donde vemos a Harper cubrir a Jasmine sin dudarlo un segundo.

Harper y Yasmine en la cubierta del yate.

Mihala y Marissa Abella en “Industria”.
Copyright: Nick Strasburg/HBO

“El episodio final trata sobre cómo llevamos a Harper y Jasmine al fondo de su relación, donde se abofetean”, le dijo Dawn a Mashable. “Este es el final para ellos en términos de su relación personal, así que mostremos también el punto en el que su relación era más pura, cuando Harper estaba haciendo algo por Yasmine que probablemente fue una de las cosas más desinteresadas que jamás haya hecho”.

Más tarde, Jasmine seguiría creyendo que ayudarla en sus momentos más vulnerables era sólo otro intento de control. Pero para Mihala y Abella, este no es el caso.

“Parece una cuestión de vida o muerte”, dijo Mihala. “En ese momento cuando Harper descubre lo que le pasó a Jasmine, mira el rostro aterrorizado de su amiga, como si estuviera completamente agotada, y claramente necesitara ayuda. No hay duda de si yo, como tu amiga, te ayudaré o no. La situación es tan grave que Harper no puede preguntar: '¿Cómo puedo usar esto esta noche?' No se trata de trabajo, solo se trata de nuestra amistad, y eso es todo.

Abella agregó que ayudar a Harper en ese momento la convirtió en una presencia tranquilizadora para Jasmine durante toda la temporada. “En el momento en que Harper entra en la habitación, [Yasmin] “Al menos puede respirar un poco de aire fresco, sabiendo que hay alguien en esta sala que entiende por lo que estás pasando, incluso si ella no puede compartir la carga”, dijo Abella. “Puedo verla y ella puede verme”.

Pero ahora, la discusión ha obligado a Harper y Jasmine a verse de manera diferente, exponiendo toda su inseguridad y hostilidad. Y en un programa basado en apuñalar por la espalda y explotar a las personas para salir adelante, tal vez esta sorprendente claridad sea un regalo especial. Pero para Harper y Jasmine, que se están perdiendo no sólo como amigos sino como sistema de apoyo, este regalo tiene un costo muy alto.

industria La temporada 3 ahora se transmite en Max, con nuevos episodios que se estrenan los domingos a las 9 p.m. EST en HBO y Max.



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Entertainment

“Industry” examina el impacto de la tecnología exagerada en su ambiciosa tercera temporada

[ad_1]

Si extrañas el colorido mundo lleno de cosas mundanas. Sucesiónun programa donde la mayoría de los personajes venden felizmente sus almas por poder y dinero, es una visita obligada en HBO Max. industriaSi bien comparten algunas similitudes (ambos están escritos por creadores británicos y siguen a un grupo de personajes antiheroicos en un mundo de extrema riqueza) industria La película se centra más en la ambición inhumana que impulsa a sus personajes.

mientras Sucesión Sigue a una familia ya rica que se esfuerza por mantener su importancia, industria La serie gira en torno a un grupo de jóvenes de veintitantos años, que (la mayoría de ellos) no son ricos y están desesperados por demostrar su valía en el famoso banco de inversiones londinense Pierpoint & Co. En contraste con el nepotismo desenfrenado en la familia Roy, su lugar de trabajo puede describirse como meritocrático (quién eres no importa tanto como el dinero que ganas), pero también es un mundo profundamente tóxico y carente de moralidad.

Nuestra puerta de entrada al mundo de Pierpoint es Harper Stern (Myha'la Herrold, cuerpos cuerpos cuerpos), una comerciante genial con un oscuro secreto (nunca se graduó de la universidad). Como joven estadounidense negra, se destaca entre el mar de hombres británicos, en su mayoría blancos, en el piso de ventas. Quizás por esta razón, su jefe neoyorquino, Eric Tao (Ken Leung, Perdido(Él la ve como una protegida potencial). Harper trabaja junto a Jasmine (Marissa Apple), la hija de una familia editorial adinerada; Gus, un comerciante conservador negro gay y Harry (Robert Spiering), el obligado triunfador de un trabajador; antecedentes de clase.

En la temporada 3, que se estrena el 11 de agosto, Game of Thrones' Kit Harington se une al elenco como Henry Mok, el rico director ejecutivo de Lumi Corporation, una querida startup de energía verde a punto de salir a bolsa. (No debe confundirse con empresas reales, p. ej. estudio de diseño lomiel Herramienta de aprendizaje de piano Lumio el Compañía de embalaje Dead Lomi) Pero, como una mezcla entre teranos, Solyndra y una serie de startups fallidas de tecnología verde bajo ObamaEs posible que el Lumi no esté a la altura de sus expectativas sobre ser respetuoso con el medio ambiente. Algunos bancos pueden ser reticentes a sacar una empresa problemática al mercado de valores, pero ese no es el caso de Pierpoint: su trabajo es ganar dinero con una oferta pública inicial, no juzgar la viabilidad a largo plazo de Lumi.

Este tipo de punto de vista poco ético no es nada nuevo para Pierpoint o sus seguidores. industriaDesde el principio, los creadores de la serie Mickey Down y Conrad Kaye evitaron convertir la serie en un sermón contra el mundo de la banca de inversión. En cambio, sus personajes reflejan la filosofía egoísta que planteó inicialmente. mundo financiero Gordon Gekko: “La codicia, a falta de una palabra mejor, es algo bueno”.

Sagar Radia y Mihala Herold en la tercera temporada de Sagar Radia y Mihala Herold en la tercera temporada de
Foto de Simon Ridgway/HBO

Si bien algunos personajes expresan preocupaciones sobre Lumi, industria En este libro, el autor explora el resultado más pesimista (y quizás realista): que casi todo el mundo encuentra una manera de sacar provecho del posible fracaso de la empresa (excepto, por supuesto, los clientes y los primeros inversores de Lummi).

“Queríamos escribir sobre una empresa de energía que tuviera intereses reales en el mundo real, y que parecía estar pisando los talones a competidores monopolísticos mucho más grandes”, dijo Down en una entrevista en el podcast Engadget. “Entonces también quisimos escribir sobre el colapso de una empresa como ésta: una empresa [has] “En realidad, se fundaron para hacer algo realmente bueno y lo que sucede cuando esa empresa fracasa y deja mucha devastación”.

industria Comenzó como un programa centrado en las relaciones personales de un pequeño grupo de colegas, su vida nocturna llena de diversión y la erosión de su humanidad por parte de Pierpoint, pero su alcance ahora se ha ampliado para incluir la economía global más amplia y el papel de Gran Bretaña en el apuntalamiento de la crisis. empresas y negocios rivales.

Mihala, Harry Luty y Marissa Abella en la tercera temporada de Industry.Mihala, Harry Luty y Marissa Abella en la tercera temporada de Industry.
Foto de Simon Ridgway/HBO

“Cuando empezamos, éramos escritores bastante inexpertos”, dice Kay. “Escribimos deliberadamente sobre una experiencia muy aislada y muy universal, que es que la gente empieza a trabajar en el lugar de trabajo en un momento determinado. 1723065653 “Hay mucho en juego. Se trata más bien de cómo el campo de entrenamiento se cruza con el resto del mundo, la política, los periódicos, los medios de comunicación y la clase social”.

Lejos del funcionamiento interno de las finanzas y de la vida romántica de las celebridades, Industria El verdadero atractivo del programa es “ver a personas competentes ser buenas en su trabajo”, dice Down. Y no importa si no entiendes toda la jerga financiera que hablan los personajes en la primera temporada. Como una mezcla en el medio Llamada de margen Y Michael Clayton ¿Qué hace? industria Es realmente interesante ver a personas inteligentes demostrar su brillantez una y otra vez en un entorno de alta presión.

Para un espectáculo que parecía Sucesión reproducción temprana, industria Ha evolucionado hasta convertirse en algo completamente diferente. La riqueza y el éxito no son constantes para nadie en el programa; más bien, son algo que deben ganarse con sangre, sudor y compromiso moral.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

No ‘independent chip makers and system makers and storage makers’: Industry expert paints bleakest picture of future of IT — insatiable tech appetite of Google, Microsoft and other hyperscalers could kill off competition forever

[ad_1]

In IDC’s own words, its Worldwide Quarterly Enterprise Infrastructure Tracker: Buyer and Cloud Deployment is “designed to provide clients with a better understanding of how enterprise infrastructure technologies (server, external enterprise storage systems, purpose-built appliances: HCI and PBBA) are being deployed in cloud environments and what type of buyers are acquiring them.”

The Next Platform has been following these trackers as they are released every quarter, and noticed that while hyperscalers, cloud builders, and other service providers who “build datacenter infrastructure and sell capacity on it” surpassed 50 percent share of the combined server and storage revenues in the first quarter of 2020, by the close of 2028, if IDC is right, that figure will have jumped to 69.7 percent.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Dear tech industry, we don’t need to follow behind gaming with terrible product trade-in values

[ad_1]

Recently a story made headlines concerning a potential seller finding out just how bad Microcenter’s trade-in value is for a Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 graphics card. 

The retailer only offered $700 for a card that’s currently priced at nearly $2000 on its own online store, less than half its original value. And keep in mind that this is a current-gen high-end component, easily the best graphics card out there right now, not something from two generations ago.

screenshot of gpu trade in value

(Image credit: Wccftech / Mr. Biggie Smallz)

Of course, there are several factors involved in trade-in value, including the condition of the product in question. However, Wccftech reported that this was a simple look-up through Microcenter’s website, meaning that this value is the standard one. Compare this to what Newegg is offering, about $1,500 or over twice as much, and you see quite the discrepancy between the two amounts.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Baldur’s Gate 3 publishing head reflects on recent industry layoffs, “it’s incorrect to believe huge companies are run necessarily by incredibly intelligent people”

[ad_1]

Micheal Douse, head of publishing at Baldur’s Gate 3 developer Larian Studios, has reflected candidly on the current state of the video game industry and described the ongoing wave of mass layoffs as “an avoidable f***-up.”

It comes in a recent interview with gaming newsletter Game File, where Douse said that “it’s incorrect to believe that huge companies are run necessarily by incredibly intelligent people that have the means to do the right thing all the time.”

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Entertainment

Fairphone’s repairable wireless earbuds put the industry on notice

[ad_1]

True wireless earbuds are flimsy, easily lost and prone to battery failure. Given their size and cost, companies would rather you throw them out when they succumb to the inevitable. Fairphone, however, has built a pair of buds with easily replaceable batteries, as well as a swappable cell in the charging case. And, look, if the engineers working at this tiny Dutch company can work this out, then the army of designers in Apple and Samsung’s steel-and-glass cathedrals have no excuse.

Fairbuds are a pair of true wireless earbuds that look like Samsung’s Galaxy Buds, with the outermost surface on both sides being a controller. Fairphone promises six hours of battery life on a charge with an extra 20 hours nestled inside the case. The buds are packing the usual feature list, including ANC, multipoint connectivity as well as an IP54 rating for sweat and water resistance. As usual, the company wants to make the argument (on paper, at least) that just because the devil has the best toys, you can still have fun while wearing a halo.

Fairbuds are the company’s second crack at the true wireless whip after its 2021’s obviously named True Wireless Stereo Earbuds. Those were made with fairtrade gold and 30 percent recycled plastic, but were still more a part of the problem than the solution. At the time, I gave the company grief for launching a product so at odds with its environmental goals. In retrospect, the crap name should have been a clue that these were a stopgap. Since then, the TWS were dumped off, and the company released Fairbuds XL, a pair of over-ear cans that I rather liked.

Fairphone says that the Fairbuds here are made with 70 percent recycled and fair materials, while 100 percent of the rare earth elements and tin are recycled. The company also claims to offer improved pay for factory workers compared to rival manufacturers and works with suppliers to improve working conditions for the people on the production line.

Image of a Fairbud with its battery slider open.Image of a Fairbud with its battery slider open.

Photo by Daniel Cooper / Engadget

I don’t think it’s unfair to say Fairphone prioritizes repairability over look and feel, so these won’t take a podium at the Beautiful Gadget Awards. I had a pair of AirPods Pro on my desk and, sat beside the Fairbuds, the difference between the two is almost comical. Fairbuds’ case is about twice the size and, while the corners are rounded off, it’s still going to be an unwelcome presence in your jeans pocket. It’s not as if there’s acres of wasted space in the case but it’s a product that the armchair designer in me keeps wanting to slim down.

There are other irritations, like the fact the action button is on top of the charging tray but the status light is on the side by the USB-C port. That’s not a deal breaker but you hope these fit and finish issues are the focus for any future version two. But the point of these irritations is that elegance has been sacrificed on the altar of repairability, and that’s why you’d buy a pair.

I probably need to make clear, for the people who will point to the iFixit guides showing you how to swap the battery in an AirPod and a Galaxy Bud that it is possible to do so. But if the guides ask you to use a heat gun, scalpel, vice, pry bar and glue-dissolving solvent, then that’s not an easy job just anyone can do. When I say that you can swap out the battery on each Fairbud with the same level of ease as you could a ‘90s cell phone battery, I mean it.

In fact, my first attempt took all of 30 seconds since all you need to do is get a small, flat-headed screwdriver to slide off the rubber gasket. Once done, you just need to gently pry out the hinged holder and the battery will slide out easily. Swap in a new cell, slide the rubber gasket back in place (if you’re gentle, it mostly plops back into position without any fussing) and you’re done.

Similarly, the charging case has a replaceable battery held in place with a single philips head screw. A few twists and the charging plate pops out, revealing the 500mAh cell underneath, with users able to buy replacement outer shells, charging trays and case batteries. You can also buy eartips, earbuds and earbud batteries from Fairphone’s online parts store.

Image of the Fairbuds case open with the charging plate and battery exposed.Image of the Fairbuds case open with the charging plate and battery exposed.

Photo by Daniel Cooper / Engadget

It’s likely you’d only want or need to swap the batteries once every three or four years so you won’t benefit from this flexibility on a daily basis. Reading lots of online chatter, a rule of thumb is that most TWS buds last for between two and three years before things start to go wrong. Fairphone, too, offers a three-year warranty on the buds, but I’d hope to see a well-used pair of Fairbuds lasting for twice as long, assuming you don’t lose them in a sewer or leave them in the back of a cab.

Sadly, I can’t be as praiseworthy for the Fairbuds’ sound quality which isn’t as strong as you may hope. They’re not bad by any means, but the default sound profile lacks a dynamism you hear in competitors. It doesn’t matter if you’re playing a lush orchestral piece by Jerry Goldsmith or something beefier, like Korn, you’ll feel the sound is rougher and flatter than other products. It’s like the top and bottom ends of the sounds are being sliced off to keep everything from getting too out of hand.

There are sound profiles in the Fairbuds app that I found similarly lackluster with users able to opt between standard tuning, Bass Boost or Flat. None of them feel distinct. There’s also a Studio option where you can adjust the tuning along eight specific frequency bands. It’s here that you can really improve the sound quality but it’s more time and effort than I’d be happy putting in on a regular basis.

At least the fundamentals are all pretty good: I’ve been testing these for a big chunk of the last five days and I’ve not felt the need to recharge the case battery at all. Even with ANC on, I think I’ve squeezed at least 20 hours out of these things and I’ve still got juice left in the tank. And the ANC itself offers the same background muffling you’ll hear in every other mid-range ANC earbud.

One of the mantras Fairphone has always repeated is that it doesn’t expect to build a phone that will topple the big manufacturers. Its products are designed to appeal to folks who want something a little more ethically made, and to act as a north star for the technology industry more broadly. There are plenty of engineering questions — around durability, bulkiness and ease of use — that linger. But Fairphone’s impact here should be to lay down a challenge to its bigger rivals to use their vast resources to build an earbud that isn’t condemned to live in the trash from the moment it was born.

Fairbuds are making their debut in Europe today from Fairphone as well as a variety of retail partners across the territory. They are priced at €149 and while there’s no word on the matter now, it’s likely that we’ll see them making their way to the US at some point in the future.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

China’s medical-device industry gets a makeover

[ad_1]

Person standing at centre, slightly bent over, surrounded by machines

China wants to use and manufacture more of its own medical equipment.Credit: VCG via Getty Images

As a sinology student in the early 1990s at Nanjing University, Elisabeth Staudinger “got a flavour of what health care felt like for the people in China”. As part of her studies, she had to venture more than 2,000 kilometres to Yunnan in China’s southwest corner. Back then, parts of the province were so remote that people who needed medical attention would often have to wait for Mondays to roll around, when visiting merchants, physicians and dentists would set up shop in a weekly market.

“Fast forward to today, you have very reasonable hospitals and health-care infrastructures across the country” alongside near-universal health coverage, says Staudinger, who is now a managing board member of the global medical technology company Siemens Healthineers in Erlangen, Germany. “Things are massively better than it used to be,” she says. “But there’s still a lot of work to do.”

China has a population of around 1.4 billion people, one-fifth of whom are over the age of 60. A burgeoning middle class and the accompanying rise in medical conditions linked to affluence, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension, has meant that China has embraced preventive care, alongside treatment, says Jeroen Groenewegen-Lau, an analyst who studies science, technology and innovation at the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), a think tank in Berlin. But this has meant opening up the market to expensive treatments and technology, he says.

Aware of the costs, the Chinese government began a drive around a decade ago to produce and use more locally manufactured medical devices, says analyst Alexander Brown, also at MERICS. In particular, the focus has been on high-end equipment such as X-ray scanners, which can aid early disease detection. The push intensified further in 2021, in the hope of slashing costs and meeting the evolving health-care needs of an ageing population, while also boosting innovation and enhancing national security by curtailing imports.

The strategy is affecting both China’s medical-device sector and the medical-technology industry as a whole. Medical technology includes devices that use information technology to detect, collect and upload data. Hospitals in China have been instructed to procure products made in the country when possible, and domestic and foreign manufacturers have altered their business operations and focus. In 2021, the most recent year for which data were available, China held 20% of the medical-device market share, second only to the United States.

Gathering momentum

The Chinese government promotes its ‘make local, buy local’ strategy in a variety of ways: dedicated innovation parks, subsidies and research funding for domestic medical-technology companies, and centralized volume-based purchasing for public hospitals.

“But technically there is only one regulation on the books that is explicitly around Chinese-product procurement,” says Helen Chen, a managing partner based in Shanghai at the global firm L.E.K. Consulting. In May 2021, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and the Ministry of Finance introduced Order 551, which comprises a list of 315 products. Around half of these are medical equipment such as ophthalmic lenses and medical lasers, while the rest includes items such as those used in marine, geological and geophysical work — ground-based radars, for example. State-owned firms looking to procure such items must ensure that the equipment is made of 25–100% of locally manufactured parts.

Order 551 must be viewed in the broader context, says Chen, “which is that China, in general, is trying to be much more self-sufficient in its health-care products”. The directive came just a month after the Chinese government outlined a five-year plan aimed at propelling six or more Chinese companies into the world’s top 50 medical-device firms — up from the 4 that were in the top 100 in 2021. The country’s ambition for its medical-device sector can be traced back further, however. In 2010, medical devices were identified as one of 20 Strategic Emerging Industries — alongside biotechnology, renewable energy, and the Internet of Things — and the central government began dedicating five-year plans to the sector.

In 2014, Chinese President Xi Jinping highlighted the cause further, announcing: “It is necessary to accelerate the localization of high-end medical devices to decrease production costs and to promote the continuous development of national enterprises.” The pivot to producing products such as high-value imaging, diagnostic and treatment equipment — including computed tomography (CT) scanners, ultrasound and dialysis machines, as well as implantables such as pacemakers — is particularly notable because up until that point, medical manufacturing had centred mainly on producing syringes, gloves, gauzes and other low-end disposables (see ‘Medical machines’).

Medical machines: bar chart shows firms from China won a higher proportion of contracts for computed tomography scanners from Chinese hospitals than they did in previous years.

Source: Alexander Brown/Merics

But for industry watchers such as Chen, the real game-changer occurred in 2015, when the government announced its Made in China 2025 (MIC2025) initiative. The strategic plan boldly declared the country aimed to become a global manufacturing powerhouse for ten industries — including robotics, electric vehicles and medical devices — by 2025. China hopes to achieve this by boosting local industrial capabilities in research and development, design, and the procurement of crucial components, as well as by moving assembly processes into the country.

Among other targets, MIC2025 calls for 70% of mid-to-high-end medical devices to be produced domestically by 2025, and for this to rise to 95% by 2030.

With only a year to the first deadline, Brown says: “I think they still have a way to go. They haven’t been able to catch up as much as they would have liked in contrast to something like new-energy vehicles.”

“But it’s not for the lack of effort — China has been funnelling a lot of money into the sector. I think the hurdles are partly to do with the highly specialized nature of medical devices,” Brown adds. “Still, Made in China has had the greatest impact in terms of building up local industrial capacity.”

And it’s a tried-and-tested approach. The country has gained dominance in industries such as pharmaceuticals, solar panels and machine tools, according to a report by Brussels-based think tank, the European Centre for International Political Economy. Policymakers first identify sectors and technologies that they think are important to the country’s economic development and security. The government then initiates policies to grow domestic industries that can challenge global firms (see go.nature.com/49rlyhv).

China’s ambitions for its medical-device industry look no different. A profusion of policy and fiscal initiatives to boost local production and use of medical devices appeared after MIC2025. In April 2022, for instance, provincial governments in Anhui, Hubei and Shanxi told hospitals to limit their use of medical and testing equipment to those produced domestically.

The government also began offering incentives, such as reduced rent, to entice firms to move or set up offices in four medical-device industrial zones — the Bohai Economic Rim including Beijing; the Yangtze River Delta encompassing Shanghai; the Pearl River Delta, made up of Guangdong, Shenzhen and a handful of other cities; and Central China, which includes Wuhan, Chengdu and Chongqing. It also increased tax benefits for research and development investments: rising from 1.7 billion yuan (US$236 million) in 2017 to 11.4 billion yuan in 2022, according to a MERICS analysis of 122 medical-technology firms listed on the Shanghai, Shenzhen and Beijing stock exchanges (see go.nature.com/3urvdkn).

In July 2023, the Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology began mass producing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) instrument it had developed. And at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, United Imaging Healthcare in Shanghai supplied more than 100 domestically produced CT scanners and X-ray machines to hospitals including those in Wuhan, Shanghai and Beijing.

In 2019, one of China’s biggest medical-technology firms, MicroPort in Shanghai, reported that surgeons had completed the first successful surgery, a prostatectomy, with its lacroscopic robot Toumai. The four-armed Toumai can do complex surgeries in narrow spaces in the body, such as urethral reconstructions. It can even be operated remotely.

Ripples far and wide

According to a 2021 analysis by consultancy firm Deloitte (see go.nature.com/3uyujzw), the market revenue of China’s medical-device industry more than doubled between 2015 and 2019, constantly outpacing the expansion in gross domestic product with an annual growth rate of roughly 20% since the launch of MIC2025.

Some sectors have even begun to turn the tide on trade — manufacturers of pacemakers, for instance, saw their global exports grow by 110% between 2015 and 2020. Meanwhile, sales of pacemakers by foreign competitors to China rose by 2%.

Overall, the market share of domestic brands producing high-end devices has risen from 20% to 30% in the past decade. US and European multinationals such as Siemens, GE HealthCare and Medtronic continue to dominate the sector, however, says Rohit Anand, an analyst at the consulting firm GlobalData in Hyderabad, India. This difference in market share boils down to “substantial disparity in product quality, scale and efficiency”, he says.

Person in foreground wearing protective clothing and face mask, working on plastic equipment

Parts of high-end devices such as computed tomography scanners are now made in China.Credit: Feature China/Future Publishing via Getty

Brown observes that medical devices are niche products that require specialized knowledge, and Chinese firms have struggled to gain a foothold.

Citing medical robotics as an example, he adds: “There isn’t a big market in China because they are very expensive. The average Chinese customer just can’t afford to pay for that, and the ones that can afford to would probably opt for a leading American firm over some inexperienced Chinese one.”

Attitudes among medical professionals are changing, however. A 2020 survey of Chinese hospital workers, conducted by the firm L.E.K. Consulting, found that 3% “use Chinese materials when possible”. In a follow-up survey a year later, after Order 551, around 30% said they always use Chinese materials (see go.nature.com/3iba26v).

Often, the decision comes down to practicalities, says Deloitte analyst Alan MacCharles in Shanghai. “You might have two or three options and the doctor might say: ‘The Western device is slightly better but because I haven’t had training on that system in awhile, I’m much more proficient with the Chinese brands.’”

Because of new purchasing regulations, many international manufacturers have opted to establish local operations in China. Some partner with local firms, setting up joint ventures, such as the ones between Sinopharm Imaging in Beijing and US firm GE Healthcare, or between Shanghai Electric and Siemens.

A handful of prominent foreign firms have established their own manufacturing plants in the country. Sysmex in Kobe, Japan, now assembles its blood and urine testing equipment in Shandong. Similarly, Dutch firm Philips produces a handful of high-end scanners in China, such as its EPIQ Elite ultrasound series, which includes an AI-powered cardiovascular machine. In 2020, Philips launched its Ingenia Ambition MRI, which is made in China and boasts a 50% reduction in scan times. It is the first MRI to operate without helium gas, a non-renewable resource that is in scarce supply.

And at an international trade fair last May, GE Healthcare displayed 23 medical devices, 18 of which were made and developed in China. One highlight was the ultra-high-end Revolution CT scanner, which boasts the ability to conduct a coronary examination “in one heartbeat under any heart rate and rhythm conditions”, according to GE Healthcare. The firm began manufacturing the scanner at its Beijing factory in 2020. Of the CT equipment that the company ships to customers worldwide, 70% are made at that factory.

Making the decision to start manufacturing in China isn’t taken lightly. “It’s not an easy process because the cost of building these plants for high-end devices is high,” says MacCharles. “You can have local supply-chain and intellectual-property issues, it takes years to get fully certified and basically you can’t produce anything for quite some time.”

US firms, in particular, face challenges, given the ongoing tensions between the two nations, says Grace Fu Palma, founder of China Med Device in Beijing, a consultancy that offers regulatory and business advice to foreign firms looking to enter the Chinese market. “The political situation is definitely having a negative impact on the entry of foreign firms.”

Staudinger says that China continues to be a priority location for Siemens, which has been operating there for more than 30 years and has six research and development sites in the country, despite increasing pressures for consumers to buy from local firms. “The regulations are sometimes projected as this thing where they want to get foreign companies out of the country,” she says. “But that is not what we have experienced.”

“As long as you’re part of the journey and a part of supporting the direction of building a robust, high-quality health-care system in China,” says Staudinger, “you’ll feel very welcome.”

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Former PlayStation chairman sees exclusivity as ‘Achilles’ heel’ of industry, urges companies to ‘get that funnel wider’

[ad_1]

Former Sony Interactive Entertainment (SIE) chairman Shawn Layden addressed the challenges facing the modern games industry in a brand new interview, calling console exclusives the “Achilles’ heel” of the video games landscape. 

Speaking with VentureBeat, Layden stated: “When your costs for a game exceed $200 million, exclusivity is your Achilles’ heel. It reduced your addressable market. Particularly when you’re in the world of live-service gaming or free-to-play. Another platform is just another way of opening the funnel, [and] getting more people in. In a free-to-play world, as we know, 95% percent of those people will never spend a nickel. 

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

The story of ARM CPUs from Acorn innovation to industry adoption

The story of ARM CPUs from Acorn innovation to industry adoption

In the world of technology, few innovations have had as widespread an impact as the ARM processor. This remarkable piece of engineering has its roots in the late 1970s, when a team from Acorn Computers and the University of Cambridge set out to create a new kind of processor. Their vision was clear: to design a chip that was both power-efficient and capable of handling the demands of the emerging mobile market. Little did they know, their creation would go on to power billions of devices around the globe.

The ARM architecture is a family of reduced instruction set computing (RISC) architectures for computer processors. It is the most pervasive processor architecture in the world, with more than 270 billion ARM-based chips shipped by our partners over the past three decades in products ranging from sensors, wearables and smartphones to supercomputers. Benefits of the ARM CPU architecture include:

The story of ARM’s rise begins with Acorn Computers, a company that quickly made a name for itself with the Acorn Atom. Founders Hermann Hauser and Chris Curry, along with a talented team including Steve Furber and Sophie Wilson, were instrumental in securing a government contract with the BBC Micro. This project was part of an educational initiative that aimed to revolutionize computing education in the UK. The success of the BBC Micro laid the groundwork for what was to come.

The development of the ARM chip was a pivotal moment for Acorn. The engineers at Acorn had a bold idea: to create a processor that used a reduced instruction set. This meant that the chip could operate with fewer instructions, making it simpler and more power-efficient. The ARM’s ability to run on just the power of leaked current was not only a testament to its efficiency but also a sign of its potential to transform the mobile technology landscape.

The history of ARM CPU development

As the popularity of portable devices began to soar, the ARM processor’s unique attributes made it the ideal choice for smartphones and tablets. Its low power consumption and high performance were exactly what manufacturers were looking for. Although Acorn Computers did not manage to stay afloat in the highly competitive international market, the ARM CPU became a key player in the tech industry.

The ARM processor’s journey from a British innovation to a global powerhouse is a story of ambition, foresight, and the relentless pursuit of efficiency. It is a testament to the idea that a simple concept, when executed well, can outlast its creators and reshape the technological world. Today, ARM processors are found in a vast array of devices, from the phone in your pocket to the smart thermostat on your wall.

The success of ARM is also a reflection of the changing needs of our society. As we have become more reliant on mobile technology, the demand for processors that can deliver performance without draining battery life has grown exponentially. ARM’s architecture, with its focus on power efficiency, has proven to be perfectly suited to meet this challenge.

Moreover, the ARM processor has become a foundation for innovation in the tech industry. Its adaptable design allows for a wide range of applications, enabling companies to create products that are both powerful and energy-efficient. This flexibility has made ARM a favorite among developers and manufacturers alike.

The influence of ARM extends beyond just mobile devices. It is also making strides in the server market, where energy efficiency is becoming increasingly important. As data centers look to reduce their carbon footprint, ARM’s architecture offers a compelling solution. This expansion into new markets is a clear indication of ARM’s versatility and its potential for continued growth.

The story of ARM is not just about a processor; it’s about the vision and determination of a group of engineers who dared to think differently. Their willingness to challenge the status quo and their commitment to efficiency have left an indelible mark on the tech industry. As we look to the future, the principles that guided the development of the ARM processor remain as relevant as ever.

In a rapidly evolving technological landscape, the ARM processor stands as a reminder of what can be achieved when innovation is driven by a clear understanding of the market’s needs. Its continued dominance in the mobile sector and its expansion into new areas are a testament to the enduring value of the ARM architecture.

The legacy of ARM is a powerful one. It shows us that with the right approach, a small team can create something that has a global impact. As we continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with technology, the ARM processor will undoubtedly play a central role in shaping our digital future. Its story is far from over, and its influence will be felt for many years to come. Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of RISC hardware :

Filed Under: Gadgets News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

How AI is transforming the music industry

How AI is transforming the music industry with voice cloning lyrics beats and more

Whatever your opinion of artificial intelligence might be—whether you consider it a tool to enhance innovation or believe that AI is destroying creativity—large language models (LLMs) and diffusion-based generative models are here to stay. They are developing and expanding on a daily basis, being used in a variety of ways to create music, song lyrics, beats, tunes, and even complete songs with vocals and music videos, all created by AI. In this guide, we take a look at how artificial intelligence is changing the music industry, featuring technologies such as voice cloning and tune creation, with the likes of Stability AI’s new audio creation tool, Stable Audio.

AI’s role in creating new songs, generating lyrics, and crafting melodies has been a game-changer, reshaping the landscape of music creation and performance. However, this technological revolution has not been without its controversies and debates, particularly around the potential “death of music,” effects on musicians’ income, and the implications for artistic expression.

Stable Audio

Stability AI’s mission for its Stable Audio music generation product is to empower creators with tools that aid musical creativity. Enabling anyone to create original music for commercial projects if you’re a Pro user, or your non-commercial projects if you’re a Basic tier user.

AI’s influence on music creation is far-reaching, with tools like ChatGPT for lyrics and Google’s MusicLM for melody creation being embraced by musicians. These tools have the potential to revolutionize the music creation process by shrinking “the gap,” or the difference between a creative idea and a tangible creation. The ability to generate new songs, lyrics, and melodies in seconds using AI voice cloning has opened up new avenues for creativity. However, this also raises questions about authenticity and the potential for ‘fake collaborations’ that could mislead fans.

How AI is transforming the music industry

Check out the video below to learn more about how artificial intelligence is transforming the music industry. Is it a good thing or a bad thing?  I think only time will tell as AI tools and technologies are still being developed and new innovations are being released on a daily basis.

Google Music LM

Google has made significant strides in the melding of artificial intelligence with music through its MusicLM technology. MusicLM is particularly fascinating as it brings the ability to generate high-fidelity music from text-based descriptions. Imagine a textual input like “a calming violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff,” and MusicLM can turn this description into a real, listenable musical piece.

It operates as a hierarchical sequence-to-sequence model, capable of generating music at an impressive 24 kHz and sustaining a consistent musical environment over extended periods. The technology manages to outperform prior systems in terms of both audio quality and faithfulness to the text description, marking a remarkable advancement in conditional music generation.

Adding another layer of versatility, MusicLM isn’t just limited to text; it can also condition its musical output based on both text and a melody. This means that hummed or whistled tunes can be transformed to align with the style or mood described in a textual caption.

Such a feature opens up boundless possibilities for personalized music creation, be it for professional musicians looking to flesh out a musical idea or for enthusiasts who simply want to experiment. To facilitate ongoing research in this arena, Google has also publicly released MusicCaps, a dataset that comprises 5.5k music-text pairs, complete with in-depth text descriptions curated by human experts.

Is artificial intelligence going to be the death of music?

The debate around AI causing the “death of music” is a contentious one. Some industry insiders, including artist Grimes and the CEO of Spotify, see AI as a tool that can enhance creativity and uncover unknown musical talent. They argue that AI can help democratize music creation, making it more accessible to a wider audience. On the other hand, critics argue that AI’s prevalence could potentially affect how human musicians earn and create art, leading to a decrease in opportunities for artistic expression.

This debate extends to the controversial aspects around AI music like voice cloning. While some artists are embracing the technology, others express concern over its use, fearing that it could lead to a loss of individuality and originality in music. The complexities surrounding copyright with regards to AI-created music further complicate the issue. Should artists get paid if an AI is trained on their music? This question forms the crux of many legal disputes and lawsuits, as the line between copyright infringement and taking inspiration becomes increasingly blurred.

AI music creation as a tool

The existential question regarding AI as an artist is another point of contention. Can an AI, capable of autonomously creating large quantities of music, be considered an artist? Or is it merely a tool, a means to an end for human artists? This question challenges our traditional understanding of art as a form of human expression, and the answers are far from straightforward.

The music industry, as it currently stands, faces potential future changes as it grapples with these issues. The belief in music as human expression is being tested, as AI continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in music creation. The complexities surrounding payment for AI-created music, copyright issues, and the role of AI as an artist present challenges that the industry must navigate.

AI’s transformation of the music industry is a complex and multifaceted issue. While AI offers exciting possibilities for music creation and discovery, it also raises significant ethical and legal questions. The industry’s future will likely be shaped by how these questions are answered and how the balance between technological innovation and respect for artistic integrity is maintained.

Filed Under: Guides, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.