Categories
Featured

The AI image generator that protects businesses: We talk to iStock about balancing creative freedoms and commercially safe tools

[ad_1]

Billed as a commercially safe AI image generator, iStock released its AI photo platform back in January 2024 – and during a live demo of the latest update, we spoke to Chief Product Officer Grant Farhall and Bill Bon, Director of Editing, about creative efficiencies, business-first AI, and what makes a good AI text-to-image prompt.

Famed for its stock media library, the company, owned by Getty Images, has been focused of late on creating a good, usable AI tool that’s accessible at pretty much every level of an organization. And a commercially safe one, too, untrained on copyrighted materials that might bring down unnecessary lawsuits on businesses big and small. 

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

How Google protects Google Maps against fake reviews and ratings

How Google protects Google Maps against fake content

Imagine you’re planning a road trip or trying to find a new restaurant in town. You pull out your phone, tap on Google Maps, and there it is – a world of information at your fingertips. But have you ever stopped to think about how Google keeps all that info accurate and reliable? It’s not just about getting you from point A to point B; it’s about making sure you can trust what you see on the screen.

Let’s talk about how Google Maps stays on top of things. With help from a whopping 300 million users each year, you’d think it’d be tough to keep everything straight. But Google’s got a system in place that’s always on the lookout for anything fishy. Imagine a neighborhood watch, but for the digital world. If someone tries to mess with the map, like posting fake reviews or ratings, Google’s on it faster than you can say “wrong turn.” They’re constantly checking for weird patterns and if they spot something off, they’ll pull it down to keep the map clean.

Google Maps is being protected from fake content by :

    • Responding quickly to real-time abuse
    • Preventing abuse ahead of sensitive moments
    • Instating longer-term protections

Now, think about big events that get everyone’s attention – elections, hurricanes, you name it. Google Maps knows that’s when information needs to be extra reliable. So they get ahead of the game, making sure no one can tinker with important details like emergency contact numbers or shelter addresses. It’s like having a guard dog that’s always ready to protect your house when you need it most.

Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of Google and its services :

But what about places that are always sensitive, like police stations or jails? Google Maps doesn’t mess around there either. They might put a lid on certain types of comments or even hit the pause button on all user contributions for these spots. It’s not about keeping you quiet; it’s about keeping the map helpful and free from any nonsense that could cause trouble.

Ever run into a spot on Google Maps where you can’t add your two cents? Google doesn’t leave you in the dark. They’ll tell you straight up why they’ve put limits on contributions, linking you to their policies so you can see what’s up. It’s all about being clear and keeping you in the loop.

So, whether you’re exploring the streets of your own city or jetting off to a far-off land, you can count on Google Maps to be your trusty guide. Thanks to their sharp-eyed monitoring, smart planning, and clear communication, you’ve got all the info you need right at your fingertips. And that’s all thanks to Google’s smart moves to keep their maps as trustworthy as your best friend’s directions.

Source: Google

Filed Under: Technology News, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

Trump responds to Democratic efforts to bar him from the 2024 ballot by asserting that the First Amendment protects him.

Democrats say that Trump backed a “coup” against the United States.
On Monday, former President Donald Trump said that the U.S. Constitution saves him from Democrats’ plans to keep him off the presidential primary votes in 2024.

Several states are trying to get Trump’s name taken off the ballots because he took part in the protests at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. His critics say that this was an uprising against the United States. Trump’s lawyers say that the First Amendment lets him say what he wants about the 2020 race.

“Petitioners never say that President Trump did anything other than speak or refuse to speak,” attorney Geoffrey Blue wrote in a Colorado court filing on Monday. “They say that he took part in the alleged insurrection, but they never say that he did anything else.”

“The Fourteenth Amendment applies to people who “acted in uprising or rebellion,” not to people who only “instigated” actions,” he said.

Sarah B. Wallace, a judge in Denver, has set Oct. 13 as the date for a hearing on the move. On Oct. 30, there will be a meeting about the constitutional problems. It will be the first time someone tries to get Trump’s name taken off the ticket in front of a judge.
Trump’s opponents say that he can’t run for president because he has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion.” This is because of a phrase in the 14th Amendment. Stephen Yagman, a civil rights lawyer and ex-convict who brought the case in California, says that Trump’s comments about January 6 and the 2020 election show that he supports an uprising of this kind.

Yagman told the Los Angeles Times earlier this month, “There is only one issue that might need to be litigated, and that is whether or not Trump took part in an insurrection or rebellion.” “I think anyone who can see the answer to that question is that he did.”
The 14th Amendment, according to some lawyers, cannot hurt Trump. Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, said, “There are good faith arguments for this claim.” However, he thinks the theory is “not just dubious, but dangerous.”

“The amendment was written to punish people who actually start a rebellion that kills hundreds of thousands of people,” said Turley. “Proponents would expand the meaning of ‘insurrection or rebellion’ to include unproven claims and challenges about election fraud.”