Ahora, cualquiera que escriba la URL original de Twitter será redirigido a X.com. La plataforma anunció hoy el cambio a través de una ventana emergente en su navegador.
Velocidad de la luz triturable
Crédito: Captura de pantalla: X
Un mensaje en la página de inicio de sesión dice: “Le informamos que estamos cambiando nuestra URL, pero su configuración de privacidad y protección de datos sigue siendo la misma”.
Today’s Wordle is the most difficult we’ve had so far in 2024, but that doesn’t come close to describing how tough it is. ‘Wordle 1,037 X’ is trending high on Twitter, which is always a sign of a hard puzzle, and some 13% of players have failed it so far.
Solving it in six guesses or fewer and preserving your Wordle streak will be a challenge, that’s for sure. But there are ways to play it to avoid heartache (or the Wordle equivalent; this is only a game, after all). These strategies might be too late to help you now, but they could save you next time a game like this crops up. And it will.
To explain what they are, I’ll need to include SPOILERS FOR TODAY’S WORDLE, GAME #1,037, ON SUNDAY, 21 APRIL 2024. So please don’t read on if you haven’t already completed it. Just bear in mind that you might want some hints for Wordle today before doing so.
How hard?
OK, so let’s talk about today’s Wordle word and exactly how hard it was.
The answer to game #1,037, assuming you’ve played by now **FINAL SPOILER ALERT**, is JOLLY – and it really is causing a lot of problems.
The way I assess the difficulty of each Wordle is to consult WordleBot, the New York Times’ AI-powered helper tool. Each day, WordleBot analyzes the games of everyone who plays and reports an average score for it. And today, it says people are solving it in an average of 5.4 guesses. That’s based on a random sample of 1,778,346 Wordlers who have so far played it – so it’s a pretty sizeable survey.
I’ve recorded the WordleBot average scores every day since the tool launched in April 2022, meaning I now have a list of 749 games ranked by difficulty. By that measure, JOLLY is the hardest Wordle so far in 2024, comfortably beating the previous holder of that title, PIPER, which was a 5.2 game in February.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
But that only tells half of the tale, because JOLLY is in fact the toughest Wordle since June 2023, and is actually the equal fourth worst ever. Only PARER (average score 6.3), MUMMY (5.8) and JAZZY (5.5) have been harder, while FOYER, RIPER and JOKER all had the same 5.4 average.
Unsurprisingly, many players are struggling. Some 233,791 Wordlers have failed to solve it as of the time of writing, which is 13% of the total. That’s a super-high failure rate.
Turn to Twitter and you can see the reaction, with scores of players posting their games and bemoaning their luck:
A quick glance is enough to see one of the main causes of this glut of failures – namely the too-many-answers problem. But it’s far from the only one.
Too many answers
(Image credit: New York Times)
Lots of the hardest Wordles ever share a common theme, namely too-many-answers. In other words, the solution is one that could have been another word if you just changed one (or sometimes two) letters.
There are several of these traps, for instance -IGHT, -OUND and -ATCH. The first of those has nine possible solutions: WIGHT, EIGHT, RIGHT, TIGHT, LIGHT, FIGHT, SIGHT, MIGHT and NIGHT. The second has eight – WOUND, ROUND, POUND, HOUND, FOUND, SOUND, MOUND and BOUND – while the third has seven (WATCH, PATCH, LATCH, HATCH, MATCH, BATCH and CATCH).
The -OLLY trap, meanwhile, is on a par with -ATCH, because it has seven definite answers: LOLLY, JOLLY, HOLLY, GOLLY, FOLLY, MOLLY and DOLLY. It’s up there with the worst possible formats.
These kind of games are a nightmare if you play on hard mode, where you can easily get stuck with four green letters and be forced to randomly guess letters in the search of the right one. So my first tip is simply not to play on hard mode! Or, if you do, you need to bear in mind that this kind of thing might happen, and guard against it from the very start,
Worse still here, the eventual answer was JOLLY, which begins with the least common letter in the game. This is something I prove in my analysis of every Wordle answer; J only appears in 27 of Wordle’s 2,309 original solutions, and it’s therefore not a letter most people use very often.
Add to that the fact that JOLLY also includes a repeated letter – which itself is a less common occurrence than getting five individual letters – and you have a game that’s set up to make life difficult for you.
How to play one of these games and win
The key to beating a game like JOLLY – unless you play on hard mode – is to narrow down your options as early as possible.
What this means is not chasing a high score, because that way lies disaster. Let’s say you established this was an -OLLY word as early as the third guess, which isn’t unreasonable depending on what your start word was. In that scenario, it can be tempting to guess common words such as FOLLY, say, or HOLLY, in the search of that average-beating 4/6 score.
DO NO DO THIS.
Instead, the second you realize that there are more answers left than guesses, the only way to consistently beat Wordle is to find a narrowing-down word that eliminates as many options as possible. In my example above, it was MIGHT – because that ruled out MOLLY, GOLLY and HOLLY in a single guess, leaving me with only JOLLY left to play next time.
This goes against many people’s instincts, because it involves leaving out green letters, which just feels wrong. But it’s what WordleBot does, and the ‘bot is far smarter than you or I.
In some cases, you might even need to play two such words, and in fact I kind of did that; LOWLY, which I played the guess before MIGHT, was chosen partly to rule out LOLLY as an option. The important thing is to establish what all of the options are, draw up a list of all those possible letters (in this case F, H, G, L, M, D and J), then think of words that contain as many of them as possible.
You could consider this an overly cautious and maybe cowardly way to play Wordle, but if you value your streak then it’s the only approach that makes sense.
In January this year, X (formerly Twitter) added support for passkeys to the X app for iOS. Now, the company is working on bringing support for passkeys to the X app for Android.
According to AssembleDebug on TheSpAndroid, the latest beta version of the X app for Android (version 10.32.0) contains strings of codes mentioning passkeys. What’s even more interesting is that the author was able to activate the feature. Once they activated it, an option to enable passkeys appeared in the app with the description “Enable passkeys for added protection that may be tied to your biometrics.” The option is located in Settings and privacy » Security and account access » Security.
Unfortunately, the support for passkeys is not functional in the app at the moment, which suggests that the project is still under development. Once the feature is ready, the company might activate it by default in the beta version of the app, test it thoroughly, and then make it available in the stable version of the app. Once that happens, you will be able to log into the X app for Android by authenticating your identity using your phone’s or tablet’s fingerprint scanner or facial recognition system.
Willie E. Gary rose from a common sharecropper son to become one of America’s most popular and influential attorneys. Gary’s rise from poverty to $50 million in net worth is nothing short of inspiring. His tenacity and skills are matched by his extraordinary determination. The movie “The Burial”, starring Jamie Foxx, immortalizes his story as a testament to the American Dream.
Willie E. Gary: Who is he?
Willie Edward Gary was born on July 12, 1947 in Eastman, Georgia. He experienced hardships at a young age. Gary grew up with ten siblings in a sharecropper family. They faced many challenges and slept in tents at times because they did not have a permanent residence. Willie was determined to overcome his situation and earned a law diploma from North Carolina Central University School of Law.
Why is he known as “The Giant Killer?”
Gary’s nickname “The Giant Killer”, is more than just a clever moniker. It’s also a testament to his skill in the courtroom. Gary has won 150 settlements worth millions of dollars for his clients. The Law Firm of Gary, Williams, Parenti, Watson, Gary & Gillespie, P.L.L.C., with over 30 attorneys, is synonymous with landmark verdicts.
What was the $500 million Judgement about?
Gary’s biggest accomplishment is his lawsuit against Loewen Group. This massive funeral home company. Gary obtained a $500 million verdict for a funeral home owner, Jeremiah Joseph O’Keefe. The Burial, the film that details Gary’s amazing victory, is based on this David vs. Goliath battle.
How Does Gary’s Contingency Lawsuit Model Work?
Gary’s firm operates on a contingent basis, which is a unique way to approach legal cases. The firm is only paid if it wins a case. Their cut could range between 30% and 50%, depending on the case. Gary’s confidence and commitment to his clients is reflected in this model.
What financial challenges has Gary faced?
Success is not without obstacles. Gary’s law firm relies on specialized financial companies, like LawFinance Group, to fund the high operational costs of contingency suits. Gary was faced with legal issues in 2012 when LawFinance filed a lawsuit against him for an alleged $10,000,000 high-interest loan.
In 2013, IberiaBank filed a lawsuit and seized $3.2 million in personal property from Gary’s mansion in Sewall Point. The bank claimed Gary and his spouse owed $3.3million in relation to three properties located in Fort Pierce, Florida. Gary is undeterred by these setbacks and remains a force in the legal field.
What is the impact of Willie E. Gary on popular culture?
Gary’s influence extends far beyond the courtroom. Gary has appeared on numerous talk shows, including “The Oprah Winfrey Show.” He was also named to “Ebony’s” “100 Most Important Black Americans” List for 2002. His incredible journey, filled with challenges and victories, is an inspiration to many and a shining example for perseverance and backbone.
Willie E. Gary is a living testament to the spirit of hard work and determination. His journey from the Georgia fields to the elite legal circles in Florida underscores his belief that passion and dedication can help one overcome the most impossible odds.
Environmental organizations issued a report on Wednesday that rated social media platforms based on their reaction to climate change misinformation. Elon Musk’s X app was harshly criticized in the study.
X, formerly known as Twitter, received the lowest grade since it is unknown whether or not the app has restrictions against the dissemination of erroneous information about climate change, according to the score card’s inventor, Climate Action Against Disinformation. The group includes over fifty environmental organizations, advertising corporations, and others.
Some famous accounts on X promote the notion that climate change is a “hoax” or spread conspiracy theories about green energy programs, making it easy to obtain inaccurate information on the issue. Musk has wrongly asserted that surface-level phenomena have no influence on global warming.
According to the group, the stakes are high since climate change disinformation has impeded action, such as stronger limits on fossil fuels.
“A toxic and fossil-fueled minority is drowning out the voices of science and reason,” Friends of the Earth spokesperson Erika Seiber said in a statement. “Social media platforms are complicit.”
The alliance was formed in 2021 by environmental organisations concerned that the United Nations Climate Summit in Scotland will be damaged by fake news. Friends of the Earth, World Wildlife Fund International, and Patagonia are just a handful of the coalition’s member groups.
The group opted to share the data during this week’s United Nations General Assembly session and Climate Week NYC, where leaders from civil society and other sectors converge to discuss climate change policy.
In the year preceding up to Musk’s purchase of Twitter, the firm announced that it will no longer accept advertisements that “contradict the scientific consensus on climate change.” However, it is unclear if the restriction is still in effect at this moment.
According to the story, Elon Musk’s acquisition of X/Twitter has people questioning whose company policies are still in force.
X’s officials did not respond to NBC News’ request for comment. The authors of the research also claimed that they contacted X throughout the report writing process but did not obtain a response.
The scale of 1 to 21 was utilized, and X received a 1. According to the researchers, the app’s privacy policy is critical in the fight against climate misinformation since fossil fuel companies, like other advertisers, may use personal data to affect public opinion. You did terrible if you received a 0.
Pinterest received the most points (12) in this round. Researchers discovered that this platform was the only one that identified climate misinformation specifically in its community rules and released an annual report on the topic. (Other websites do not describe climate-related misinformation.)
Pinterest has received plaudits for its attempts to restrict the selling of climate denial and to protect the personal information of individuals who protest against fossil fuels.
Corporate leaders acknowledged their delight with their efforts on Tuesday.
“Pinterest has a long history of establishing guidelines that help to grow a welcoming community in cyberspace.” Pinterest noted in a statement that it is “constantly evaluating our guidelines and enforcement approaches” owing to the dynamic nature of the anti-disinformation battle.
TikTok came in second with 9 points, Meta came in eighth with 8, and YouTube came in sixth with 6 points. Despite the fact that LinkedIn and Wikipedia were not included in the scope of the analysis, the researchers stated that they visited other tech sites to share their experiences with users.
For years, social media researchers have been warning about the rise of climate change denial, claiming that the inability of internet platforms to aggressively delete false material adds to concerns such as increasing sea levels. Extreme weather events, particularly in Spanish-speaking nations, can elicit a spike in climate-related conspiracy theories, which are sometimes entwined with other types of misinformation, such as those regarding Covid.
In various ways, the platforms have begun to crack down on climate deception.
When Facebook was still known as Meta, the corporation stated in 2021 that it will identify and redirect users away from content that promotes climate change denial. Despite this, researchers from outside Facebook reported that the labels were not always used by Facebook.
In the same year, YouTube said that it will prohibit climate change doubters from selling their material on the site; nevertheless, the New York Times reported that some skeptics were still doing so as of May of this year.
Following the release of the climate report card, YouTube issued the following statement: “Our climate change policy explicitly prohibits the monetization of content that denies the existence of climate change, as well as ads that promote these claims.” We do not remove advertising from videos that involve debate or arguments on climate change subjects, such as public policy or research, but we do remove commercials from videos that explicitly or indirectly dispute the scientific consensus on climate change. Our algorithms also do not like or surface anything that spreads climate change misinformation.
YouTube has also said that its search and recommendation algorithms promote information from reliable sources.
TikTok did not respond immediately to the results. Meta did not respond immediately when we requested for comment.
The scorecard focused on the limits themselves and their extent, rather than how closely social networking services enforced them.
Bringing the average down: It said that none of the platforms offered researchers and academics with sufficient access to anonymised data on content and advertising.
The procedure also necessitates a quick selfie, which will be cross-referenced with the official ID using biometrics by a private company. However, the benefits of this kind of verification are currently rather minor.
Twitter’s new account verification process necessitates the submission of a government-issued picture ID as well as a live selfie.
The verification mechanism will be accessible only to paying customers. Twitter (previously known as X) has been urging its premium subscribers to sign up for the “ID verification” system by presenting a pop-up message about it, according to TechCrunch’s initial finding.
The prompt claims that you must have a government-issued picture ID to access your account. This should take no more than five minutes.
Twitter built the ID system, according to a company assistance manual, to prevent account “impersonation” and to “increase the overall integrity and trust on our platform.” This is because the company’s CEO, Elon Musk, changed the rules so that anybody who pays for Twitter Blue (previously X Premium) may acquire the blue verified checkmark on their account.
Because Twitter is requesting one of their most sensitive documents, the reveal of the verification process last month aroused privacy concerns.
Users are requested to grant the verification system access to collect biometric data. Twitter is reportedly collaborating with an external Israeli business called Au10tix to extract facial data from both the official ID and the live selfie in order to validate a user’s identify. According to Twitter’s new privacy policy, users must consent to Au10tix retaining their data for up to 30 days.
As a result of verifying your account, you will “receive a visibly labeled ID verification in the pop-up that appears when clicking on your blue check mark.” They will get “prioritized support” from the firm, which implies they will receive answers to their issues more quickly.
Although the verification procedure seems to be intrusive, it is entirely optional. Users may reject the ID verification pop-up window, however Twitter suggests that doing so will ultimately provide access to further functions.
The company’s help center states that “users who choose to participate in this optional ID verification may receive additional benefits associated with the specific X feature in the future.” In the future, verified accounts will get a blue check mark much more rapidly, and users will have “greater flexibility in making frequent changes to your profile photo, display name, or username (@handle).”
The support post also mentions that Twitter may request government-issued IDs from chosen users “to ensure the safety and security of accounts on our platform.”
