Categories
Life Style

changing Arctic fjord hints at our climate future

[ad_1]

Far north of the Arctic Circle lies a fjord on the front lines of climate change. Geir Wing Gabrielsen has been visiting this inlet, located on the northwest side of the Norwegian archipelago Svalbard, since 1981, when he first came to study the behaviour of Arctic birds. It used to be that each year when the ecotoxicologist would arrive in May or June — springtime in Svalbard — he could count on one thing: that the fjord would still be locked in ice.

But all of that has changed.

The Arctic is warming four times as fast as the rest of the world owing to climate change. And because of a quirk of ocean currents, the fjord, called Kongsfjorden, is warming even faster (see ‘Current situation’). So much so that, since 2006, it no longer freezes over — even when the Sun sets during the winter months, between October and February.

Current situation: Location of Kongsfjorden in Svalbard, Norway and the currents from Atlantic and Arctic coastal waters.

Source: Buchholz, F., Buchholz, C. M. & Weslawski, J. M. Polar Biol. 33. 101–113 (2009).

This has completely reshaped the fjord’s ecosystem, according to a study in Polish Polar Research published in January1. Arctic mammals such as beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) and ringed seals (Phoca hispida) that once called the fjord home have left. Meanwhile, more southerly animals including Atlantic puffins (Fratercula arctica) and Atlantic mackerels (Scomber scombrus) have moved in. And new habitats have popped up along the shoreline where sea ice once suffocated plant growth.

For researchers such as Gabrielsen, at the University Centre in Svalbard, these changes are met with a sense of loss. But they are also viewed as an opportunity. The fjord “will provide information about how the Arctic will be in the future”, Gabrielsen says. And it could help to answer the big questions of which species will survive the shifting climate in the Arctic, and how.

“It’s incredible that I — in my time — have been able to see such dramatic changes,” he says.

Safe instruction of students from the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) standing Kongsfjorden sea-ice in April 2005.

As shown in this photo from April 2005, Kongsfjorden used to freeze over enough during springtime for students and researchers to safely walk on it.Credit: Kim Holmén

Vanishing Ice

Kongsfjorden, meaning ‘king’s fjord’, is arguably the best-studied Arctic fjord in the world. Norway established its first Arctic research station there in the 1960s in what was then the mining community of Ny-Ålesund. Since then, 11 other nations, including Germany, China and India, have set up camp there.

The density of research activity in the fjord has made it possible to track its environmental changes in detail. The eastern reach of Svalbard is pummeled by an Arctic current that keeps its frigid temperatures stable. Meanwhile, the western reach — where Kongsfjorden sits — is exposed to an offshoot of the Atlantic Gulf Stream. As a result, the fjord’s winter water temperature rose from 0.3 ºC in 2004 to 4 ºC in 2017. The most obvious effect of the warmer water hitting Kongsfjorden is the rapid retreat of its glaciers, says Kai Bischof, a marine biologist at the University of Bremen in Germany.

An aerial view of the town of Ny-Alesund near Kongsfjord, Svalbard, Norway, April 6, 2023, with snow and a fjord in the background.

A view of Ny-Ålesund from April 2023 showing the fjord free of sea ice.Credit: Lisi Niesner/Reuters

“If you go there, like me, every other year, you can really see the changes,” Bischof adds. He remembers how, in the 1990s, a retreating glacier revealed a surprise: a piece of land once covered in ice and marked on maps as a peninsula turned out to be an island. Scientists can now comfortably motor around it in boats. “The rate of change is accelerating,” Bischof says.

Out with the old, in with the new

Kongsfjorden has become something of a pilgrimage for politicians seeking to understand global warming. Both former UN secretary general Ban Ki-Moon and former US secretary of state John Kerry have toured the fjord. The rapidly changing landscape makes it “a place where you can really experience the changing climate through your eyes”, says Bischof.

The fjord has already taught researchers that the Arctic is susceptible to tipping points. When it failed to ice over in 2006, it “was a great wake-up call”, Gabrielsen says.

But determining how exactly climate change will scramble the fjord’s ecosystem is a bit more difficult.

Researchers have so far recorded the effects on some species. For instance, ringed seals have mostly left the fjord because, without any sea ice in which to build their dens during the spring, their pups were exposed to predatory birds. In 2023, scientists recording the living symphony of the fjord also noted that the frequency of whale songs had diminished, compared with Svalbard’s northeast coast2.

Kittiwakes feeding in front of the glacier near Kongsfjorden, Svalbard.

Black-legged kittiwakes feed in Kongsfjorden.Credit: Geir Wing Gabrielsen

Meanwhile, some opportunistic species have moved onto the scene. Atlantic mackerels were first spotted in September 2013. The Atlantic puffin, spotted occasionally in the 1980s, is now thriving in Kongsfjorden. And a 19-year survey3 of the stomach contents of black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) in the fjord — a type of seabird in the gull family — suggests that, since around 2006, they have started to feast on a wide array of Atlantic fish that seem to have relocated, including Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), capelin (Mallotus villosus) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

The presence of these southern migrants seems to support the hypothesis that the Arctic will become more and more similar to the North Atlantic Ocean, a process aptly called Atlantification.

Arctic adapters

Some newcomers to Kongsfjorden present a challenge for researchers. Luisa Düsedau, a molecular biologist at the Alfred Wegner Institute in Bremerhaven, Germany, says that she and her colleagues now need to keep a watch out for polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as they walk the shoreline to collect specimens such as algae and kelp.

A polar bear eats common eider eggs near Kongsfjorden, Svalbard.

Polar bears now come into the fjord to eat the eggs of eiders along the shoreline.Credit: Geir Wing Gabrielsen

Once upon a time, these massive marine mammals would rarely come into the fjord. But with there being less and less sea ice — which polar bears rely on to hunt — the animals have started shifting tactics. Last summer, according to Gabrielsen, an unprecedented 20 polar bears and cubs travelled to the fjord to eat the eggs of common eiders (Somateria mollissima) and barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis) nesting along the shore.

Polar bears aren’t the only new thing on the shoreline. Scientists used to have a hard time studying anything growing along the tide line because of the sea ice covering it for a large chunk of the year. They also assumed that the ice would prevent most plants from growing there, because it would scrape away anything that tried to take root. Today, thick strands of kelp and algae — some species entirely new to science, according to Düsedau — are flourishing.

Luisa Dusedau working in the intertidal zone of Hansneset in Kongsfjorden in June 2021.

Molecular biologist Luisa Düsedau works along the tide line of Kongsfjorden, where you can now see kelp and algae, in 2021.Credit: Nele Schimpf

“It’s like a tiny forest” that forms a home for crabs, worms, snails and many other creatures that used to live on the sea floor, says Düsedau. “It’s blooming.”

The growth is a reminder that nature can adapt, she says. But she also emphasizes that it used to be difficult to know what was actually under the sea ice, especially during the harsh conditions of winter.

With the shifting environment, that is changing. Researchers are trying to establish a baseline for what typically lives in the fjord so that they can systematically bear witness as the ecosystem continues to evolve.

Two years ago, for instance, polar ecologist Charlotte Havermans, also at the Alfred Wegner Institute, travelled with a team to Kongsfjorden to learn whether jellyfish stayed active during the polar winter. The researchers didn’t know whether they would succeed. But upon shining their headlamps into the dark, now-uncovered water, “we saw so many jellyfish”, she says, “it was incredible”. She adds: “There were so many more species in the winter than we thought.” Not only that, but the team found jellyfish DNA in the stomachs of amphipods — tiny crustaceans — also spending the winter in the fjord. It was the first time scientists had spotted Arctic amphipods naturally feeding on jellyfish, and suggested that the jellies play a much bigger part in the winter food chain that previously thought4.

(L-R): Annkathrin Dischereit, Charlotte Havermans and Ayla Murray, researchers at the Alfred Wegener Institute, observe a jellyfish caught in the harbor of Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard.

Polar ecologist Charlotte Havermans (centre) and team sample amphipods in the water of Kongsfjorden during winter 2022.Credit: Alfred-Wegener-Institut/Esther Horvath

Kongsfjorden is powerful because it serves as a visual reminder of the power that climate change has to reshape the world, says Gabrielsen. Some 40 years ago, “I was so fascinated” by the fjord’s beauty, he says. Now, “I have grandchildren, and I wonder if they will be able to see what I have seen”.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

what does that mean for future pandemics?

[ad_1]

The World Health Organization (WHO) has changed how it classifies pathogens that spread through the air, such as SARS-CoV-2. The redefinition has been two years in the making and comes after criticism that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO was too slow to acknowledge that COVID was airborne. The change aims to provide clarity during pandemics, but some researchers are not convinced.

Virologists now acknowledge that SARS-CoV-2 spreads mostly by airborne transmission of small particles that are inhaled and that can remain in the air for hours — a method that was previously called ‘aerosol’ transmission. It also spreads by larger ‘droplets’ of virus-containing particles on surfaces, including hands, or ejected over short distances.

However WHO didn’t publicly acknowledge the importance of airborne transmission until October 2020, a decision that outgoing chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan said in November 2022 said should have been made much earlier based on the available evidence. It didn’t amend its official document on COVID-19 transmission to include airborne transmission until December 2021. As a result, early infection control and prevention advice focused mainly on surface cleaning, hand-washing and social distancing, rather than mask-wearing and improved ventilation.

Some researchers say earlier recognition of airborne transmission by the WHO could have saved lives, noting mounting evidence that pointed to airborne transmission before its official acknowledgement.

Technical report

To clarify the distinction between airborne, droplet and aerosol, the WHO released a technical report on 18 April after more than two years of consultation with more than 100 experts from a range of scientific disciplines. The report does away with the division between ‘droplets’ and ‘aerosols’ used during the pandemic to distinguish between particles above or below five micrometres in diameter. Instead, it proposes the term ‘infectious respiratory particles’ to describe all such particles, regardless of size.

However the report still shies away from describing all pathogens that spread through the air as ‘airborne’. Instead, the document uses the umbrella term ‘through the air’ to describe any mode of transmission that “involves the pathogen travelling through or being suspended in the air”. That is then further broken down into two categories: ‘airborne transmission/inhalation’ is when infectious respiratory particles are inhaled from the air into the respiratory tract; while ‘direct deposition’ is when those particles travel over short range to land directly on the mouth, nose or eyes of another person.

Under this terminology, COVID-19 would be recognized as spreading through the air by airborne/inhalation transmission, with a much smaller risk of transmission by direct deposition.

Up in the air

It’s a mixed result for many scientists. “The positive thing which I see of this report is the fact that the report removes this division of five micrometres between aerosols and droplets,” says Lidia Morawska, an aerosol scientist at the Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia. That distinction was the justification for emphasis on hand-washing, distancing and surface-cleaning, rather than mask-wearing and ventilation — a distinction Morawska says was unscientific. It was also the distinction that justified WHO’s March 2020 assertion that COVID-19 was not airborne.

But that achievement of the report has been tarnished for some by the classification of ‘through the air’, instead of airborne.

“The simplest and clearest way to describe it is to call it airborne transmission,” says Linsey Marr, environmental engineer at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, United States, whose research focuses on the transmission of infectious disease via aerosols and who was involved in the report. “We talk about waterborne transmission, blood-borne transmission, vector-borne transmission; it seems very logical and simple to me that we would call this airborne transmission.”

WHO Chief Scientist Jeremy Farrar says ‘through the air’ allows for recognition of both airborne transmission in which infectious respiratory particles are inhaled, and the less common transmission via direct deposition. “It’s not a dichotomy of mutually exclusive transmission routes,” he says. The recognition of both ‘airborne’ and ‘direct deposition’ under the umbrella of ‘through the air’ avoided going back to the divide between aerosols and droplets, Farrar says. ‘Through the air’ is comparable with vector-borne and waterborne, he says, but acknowledges that “there is a direct deposition element, even if that is not the major way it transmits.”

Julian Tang, a clinical virologist at the University of Leicester, UK, who was also involved with the report, says there was vigorous debate among experts about the term airborne and what it conveys. Some of the scientists on the team that prepared the report argued that it would be problematic to use ‘airborne’ for all pathogens that spread through the air. “They think it’s too scary, too frightening, has too many connotations and it will cause panic, so they chose ‘through the air’,” Tang says.

Farrar says he has no reticence to use the term ‘airborne’. He stresses that this technical report is merely the ‘base camp’ of an ongoing process to refine terminology and its practical applications. “I’m not saying everybody is happy, and not everybody agrees on every word in the document, but at least people have agreed this is a baseline terminology.”

But Morawska, who also consulted on the report, argues that division between airborne and direct deposition is not justified. “It is just confusing the issues,” she says.

Even the co-chair of the group that developed the document, environmental engineer Yuguo Li from the University of Hong Kong, says he prefers the term ‘airborne’ to ‘through the air’. However, he says what’s important is how the concept is applied in practice. “In theory, airborne is a perfect umbrella term as waterborne and vector-borne, but it means different things to different people,” Li says. “The issue is not only about terminologies, it’s about the need to work with public health experts, medical experts to understand those responses.”

Tang says the document sets an important benchmark for how the world responds to the next pandemic. “The next pandemic will most likely be a respiratory virus again because that’s normally the pathogen that mutates the fastest,” he says. The report’s clarity around transmission will help public health providers to respond appropriately. “They will then consider masking early, they’ll consider ventilation early, they’ll consider all these precautions early because a precedent has been set already.”

The report notes that measures to address through-the-air transmission must take into account both the risk posed by the infection itself — for example, disease severity — and the resources available, which may be limited in low or middle-income countries.

Farrar believes this new definition could save lives in future pandemics. “What’s needed now is moving on from base camp to now understanding actually, the non-pharmacological interventions that really matter, and if they work, and the evidence of it.”



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Today’s Wordle answer is the hardest this year, with an average score of 5.4, and ‘Wordle 1037 X’ is trending on Twitter – here’s why it’s so tough and what to do in future

[ad_1]

Today’s Wordle is the most difficult we’ve had so far in 2024, but that doesn’t come close to describing how tough it is. ‘Wordle 1,037 X’ is trending high on Twitter, which is always a sign of a hard puzzle, and some 13% of players have failed it so far.

Solving it in six guesses or fewer and preserving your Wordle streak will be a challenge, that’s for sure. But there are ways to play it to avoid heartache (or the Wordle equivalent; this is only a game, after all). These strategies might be too late to help you now, but they could save you next time a game like this crops up. And it will.



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Obscure $10 billion chip firm you never heard of finally delivers crucial tech for AI future — Astera Labs showcased its Aries 6 PCIe retimer board as it targets future Nvidia HGX boards

[ad_1]

Astera Labs, a relatively unknown semiconductor company with a $10 billion market value, recently showed off its new Aries 6 PCIe retimer board, which it is now sampling to leading AI and cloud infrastructure providers.

Due to the high-speed data transfer within the PCIe interface, the signals can suffer from degradation, especially over longer distances or due to interference. A PCIe retimer helps maintain the data signal integrity over the PCIe interface by cleaning, reshaping, and retransmitting the data signals.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

Amazon Prime Video’s disappearing act could point to a future without the service

[ad_1]

Something strange is going on with Amazon Prime Video. A report from news site Cord Busters originally claimed that the tech giant quietly pulled the plug on the service in the United Kingdom. If you head over to Amazon Prime’s UK page, you’ll notice that Prime Video isn’t among the list of plans near the bottom. All you see are Prime Monthly and Prime Annuals. The same thing is happening on the American website. Scroll down to the “Choose Your Plan” section and it’s not there.

As it turns out, Prime Video continues to exist although it’s being obscured. If you go down to the bottom of the UK website, you’ll find Prime Video listed among the other subscription plans with a direct link to sign up. This isn’t the case with the US page, however. There isn’t a clear indicator of Prime Video’s availability in the States; not a cornered-off section or even a small hint. Luckily, the subscription’s signup page is still live if you know where to look or if you have a link. The cost of the subscription hasn’t changed. It’s still $8.99/£5.99 a month.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

New OLED TVs are brighter than ever – here’s what that means for LCD’s future

[ad_1]

We might only be a couple of weeks in to the 2024 TV hardware season, but it’s already looking set to be a transformative year for the once humble gogglebox. One where we could see the long-established best TV landscape transformed so much by a battle over brightness that a once-key premium TV technology may find itself fighting for survival.  

This sounds like pretty apocalyptic talk, I realise, at a time when most AV fans (apart from a few middle aged CRT fans, maybe) would likely say that when it comes to TV technology, we’ve never had it so good. Intense rivalries between the world’s biggest manufacturers and, increasingly, competing technologies have propelled the TV world forward over the past 10 years at an unprecedented rate, leaving us spoilt for choice like never before.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

iPhone 15 just got a big repairability boost and it’s good news for future models, too

[ad_1]

Apple is easing up its self-repair policy, allowing iPhone owners to fix their devices with used parts instead of forcing them to buy new replacements. The tech giant told The Washington Post the update will apply to screens, batteries, and cameras among other things.

Apple states in its announcement post that they have plans to grow the program to include biometric sensors. The changes are scheduled to take effect this autumn, starting, Apple confirmed with TechRadar, with the iPhone 15 and future models. 

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Bisnis Industri

John Sculley, future Apple CEO, is born

[ad_1]

April 6: Today in Apple history: Apple CEO John Sculley born April 6, 1939: John Sculley is born in New York City. He will grow up to be hailed as a business and marketing genius, eventually overseeing Apple’s transformation into the most profitable personal computer company in the world.

After a remarkable stint as president of Pepsi-Cola, Sculley will take over as Apple’s third CEO in 1983. He runs Apple for a 10-year period, guiding the creation of the revolutionary Newton MessagePad.

During Sculley’s decade at the helm, Apple sells more personal computers than any other company. But most people still remember him for his role in kicking Steve Jobs out of Cupertino.

John Sculley: Apple’s third CEO

Before his decade at Apple, Sculley lacked any background in selling tech products. Still, Jobs lured Sculley to Apple from Pepsi with one of the most famous lines in business: “Do you want to spend the rest of your life selling sugared water or do you want a chance to change the world?”

Jobs did not technically run Apple as CEO until he returned to Cupertino in the late 1990s. During the early ’80s, the idea was that Jobs and Sculley would helm the company together like co-CEOs. Jobs and Apple’s engineers would take care of the cutting-edge technology, while Sculley would use his marketing expertise to legitimize Apple.

Unfortunately, this arrangement did not last long. Jobs got squeezed out of Apple after a failed boardroom coup. He went on to found NeXT, a computer company that Apple eventually acquired.

Sculley, meanwhile, resigned as Apple CEO in 1993, having increased the company’s sales from $800 million to $8 billion. During this period, the Apple II and Macintosh computers became Apple’s biggest sellers, with the latter gradually overtaking the former.

MessagePads and Knowledge Navigators

“One of the issues that got me fired was that there was a split inside the company as to what the company ought to do,” Sculley told Cult of Mac in a wide-ranging interview in 2010.

“There was one contingent that wanted Apple to be more of a business computer company,” Sculley said. “They wanted to open up the architecture and license it. There was another contingent, which I was a part of, that wanted to take the Apple methodology — the user experience and stuff like that — and move into the next generation of products, like the Newton.”

While at Apple, Sculley sometimes got painted as an operations-minded outsider who lacked the world-changing vision of someone like Jobs. Sculley will be the first person to tell you he didn’t measure up to Jobs in this capacity. However, he oversaw some amazing R&D projects during his time as Apple CEO.

One of these was the Newton. Often regarded as Sculley’s answer to the Mac, it represented his first attempt at launching a game-changing new product line during his tenure as Apple CEO.

“It was Sculley’s Macintosh,” Frank O’Mahoney, one of the Apple marketing managers who worked on the Newton, told me when I interviewed him for my book The Apple Revolution. “It was Sculley’s opportunity to do what Steve had done, but in his own category of product.”

John Sculley and Newton: A futuristic ‘failure’

The Newton failed to take off immediately. But the concept for such a mobile device formed the basis for the iPhone, which now represents the bulk of Apple’s revenues. Sculley also commissioned an R&D project called the Knowledge Navigator — which predicted the arrival of tools like Siri and the iPad, almost down to the exact month.

After resigning as CEO, Sculley stayed at Apple as chairman until 1995, when he left the company completely. Today he remains in tech as an investor, particularly interested in smartphones for developing markets.

What did you think of Sculley as Apple CEO? Leave your comments below.



[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

How to watch A Brief History of the Future online from anywhere

[ad_1]

How to watch A Brief History of the Future

From Drake’s DreamCrew production company, A Brief History of the Future looks to challenge the oft depicted dystopian view of the future and aims to use lessons from history and groundbreaking modern science to help viewers work toward a hopeful tomorrow. So keep reading, as we explain how to watch A Brief History of the Future online and from wherever you are in the world.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Hosted by renowned futurist Ari Wallach, A Brief History of the Future will tour the globe, meeting with those who are already working toward securing a hopeful future and discuss the changes we can make today to lead us into a better tomorrow. This series will explore how economics, art, philosophy and politics can all play a part in how we approach the years to come and create a sustainable Earth for the generations ahead.   

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Featured

This tiny box from Samsung can hold 2TB of a special kind of RAM worth tens of thousands of dollars — CXL Memory Module Box hailed as the future of expansive server memory in the age of AI

[ad_1]

At MemCon 2024, Samsung showcased its latest HBM3E technology, talked about its future HBM4 plans, and unveiled the CXL Memory Module Box, also known as CMM-B, the latest addition to its Compute Express Link (CXL) memory module portfolio.

CMM-B is essentially a memory pooling appliance for rack computing leveraging CXL. It supports disaggregated memory allocation, allowing memory capacity available in remote locations to be shared across multiple servers. Through this, CMM-B enables independent resource allocation in the rack cluster and allows for larger pools of memory to be assigned as needed. With up to 60GB/s bandwidth, Samsung says CMM-B is ideal for applications like AI, in-memory databases, and data analytics.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link