Jio Platforms Ltd. anunciado (JPL) anunció una asociación con Polygon Blockchain mientras planifica su proyecto en tecnología Web3. Jio, filial de telecomunicaciones de Reliance, busca ofrecer funciones basadas en la tecnología Web3, además de sus funciones existentes disponibles para más de 450 millones de usuarios. JPL espera explorar las nuevas capacidades que ofrece la tecnología Web3 y ofrecer una experiencia digital mejorada a sus usuarios, según la compañía.
Durante los últimos ocho años, geo acreditación Ha pasado de brindar servicios de telecomunicaciones a tiendas de compras en línea y fuera de línea, plataformas de transmisión de medios, videoconferencias, navegadores web, servicios de juegos en la nube y servicios de seguridad.
Geo y acanalado Aún no se ha revelado cuál de las aplicaciones y servicios del operador será el primero en actualizarse con capacidades blockchain. Se espera que sea uno de los más grandes. esfuerzos Integrar la tecnología Web3 con los servicios existentes en el país.
En declaraciones a Gadgets 360, Aishwari Gupta de Polygon dijo que este desarrollo representa un gran paso para Web3 En la India. Gupta es el director global de pagos y tecnología financiera de Polygon.
“Esta es una de las asociaciones más grandes que tenemos en India y nuestra idea es ayudar a Jio a habilitar componentes Web3 en su conjunto de productos existente”, dijo Gupta. “Hay algunos productos en los que estamos trabajando para integrarlos mientras hablamos. Desde el punto de vista indio, es un gran paso ya que queremos habilitar la web3 en India y esto nos ayuda en esa dirección”, añadió.
Presidente y Director General de RIL Mukesh Ambani El plan de integración blockchain de Jio se insinuó por primera vez en agosto de 2023. Durante la 46ª Asamblea General Anual de Reliance Industries, Ambani dijo que Jio Financial Services (JFS) será el punto de entrada de la marca en el segmento Web3.
En ese momento, se reveló que a través de JFS, Reliance ofrecerá servicios de gestión de activos digitales. Desde entonces no se han publicado detalles sobre la incursión de JFS en Web3. el año pasado, Informes de prensa Se sugirió que JFS y roca negra Estaban planeando una empresa de gestión patrimonial y presentaron una solicitud a la Bolsa de Valores Nacional de la India en abril de 2024.
Si bien Reliance ha optado por no exponer a sus usuarios a servicios relacionados con criptoactivos volátiles, la empresa ha trabajado con otras tecnologías Web3. En 2023, Reliance General Insurance el dijo Ha comenzado a aceptar eRupee CBDC para pagos simbólicos. En el mismo año, Reliance Retail también Anunciar Permitirá a los compradores pagar a través de eRupee CBDC en sus tiendas en Mumbai.
Al comentar sobre la asociación con Polygon, Kiran Thomas, director ejecutivo de JPL, dijo en una declaración preparada que “Unir fuerzas con Polygon Labs marca un hito importante en el viaje de Jio hacia la excelencia digital. Estamos entusiasmados de explorar las posibilidades ilimitadas de Web3 y ofrecer una oferta incomparable. experiencias digitales para nuestros usuarios”.
almohadillas jio Según se informa, está colaborando con gigantes tecnológicos como Nvidia con el objetivo de revolucionar el espacio de la inteligencia artificial (IA) de la India de forma similar a como revolucionó el sector de las telecomunicaciones con precios competitivos y acceso a datos móviles ilimitados. Según el informe, Jio está trabajando con varias empresas para desarrollar conjuntamente modelos de lenguajes grandes (LLM) nativos. A través de esto, se dice que la compañía quiere comenzar a ofrecer aplicaciones de inteligencia artificial como servicio a precios asequibles para las empresas. Además, Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) también participa en la misión de IA del gobierno en India.
Se dice que Jio Platforms está creando su propio libro de jugadas de IA en India
Tiempos económicos mencioné Jio Platforms ahora se centra en revolucionar el espacio de la IA en la India proporcionando a las empresas acceso asequible a herramientas de IA y aplicaciones de agentes. Citando a un alto ejecutivo de la empresa anónimo, la publicación afirmó que Jio está trabajando con él. NVIDIA Y otros gigantes tecnológicos también ofrecen soporte de hardware para ejecutar inferencias de IA.
Se dice que Jio Platforms está planeando esto después de integrarse en la misión de inteligencia artificial de la India, por Rs. Un proyecto de 10.300 millones de rupias del gobierno, ofrecerá GPU como servicio a nuevas empresas e investigadores a los “precios más competitivos del mundo”. Según se informa, la compañía se ha asociado con Nvidia para asegurar sus GPU Blackwell para este propósito.
Según se informa, el CEO también destacó que Jio está trabajando actualmente en las tres vías de la infraestructura de IA (dispositivo, servicio en la nube y redes de banda ancha de alta velocidad) para ofrecer IA asequible a empresas e individuos.
Al explicar los aspectos financieros del servicio centrado en GPU, el ejecutivo dijo al Economic Times: “Mission AI es una iniciativa gubernamental para ofrecer GPU a un costo subsidiado, suponiendo que si el precio es de 25 rupias por reloj de GPU, entonces. El gobierno subsidiará entre 5 y 10 rupias de esta cantidad y nosotros (Jio y otros), como vendedores, competiremos para ofrecer precios más bajos hasta 25 rupias.
En particular, a principios de este año, se lanzó Jio Platforms. Anunciar Jio Brain, es una plataforma integrada de inteligencia artificial y aprendizaje automático (ML) para empresas. Según los informes, el ejecutivo dijo que la compañía también está buscando formas de monetizar el programa.
El espacio de la IA en la India está fragmentado y diferentes actores ofrecen diferentes servicios. mientras GoogleAmazon, Nvidia y Microsoft están tratando de ingresar al espacio con servicios de inteligencia artificial integrados, y se dice que los precios empresariales de sus productos son demasiado altos, lo que lleva a una lenta adopción de la tecnología.
Si Jio puede ofrecer servicios en los que proporcione herramientas de inteligencia artificial de front-end, LLM de back-end, así como servicios en la nube para ejecutar el procesamiento de datos, todo a precios competitivos, puede acelerar la tasa de adopción de la IA entre las empresas.
It was expected that Intel‘s LGA1851 socket would house the tech giant’s next-gen Arrow Lake chips, but for now it seems the company might have another use for it.
At the recent Embedded World conference, Intel unveiled its Meteor Lake-PS architecture for edge systems, the first Core Ultra processor on an LGA socket.
The new SoC design, which integrates the Intel Arc GPU and a neural processing unit, is aimed at enabling generative AI and handling demanding graphics workloads for sectors such as retail, education, smart cities, and industry.
Ultra low TDP
Intel says its Core Ultra processors offer up to 5.02x superior image classification inference performance compared to the 14th Gen Core desktop processors. Applications for the PS series include GenAI-enabled kiosks and smart point-of-sale systems in physical retail stores, interactive whiteboards for advanced classroom experiences, and AI vision-enhanced industrial devices for manufacturing and roadside units.
The new chips are designed with low-power, always-on usage scenarios in mind. This is evident from the fact that none of these chips have a Thermal Design Power higher than 65W. There’s even a low-power version with a 15W rating (12-28 configurable TDP).
Intel says “Moving away from the conventional setup where Intel Core desktop processors are combined with discrete GPUs, the PS series of Intel Core Ultra processors introduce an innovative integration of GPU and AI Boost functionalities directly within the processors, alongside the flexible LGA socket configuration. Offering four times the number of graphics execution units (EUs) compared to their predecessors in the S or desktop series, these processors deliver a powerful alternative for handling AI and graphics-heavy tasks. This design not only negates the necessity for an additional discrete GPU, thereby lowering costs and simplifying the overall design process, it also positions these processors as the go-to solution for those prioritizing efficiency alongside enhanced performance.”
The desktop LGA1851 socket can support 5600MHz DDR5 memory, two PCIe Gen4 SSDs, and four Thunderbolt 4 devices. There is a notable absence of chipset support for Thunderbolt 5, Wi-Fi 7, and PCIe Gen5, however.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
The new desktop Intel Meteor Lake chips are not expected to be available until the fourth quarter of 2024. This timeline also coincides with the expected launch of Arrow Lake desktop CPUs, according to the latest industry rumors.
One of world’s largest oil platforms, the North Sea’s Gullfaks C, sits on immense foundations, constructed from 246,000 cubic metres of reinforced concrete, penetrating 22 metres into the sea bed and smothering about 16,000 square metres of sea floor. The platform’s installation in 1989 was a feat of engineering. Now, Gullfaks C has exceeded its expected 30-year lifespan and is due to be decommissioned in 2036. How can this gargantuan structure, and others like it, be taken out of action in a safe, cost-effective and environmentally beneficial way? Solutions are urgently needed.
Many of the world’s 12,000 offshore oil and gas platforms are nearing the end of their lives (see ‘Decommissioning looms’). The average age of the more than 1,500 platforms and installations in the North Sea is 25 years. In the Gulf of Mexico, around 1,500 platforms are more than 30 years old. In the Asia–Pacific region, more than 2,500 platforms will need to be decommissioned in the next 10 years. And the problem won’t go away. Even when the world transitions to greener energy, offshore wind turbines and wave-energy devices will, one day, also need to be taken out of service.
Source: S. Gourvenec et al. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.154, 111794 (2022).
There are several ways to handle platforms that have reached the end of their lives. For example, they can be completely or partly removed from the ocean. They can be toppled and left on the sea floor. They can be moved elsewhere, or abandoned in the deep sea. But there’s little empirical evidence about the environmental and societal costs and benefits of each course of action — how it will alter marine ecosystems, say, or the risk of pollution associated with moving or abandoning oil-containing structures.
So far, politics, rather than science, has been the driving force for decisions about how to decommission these structures. It was public opposition to the disposal of a floating oil-storage platform called Brent Spar in the North Sea that led to strict legislation being imposed in the northeast Atlantic in the 1990s. Now, there is a legal requirement to completely remove decommissioned energy infrastructure from the ocean in this region. By contrast, in the Gulf of Mexico, the idea of converting defunct rigs into artificial reefs holds sway despite a lack of evidence for environmental benefits, because the reefs are popular sites for recreational fishing.
A review of decommissioning strategies is urgently needed to ensure that governments make scientifically motivated decisions about the fate of oil rigs in their regions, rather than sleepwalking into default strategies that could harm the environment. Here, we outline a framework through which local governments can rigorously assess the best way to decommission offshore rigs. We argue that the legislation for the northeast Atlantic region should be rewritten to allow more decommissioning options. And we propose that similar assessments should inform the decommissioning of current and future offshore wind infrastructure.
Challenges of removing rigs
For the countries around the northeast Atlantic, leaving disused oil platforms in place is an emotive issue as well as a legal one. Environmental campaigners, much of the public and some scientists consider anything other than the complete removal of these structures to be littering by energy companies1. But whether rig removal is the best approach — environmentally or societally — to decommissioning is questionable.
Energy crisis: five questions that must be answered in 2023
There has been little research into the environmental impacts of removing platforms, largely owing to lack of foresight2. But oil and gas rigs, both during and after their operation, can provide habitats for marine life such as sponges, corals, fish, seals and whales3. Organisms such as mussels that attach to structures can provide food for fish — and they might be lost if rigs are removed4. Structures left in place are a navigational hazard for vessels, making them de facto marine protected areas — regions in which human activities are restricted5. Another concern is that harmful heavy metals in sea-floor sediments around platforms might become resuspended in the ocean when foundations are removed6.
Removing rigs is also a formidable logistical challenge, because of their size. The topside of a platform, which is home to the facilities for oil or gas production, can weigh more than 40,000 tonnes. And the underwater substructure — the platform’s foundation and the surrounding fuel-storage facilities — can be even heavier. In the North Sea, substructures are typically made of concrete to withstand the harsh environmental conditions, and can displace more than one million tonnes of water. In regions such as the Gulf of Mexico, where conditions are less extreme, substructures can be lighter, built from steel tubes. But they can still weigh more than 45,000 tonnes, and are anchored to the sea floor using two-metre-wide concrete pilings.
Huge forces are required to break these massive structures free from the ocean floor. Some specialists even suggest that the removal of the heaviest platforms is currently technically impossible.
And the costs are astronomical. The cost to decommission and remove all oil and gas infrastructure from UK territorial waters alone is estimated at £40 billion (US$51 billion). A conservative estimate suggests that the global decommissioning cost for all existing oil and gas infrastructure could be several trillion dollars.
Mixed evidence for reefing
In the United States, attitudes to decommissioning are different. A common approach is to remove the topside, then abandon part or all of the substructure in such a way that it doesn’t pose a hazard to marine vessels. The abandoned structures can be used for water sports such as diving and recreational fishing.
This approach, known as ‘rigs-to-reefs’, was first pioneered in the Gulf of Mexico in the 1980s. Since its launch, the programme has repurposed around 600 rigs (10% of all the platforms built in the Gulf), and has been adopted in Brunei, Malaysia and Thailand.
How to stop cities and companies causing planetary harm
Converting offshore platforms into artificial reefs is reported to produce almost seven times less air-polluting emissions than complete rig removal7, and to cost 50% less. Because the structures provide habitats for marine life5, proponents argue that rigs increase the biomass in the ocean8. In the Gulf of California, for instance, increases in the number of fish, such as endangered cowcod (Sebasteslevis) and other commercially valuable rockfish, have been reported in the waters around oil platforms6.
But there is limited evidence that these underwater structures actually increase biomass9. Opponents argue that the platforms simply attract fish from elsewhere10 and leave harmful chemicals in the ocean11. And because the hard surface of rigs is different from the soft sediments of the sea floor, such structures attract species that would not normally live in the area, which can destabilize marine ecosystems12.
Evidence from experts
With little consensus about whether complete removal, reefing or another strategy is the best option for decommissioning these structures, policies cannot evolve. More empirical evidence about the environmental and societal costs and benefits of the various options is needed.
To begin to address this gap, we gathered the opinions of 39 academic and government specialists in the field across 4 continents13,14. We asked how 12 decommissioning options, ranging from the complete removal of single structures to the abandonment of all structures, might impact marine life and contribute to international high-level environmental targets. To supplement the scant scientific evidence available, our panel of specialists used local knowledge, professional expertise and industry data.
The substructures of oil rigs can provide habitats for a wealth of marine life.Credit: Brent Durand/Getty
The panel assessed the pressures that structures exert on their environment — factors such as chemical contamination and change in food availability for marine life — and how those pressures affect marine ecosystems, for instance by altering biodiversity, animal behaviour or pollution levels. Nearly all pressures exerted by leaving rigs in place were considered bad for the environment. But some rigs produced effects that were considered beneficial for humans — creating habitats for commercially valuable species, for instance. Nonetheless, most of the panel preferred, on balance, to see infrastructure that has come to the end of its life be removed from the oceans.
But the panel also found that abandoning or reefing structures was the best way to help governments meet 37 global environmental targets listed in 3 international treaties. This might seem counter-intuitive, but many of the environmental targets are written from a ‘what does the environment do for humans’ perspective, rather than being focused on the environment alone.
Importantly, the panel noted that not all ecosystems respond in the same way to the presence of rig infrastructure. The changes to marine life caused by leaving rigs intact in the North Sea will differ from those brought about by abandoning rigs off the coast of Thailand. Whether these changes are beneficial enough to warrant alternatives to removal depends on the priorities of stakeholders in the region — the desire to protect cowcod is a strong priority in the United States, for instance, whereas in the North Sea, a more important consideration is ensuring access to fishing grounds. Therefore, rig decommissioning should be undertaken on a local, case-by-case basis, rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach.
Legal hurdles in the northeast Atlantic
If governments are to consider a range of decommissioning options in the northeast Atlantic, policy change is needed.
Current legislation is multi-layered. At the global level, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS; 1982) states that no unused structures can present navigational hazards or cause damage to flora and fauna. Thus, reefing is allowed.
Satellite images reveal untracked human activity on the oceans
But the northeast Atlantic is subject to stricter rules, under the OSPAR Convention. Named after its original conventions in Oslo and Paris, OSPAR is a legally binding agreement between 15 governments and the European Union on how best to protect marine life in the region (see go.nature.com/3stx7gj) that was signed in the face of public opposition to sinking Brent Spar. The convention includes Decision 98/3, which stipulates complete removal of oil and gas infrastructure as the default legal position, returning the sea floor to its original state. This legislation is designed to stop the offshore energy industry from dumping installations on mass.
Under OSPAR Decision 98/3, leaving rigs as reefs is prohibited. Exceptions to complete removal (derogations) are occasionally allowed, but only if there are exceptional concerns related to safety, environmental or societal harms, cost or technical feasibility. Of the 170 structures that have been decommissioned in the northeast Atlantic so far, just 10 have been granted derogations. In those cases, the concrete foundations of the platforms have been left in place, but the top part of the substructures removed.
Enable local decision-making
The flexibility of UNCLOS is a more pragmatic approach to decommissioning than the stringent removal policy stipulated by OSPAR.
We propose that although the OSPAR Decision 98/3 baseline position should remain the same — complete removal as the default — the derogation process should change to allow alternative options such as reefing, if a net benefit to the environment and society can be achieved. Whereas currently there must be an outstanding reason to approve a derogation under OSPAR, the new process would allow smaller benefits and harms to be weighed up.
The burden should be placed on industry officials to demonstrate clearly why an alternative to complete removal should be considered not as littering, but as contributing to the conservation of marine ecosystems on the basis of the best available scientific evidence. The same framework that we used to study global-scale evidence in our specialist elicitation can be used to gather and assess local evidence for the pros and cons of each decommissioning option. Expert panels should comprise not only scientists, but also members with legal, environmental, societal, cultural and economic perspectives. Regions outside the northeast Atlantic should follow the same rigorous assessment process, regardless of whether they are already legally allowed to consider alternative options.
For successful change, governments and legislators must consider two key factors.
Get buy-in from stakeholders
OSPAR’s 16 signatories are responsible for changing its legislation but it will be essential that the more flexible approach gets approval from OSPAR’s 22 intergovernmental and 39 non-governmental observer organizations. These observers, which include Greenpeace, actively contribute to OSPAR’s work and policy development, and help to implement its convention. Public opinion in turn will be shaped by non-governmental organizations15 — Greenpeace was instrumental in raising public awareness about the plan to sink Brent Spar in the North Sea, for instance.
EU climate policy is dangerously reliant on untested carbon-capture technology
Transparency about the decision-making process will be key to building confidence among sceptical observers. Oil and gas companies must maintain an open dialogue with relevant government bodies about plans for decommissioning. In turn, governments must clarify what standards they will require to consider an alternative to removal. This includes specifying what scientific evidence should be collated, and by whom. All evidence about the pros and cons of each decommissioning option should be made readily available to all.
Oil and gas companies should identify and involve a wide cross-section of stakeholders in decision-making from the earliest stages of planning. This includes regulators, statutory consultees, trade unions, non-governmental organizations, business groups, local councils and community groups and academics, to ensure that diverse views are considered.
Conflict between stakeholders, as occurred with Brent Spar, should be anticipated. But this can be overcome through frameworks similar to those between trade unions and employers that help to establish dialogue between the parties15.
The same principle of transparency should also be applied to other regions. If rigorous local assessment reveals reefing not to be a good option for some rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, for instance, it will be important to get stakeholder buy-in for a change from the status quo.
Future-proof designs
OSPAR and UNCLOS legislation applies not only to oil and gas platforms but also to renewable-energy infrastructure. To avoid a repeat of the challenges that are currently being faced by the oil and gas industry, decommissioning strategies for renewables must be established before they are built, not as an afterthought. Structures must be designed to be easily removed in an inexpensive way. Offshore renewable-energy infrastructure should put fewer pressures on the environment and society — for instance by being designed so that it can be recycled, reused or repurposed.
If developers fail to design infrastructure that can be removed in an environmentally sound and cost-effective way, governments should require companies to ensure that their structures provide added environmental and societal benefits. This could be achieved retrospectively for existing infrastructure, taking inspiration from biodiversity-boosting panels that can be fitted to the side of concrete coastal defences to create marine habitats (see go.nature.com/3v99bsb).
Governments should also require the energy industry to invest in research and development of greener designs. On land, constraints are now being placed on building developments to protect biodiversity — bricks that provide habitats for bees must be part of new buildings in Brighton, UK, for instance (see go.nature.com/3pcnfua). Structures in the sea should not be treated differently.
If it is designed properly, the marine infrastructure that is needed as the world moves towards renewable energy could benefit the environment — both during and after its operational life. Without this investment, the world could find itself facing a decommissioning crisis once again, as the infrastructure for renewables ages.
No-code platforms have emerged as a popular solution for developing software applications without the need for traditional coding, offering a way for non-programmers to build applications through graphical user interfaces and configuration. While these platforms can significantly reduce the time and expertise required to launch an application, there are several drawbacks, especially when considering the development of full-stack software applications, which include both front-end (client-side) and back-end (server-side) components.
In the fast-paced world of software development, the allure of no-code platforms is undeniable. They promise a quick and easy path to creating a minimum viable product (MVP), bypassing the need for deep technical knowledge. Platforms like Bubble allow entrepreneurs to transform their ideas into working software with just a few clicks and drags. This approach can be particularly tempting for those looking to validate their software concepts in the market swiftly.
However, this convenience comes with its own set of challenges. As your software project grows, the simplicity of no-code tools may start to hinder progress. The inability to customize or scale your application due to a lack of access to the underlying code can become a major roadblock. This is especially true when your software needs to evolve to meet increasing user demands or when you’re trying to add unique features that set your product apart from the competition.
Managing a development team also becomes more complex without a solid grasp of coding principles. Trusting your team is crucial, but if you can’t understand the work they’re doing, you might find yourself facing mismanagement issues. This can lead to higher costs and delays that could have been avoided with a better understanding of the development process.
Things to consider when using no-code providers
Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of no-code platforms and what they can be used for.
Legal issues are another area of concern. Working with international developers can introduce unexpected legal challenges, and intellectual property rights can be tricky to navigate on no-code platforms. These platforms may have terms that restrict your control over the software, which could affect your ability to transfer or sell it later on.
Cost is always a consideration in software development. Without coding knowledge, you might find it difficult to negotiate effectively with full-stack developers or to understand the true value of the work being done. This can result in spending more than necessary, straining your budget.
Moreover, a lack of technical expertise might lead to accepting longer development timelines, delaying your entry into the market. This gives competitors the chance to capture your intended audience before you’ve even launched. Unique features are often what attract users and investors to a software product. Relying solely on a no-code platform may limit your ability to offer these proprietary elements, making it harder to stand out in a crowded marketplace.
Drawbacks to no-code platforms
1. Limited Customization and Flexibility
No-code platforms provide a set of pre-built components and templates that users can utilize to build applications. This approach inherently limits the degree of customization and flexibility available. For full-stack applications, which often require complex, unique functionalities to meet specific business logic or user experience requirements, this limitation can be a significant drawback. Users may find it challenging to tailor the application to their exact needs or to implement advanced features that go beyond the platform’s capabilities.
2. Scalability Concerns
While no-code platforms are capable of supporting the development of applications quickly and with fewer resources, they may not always be the best choice for applications that need to scale significantly. As user base and data volume grow, the underlying infrastructure and architecture of a no-code platform might not provide the necessary control or optimization options to ensure efficient scaling. This can lead to performance issues, increased costs, or the need to migrate to a custom-coded solution eventually.
3. Integration Limitations
Full-stack applications often require integration with external services, APIs, or legacy systems. No-code platforms may offer some integration capabilities, but they are typically limited to popular services or require the use of generic, less efficient connectors. This can pose a challenge for complex applications that depend on deep, custom integrations, potentially leading to compromised functionality or additional development work outside the no-code environment.
4. Dependence on Platform Providers
Using a no-code platform for application development introduces a dependency on the platform provider for hosting, maintenance, and ongoing support. This can raise concerns about vendor lock-in, where migrating an application to another platform or a custom solution becomes difficult, time-consuming, and expensive. Additionally, the long-term viability of the platform provider becomes a critical factor, as changes in service, pricing, or company status could directly impact the application and its users.
5. Security and Compliance
Ensuring the security and compliance of a full-stack application is paramount, especially in industries subject to strict regulations. No-code platforms may not offer the same level of control over security configurations or compliance measures as custom-coded solutions. Users have to rely on the platform’s built-in security features and practices, which may not fully meet specific industry standards or regulatory requirements.
6. Performance Optimization
No-code platforms are designed to accommodate a wide range of applications, which means they often use generalized architectures that are not optimized for any specific use case. For full-stack applications with high performance requirements, this can result in inefficiencies, slower response times, and a less optimized user experience compared to applications developed with custom code, where every aspect of the system can be fine-tuned.
7. Prices Changes
An additional concern when using no-code platforms for full-stack software applications is the risk associated with price changes. Users of these platforms are subject to the pricing policies set by the platform providers, which can change. While reputable providers aim to notify users of pricing changes in advance, there’s always a risk that costs could increase unexpectedly or that new pricing models could be introduced that significantly affect the overall budget for maintaining and operating the application.
This lack of control over pricing policies can be particularly challenging for businesses that operate with tight budgets or for applications that are critical to business operations. Increases in costs could necessitate unexpected financial planning or even force users to consider migrating to other platforms or custom solutions, which can be costly and time-consuming. Furthermore, if the platform introduces new limits or features only available at higher pricing tiers, users may find themselves compelled to upgrade to continue meeting their application’s requirements.
The potential for price changes without adequate notification adds a layer of financial uncertainty when committing to a no-code platform for full-stack development. This underscores the importance of thoroughly reviewing the terms of service, including the pricing and notification policies, and planning for contingencies in the event of significant changes. It also highlights the need for a strategic approach to selecting a no-code platform, considering not just the current costs and features but also the long-term reliability and transparency of the provider.
Given these considerations, it’s clear that having some coding knowledge can be a significant advantage. As technology continues to advance, with AI becoming more integrated into our tools and systems, the value of understanding code only increases. Fortunately, learning to code is more accessible than ever, with resources like educational chatbots making the process more interactive and user-friendly.
While no-code platforms can be a great starting point for creating an MVP, they are not without limitations. These limitations can affect the long-term success of your software project. Knowing how to code, even at a basic level, can empower you to manage your team more effectively, keep costs under control, and ensure that your software has the unique qualities needed to succeed in today’s competitive environment.
Filed Under: Guides, Top News
Latest timeswonderful Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The ability to create web applications without extensive coding knowledge is a significant advantage in today’s AI driven world. Allowing anyone to create both online and mobile applications without the need for any knowledge of coding or programming languages. No-code web building platforms have emerged as a vital tool for entrepreneurs, businesses, and creative individuals who aim to launch web or mobile applications quickly and without the complexities of traditional coding.
Quick Links:
These platforms offer a range of features that cater to various needs, from design aesthetics to security compliance. Let’s delve into some of the top no-code web building platforms available today and what makes each one unique. Let’s look at each in the little more detail.
Webflow
Webflow: Primarily a website builder with a visually appealing UI, Webflow can be extended into a web app builder when integrated with tools like Wist. It allows for detailed design control and integrates with various apps, but requires additional costs for app functionality.
For those who prioritize design and aesthetics, Webflow is an excellent option. It offers precise control over the visual elements of your website and can be transformed into a powerful web app builder when used in conjunction with third-party tools. While Webflow is a strong contender for design-focused projects, be mindful of the potential extra costs for accessing advanced features.
Webflow’s no-code builder is renowned for its strengths in design and aesthetics, offering users precise control over the visual elements of their website. This control extends to intricate details like typography, color schemes, animations, and overall layout, allowing for a high degree of customization without the need for coding. It’s particularly beneficial for designers and individuals who have a clear visual concept but lack coding skills.
Additionally, Webflow’s capabilities as a web app builder are significantly enhanced when integrated with third-party tools. These integrations can include e-commerce platforms, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, or marketing tools, providing a comprehensive suite for creating dynamic, interactive web applications.
No-code platforms to build almost anything
Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of no-code services and solutions :
Betty Blocks
Betty Blocks: Targeted at enterprises and citizen developers, Betty Blocks focuses on security and compliance, offering ISO-certified tools for building enterprise-grade applications with no-code.
Betty Blocks distinguishes itself in the no-code landscape primarily through its strong emphasis on security and compliance, aspects that are crucial for businesses, especially those in regulated industries. Being an ISO-certified platform, it assures users of its commitment to international standards in data security and management. This certification is a testament to its reliability for creating secure, enterprise-grade applications, a critical factor for businesses that handle sensitive data or operate under stringent regulatory requirements.
The platform’s architecture is designed to ensure robust security measures are inherent in the applications built on it. This includes features like secure user authentication, data encryption, and regular security updates, which are essential for protecting against cyber threats and data breaches. Additionally, Betty Blocks provides tools for compliance management, making it easier for businesses to adhere to various regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or industry-specific standards.
Furthermore, Betty Blocks’ focus on ease of use without compromising security appeals to businesses lacking extensive IT resources. The no-code aspect enables business professionals to develop applications swiftly, reducing reliance on IT teams and accelerating the digital transformation process. This democratization of app development, combined with the platform’s security features, makes Betty Blocks an appealing option for businesses that prioritize security but also seek agility and efficiency in their application development processes.
Dropsource
Dropsource: Allows users to build full-stack web apps with no-code and own the generated source code. It offers better data encryption, UI flexibility, and hosting options, catering to those who want control over their code.
Dropsource positions itself uniquely in the no-code and low-code market by offering a solution that caters to those who want to maintain control over their source code after development. This feature is particularly appealing for developers and organizations that wish to have the flexibility to modify, extend, or integrate their applications post-development with other systems or technologies. By providing access to the source code, Dropsource ensures that users are not locked into its platform, offering a degree of independence and long-term control that is often not available in other no-code environments.
In addition to source code control, Dropsource offers a full-stack development environment. This means it supports both front-end and back-end development, enabling the creation of comprehensive, feature-rich applications. The platform’s customizable UI options allow developers to design applications that align with specific brand guidelines or user experience requirements, offering a level of customization that is highly valued in bespoke application development.
Another significant aspect of Dropsource is its emphasis on security, particularly through strong data encryption. In today’s digital landscape, where data breaches and cybersecurity threats are prevalent, having robust encryption is essential for protecting sensitive data. This makes Dropsource a suitable option for projects where data security is a paramount concern.
Backendless
Backendless: A full-stack web app builder that also supports native mobile apps, Backendless offers high performance, real-time databases, and a unique block-based approach to logic and APIs. It has a scalable pricing model based on usage.
Backendless distinguishes itself in the no-code and low-code market with its strong emphasis on performance and mobile integration, positioning it as an ideal choice for developers and businesses focusing on mobile app development. As a full-stack solution, Backendless provides both front-end and back-end development capabilities, allowing the creation of comprehensive applications without the need to switch between different tools or platforms.
One of the key strengths of Backendless is its adeptness in handling complex, real-time data. This feature is particularly important for applications that require instantaneous data updates, such as chat applications, live streaming services, or real-time analytics platforms. The ability to manage real-time data effectively ensures that the user experience is seamless and responsive, a critical factor in the success of many modern applications.
In addition to its real-time capabilities, Backendless supports native mobile app development. This is significant because native apps typically offer better performance and a more refined user experience compared to web or hybrid apps. By supporting native development, Backendless allows developers to create applications that are optimally designed for mobile platforms, taking full advantage of the hardware and software capabilities of these devices.
Another noteworthy feature of Backendless is its use of block-based logic. This approach makes it easier for developers, including those without extensive coding experience, to implement complex functionalities and workflows. It simplifies the development process while still allowing for a high degree of customization and flexibility in application design.
Furthermore, Backendless’s scalable pricing model based on usage is an attractive aspect for projects of varying sizes. It enables startups and small businesses to begin with a cost-effective plan and scale up as their needs grow, while also catering to the requirements of larger enterprises with more substantial usage demands.
Bubble
Bubble: Known as the industry standard for no-code web apps, Bubble features a drag-and-drop UI builder, workflow automation, API integration, and a robust community with templates and plugins. It offers scalable pricing but lacks code exportability in recently increased its prices annoying many of its users.
Bubble has carved out a significant niche in the no-code platform market, primarily appealing to those who prioritize user-friendliness and workflow automation. Its stand-out feature is the intuitive drag-and-drop interface, which simplifies the process of web app development. This approach allows users, even those with minimal technical expertise, to construct web applications quickly by visually assembling elements on the screen. It’s particularly beneficial for entrepreneurs, small businesses, and individuals who want to develop web applications without delving into the complexities of traditional coding.
Another key strength of Bubble is its seamless integration with external APIs. This feature allows users to connect their web applications with a wide array of external services and platforms, significantly expanding the functionality and scope of their applications. For example, users can integrate payment processors, social media platforms, or data analytics tools, enhancing the versatility and capability of their web apps.
The Bubble community is another notable asset. It is an active and supportive ecosystem that offers a wealth of resources, including templates and plugins. These resources enable users to enhance their web applications’ capabilities and reduce development time. The availability of pre-built components and the shared knowledge from the community can be invaluable for users navigating the no-code development process.
However, a limitation of Bubble is the inability to export source code. This means that once a project is developed in Bubble, it’s not straightforward to migrate it to another platform or to continue development outside of the Bubble environment. This can be a significant consideration for businesses or developers who anticipate needing to transition their projects to other platforms or who require direct access to the underlying code for advanced customization or integration purposes.
WeWeb
WeWeb: Specializes in front-end development with an intuitive builder and visual logic setup. It requires users to connect their own backend but offers code exportability and a range of integrations.
WeWeb stands out in the landscape of web development platforms, catering specifically to users who seek a balance between an easy-to-use front-end builder and versatile backend connectivity. This dual focus on simplicity in front-end design and flexibility in backend integration makes WeWeb a unique and valuable tool, especially for projects that require a customized approach to both aspects of web development.
The platform’s front-end builder is designed to be user-friendly, appealing to both novice and experienced developers. It emphasizes a streamlined, intuitive interface that allows users to create sophisticated and visually appealing web interfaces without getting bogged down in complex coding. This ease of use does not come at the expense of customization, as WeWeb provides a range of design options and templates to suit various aesthetic preferences and functional requirements.
A significant advantage of WeWeb is its support for code exportability. This feature is crucial for developers who want the freedom to move their projects between different platforms or need direct access to the code for further development outside of WeWeb. The ability to export code offers a level of independence and flexibility that is not always available in other no-code or low-code platforms.
Moreover, WeWeb’s wide range of integrations is a key selling point. The platform allows seamless connections with various backend services, databases, and third-party APIs. This flexibility is particularly valuable for projects that require the integration of complex systems or need to pull in data from multiple sources. It ensures that the front-end developed on WeWeb can be effectively paired with virtually any backend system, providing a comprehensive solution for web development.
Each of these no-code web building platforms offers distinct advantages that can align with different project requirements. Whether your focus is on design, security, code control, or seamless integrations, it’s crucial to select a platform that resonates with your project’s vision. By understanding the unique features of Bubble, Webflow, Betty Blocks, Dropsource, Backendless, and WeWeb, you can make an informed decision that will help bring your web application to life with relative ease.
Filed Under: Guides, Top News
Latest timeswonderful Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
In today’s globalized world, the ability to communicate across languages and cultures is more crucial than ever. As businesses expand internationally, travelers explore new destinations, and digital content proliferates, the demand for accurate and efficient translation has skyrocketed. Enter online translation platforms, the unsung heroes of our interconnected age.
1. What are Online Translation Platforms?
Online translation platforms are digital tools or services that allow users to translate text or speech from one language to another. These platforms can range from simple text-based translators, like Google Translate, to more sophisticated systems that integrate with websites and applications, offering real-time translation for users.
2. The Evolution of Translation Platforms
The journey of online translation began with basic word-for-word substitutions, which often resulted in translations that were technically correct but lacked context or cultural nuance. However, with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, these platforms have evolved significantly:
Machine Translation (MT): Early systems used rule-based methods, but modern MT employs neural networks and deep learning to produce more accurate and contextually relevant translations.
Real-time Translation: Platforms now offer real-time translation for live conversations, be it in messaging apps or video conferences.
Integration with Other Services: Many platforms integrate with websites, apps, and content management systems, allowing for seamless translation of digital content.
3. Benefits of Using Online Translation Platforms
Accessibility: Anyone with an internet connection can access these platforms, breaking down language barriers.
Cost-Effective: Compared to hiring professional translators, online platforms can be a more affordable solution for many tasks.
Speed: Instant translation is now a reality, making communication faster than ever.
Continuous Improvement: With each translation, many platforms learn and improve, offering better results over time.
4. Limitations and Challenges
While online translation platforms offer numerous benefits, they are not without limitations:
Lack of Nuance: Translations can sometimes miss cultural nuances or idiomatic expressions.
Data Privacy Concerns: Users might be wary of sharing sensitive information on online platforms.
Over-reliance: Sole reliance on machine translation can lead to miscommunication, especially in critical areas like legal or medical translations.
5. The Future of Online Translation
The future looks promising for online translation platforms. With advancements in AI and machine learning, we can expect even more accurate and context-aware translations. Additionally, augmented reality (AR) might play a role, with real-time translations appearing as overlays in AR glasses.
Moreover, as the world becomes more interconnected, the demand for translation services, both online and offline, will continue to grow. This will drive innovation and competition in the sector, leading to even more advanced and user-friendly platforms.
6. The Role of Human Translators in the Digital Age
Despite the rapid advancements in online translation platforms, the role of human translators remains indispensable. Machines, no matter how advanced, lack the human touch, cultural understanding, and emotional intelligence that human translators bring to the table. Here’s why they remain relevant:
Cultural Sensitivity: Human translators understand the cultural nuances and can interpret context in ways machines can’t. This is especially crucial for content that requires a deep understanding of local customs, traditions, and idioms.
Specialized Fields: Areas like legal, medical, and technical translations often require a specialized knowledge base. Human experts in these fields ensure that translations are not just linguistically accurate but also contextually correct.
Quality Assurance: Many businesses and organizations use a hybrid approach. They combine machine translation for speed and scale with human oversight for quality assurance, ensuring the final output is both fast and accurate.
Platforms like Duolingo and Wikipedia have leveraged the power of the community to drive translations. These crowd-sourced models allow for a diverse set of inputs, often resulting in translations that are both accurate and rich in local flavor.
8. Ethical Considerations in Online Translation
As with all technology, online translation platforms come with ethical considerations:
Bias and Stereotyping: Algorithms can sometimes perpetuate biases present in the data they were trained on. It’s essential to ensure that these platforms are trained on diverse datasets to avoid reinforcing stereotypes.
Job Displacement: While online platforms create new opportunities, there’s also a concern about job displacement in the translation industry. Balancing technological advancement with job preservation is a challenge that the industry must address.
9. Personalized and Adaptive Translation
The future might see translation platforms that adapt to individual users. Just as AI can learn a user’s preferences in music or shopping, future translation tools might adapt to a user’s linguistic style, offering personalized translations based on past interactions.
10. Conclusion: A Collaborative Future
The future of translation is not a choice between humans and machines but a collaboration between the two. Online translation platforms will continue to evolve, becoming more sophisticated and integrated into our daily lives. However, human expertise will always be needed to navigate the complexities of language and culture. Together, humans and technology will work hand in hand to make cross-cultural communication smoother and more accessible to all.
In today’s fast-paced and interconnected world, healthcare services are evolving to meet the needs of a digitally engaged society. One of the transformative advancements in the healthcare domain is the advent of telehealth platforms. These platforms are revolutionizing the way healthcare is delivered, making it more accessible, convenient, and efficient for both patients and healthcare professionals. In this article, you’ll delve into the world of telehealth platform, understanding what they are, their significance, and how they are reshaping the healthcare landscape.
What are Telehealth Platforms?
Telehealth platforms are digital technologies that facilitate the delivery of healthcare services remotely. They leverage the power of telecommunications and digital tools to enable virtual consultations, health monitoring, education, and various other healthcare-related activities. They can encompass a range of services, including but not limited to:
Virtual Consultations:
Patients can consult with healthcare professionals through video calls, audio calls, or secure messaging. This enables timely medical advice and reduces the need for in-person visits, especially for minor health concerns.
Remote Monitoring:
Devices and sensors can be used to monitor patients’ vital signs and health parameters. The data collected can be transmitted to healthcare providers for analysis, allowing for proactive management of chronic conditions and early intervention.
Health Education:
Telehealth platforms can provide a wealth of health-related information to patients, empowering them to make informed decisions about their well-being. This education can range from general health tips to specific disease management guidelines.
Prescription Management:
Healthcare professionals can electronically prescribe medications and treatments, which can be easily accessed by patients through the platform. This streamlines the prescription process and enhances medication adherence.
The Significance of Telehealth Platforms
Telehealth platforms are playing an increasingly vital role in the healthcare ecosystem for several reasons:
Enhanced Accessibility:
Telehealth platforms break down geographical barriers and provide healthcare access to individuals in remote or underserved areas. Patients can receive consultations and advice without the need to travel long distances.
Convenience and Efficiency:
Patients can consult with healthcare providers from the comfort of their homes or workplaces. This convenience saves time and effort, making healthcare more accessible for individuals with busy schedules.
Cost-Effectiveness:
Telehealth consultations are often more affordable compared to in-person visits. Patients can save on transportation costs and other related expenses, making healthcare more cost-effective and accessible.
Continuity of Care:
Telehealth platforms facilitate continuous care, ensuring that patients can easily follow up with their healthcare providers. This continuity is especially crucial for managing chronic conditions and post-operative care.
Preventive Care and Early Intervention:
Remote monitoring and virtual consultations enable healthcare professionals to detect potential issues early and intervene proactively. This approach can prevent the escalation of health problems and lead to better outcomes.
The Evolution of Telehealth Platforms
Telehealth platforms have come a long way since their inception. Initially, telehealth was primarily focused on providing consultations via phone calls. However, with the advancement of technology, telehealth has evolved into a multifaceted platform encompassing a wide array of services.
Integration of Electronic Health Records (EHRs):
Modern telehealth platforms often integrate with electronic health record systems. This integration ensures that healthcare professionals have access to the patient’s medical history and relevant data during virtual consultations, enabling comprehensive and informed decisions.
Mobile Applications:
Many telehealth platforms now offer mobile applications, allowing patients to access healthcare services using their smartphones or tablets. Mobile apps make healthcare even more accessible, putting it literally at the fingertips of the patients.
Remote Monitoring Devices:
Advanced telehealth platforms support the integration of various monitoring devices. Patients can use wearable devices and sensors to measure vital signs like blood pressure, glucose levels, or heart rate. The data is then transmitted to the platform for analysis and monitoring by healthcare professionals.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration:
AI is increasingly being integrated into telehealth platforms, enabling functions like symptom checking, preliminary diagnosis, and personalized recommendations. AI-powered chatbots can assist patients in understanding their symptoms and seeking appropriate care.
The Future of Telehealth Platforms
The future of telehealth platforms is incredibly promising, with rapid advancements and innovations on the horizon. Here are some aspects that will likely shape the future of telehealth:
Telehealth for Mental Health:
Mental health services provided through telehealth platforms are expected to grow significantly. The convenience and privacy offered by virtual consultations make telehealth an ideal medium for mental health support and therapy.
Telehealth for Specialized Care:
Telehealth will extend beyond primary care to specialized fields such as dermatology, ophthalmology, and cardiology. Specialized consultations and follow-ups will become more common through telehealth platforms.
Enhanced User Experience:
Future telehealth platforms will focus on improving the user experience making the interfaces more intuitive and engaging. Video consultations will become more seamless, providing a face-to-face experience even virtually.
Integration with Smart Home Devices:
A telehealth platform may integrate with smart home devices, allowing for real-time monitoring of patient’s health within the comfort of their homes. This can include monitoring medication adherence, activity levels, and more.
In Conclusion
Telehealth platforms are revolutionizing healthcare, offering a glimpse into the future of healthcare delivery. These platforms bring the healthcare system closer to the people, fostering accessibility, convenience, and efficiency. As telehealth continues to evolve, it holds the potential to bridge gaps in healthcare and provide comprehensive, holistic care to individuals globally. Embracing the benefits of telehealth platforms can lead to a more connected and healthier world.