Acer ha lanzado sus televisores inteligentes híbridos QLED + MiniLED 4K de la serie M en India. La línea incluye tamaños de pantalla de 65 y 75 pulgadas. Los paneles de visualización de los televisores también son compatibles con Dolby Vision. Los televisores se entregan con un control remoto inteligente dedicado para las teclas de acceso rápido de Netflix, Prime Video, YouTube y Disney+ Hotstar. Está equipado con un sistema de altavoces de 2.1 canales de 60 vatios y sistema Dolby Atmos. Tienen bordes estrechos y ya están disponibles para su compra en el país.
Precios y disponibilidad de los televisores inteligentes Acer M Series Hybrid MiniLED 4K en India
El precio del televisor inteligente Acer M Series Hybrid MiniLED 4K en India comienza en Rs. 89,999 para la opción de 65 pulgadas, mientras que la variante de 75 pulgadas cuesta Rs. 1.39.999. Ambas versiones se encuentran actualmente disponibles para su compra en el país. a través de Amazonas.
Especificaciones y características de los televisores inteligentes híbridos MiniLED 4K de la serie M de Acer
Los televisores inteligentes Acer M Series Hybrid MiniLED 4K (3840 x 2160 píxeles) vienen con pantallas híbridas QLED y Mini LED con una frecuencia de actualización de hasta 144 Hz y 1400 nits de nivel de brillo máximo. Tienen soporte Dolby Vision y HDR10. Los televisores funcionan con una arquitectura de procesador dual impulsada por IA (A77 + A55), combinada con 3 GB de RAM y 32 GB de almacenamiento interno.
Los televisores MiniLED híbridos de la serie M de Acer ejecutan Google TV Android 14 para el televisor. Los modelos de la línea tienen soporte Chromecast incorporado y permiten conectividad Wi-Fi de doble banda, Bluetooth 5.2, HDMI y USB. Viene con un control remoto inteligente activado por voz y tiene teclas de acceso rápido a Netflix, Prime Video, YouTube y Disney+ Hotstar para un acceso rápido.
Los televisores inteligentes híbridos MiniLED de la serie M de Acer están equipados con un sistema de altavoces de 2.1 canales con salida de 60 W y compatibilidad con Dolby Atmos. Ambos modelos brindan soporte para instalaciones de mesa y pared. Los televisores tienen un diseño delgado con marcos metálicos estrechos. La opción de 65 pulgadas mide 70 x 1448 x 838 mm y pesa 21,2 gramos, mientras que la opción de 75 pulgadas mide 74 x 1658 x 965 mm y pesa 30,2 gramos.
Los enlaces de afiliados pueden generarse automáticamente; consulte nuestro sitio web Declaración de ética Para más detalles.
Hybrid, en asociación con Adjoli, organizó recientemente Auto Konnect, un evento líder en la industria dedicado al futuro de la publicidad automotriz, en Gurugram. El evento reunió a líderes de la industria, innovadores de marketing y expertos en tecnología para explorar el poder transformador de la publicidad programática.
El tema “Marcas en la vía rápida: enfoques innovadores para la publicidad automotriz” se centró en cómo las tecnologías de vanguardia mejoran la participación del cliente, impulsan las ventas y crean experiencias de compra fluidas.
Hybrid es un proveedor líder de soluciones publicitarias innovadoras que aprovecha las últimas tecnologías para ofrecer campañas de marketing personalizadas y efectivas. Al centrarse en la publicidad programática y contextual, Hybrid ayuda a las marcas a conectarse con sus audiencias de manera significativa, lo que genera una mayor participación y ventas.
El evento acogió a algunas de las mentes más brillantes de la industria automotriz. Los asistentes obtuvieron información sobre las últimas tendencias, estrategias y mejores prácticas para aprovechar la publicidad programática para maximizar sus esfuerzos de marketing.
“Auto Konnect no fue sólo un evento; fue una plataforma para la innovación y la transformación en la industria de la publicidad automotriz”, dijo Sergey Kovalev, director comercial y cofundador de Hybrid.
“La conferencia AutoConnect representa una oportunidad única para que los líderes de la industria automotriz exploren estrategias publicitarias impulsadas por la inteligencia artificial”, dijo Shreyas Satti, director general y cofundador de Hybrid Insia. “Nuestras soluciones de vanguardia están diseñadas para elevar el perfil de las marcas en. el espacio digital, y esperamos conectarnos y establecer contactos con expertos de la industria para impulsar la innovación y el éxito”.
“La conferencia AutoConnect representa un momento crucial para la industria automotriz, donde los líderes visionarios pueden aprovechar el poder de la publicidad impulsada por IA para revolucionar sus estrategias de marketing”, dijo Gandharv Sachdeva, presidente de Hybrid Ensia India. “En Hybrid Ensia, estamos comprometidos. para ampliar los límites de la innovación”. Colaboración, y estoy entusiasmado de conectarme con otros líderes de la industria para dar forma al futuro del marketing automotriz”.
En su discurso de apertura, Shashank Shrivastava, director ejecutivo de Maruti Suzuki India, destacó el rápido desarrollo de la industria del automóvil en la India, impulsado por la diferenciación, la hiperpersonalización, la pertenencia y la sostenibilidad. Habló del importante cambio demográfico y señaló que más del 65% de la población tiene menos de 35 años, lo que lleva a una preferencia por la tecnología, la conectividad y las características premium de los automóviles.
La conferencia Auto Konnect mostró a un sólido grupo de profesionales líderes que compartieron su experiencia sobre el futuro de la publicidad en la industria automotriz. Los aspectos más destacados de la presentación incluyeron una inmersión profunda en las tendencias digitales internacionales, información sobre las necesidades cambiantes de los compradores de automóviles indios y una mirada al papel transformador de la inteligencia artificial. Los comités participantes también discutieron estrategias publicitarias innovadoras y el vínculo crucial entre el compromiso digital y las ventas en el mundo real.
Descargo de responsabilidad: este artículo es una publicación paga y no implica la participación periodística/editorial de NDTVGadgets360. NDTVGadgets360 no respalda ni se suscribe al artículo/contenido publicitario ni a las opiniones expresadas aquí. NDTVGadgets360 no será responsable y/o estará obligado de ninguna manera por todo lo expresado en el artículo y/o también en relación con los puntos de vista, opiniones, declaraciones, afirmaciones, aseveraciones, etc., mencionados/mencionados en el mismo artículo.
Dell has issued a nineteen eighty-four-esque warning to its hybrid working employees, who shall from now on be tracked using electronic badge swipes, VPN usage and a color-coding system, in order for the company to keep tabs on office usage.
A source familiar with the matter told The Register the new initiative, spearheaded by COO Jeff Clarke, is designed to monitor the on-site presence of the company’s hybrid workers.
The system will be used to grade employees based on their presence in the office for at least 39 days per quarter, which equates to around three days per week.
Dell vs hybrid working
Starting May 13, Dell intends to provide employees with weekly updates on their onside presence through its HR software, with reports accompanied by a color-coded rating. The ratings will include green, yellow and red flags for ‘regular,’ ‘some’ and ‘limited’ on-site presence, with a special blue flag awarded to those with ‘consistent’ on-site presence.
A Dell spokesperson commented (via The Register): “In today’s global technology revolution, we believe in-person connections paired with a flexible approach are critical to drive innovation and value differentiation.”
However, workers have expressed dissatisfaction with the company’s increasingly strict measures. The news comes just weeks after the company announced it would be penalizing workers for working from home too much, with promotions being threatened.
Other workers have linked the increased surveillance with continued headcount reduction and cost optimization efforts. Dell laid off around 6,000 workers in March 2024, and a further 6,650 in February 2023. Both times, the company saw a 5% reduction in its workforce.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
BenQ is a brand best known for displays, but the BenQ beCreatus DP1310 is a USB-C dock designed to connect multiple monitors (some BenQ-made, perhaps) to a laptop via USB-C.
Unlike many competitor devices, this unit looks much more like HiFi hardware than computer equipment, with the on/off button on the front giving a distinct volume control appearance.
Despite its looks, this USB-C docking station was designed to connect a laptop using USB-C to power and peripherals with a single cable. While the ports appear identical, this isn’t a Thunderbolt dock for those with that port on their laptop.
It offers a triple monitor connection with two HDMI ports and one DisplayPort, four USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, one of which is USB-C, dual USB 2.0, a LAN port, and a 3.5mm audio jack.
The caveat to the port selection is that this is all driven from a single USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C downlink from the laptop, so a 10Gbps line is divided between all those potential devices.
In short, the more things you connect, the smaller a bandwidth slice of the pie each will get.
Using the display outputs also requires a software driver for DisplayLink to be installed on the host system, or it won’t work.
As well-made as the BenQ DP1310 is and lovely, it is an expensive USB-C dock that can’t negate some of the significant limitations of using USB-C technology in this way come with inherently.
However, with 100W charging provided for the connected laptop, it will work with the more demanding systems and charge them while in use. Also, the ability to control a second HDMI source may attract some game developers.
BenQ beCreatus DP1310: Price and availability
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
How much does it cost? $299/£309/€ 360
When is it out? It is starting to be available now
Where can you get it? Through online retailers like Amazon.
The price for the BenQ DP1310 is reasonably consistent across regions. Using Amazon as the source, it costs $299 in the USA, £309 in the UK, and €360 across most of Europe. With exchange adjustments, this is one of those common examples of a product being cheaper in the USA than in Europe.
The snag with that price is that Thunderbolt docks are cheaper than this, like the $287.99 StarTech Thunderbolt 3 Dock.
Those wanting a cheap USB-C dock without the 100W charging can get the Belkin 14-part USB-C Docking Station for about half the asking price of the BenQ.
From a value perspective, the BenQ has a hill to climb.
BenQ beCreatus DP1310: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Technology
USB-C, DisplayLink
Compatibility
Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, ChromeOS, Ubuntu
Number of Ports
13
Ports
1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 upstream, 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, 2x USB 2,0 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort, 1x HDMI 2.0 in, 1x universal audio combo jack, 1x 1GbE RJ45 Ethernet port
Upstream power
100W
Size
156 x 103 x 40 (mm) (W x D x H)
Weight
?550g
Accessories
Adapter 180W 19.5V 9.23A
BenQ beCreatus DP1310 Design
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Compact and stylish
Passively cooled
Unique port selection
At 550g, the BenQ DP1310 feels heavier than expected for a small aluminium box of 156 x 103 x 40mm, making it much smaller than typical USB-C docks.
The source of the heft is balanced between the internal components and a substantial aluminium case, capped front and back by plastic facia.
The extruded metal tube that provides most of the enclosure has a corrugated profile to help radiate heat and avoid the need for cooling fans and air vents.
Rubber feet are on both the base and the end, providing some choice as to how it can be orientated, and vertical would work well on a busy desktop.
The stylists behind this design clearly thought about HiFi when they designed this dock, as the large green power button. Sadly, this doesn’t rotate, which might be a missed opportunity.
It is dual function, but not in the way you might expect. Pressing it for three seconds powers the dock, and after it’s on, click it once the video output mode changes.
Along with the dramatic power button, the front has two 10Gbps USB Type-A ports, a single USB-C 10Gbps port with up to 36W power output (ideal for phone charging), and a 3.5mm headphone jack socket.
The rear has another Type-A 10Gbps port, two USB 2.0 ports for the mouse and keyboard, the USB-C downstream from the laptop, a 1Gbit LAN port, three HDMI ports and one DisplayPort.
Just to confuse matters, it doesn’t have four display outputs since one of the HDMI ports is an input. One of the HDMI ports is rated as a 2.1 specification, with 120Hz at 4K or 60Hz at 8K resolution.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
In the box with the dock is a large FSP Group branded PSU rated for 19.5V at 9.23A with a total output of 180W, a UK and EU power cable (for European customers), a BenQ-certified USB 2.1 HDMI cable and a USB-C 3,2 Gen 2×2 rated cable.
It’s unclear why the USB cable is rated for Gen 2×2 20Gbps, as the dock only connects using Gen 2 10Gbps, even if support for Gen 2×2 would have been wonderful.
BenQ beCreatus DP1310: Features
Oversubscribed USB bandwidth
HDMI in and out
100W charging power
Having four USB ports, each rated for 10Gbps, there is something of an obvious over-subscription when the dock only connects to the host using a single 10Gbps connection. And that doesn’t consider the extra demands added by the LAN port, display outputs or the USB 2.0 ports.
Anyone using this needs to know that copying a file from a Gen 2 capable external SSD to another connected to the dock will not go at the marketed 1,000MB/s if any other ports are in use.
That’s why Thunderbolt is such a popular dock technology; dividing up 40Gbps between lots of ports is easier than allocating a portion of 10Gbps for multiple uses.
While using an external SDD and a mouse and keyboard won’t run into big trouble with a monitor connected, there are limits to using USB-C as the whole bandwidth channel, and purchasers should be aware of those.
One odd twist about using USB for displays is that this isn’t an inherent feature of the technology. A software driver is required to configure a data pathway for the display data to travel over USB using either DisplayLink or SiliconMotion technology, and BenQ went with DisplayLink in this context.
A large sticker on the top of the BenQ DP1310 tells the owner to go to a specific website and download the driver onto the computer to provide this functionality. Without this driver, the display outputs from the BenQ DP1310 would be largely useless.
That said, one of the HDMI ports is designed to connect another system, possibly a games console, to the box, and then the power button is used to switch the monitor to this source.
That source system isn’t connected in any other way to the dock, so the mouse and keyboard won’t control the games console or second computer when you switch over.
This inclusion makes some sense, as DisplayLink is notorious for creating a lag between the computer and the video output that might be acceptable for office work but unsuitable for gaming.
The reasonable question is why you would do that, as most monitors have more than one input, and you could select a second source directly using the same cable connected to the dock.
Using DisplayLink, it is possible to connect two HDMI outputs and a single DisplayPort monitor to the dock, although because of the limited bandwidth, they can’t be 8K at 60Hz.
It can only support 8K with a single display connected, and a second display (HDMI or DP) is at 4K, or all three outputs can be 4K.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
That description of the choices has numerous problems because not all laptops support 8K, and most can only effectively drive a single 4K output, not dual or triple outputs.
The issues mostly relate to integrated GPUs that use shared memory from the system, which cannot drive multiple displays with good enough performance for video playback. Some of AMD and Intel’s new ARC designs are better than prior technologies.
Those lucky enough to have discrete graphics cards onboard might be better positioned. Still, multiple high-resolution panels are more effectively driven with desktop systems and video cards that full PCIe slots can install.
Undoubtedly, the best aspect of the BenQ DP1310 is its power distribution model. The single USB-C connecting line delivers 100W of charging power to the attached laptop, covering almost any laptop. Another 36W can be sourced from the front-facing USB-C for phone or tablet charging, and another 7.5W can be obtained from each USB-A port.
Impressively, this unit can output a tremendous amount of power while maintaining an internal temperature of a maximum of 40C for prolonged periods.
(Image credit: BenQ Inc.)
BenQ beCreatus DP1310: Verdict
A few issues with this dock might put some customers off, and they slightly undermine a beautifully made piece of hardware.
But let’s first cover what BenQ got right. That charging power of 100W is ideal for most users, even if it makes the PSU rather large.
Most modern laptops need at least 65W to charge and run. Those with an onboard discrete GPU might want 89W or more, and BenQ is looking to service that market with this device.
You can use it with a low-power laptop or a Chromebook, but that isn’t what this dock is designed for. These won’t support the three monitor outputs that the BenQ DP1310 offers, making it somewhat redundant.
These mobile workstations and gaming machines often have Thunderbolt ports, yet the BenQ DP1310 was designed to exploit USB 3.2 Gen 2 instead.
The choice of USB-C implemented with DisplayLink technology has well-documented limitations that might only become apparent after initial use.
Of these, the one that causes the most consternation is the latency created by the encoding of the data stream, making it entirely unsuitable for gaming or interactive graphics.
It might be fine for office work but not for gaming. The workaround for that is the HDMI in port, which would allow a machine with HDMI out to be connected to the dock without delays in DisplayLink. However, would it be simpler to connect it directly to the monitor than to connect two HDMI cables via the dock?
These caveats make us wonder if BenQ engineers fully thought the DP1310 through, as the USB-C and Thunderbolt docks market is remarkably competitive.
While the engineering and design that went into the BenQ DP1310 is excellent, it stretches a single USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port beyond its practical limits, and maybe Thunderbolt or USB 4.0 might have been a better choice.
BenQ beCreatus DP1310: Report card
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Value
Priced like it’s a Thunderbolt Dock, but it is USB-C
3 / 5
Design
Small, elegant and very well-made
3,5 / 5
Features
Many ports and input link for HDMI from second source
4 / 5
Total
For a USB-C dock this should be cheaper. But it’s a high-quality item even if it can’t compete with a Thunderbolt alternative.
The E10s is Eureka’s mid-range robot vacuum, offering every feature you need. Its vacuuming and mopping capability is complimented by a bagless self-emptying dust station, real-time mapping, and customizable cleaning schedules.
The vacuum strength can be adjusted to suit the debris that needs picking up, but even at the strongest 4,000Pa of suction, there was still litter left behind. Freshly dropped crumbs and dirt were generally fine, but more stubborn walked-in dirt couldn’t be captured. The noise at this level of suction also becomes a problem, especially if you’re trying to relax at the same time or make sure the children stay asleep. This lack of high-end performance means you’ll still need one of the best vacuum cleaners for those deeper cleans, though generally speaking no robotic cleaner can ever live up the the best vacuum cleaners in terms of suction power.
The E10s took a while to map my house, but once it was finished, it was able to predictably find its way around each room without too much trouble. As with most vacuums of this type, getting into corners was a little tricky, although the rotating dual brushes helped extend the capture range.
At the end of a clean, the E10 found its way back to its charging station and emptied its contents. It did this reliably and without any mess spilling out onto the floor. Unfortunately, the vacuum was rarely able to deposit the full contents of its clean into the base station. This resulted in the need for fairly regular maintenance cleaning to keep everything running smoothly. The base station itself looks great, with a clear perspex front, enabling users to see whether it needs emptying without having to tamper with it, though some may prefer vacuum debris to be left unseen.
(Image credit: Future)
The mop pad feels like a half-hearted attempt at providing a premium feature. In essence, all it is doing is running a wet cloth along the floor behind the vacuum. The app allows you to control how much water it uses, something you’ll need to be conscious of with hardwood floors. The mop was able to clean up fresh spills but couldn’t push through deeper stains. I don’t particularly mind this, as any mop that excels at this is likely to risk damaging the top layer of the floor.
The mop automatically lifts when it’s working in a ‘no mop zone’ which means the vacuum can move between surfaces without the user having to remove or insert the mop pad. That being said, the pad does attract a lot of unwanted dirt when traveling across carpets, which substantially limits its effectiveness when it then moves on to a hard floor.
Despite these small setbacks, the E10s is still a fantastic mid-range robot vacuum that will keep your house clean and tidy. At only $699, you’ll get a largely effective robot vacuum, which will only require you to get out a standard vacuum cleaner or mop when performing deep cleans.
Where is it available? Available in the US and Australia
The Eureka E10s costs $699.99 / AU$1,099, and you can buy it in the US at various retailers, including Amazon and Walmart. The E10 is also available in Australia. There are no plans at the moment for a UK release.
This price point puts it firmly in the middle of the market between the super-budget options and premium alternatives. For the price, you’ll get a fantastic all-rounder robot vacuum cleaner that includes a mop pad for basic mopping capabilities. Its bagless technology means owners will also avoid the cost of replacement bags, making this an even more affordable option.
The Eufy Clean X9 Pro is a little more expensive, but delivers better mopping performance. If mopping is important to you, then the Ecovacs DEEBOT T20 Omni is another great option. If you want one of the best robot vacuums that excel at everything, then check out the Roborock S8 Pro Ultra for $1,599 / AU$2,699.
Value score: 4.5 out of 5
Eureka E10s robot vacuum specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Here are the Eureka E10s specifications
Watt:
55 Watts
Suction power
4,000pa
Speeds
Gentle, Quiet, Standard, Turbo
Bin volume
0.2L for Robot vacuum; 2L for station dust cup
Battery life
180 minutes
Filtration
Yes
Noise volume
65Db (vacuum)
Mop water volume
Not specified
Water levels
Dry, Low, Standard, High
Mapping
Yes
Obstacle avoidance
Yes
Base
9.87″x7.1″x17.4 in
Smart support
App and voice activation
Tools
None
Weight
17.6lbs
Eureka E10 robot vacuum review: design & features
Bagless Self-Emptying Dust Station
2-in-1 Vacuum and Mop System
Multi-Level Cleaning
The Eureka E10s vacuum and base station are fairly compact and were well packaged inside a relatively small box. Having unboxed everything, I proceeded to plug the device in, download the app, and connect the two, which took no more than 10 minutes. After leaving the device to charge for a few hours, it was ready to map my house.
The robot vacuum is a beautiful round shape made of premium-quality powder-coated dark grey plastic. The color and material will help to keep the case looking great and free from scuff marks compared to white plastic alternatives.
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Future)
(Image credit: Future)
At 13.8 x 13.8 x 3.8 inches, it is a little larger than I expected, but it really looks the part. However, it is on the taller side of the robot vacuum spectrum, so it’s worth considering if there will be enough clearance room for the E10s to venture beneath lower furniture. The top of the robot includes three neat buttons for quickly turning it off, setting it to clean, or sending it back to the base station for charging. More specific and targeted cleaning tasks can be carried out through the app.
Two side brushes are easily inserted into the vacuum, which helps it cover a greater area of dust and dirt. This was particularly effective at the edges and corners of rooms. Without them, I think it would have struggled in these areas.
(Image credit: Future)
The mop pad sits at the back of the device and is attached with velcro and a thin rod that you slide into the main unit. The pad can be easily removed for cleaning and re-applying. The dust box is easy to remove and clean out, something that is regularly necessary due to the middling performance of the self-emptying process.
Moving on to the base station, we find an identical design ethos with pleasing curved edges and the same powder-coated dark grey plastic. At a size of 9.87 x 7.1 x 17.4 inches, it sits next to the wall and, after a while, just blends into the background.
(Image credit: Future)
The debris receptacle is easily removed by pulling on the top handle and is largely made of see-through plastic, so you know when it needs emptying. The presence of a small LED light on the front of the base station tells you that it is connected to a power source.
The robot vacuum includes two metal connection points, which, when connected to the base station, allow the device to be charged. I found that the robot had no problems finding its way back to its home.
(Image credit: Future)
The vacuum is complemented by an easy-to-use, powerful app. This makes it possible to see the mapped area, specify rooms, and dictate the suction power and water level. You can also set up a cleaning schedule for automated cleaning at set times.
I found it funny that there was a ‘Find My Robot’ feature. I’m not sure whose house is so big that it might get lost, but maybe it could get stuck under a sofa or chair. I can’t say I needed it, but the option is certainly nice to have.
Eureka E10 robot vacuum review: performance
Easy-to-use app
Vacuuming for everyday cleaning
Sub-par mopping
For the first test, I sprinkled a mix of crushed digestives and flour onto my carpet and hard floor before setting it to clean on its lowest suction power. At this level of power, the E10s was unable to pick up any of the debris. The flour and biscuits just got compacted into the carpet, meaning I needed to wipe the carpet afterward.
It fared slightly better on a hard floor, although it still struggled to collect a meaningful amount of dirt. After changing the power modes all the way from gentle through to turbo, I found that at the highest power setting, it was able to collect most of the debris, although it needed two or three turns to do it adequately.
(Image credit: Future)
The second test with oats was very much the same story. The dual brushes helped to direct the oats into the vacuum, but the lowest suction wasn’t strong enough to draw them up. The highest suction power was able to get up most of the oats.
The mop pad cleaned fresh spills nicely, although its effectiveness in mopping up spills rather than just spreading them around was completely dependent upon how wet the pad already was. More stubborn stains weren’t effectively removed, largely due to the lack of oscillating or rotating mops.
In terms of noise, the robot vacuum reached 55dB on its lowest suction and 70dB on its highest. The former noise level just blends into the background, whereas the latter ruins a nice, relaxing evening. Because you’ll want to use the highest suction level most of the time, you’ll need to run this vacuum when you’re out and about, during the daytime, or when you’re doing other jobs around the house and are less likely to be bothered by the volume.
(Image credit: Future)
The E10s boasts self-emptying technology that negates the need for bags. I was excited to use this feature but was disappointed by its performance. Dust, dirt, and debris became stuck along the route from capturing to emptying, and it quickly became clogged.
This made the vacuum largely ineffective, even at the highest suction power. This problem meant that I had to get in the habit of cleaning out the various parts of the robot vacuum before setting it going. I don’t mind a certain amount of maintenance, but when you expect your robot vacuum to remove these tasks, it becomes a little annoying.
(Image credit: Future)
The performance of the mapping and navigation technology was second to none. The robot vacuum took a while to map out our house, taking a lot of wrong turns and stumbling over table legs, but after it was finished, the map was surprisingly accurate. The software did a good job of straightening out edges and producing a reliable map for the robot to follow.
These types of vacuums can have a hard time navigating around the edges of rooms, constantly readjusting themselves to try and access all areas. The E10s was able to detect objects and brush up alongside them with a high level of accuracy. Rather than rotating and readjusting, it opted to push alongside these edges and therefore perform more efficient routes.
There are, of course, times when the robot became confused or tried to repeatedly travel in a set direction, but on the whole, it proved to be both reliable and predictable.
Performance score: 3.5 out of 5
Eureka E10 robot vacuum review: app
Easy-to-use app
Room and zone mapping
Cleaning scheduling
The Eureka app offers a high level of functionality while maintaining a relatively simple and intuitive interface. After performing the initial mapping, the app gives a full display of the scanned rooms and enables users to name rooms as well as set no-go or no-mop zones. The map also shows where the base station is to help you orient yourself.
Setting the robot to clean can be done in a number of ways. The easiest way is to select specific rooms on the map and hit the clean button. It is also possible to use the zones feature and create a cleaning area. For more stubborn dirt, it is possible to set the clean to be carried out up to three times.
(Image credit: Future)
The final way to set a clean going is to use the Scheduled Cleaning feature. This lets you specify a time, a repeat schedule, and a number of cleaning cycles. It also allows you to specify which rooms are to be cleaned on that particular schedule. Finally, multiple schedules can be created to create a highly customized schedule.
Another feature is multi-floor mapping and thankfully, the robot is clever enough to not throw itself down the stairs. The only downside, albeit an understandable one, is that the robot can’t move between floors and so will require manual moving before a clean occurs. This gets tricky when partnering multi-floor cleaning with a cleaning schedule.
I found the mapping and customizing of the resulting maps pretty intuitive, but after showing my parents how it worked, I realized that the process is not as straightforward as it needs to be for less tech-savvy people. There were times when the app went wrong or the robot struggled, requiring a certain level of intervention and troubleshooting.
Eureka E10 robot vacuum review: battery life
Battery lasts up to three hours
Takes around 4 hours to recharge
The E10s is equipped with an internal lithium-ion battery that is advertised to last as long as 3 hours. The maximum battery life is only applicable when using the quiet setting for suction, and the life drops to 100 minutes when set to high suction power.
In practice, I found the battery lasted just over an hour when at its highest suction setting. Considering that the effectiveness of the vacuum requires it to be on this level, you shouldn’t expect it to be able to clean much more than 600-800 square feet per charge.
It took around four hours to charge the battery from empty to full, an amount of time that is fine considering most people will only perform a maximum of one clean per day.
The robot will return to its base station whenever it needs a charge and will return to cleaning automatically when it has finished charging.
Battery life score: 3.5 out of 5
Should I buy the Eureka E10?
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Eureka E10s report card
Attribute
Notes
Score
Value
Mid-range price with some higher end features.
4.5 / 5
Design
Modern design with robust materials. Dual brushes help direct dirt into the vacuum and a mop pad cleans easy spills.
4 / 5
Performance
Most dirt was picked up on the highest suction setting although it struggled with more stubborn walked-in dirt.mop pads work great, but the vacuum pick up and edge clean up are mediocre
3.5 / 5
App
The app is simple to use and offers multi level home mapping.
4.5 / 5
Battery life
Battery lasts over an hour on the highest suction power.
3.5 / 5
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
Eureka E10: Also consider
If the Eureka E10s isn’t for you, have a look at these alternatives.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Here are the Eureka E10s specifications
Header Cell – Column 0
Eureka E10s
Narwal Freo
Eufy Clean X9 Pro
Price:
$699.99 / AU$1,099 (about £555)
$1,399.99 / AU$1,999 (about £1,100)
$899.99 / £899.99 / AU$1,499.95
Watt:
55 Watts
45W(vacuum) / 72W (base)
Row 1 – Cell 3
Suction power:
4,000pa
Quiet, Normal, Strong, Super Powerful
5,500Pa
Bin volume:
0.2L for Robot vacuum; 2L for station dust cup
480 ml
13.9 oz (410 ml)
Battery life:
180 minutes
180 minutes (Freo Mode)
150 min (standard vacuum/mop setting)
Filtration:
Yes
Yes
Row 5 – Cell 3
Noise volume:
65Db (vacuum)
65Db (vacuum), 50Db (base)
65dB (vacuum), 50dB (base)
Mop water volume:
Not specified
Not specified
1.1 gallons (4.1L)
Water levels:
Dry, Low, Standard, High
Slightly dry, normal, wet mopping
Row 8 – Cell 3
Mapping:
Yes
Yes
Yes
Obstacle avoidance:
Yes
Yes
Yes
Base:
9.87″x7.1″x17.4 in
14.6 x 16.3 x 17.1 in (370 x 415 x 435 mm)
17.4 x 16.6.2 x 16.4 in (44.3 x 42.2 x 41.6 cm)
Smart support:
App and voice activation
Siri
Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant
Tools:
None
None
Row 13 – Cell 3
Weight:
17.6lbs (7.98 kg)
9.59 lbs (4.35 kg)
31.7 lbs (14.4 kg)
How I tested the Eureka E10s
Tested over several weeks
Used all vacuum and mopping settings
Tests included all floor types, including carpet and hardwood
I tested the Eureka E10s in my 600-foot home, which includes a mixture of carpet, hardwood materials, and a low-pile rug. Over several weeks, I set the robot out on several whole house cleans, and as much as possible, I tried to leave the vacuum to get on with the job itself. These cleans enabled me to see how the vacuum handled a wide variety of different debris and types of navigation situations.
I carried out some more defined tests, including a fine dust and larger debris test to check its vacuuming capabilities. The former was made up of crushed digestives and flour, with the latter consisting of oats. These helped me see how well the vacuum was able to handle different types of mess.
We pride ourselves on our independence and our rigorous review-testing process, offering up long-term attention to the products we review and making sure our reviews are updated and maintained – regardless of when a device was released, if you can still buy it, it’s on our radar.
The Range Rover Evoque changed Land Rover forever. Before its launch in 2012, the 4×4 maker’s SUVs were attractive, but in a functional, boxy sort of way. After it, the British brand was as much about the latest trends and fashion as off-roading and country estates.
Speaking at the launch event in 2012, Victoria Beckham spoke about her hand in creating it. “I’ve designed a car that I want to drive,” she said at the time. Since then, however, chief creative officer Gerry McGovern has corrected matters somewhat, stating that Posh Spice exaggerated her role in the creation of the Evoque.
Still, by 2016, more than half a million Evoques have been sold globally in more than 180 countries, with Land Rover describing it as its “greatest sales success story.”
It’s hardly surprising, then, considering the model’s history, that the designers of the latest Evoque opted to take an evolutionary approach in terms of technology to the urban-orientated SUV.
This iteration comes in four different models; Range Rover Evoque S, Dynamic SE, Dynamic HSE, and finally Autobiography, all of which have a plug-in hybrid option. WIRED got its hands on the top-end Autobiography model on a brand-hosted drive in the Champagne wine region in the northeast of France. But will it be a vintage year for JLR?
On the surface the changes are subtle; inside is where the overhaul has really happened. That said, the Evoque’s exterior presence is enhanced by a new grille and revised super-slim Pixel LED headlights with signature DRL (daytime running lights), which deliver a technical, jewel-like appearance. New exterior accents also complement the characteristic “floating roof” that defines Range Rover’s design DNA.
The new super-slim Pixel LED headlights aren’t just for show, either—they house JLR’s new advanced headlight tech. Each light has 26 individual LED segments, which switch on or off automatically to supposedly provide the most effective forward beam at all times. These segments are also home to sensors, which scan the roads ahead and at each side. When another vehicle is in sight, the LEDs within the section it’s covering shut off, ensuring that you are not blinding any oncoming vehicle.
Speed-capturing cameras placed within the headlights pick up speed warning signs, instantly letting you know what speed you should be going on any given road. However, when driving down the freeway, the cameras would occasionally pick up side road signs, and in doing so show an incorrect reading on the dash.
All About the Inside
Photograph: Land Rover
The interior is where we see the big changes. The Evoque does channel its big brother, the flagship Range Rover to good effect inside, with comfortable seats, high-end materials, and a slick touchscreen infotainment system that’s consumed all the tech around it from previous examples. More on that in a bit.
Our best hybrid mattress guide contains some of the most popular (and most comfortable) beds on the market, so if you’re thinking of upgrading your sleep setup, this is an excellent place to start. And occupying the top spots on our list are two incredible beds – the DreamCloud mattress and the Helix Midnight mattress. But which hybrid is right for you?
Here at TechRadar, we’ve had the opportunity to test out both these mattresses – head to our DreamCloud mattress review and our Helix Midnight mattress review for the in-depth results. To cut a long story short, these hybrid mattresses use a combination of springs and foams to deliver exceptional support, and they’re both good enough to earn a place in our overall best mattress guide.
In this article, we’ll break it down and compare exactly how the the DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight match up in a range of specific areas. Overall, we think the DreamCloud mattress is the better hybrid bed, winning three categories and drawing the fourth. An affordable yet high quality bed, the DreamCloud hybrid mattress has a versatile sleep surface that will suit a range of people.
However, this isn’t quite the runaway victory you might expect from those results. The Helix Midnight puts up a good fight, especially as the softer surface makes it one of the very best mattresses for side sleepers as well as those with a lighter build. Preference plays a big role in which mattress to choose, so let’s dive into this DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight showdown and see what’s happening.
Image 1 of 2
The DreamCloud in our reviewer’s bedroom(Image credit: Future)
The Helix Midnight mattress in our reviewer’s bedroom(Image credit: Future)
DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight mattress: specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell – Column 0
DreamCloud
Helix Midnight
Type
Hybrid
Hybrid
Materials
Gel memory foam, other foams, pocket coils
Memory foam, polyfoam, pocket coils
Cover
Cashmere-blend fabric, not removable
Breathe knit cover (GlacioTex cooling cover available as an upgrade)
Handles
Yes
No
Firmness (1-10)
Officially 6.5, we rate 7.5
5.5
Height
12 inches
11.5 inches
Trial period
365 nights
100 nights
Warranty
Lifetime
10 year
Price bracket
Lower mid-range / mid-range
Mid-range
Queen price
MSRP $1,332 (usually sold at $799)
MSRP $1,373.80 (usually sold at $1,099)
Sizes
Twin, twin XL, full, queen, king, Cal king
Twin, twin XL, full, queen, king, cal king, short queen, RV king
Delivery
Free standard delivery, $199 for White Glove
Free standard delivery
Returns
Free
Free
DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight mattress: design
Both hybrid mattresses containing a combination of springs and foam
Both feature a variety of foams, including memory foam
Premium upgrades available for both – more layers and increased cooling
Both the DreamCloud and the Helix Midnight are hybrid beds, meaning they contain springs and foams (you can learn more with our memory foam vs hybrid mattress explainer).
The DreamCloud contains six internal layers, plus a cashmere upper cover and a shift-resistant lower cover. At the top is a layer of quilted gel memory foam, designed to be both contouring and breathable. Beneath this sits a layer of support foam, followed by a layer of adaptive, cushioning, gel-infused memory foam, before a dynamic transition foam. Next comes the springs – individually wrapped coils, with thicker springs placed around the perimeter for support. Finally, there’s one more layer of foam, this time to provide stability at the base.
Image 1 of 2
The DreamCloud has six interior layers, plus covers(Image credit: DreamCloud)
The Helix has five interior layers plus a cover(Image credit: Helix)
The Helix Midnight features five internal layers, plus a breathable knit cover (or you can upgrade to the GlacioKnit cooling pillow top cover, for roughly an extra $350). The top layer consists of a Helix-blend memory foam, crafted to provide sleepers with unique pressure relief. Beneath this sits two layers of response foam, offering cushioning alongside ergonomic support. Then there’s the individually wrapped springs – up to 1,000, depending on the mattress size – with reinforced coils at the lengthwise sides. At the base is a layer of DuraDense foam, for stability and durability.
The DreamCloud has the slightly more complex design, and it also comes with handles, which make it easier to move. The Helix Midnight is both handle-less and heavy (a queen weighs 100 lbs, compared to the 78 lbs DreamCloud). If you want to shift the Helix Midnight, you’ll probably need to call in a second pair of hands.
(Image credit: DreamCloud)
If you like the sound of either mattress but you’d prefer something a little more luxurious, good news: you can opt for a premium upgrade. For the DreamCloud, you can upgrade to the Premier, which is taller with upgraded cooling, or the Premier Rest, which is even taller again and has even better cooling.
But for the biggest choice of upgrades, check out the Helix Midnight. This is available as the the Helix Midnight Luxe, which is taller, comes with a cushioned pillow top cover, and has an additional layer of cooling memory foam. Or there’s the Helix Midnight Elite – it’s more than twice the price, but you’ll get two additional layers of micro-coils, plus a GlacioTex cushioned cover is included as standard. For a more affordable upgrade, add the GlacioTex cooling pillow top cover to the Helix Midnight (you can also add a GlacioTex cover to the Helix Midnight Luxe). There are a lot of ways to customize this bed.
Design winner: DreamCloud
The DreamCloud just takes this thanks to its extra layer and the convenient handles. But it’s a tough call, as they’re both solid designs.
DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight: price & extras
DreamCloud is lower-mid range with a year trial and lifetime warranty
Helix Midnight is mid-range with a 100-night trial and 10-year warranty
Both mattresses are always discounted
DreamCloud is priced at $1,332 for a queen, which puts it in the upper mid-range price bracket. However, you never have to pay full price at DreamCloud. Sales run throughout the year, with a queen typically sold for $799. If you’re lucky, you might be able to grab it during a DreamCloud half price sale, when the queen sells for $665, putting it in the lower-mid range.
Similarly, while the Helix Midnight has an MSRP of $1,373.80, you should never pay full price. The Helix Midnight evergreen sale always knocks off 20%, taking a queen down to $1,099 and you can expect Helix to throw in a freebie as well (typically a pillow set). And like DreamCloud, Helix occasionally offers a bigger discount – you’ll often be able to nab 25% off around the major sale days.
In the evergreen sale, the DreamCloud offers incredible value for the price. It has a luxurious look and feel, and while it might not deliver the longevity and performance of a premium mattress, it goes above and beyond the mid-range price bracket. And although the Helix Midnight isn’t quite so affordable, it’s still great value for money.
When it comes to extras, DreamCloud again over-performs for the price: you get a full 365 nights to test the mattress, plus a forever warranty. The 100-night mattress trial and 10-year warranty of the Helix Midnight can’t compare (although these are fairly standard extras).
Price winner: DreamCloud
DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight: comfort & support
DreamCloud is a medium-firm bed (7.5/10)
Helix Midnight is a medium bed (5.5/10)
DreamCloud is best for back sleepers, Helix Midnight suits side sleepers
DreamCloud describes the hybrid mattress as “luxury firm”, rating it 6.5 out of 10 on the firmness scale (with one being super-soft and 10 being ultra-hard). Our tester disagreed slightly, rating it as medium-firm and placing it at 7.5 on the scale.
This makes the DreamCloud a pretty versatile mattress. Our tester found it comfortable in a range of sleep positions, and rated it highly for alleviating joint and back pains (it’s one of our best mattresses for back pain). The medium-firm feel will probably suit back sleepers best, but it can also work for side and stomach sleepers. However, lightweight side sleepers might need something softer, while stomach sleepers with a heavier build might prefer something firmer. Overall, however, this is a mattress with a wide appeal.
The DreamCloud (left) is firmer than the Helix Midnight (right) (Image credit: DreamCloud / Helix)
We typically expect hybrid mattresses to be on the firmer side, but the Helix Midnight bucks that trend with a medium feel and a contouring effect. The official rating from Helix spans five and six out of ten, and our tester largely agreed, rating it a 5.5 (or medium).
A softer feel provides more cushioning at the pressure points, which is why we recommend this bed for side sleepers – in fact, the Helix Midnight is among the best mattresses for side sleepers. However, back and stomach sleepers, as well as those with a heavier build, might need to opt for something firmer.
Comfort winner: draw
It really comes down to personal preference here, as the DreamCloud and Helix Midnight suit different sleep styles. Want something firmer? Go for the DreamCloud. Prefer a softer cushioning? Helix Midnight is the winner.
DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight: performance
Both are breathable mattresses (with cooling upgrades for hot sleepers)
Both have strong motion isolation
DreamCloud offers slightly better edge support
We test all our mattresses in three key areas: temperature regulation, motion isolation, and edge support. These attributes help us understand how the mattress performs during the night.
Despite neither mattress being a cooling bed, we were impressed with the temperature regulation of both the DreamCloud and the Helix Midnight. Hybrid mattresses are typically breathable thanks to those open coils, and these beds stay an even temperature throughout the night. Very hot sleepers might want to invest in a cooling upgrade – the premium version of both beds come with increased cooling capabilities – but the average sleeper should be pleasantly comfortable.
The DreamCloud (left) and the Helix Midnight (right) both have good motion isolation (Image credit: Future)
Motion isolation refers to how much disruptive movement travels across the bed. Simply put, if one person moves, can the other person in the bed feel it? Both the DreamCloud and Helix Midnight mattress impressed our testers with how well they trapped motion, meaning if you share with a restless partner, you should be able to sleep undisturbed (or, at least, not go barreling towards a sleep divorce).
Finally, edge support. This describes how strong a mattress is at the perimeter. Do the sides collapse when you push against them? Or can you sit on the edge of the mattress and still feel a sturdy support? While both mattresses are rated highly in this category, the DreamCloud just comes out on top. With the Helix Midnight, our tester felt the edges showed a “notable amount of sinkage” when they were reclining at night. This sinkage wasn’t an issue with the DreamCloud.
Winner: DreamCloud
DreamCloud vs Helix Midnight: which should I buy?
Buy the DreamCloud if…
✅ You sleep on your back: The DreamCloud offers good support for a range of sleeping positions, but the medium-firm feel is best suited for back sleepers. it hits the sweet spot between supporting and cushioning, offering impressive pressure relief while keeping your spine aligned.
✅ You push against the edge of the bed to get up: With reinforced coils placed around the perimeter of the mattress, the DreamCloud provides edge-to-edge support. If you push against the side of the bed to get up in the morning, you’ll find a stable base with the DreamCloud.
✅ You’re on a tighter budget: You never have to pay full price for the DreamCloud hybrid, with an evergreen discount making this mattress excellent value for money. Even better, you’ll get a 365-night trial to decide if the bed’s for you, plus peace of mind thanks to a lifetime warranty.
Buy the Helix Midnight if…
✅ You sleep on your side: Softer than your usual hybrid, the Helix Midnight offers comforting pressure relief for side sleepers. Your hips and shoulders will feel cushioned while the spine has ample support, for a dreamy experience.
✅ You want a hybrid without the bounce: Due to that layer of springs, hybrids are known for being bouncier beds than their all-foam counterparts. However, the softer top foam layers of the Helix Midnight give the bed a plusher feel, resulting in a mattress that provides a contouring pressure relief, instead of the responsiveness of a traditional hybrid. Although not quite the ‘hug’ you’d expect from the best memory foam mattresses, the Helix Midnight offers a nice middle ground.
The best hybrid mattresses are among the very best beds around. They’re breathable, they provide excellent support and pressure relief, and they suit a wide range of sleepers. So are there any down-sides to a hybrid mattress?
As a general rule, hybrid mattresses are heavier, more expensive beds, with a higher level of motion transfer. But before you assume a hybrid isn’t the best mattress for you, check out this guide, where we’ll talk you through the down-sides of a hybrid bed (and why they might actually turn out to be an advantage).
Hybrids are usually more expensive
Hybrid mattresses have a reputation for being a more expensive style of bed, and that’s generally accurate. The majority of mattresses in our best luxury mattress guide are hybrids, and when considering how much to spend on a mattress, prepare for a higher price tag if you’re set on a hybrid.
(Image credit: Getty Images)
But there’s a reason why you can expect to pay more. Hybrid mattresses take their name because they’re composed of two or more different materials (typically springs and foams, but there are variations). The price of these different materials, combined with the complexity of the manufacturing process, leads to an increased cost for the consumer.
While hybrid beds might pricier on average than memory foam or innerspring mattresses, you can still get a hybrid on a budget – several are featured in our guide to the best cheap mattresses.
And at the other end of the spectrum…
Hybrid mattresses have more motion transfer
Motion transfer refers to when movement made on one side of the bed can be felt on the other. If your mattress has good motion isolation, your bed partner can toss, turn, and even get out of bed, and you’ll hardly know they’re moving. The best memory foam mattresses have excellent motion isolation, as the dense foam absorbs the vibrations from tossing and turning.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
(Image credit: Future)
But because hybrids are often built with coils, they tend to be bouncier, resulting in increased motion transfer. There are ways to limit this. Many hybrid beds use pocket coils rather than a continuous coil, because the individual pocketing helps contain motion. In addition, top layers of cushioned comfort materials (often foams) can absorb movement before it reaches the springs. So even though when comparing memory foam vs hybrid mattresses, memory foams will generally have better motion isolation, hybrids can still be a good choice for couples.
Hybrid mattresses are heavier
With all those weighty springs, hybrid mattresses can be a heavy beds. Take one of our favorite hybrids, the DreamCloud. A queen-size DreamCloud hybrid weighs 78lbs (roughly 35kg). In comparison, in our Nectar memory foam mattress review, we noted a queen weighs only 66lbs (roughly 30kg). Both beds are from the same parent company (Resident Home) but have a noticeable weight difference.
Because of this extra weight, hybrid mattresses can be hard to maneuver. If you live alone, you might want to pay for white glove delivery to get your bed setup (or enlist several helpers). And once it’s on the bed frame, you might find it harder to clean the mattress.
(Image credit: Getty Images)
This might be where you expect us to explain how sleep brands are reducing the weight of hybrid mattresses – but that’s not really happening. It’s just something you have to expect with a hybrid. But luckily, you rarely need to flip a hybrid mattress, and as they can last for a while, once your bed is in place, it should only need to be moved slightly every few months to be cleaned (and sometimes rotated).
The Cloverlane Mattress debuted in late 2023 as Resident Sleep’s new luxury label. (Resident is the company behind Nectar and DreamCloud – two of the best mattress brands around.) It’s available as a hybrid or all-foam bed and comes with three firmness levels: Plush Soft, Luxury Firm, or Firm).
For one month, I slept on a twin Cloverlane Hybrid Mattress in Plush Soft, which is deemed the best level of firmness for pressure relief. In addition to my experience, I asked four volunteers to nap on it as well and conducted a series of objective tests. My full Cloverlane Mattress review is below but if you’re short on time, here’s the abridged version…
(Image credit: Future)
The Cloverlane either has a bed of 8-inch wrapped coils surrounded by dense foam (hybrid) or a 9-inch foam core (memory foam). The core of the Cloverlane Mattress influences its level of firmness. Both versions of the Cloverlane Mattress have multiple foam layers, a latex lumbar support strip, and a polyester-blend cover.
My fellow testers and I found the Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid most suitable for side sleeping, but it has a firmer-than-advertised feel. You’ll need to give it at least a month before you start to feel more settled into it – and even then, it may still feel firm. Fortunately, you get 365 nights to break this mattress in.
The Cloverlane’s lumbar support system – a half-inch thick strip of latex and specialized quilting in the center of the bed – kept me from waking up with stiffness in my lower back. There’s all-over pressure relief with the Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid, which increases the more you sleep on it.
My drop tests showed that the Cloverlane Hybrid has above-average motion isolation. That result is likely to be even better with the Cloverlane Memory Foam Mattress. However, the hybrid should sleep cooler than the foam version since it has springs to increase airflow along with the breathable cover and 16 brass air vents. (I didn’t overheat with my Cloverlane Hybrid at all.)
(Image credit: Resident)
Edge support, however, was hit-or-miss on my twin test unit. I found the Cloverlane Hybrid supportive enough to keep me from rolling off the bed when I rolled too close to the edges, but some of my testers didn’t feel as steady when sitting along the middle perimeter. This could be a different story on larger versions of the bed, but I believe sturdy edges should be a feature of any mattress, regardless of size.
Does the Cloverlane Hybrid do enough to overtake the Saatva Classic as TechRadar’s #1 mattress? I don’t think so. The Cloverlane is a comfortable bed but it’s not meticulously hand-crafted like the Saatva. (The Cloverlane still comes in a box, despite arriving flat.) The polyester-blend cover doesn’t feel as luxe as the organic cotton cover that kept our reviewer comfortably cool in our Saatva Classic mattress review.
The Cloverlane Mattress is always on sale for up to $700 off – a queen-size goes for $1,499 in either hybrid or memory foam. (This is interesting to point out because hybrid mattresses generally cost more than their foam-only counterparts.) It comes with White Glove Delivery plus optional mattress disposal, a one-year risk-free trial, and a lifetime warranty.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Section
Notes
Score
Comfort
Buy according to your sleep style – and anticipate a lengthy break-in period.
N/A
Value
An all-around great value among luxury mattresses.
4/5
Design
Not quite as luxe as a Saatva but otherwise well-made.
4/5
Temperature
Brass air vents and a poly-blend cover will keep most sleepers cool.
4/5
Motion isolation
Most couples should be able to sleep uninterrupted.
4/5
Edge support
More stability at the foot than in the middle, but mixed results overall.
3.5/5
Customer service
One-year trial with free returns, lifetime warranty, and White Glove Delivery included.
4.5/5
Cloverlane Mattress review: Design & materials
Available as a 15-inch hybrid or all-foam mattress
Support coils affect the Cloverlane’s firmness level
More utilitarian than luxurious but still well-made
The Cloverlane comes in one height (15 inches), two builds (hybrid and memory foam), and three firmness levels (Plush Soft, Luxury Firm, and Firm). The Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid is what’s being reviewed here.
The bottom half of the mattress either has 8-inch wrapped coils surrounded by a dense foam wall for edge support or a 9-inch foam core instead. The core of the mattress influences the level of firmness. On top are 2.5 inches of transitional support foam plus 2 inches of gel-infused memory foam. In between those layers is a half-inch thick strip of latex that runs across the center of the mattress for lumbar support.
The Cloverlane Mattress has a Euro-top: 1.75 inches of plush foam wrapped in a blend of polyester, cotton, and polyethylene. Specialty quilting in the middle third complements the latex lumbar layer.
All of the foams in the Cloverlane Mattress are CertiPUR-US certified, meaning they’ve been tested for harmful chemicals and the VOC (volatile organic compound) emissions that result in off-gassing odors. (I didn’t detect any obvious smell from my Cloverlane Hybrid mattress.) It’s unclear whether the Cloverlane Mattresses have fiberglass.
The poly-blend cover isn’t uncomfortable, but compared to a luxury mattress with a tufted organic cotton cover (Saatva Classic) or a soft cashmere-blend cover (DreamCloud), the Cloverlane appears less shiny. However, the side-carry handles are a convenient touch, and the 16 brass air vents are a good way to boost airflow.
Design score: 4 out of 5
Cloverlane Mattress review: Price & value for money
Has been on sale for up to $700 off from the time it launched
An upper mid-range mattress, a queen sells for $1,499
White Glove Delivery and a risk-free one-year trial
The Cloverlane Mattress has been on sale for up to $700 off from the time it launched late last year. Like most Resident brands, you can ignore the MSRPs. A queen Cloverlane mattress sells for $1,499, which is right on the border between TechRadar’s upper mid-range and premium pricing brackets. Prices are the same for the all-foam version of the Cloverlane.
Here is the official sale pricing for the Cloverlane Mattress, at time of writing:
Twin MSRP: $1,199 (usually on sale for $699)
Twin XL MSRP: $1,499 (usually on sale for $999)
Full MSRP: $1,999 (usually on sale for $1,399)
Queen MSRP: $2,199 (usually on sale for $1,499)
King MSRP: $2,699 (usually on sale for $1,999)
California king MSRP: $2,699 (usually on sale for $1,999)
Add-ons include a specialty cooling cover with extra heat-wicking fibers for $199 and a discounted bedding bundle with down pillows, percale sheets, and a mattress pad from $199 (up to a $696 value).
Compared to the Saatva Classic, you’re paying about $200 to $400 less, depending on the type of Saatva mattress sale running at the moment. That’s not a significant differential. Cloverlane and Saatva both offer a one-year trial, a lifetime warranty, and free White Glove Delivery with optional mattress removal. (Saatva also adds foundation removal.) Cloverlane offers free returns, while Saatva charges a $99 fee.
Among the broader luxury mattress market, Cloverlane’s extras make it an excellent value for money. Side-by-side with the Saatva Classic, however, the difference is negligible. If you have the money to spare, I’d recommend just going for the luxe, handcrafted Saatva and its free mattress and foundation removal. Otherwise, the Cloverlane is a sound choice if you want to spend a few hundred dollars less.
Value for money score: 4.5 out of 5
Cloverlane Mattress review: Comfort & support
Expect a firmer-than-advertised feel at first
However, the mattress starts to soften after a month
Endorsed by the American Chiropractic Association for back pain
The Cloverlane Mattress comes in three firmness levels (based on a 10-point firmness scale):
Plush Soft (4): Side sleepers, lightweight sleepers, maximum pressure relief
Luxury Firm (5-7): Couples, back/combi sleepers, sleepers with back pain
For the first half of my month-long testing period, my Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid Mattress felt decidedly firm. I double-checked the mattress tag and my order details to make sure I knew what I was sleeping on. However, by the fourth and final week, I noticed more give around my shoulders and hips. It still wasn’t supremely plush – and I definitely wouldn’t rate it a 4 out of 10 on the firmness scale – but it’s slightly softer than when I first laid on it.
I’m not the only one who noticed this, either. One of my lightweight volunteers tried my Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid Mattress twice. During her initial trial in week two, she rated it a 10 out of 10 on the firmness scale, but when she tried it again during week four, she knocked that down to a 9 and said she felt more settled. You’ll need to make the most of your year-long trial because the Cloverlane may take quite a while to fully break in.
(Image credit: Future)
But is the Cloverlane Mattress comfortable otherwise? My fellow testers and I think so. I rate the Plush Soft Hybrid I tested the best for side sleeping for its pressure relief from the top foam layers. I was also comfortable stomach sleeping, particularly during the first couple of weeks when it was much firmer. If you strictly sleep on your stomach, though, choose the Cloverlane Firm.
Most of the back sleepers in my group liked the Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid Mattress but you’ll want to go for the Luxury Firm version for the best balance of support and relief. One of my older back sleepers with arthritis, who tried my Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid during week three, said she would have liked more lumbar support.
(Image credit: Future)
To objectively test the Cloverlane Hybrid’s pressure relief, I placed a 50lb weight at the center of the mattress, where it sank about three inches. That seems on-brand for a Plush Soft hybrid mattress. Moving the weight towards the bottom half of the mattress yielded a similar level of sinkage.
Is the Cloverlane a good mattress for back pain? After transitioning from the Saatva RX – which is one of the best mattresses for back pain I’ve ever slept on – I think the Cloverlane’s latex lumbar strip and specialty quilting do a good job of picking up where the Saatva left off for me. I didn’t wake up with any stiffness or pain in my lower lumbar at any point during testing. By the way – the Cloverlane Hybrid is endorsed by the American Chiropractic Association.
Cloverlane Mattress review: performance
Will keep most sleepers at a comfortable temperature
Absorbs most movement well – good for couples
Edge support is a mixed bag
For one month, I slept on a slept on a twin Cloverlane Hybrid mattress in Plush Soft and asked four adult volunteers of varying body types and sleep preferences to nap on it for at least 15 minutes to help provide a broader perspective. I also tested its temperature regulation, motion isolation, and edge support. Here’s what I found…
Temperature regulation
I tested the Cloverlane Hybrid between December 2023 and January 2024, so I endured plenty of frigid nights. Of course, I kept the heat running (around 72 degrees F) and layered up with a polyester blanket and a mid-weight polyester comforter atop my 100% cotton sheets.
(Image credit: Future)
The Cloverlane Hybrid did a good job of maintaining temperature-neutral sleep throughout the month I slept on it. I wouldn’t say it’s profoundly cooling but I’m willing to bet it’s more breathable than the all-foam Cloverlane Mattress. (It’s a hybrid, after all.) If you deal with regular night sweats, you can add a specialty cover with extra heat-wicking material for $199 more.
Still, the Cloverlane Mattress is built with breathability in mind. In addition to the aforementioned cover, there are 16 hand-installed brass vents along the base to boost airflow. (The vents are on the hybrid and memory foam versions.) It may not have the same effect as a dedicated cooling mattress but for most people, the Cloverlane Mattress should be comfortable enough.
Temperature regulation score: 4 out of 5
Motion isolation
To test the motion isolation of my twin-size Cloverlane Hybrid, I performed a drop test with an empty wine glass and a 10lb weight. I dropped the weight from six inches above the surface from three distances to simulate three levels of motion transfer. In addition to that, I also noticed how quickly the weight settled.
When I dropped the weight from four inches away, the glass fell over. I repeated this drop for insurance and the glass didn’t drop but it did wobble quite a bit. These results suggest that it’s perhaps not the best choice for couples with a restless partner.
Fortunately, the empty glass remained steady when I dropped the weight from 12 and 25 inches away. This means you’re unlikely to be disturbed if your partner gets in or out of bed. Meanwhile, the 10lb weight settled into the surface after a few short bounces, indicating good absorption of movement.
The all-foam version of the Cloverlane likely performs even better here, but the Cloverlane Hybrid has a nice bouncy rhythm while maintaining a low level of motion transfer. Either way, I think the Cloverlane Mattress will allow most couples to sleep uninterrupted.
Motion isolation score: 4 out of 5
Edge support
To test the edge support of my Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid mattress, I placed a 50lb weight on the middle perimeter, where it sank about three inches. It was the same result when I put the weight at the very foot of the bed. That’s the same level of sinkage I measured at the center of the bed – which is usually a good thing, but that’s quite a deep drop for the edges.
(Image credit: Future)
Among my fellow testers, opinions were mixed. Along the middle, my lighter and taller volunteers said they were comfortable but the shorter sleepers in my group felt unsteady. (Everyone felt at ease sitting at the foot of the bed.) Meanwhile, I tend to roll toward the edge when I sleep, but the Cloverlane’s edges kept me from falling overboard.
Of course, I can only speak for a twin-sized Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid. There’s a possibility larger, firmer versions perform better here. There currently aren’t any reviews that mention the Cloverlane’s edge support. But if you want a mattress that’s known for strong edges on even the smallest bed sizes, read my Awara Natural Hybrid mattress review, which I also tested in a twin.
Edge support score: 3.5 out of 5
Cloverlane Mattress review: Customer service
Arrives flat but still comes in a box
Includes White Glove Delivery and mattress removal
One-year trial with free returns
The Cloverlane Mattress arrives flat via free White Glove Delivery. The most I had to do was schedule a delivery time, which was not the smoothest experience. However, your mileage may vary here as you’ll be dealing with a local logistics company. Fortunately, the day of the delivery went off without a hitch as the delivery crew arrived right on time. The whole process took less than 10 minutes, and that even included the free mattress removal.
Interestingly, my Cloverlane Hybrid arrived flat but still came in a box. The two delivery drivers removed my mattress from a giant brown box from the back of their truck before taking it into my home. I peeked at the mattress tag, which says it was manufactured in August 2024. I received my mattress in December 2024, about four months later. Despite that, my Cloverlane Hybrid Mattress didn’t have an obvious off-gassing smell, and it was ready to sleep on right away. It’s not your typical bed-in-a-box.
The Cloverlane comes with a one-year warranty, with free returns if you’re not happy with it. There’s also a lifetime warranty, which includes a free replacement with a factory defect for the first 10 years you own the mattress. Beyond that, you’ll just have to pay a $50 transportation fee each way for repairs.
Customer service score: 4.5 out of 5
Cloverlane Mattress review: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Type
Row 0 – Cell 1
Materials
Memory foam, other foams, latex (coils with hybrid, reviewed here)
Cover
Polyester, cotton, polyethylene
Handles
Yes
Firmness (1-10)
Plush Soft (reviewed here), Luxury Firm, Firm
Height
15 inches
Trial period
365 nights
Warranty
Lifetime
Price bracket
Premium
Queen price
$1,499 (both hybrid and memory foam)
Sizes
Twin to California King
Delivery
Free White Glove Delivery
Returns
Free
Should you buy the Cloverlane Mattress?
Buy it if…
✅ You have a bad back: Between the free in-room delivery and the specialized lumbar support, the Cloverlane should relieve many sleepers with back pain. I didn’t wake up with stiffness in my lower back throughout my month of sleeping on the Cloverlane Hybrid. The American Chiropractic Association gives it its seal of approval.
✅ You want to customize your comfort: The Cloverlane is available as a hybrid (reviewed here) or all-foam mattress in three firmness levels. There’s no price difference between the two types of builds, either, which is rare. (Hybrids are usually more expensive than foam beds.)
✅ You want a bed that’s easy to move: The side carry handles will make rotating your mattress much less of a challenge. They’re also handy if you move house often or like to rearrange your space regularly.
Don’t buy it if…
❌ You can afford a Saatva: The Saatva Classic boasts better craftsmanship and a more sumptuous appearance than the Cloverlane Mattress. If you have enough for Saatva, make that your choice. It’s only about $200 to $400 more than either version of the Cloverlane Mattress. Plus, Saatva offers free mattress and foundation removal.
❌ You don’t want a bed with a long break-in period: My Plush Soft Cloverlane Hybrid was definitely firm at first, and one month later I’d downgrade it to a medium-firm. You’ll need to be patient and allow yourself time to fully break this mattress in. Fortunately, Cloverlane gives you a year to do that.
❌ You’d rather buy a mattress without fiberglass: Cloverlane doesn’t make it clear if it uses fiberglass in its mattresses. If you’re sensitive to fiberglass or simply don’t want to sleep on a bed that has it, check out our vetted list of the best fiberglass-free mattresses.
Cloverlane Mattress review: Also consider
How I tested the Cloverlane Mattress
I slept on a twin Cloverlane Hybrid mattress in Plush Firm every night for one month between December 2023 and January 2024. My review is a combination of real-world experience and objective tests.
In addition to my perspective as a 5-foot-4, 145lb side/stomach sleeper with a lower back issue, I asked four adult volunteers to nap on the Cloverlane for at least 15 minutes in their usual positions. Our testers ranged in size from 5ft 4 and 125lbs to 6ft and 185lbs, and one of them deals with arthritis.
It’s another cold winter here, so I’ll sometimes add a polyester blanket to my regular setup: a mid-weight polyester blend comforter and 100% cotton sheets. My bedroom temperature is usually around 72 degrees F.
The Easter bunny is bringing something very special this year, with a massive 25% off our favourite hybrid mattress in the Simba sale. This huge saving is excellent news for anyone who wants to start their spring cleaning by getting rid of their old mattress and boosting their sleep.
We recently awarded the Simba Hybrid Original the number one spot in our best hybrid mattress guide, and if you take a look at our Simba Hybrid Original mattress review, it’s easy to see why. Our tester described the Simba Hybrid Original as “one of the most comfortable mattresses [they’d] ever had”, praising how it offered just the right amount of support and softness while still delivering top quality temperature regulation and motion isolation.
Simba mattress sales have undergone a bit of a shake-up recently and we’re not seeing the same number of deals we used to. So if you want to save big on a bed from one of the best mattress brands in the UK, I recommend taking a close look at this Simba sale. Read on to find out why the Simba Hybrid Original mattress is my top pick…
Buy it if…
✅ You like to move around in the night: There’s a bit of bounce to the Simba Hybrid Original mattress, which makes it easier to switch sides and move around (the mattress won’t hold onto you in the way a softer foam can). And the medium-firm feel surface suits a range of positions, so if you’re restless, you feel supported no matter how you’re lying.
✅ You share a bed: Hybrid mattresses aren’t always known for their motion isolation, but the Simba Hybrid Original actually performs pretty well in this category – if your partner moves around, your sleep shouldn’t be disrupted. And with edge-to-edge support, two people can stretch out on the bed without it starting to sink at the sides.
✅ You want to save: Simba sales are no longer the permanent presence they once were, so act now if you want a discount on a high quality mattress. When this 25% off sale is over, we don’t know when the next one will come along.
Don’t buy it if…
❌ You like to sink into the bed: Although there’s an upper layer of foam to the Simba Hybrid Original, it doesn’t off the sink-in feel of an all-foam bed. If you like a bed that hugs you in your sleep, take a look at our Emma Original mattress review. There’s also 20% off the Emma Original right now.
❌ You’re a lightweight side sleeper: The Simba Hybrid Original suits a lot of sleep styles, but lightweight side sleepers isn’t one of them, unfortunately. If this is you, consider a bed with a softer sleep surface. In our Brook + Wilde Elite mattress review, we noted this luxury hybrid suits everyone, because you can pick a firmness. Save 40% in the Brook + Wilde spring sale.
❌ You want.a more sustainable bed: Simba is a certified B Corp, and the Hybrid Original has been designed to use minimal foam to limit its carbon footprint. However, if you want a mattress that prioritizes natural materials, consider the recently-launched Simba Earth range. Combining traditional materials with the latest technology, the Simba Earth Source mattress is the most affordable option, and there’s 25% off.
