The concept of inkjet printing was a fixture throughout the 20th century – with research starting way back in the 50s with a Japanese Canon employee, Ichiro Endo, who proposed the idea for a “bubble jet” printer that could translate the images you see on a computer to a printed physical page. But it wasn’t until HP‘s ThinkJet printer launched in 1984 that inkjet printing truly entered the mainstream – and with it the dreaded ink cartridge.
One of the first commercial inkjet printers was the IBM 6640, a device designed to offer printing to offices, when it was launched in 1976. It was part of a handful of bulky, heavy and impractical devices that launched around this time – and offered inkjet printing in professional contexts.
But nearly ten years later, HP brought out a more compact machine for personal printing at home. Measuring 11.5 x 8 x 3.5 inches, the black-and-white printer would have set you back $495 – $1,478.45 by today’s standards. Its ink cartridges, which were available for $8 a pop ($24) were good for 500 pages too.
The dot-matrix disruptor
Its name is derived from the process of ‘thermal inkjet’ printing – and came about when an engineer working on a completely different project noticed something interesting about the effects of electricity. When they were making thin-film technology for integrated circuit applications, they were testing how a thin silicon film would respond when stimulated with electricity. To the engineer’s surprise, the electricity superheated the medium and droplets of fluid lying beneath the film were expelled. This, according to HP, inspired the idea for finely controlled jets of fluid in a compact inkjet printer.
This invention was a game-changer. While, as we’ve mentioned, inkjet printing was in force across enterprises – these machines could only print large characters rather crudely. Now, it was clear this technology could be reduced in size and operate with relatively little power compared to its business-centric cousin.
It also marked an end to the dot-matrix printer, which was replaced a technology that was better in almost every metric – to the extent it’s still one of the most popular types of printer today. For instance, dot-matrix printers typically printed at 120 characters per second, while the HP ThinkJet printed at 150 characters per second. The former technology also emits high-pitch scratching sounds, too, while the inkjet printer emits a “nondistracting hum that is quiet enough not to interfere with telephone conversations,” according to InfoWorld (1984).
More from TechRadar Pro
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
I’m a huge fan of resin 3D printers. While the liquid resin can be a little harder to work with than typical filament printers, the results are often much more detailed and look better. However, there are some limitations to the Elegoo Mars 3 that I used in the past. Things like its small print bed, or making sure it’s properly ventilated because resin printing can be toxic, mean I don’t turn to it as often as I’d like. The new Elegoo Saturn 3 Ultra, on the other hand, fixes all of these problems and more.
What I love most about resin printing is that it enables me to be an even bigger nerd. I have friends who play a lot of D&D, and I like to make minifigs for them. When I make costumes for Dragon Con, I find it easiest to print a lot of the accessories or details that I don’t have the skills to craft myself out of other materials like foam. With the larger print size and a better filtering system, the Saturn 3 Ultra 12K made my dreams of making nerdy stuff a more convenient reality.
Printing Space Galore
The biggest advantage of the Elegoo Saturn 3 Ultra 12K compared to other comparable 3D printers is just how much space you have to print. My Mars 3 has a build volume of 153.36 mm x 77.76 mm x 175 mm. That’s just under 7 inches tall, with a roughly 6- by 3-inch print bed. That’s good enough for printing D&D miniatures, small trinkets, or board game pieces. But it can get really restrictive if you want to do much that’s larger than that.
Photograph: Eric Ravenscraft
The Saturn 3 Ultra, on the other hand, has a positively massive 218.88 mm × 122.88 mm × 260 mm build volume. That means the print bed itself is around 8.6 inches by 4.8 inches, with a whopping 10.2 inches of height. Put more simply, the size of objects you can build is more than triple that of the Mars 3.
You might not think a couple of extra inches would matter, but it makes all the difference in the world. The printer came in handy when my partner wanted a prop for her Suzume costume. In this movie, the main character teams up with an animate children’s chair (just go with it) with a very distinct look.
We considered a number of ways to recreate this character. We could build it out of wood (we had no woodworking tools), we could make it out of foam (probably the smartest option, but we wanted it to be durable enough to survive a convention), or I could 3D-print some pieces and glue them all together. But the Mars 3 only had enough space to make a teeeeeny tiny version. And that’s not what my partner wanted.
The Saturn 3 Ultra came to the rescue. With a little finagling, I was able to fit every single piece of the chair–the back, the base, three long legs and two small supporting rods–into a single print. The whole print took about 14 long hours–the base of the chair was stretching the limits of that super tall print volume–but in the end, I was able to make all the parts needed for my partner’s costume companion with maybe a half hour of fiddling in 3D software, and a day of waiting for a print to finish.
Photograph: Eric Ravenscraft
Attention to Detail
Resin printers are so appealing because they can recreate detail that filament-based printers struggle with. They use ultraviolet light, projected through a digital display, to cure only the parts of a pool of liquid resin that are necessary for the print. And the screen in the base of the Saturn 3 Ultra 12 has a truly absurd level of detail.
The 12K in this printer’s full name refers to exactly the same thing it means in TVs. Your 4K TV has four thousand (roughly) lines of horizontal resolution. Likewise, the LCD screen in the Saturn 3 Ultra has a resolution of 11,520 x 5,120. When packed into a 10-inch display, it means the printer can create models with detail on a scale measured in tens of micrometers.
Particles on the scale of hundreds of micrometres to nanometres are ubiquitous key components in many advanced applications including biomedical devices1,2, drug-delivery systems3,4,5,15, microelectronics12 and energy storage systems16,17, and exhibit inherent material applicability in microfluidics6,7, granular systems8,9 and abrasives14. Approaches to particle fabrication inherently have trade-offs among speed, scalability, geometric control, uniformity and material properties.
Traditional particle fabrication methods range from milling and emulsification techniques to advanced moulding and flow lithography, and approaches can be classified as either bottom-up or top-down. Bottom-up particle fabrication approaches, best exemplified by grinding and milling18, emulsification19, precipitation20, nucleation-and-growth21 and self-assembly5,10,11 techniques, can have high throughput but lead to heterogeneous populations of granular particles with limited control over shape and uniformity. To address the geometric shortcomings of bottom-up approaches, top-down particle fabrication methods such as direct lithography10,22, single-step roll-to-roll soft lithography23,24 and multistep moulding4 have been employed.
Scalable particle moulding approaches, such as particle replication in non-wetting templates (PRINT) and stamped assembly of polymer layers (SEAL), incorporate lithographic approaches to attain two-dimensional (2D) geometric control4,24. PRINT utilizes a non-wetting fluoropolymer layer to facilitate rapid fabrication of isolated micro- and nanoparticles with demonstratable precise control over shape, size, surface functionalization and fillers such as drugs, proteins or DNA/RNA24,25. Detailed in vitro studies of these particles have elucidated shape-dependent tendencies of cellular uptake and enhanced localized cargo release24,25,26. Moreover, in vivo studies have shown the significant role played by particle size, shape, charge, surface chemistry and particle deformability on biodistribution via multiple different dosage forms (injection and inhalation)27,28,29. Extending the PRINT technology, the stacking of moulded particles enables more complex particle geometries as exemplified by SEAL4. Harvested moulded sections are welded together to gain three-dimensional (3D) fabrication control, yielding demonstratable pulsatile-release, drug-delivery vehicles. The trajectory and demonstrated application potential of these technologies lays the groundwork for future methods of fabricating advanced particles.
For example, continuous-flow lithography (or optofluidic fabrication) produces particles as a photopolymerizable resin flows through a fluidic channel, curing in 2D to 3D geometries30,31. The stop-polymerize-flow technique has been demonstrated to achieve quasi-continuous fabrication of 2D to 2.5D geometries (anisotropic properties on a 2D-defined shape)32. Deterministic deformation based on microfluidic flow can further enable the fabrication of concave-surface geometries, previously demonstrated at the rate of 86,400 particles per day31. Furthermore, additional dimensional control processes may be introduced to create Janus particles (particles whose surfaces have two or more distinct physical properties), nanoporous meshes using sacrificial additives or porogens or micropatterning via secondary chemical coating or formation control steps2,33,34.
One remaining major engineering challenge is to develop a particle fabrication technique that simultaneously enables all dimensions of micron-scale 3D geometric control, complexity, speed, material selection and permutability. Herein we introduce a scalable, high-resolution 3D printing technique for particle fabrication based on a roll-to-roll form of continuous liquid interface production (r2rCLIP). We demonstrate r2rCLIP using single-digit, micron-resolution optics in combination with a continuous roll of film in lieu of a static platform, enabling fast, rapidly permutable fabrication and harvesting of particles with a variety of materials and complex geometries (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1: r2rCLIP is a rapid fabrication process for particles with complex geometries.
a, r2rCLIP is a quasi-continuous technique wherein a 3D geometry of simple to complex nature is designed and subsequently sliced into 2D images. These images are then used to fabricate 3D geometries from a photopolymerizable resin in a roll-to-roll process. b, Diagram of experimental r2rCLIP setup wherein an aluminium-coated PET film is unrolled from a feed roll (I) and mechanically braked (II) to provide tension before passing over a high-precision z stage and CLIP assembly (III). A designed geometry is projected through a Teflon AF window into a vat of photopolymerizable resin. The geometry materializes onto the film and the stage pulls in the z direction to direct vertical part formation. Once materialized, the particles on film are passed under a spring-tensioning system to maintain relative substrate positioning during stage movement (IV). The film is then passed through a cleaning step (V) before secondary curing (VI) and immersion in a non-ionic surfactant solution within a heated sonication bath and a razor blade to induce delamination (VII). The film is finally collected on a second roller with a stepper motor that provides translational movement throughout the process (VIII; Extended Data Fig. 1). Insets show a graphic of particle clearance over a guide roller (IX) and an image of particles on the film post cleaning (X). c, This scalable process is demonstrated by the production of around 30,000 hollow cube particles observed in a set of computer-stitched scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. d, Octahedrons, icosahedrons and dodecahedrons with unit cell size ranging from 200 to 400 µm printed within a singular printed array. c,d, Samples printed from the HDDA–HDDMA system and coated with Au/Pd (60:40) before SEM imaging. Scale bars, 3 mm (b,c), 500 µm (d).
Continuous liquid interface production is an additive manufacturing technique that uses digital light processing (DLP) to project videos of 2D images describing 3D models into a vat of photopolymerizable resin. The resolution of this technique has improved from 50 to 4.5 μm, as well as providing speeds of up to 3,000 mm h−1 (refs. 35,36,37,38). CLIP utilizes a 385 nm ultraviolet light-emitting diode (LED) and digital micromirror device to simultaneously pattern an array of actinic photons, activating photo-initiators dissolved in liquid resin and inducing radical polymerization in each printed voxel. The CLIP technique is distinguished by the introduction of an oxygen-induced, photopolymerization-inhibited ‘dead zone’ between the photocurable resin and an optically clear vat window (Teflon amorphous fluoropolymer (AF) 1600 or 2400), effectively obviating any delamination step (Extended Data Fig. 2. and Supplementary Note 1). Lack of adherence, or glueing, of the growing particle onto the window facilitates fabrication of fragile green parts, such as thin struts on hollowed particle geometries, while maintaining high throughput speeds35,36. This technique is demonstrably versatile for a broad range of polymer chemistries, functionalization, fillers and multimaterial platforms35,38. High-resolution CLIP is used herein to obtain geometric control for the scalable fabrication of particles in the sub-200-µm regime with resin-dependent, layer-wise control down to single-digit-micron range and 2.00 × 2.00 µm2xy resolution.
To achieve a rapid and fully automated particle-printing process we substituted the conventional static build plate of a high-resolution CLIP printer with a continuous-film, modular, roll-to-roll system. This enables semicontinuous printing and automated in-line postprocessing including cleaning, postcuring and harvesting (particle liftoff). An aluminium-coated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film was chosen as the primary film substrate to maintain particle adhesion during printing at a level above in situ orthogonal resin reflow forces and normal suction forces, still allowing for delamination from film without fracture during harvesting (for additional substrates tested see Supplementary Note 2).
Complementary to film integration for particle printing, we constructed a high-resolution CLIP setup to fabricate fine particle features that achieves single-digit-micron optical resolution (2.00 × 2.00 or 6.00 × 6.00 µm2 depending on desired build area) in the xy plane. Voxel definition further depends on vertical resolution, dependent on stage movement repeatability (±0.12 μm), depth of focus of the optical setup (for example, 30 μm for 2.00 × 2.00 µm2 setup) and resin physical properties (refraction and diffraction of light, penetration depth and critical exposure dose for gelation; Table 1, Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 3).
Table 1 Experimental curing parameters for high-resolution resins utilized in particle fabrication
Fig. 2: r2rCLIP is amenable to a range of high-resolution in-house and commercial materials with high-precision optimization.
a, The bridging method enables working curve determination of resin-curing properties, as demonstrated for several bridge series from resins of increasing penetration depth at constant dosage and corresponding measured cure depth. Ridging artefacts coincide with pixel pitch at 6 µm spacing. Exposure measurement bridges coated with Au/Pd (60:40) before SEM imaging. b, Determination of intrinsic penetration depth and critical cure dosage. A lower slope correlates with greater analytical cure depth control at a given dosage (Emax), as well as with a lower propensity for fluctuations in exposure to result in major changes in cure depth (Cd). Scale bars, 15 µm.
Previous work has studied surface and resolution optimization in photopolymerization-based 3D printing systems39; achieving z resolution below 25 µm remains a challenge due to intrinsic resin penetration depth and overcuring from accumulated dosages40,41,42. To fabricate optimal, complex particle geometries a resin system must be designed to achieve high z resolution; a 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate–1,6-hexanediol dimethacrylate (HDDA–HDDMA)-based system was previously described as achieving up to 4 µm vertical resolution39. We utilize this resin system herein and adopt an analytical bridging technique to measure intrinsic resin properties, as opposed to the common glass slide method40,42,43 which does not analytically describe in situ high-resolution CLIP as accurately. Our HDDA–HDDMA resin has a characteristic penetration depth of 8.0 ± 0.4 µm and experimentally resolved a minimum unsupported bridge thickness of 1.1 ± 0.3 µm. We characterized several additional high-resolution custom and commercial resin compositions, which are also compatible with r2rCLIP and may be substituted depending on materials requirements, desired vertical resolution and application (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Notably, unsupported film bridges characterized in the curing assay are thin (under 100 µm, relevant to particle fabrication) and resolve proximal to the dead zone, introducing periodic artefacts ascribed to fluctuations in light intensity between pixels. Surface irregularities may further be attributed to either resin reflow (elongated lines) or cavitation (bubbles) and may be addressed with optimization. Resin parameterization and optimization are essential in regard to vertical resolution determination for fabrication limitations; resins with greater characteristic penetration depth are not as amenable to thin vertical geometric features.
To demonstrate the potential of r2rCLIP in the fabrication of dimensionally complex structures we designed a range of shapes with increasing geometric complexity using computer-aided design. These designs not only mirror those created by previous 2D fabrication and multistep moulding techniques4,24 but also include several geometries that cannot be moulded, exemplifying the unique capabilities of our approach (Fig. 3). Herein we categorize geometric complexity on a spectrum ranging from shapes that can be moulded at scale to those that cannot. Mouldable geometries are defined to be plausibly fabricated at scale in a single step using a uniaxial die draw, core and cavity. Geometries increase in moulding complexity (and subsequently decrease in mouldability at scale) if a theoretical moulding approach requires an increasing number of parting lines, ejector pins and angles and extensive alignment or contains non-mouldable negative internal spaces. In addition, thin or sharp geometric features may introduce moulding complications and part anisotropy due to, for example, flash, short shot, shrinkage or air pockets exacerbated at the micron scale (Supplementary Note 4)44. It should be noted that it is plausible to couple a multistep moulding process with a sacrificial etching step to achieve some geometries deemed non-mouldable in this work, although without a high degree of reproducibility given mould alignment requirements.
Fig. 3: SEM images of mouldable to non-mouldable geometries fabricated by r2rCLIP.
Particles were fabricated using the HDDA–HDDMA system and informed exposure intensities obtained from bridge fitting data (Fig. 2 and Table 1), washed as described and coated with a 60:40 Au/Pd before SEM observation. Insets show a rendering of each respective geometry for reference. Capped hollow cone inset shown as quarter cut-through for clarity. Scale bars, 250 µm.
One significant benefit of using the r2rCLIP method for particle fabrication is its inherent mouldless process, which enables changing of fabricated geometries within or between arrays based solely on optimized printing parameters. This means that a wide variety of particle geometries can be produced without needing to alter the setup, as would be necessary with previous particle fabrication methods (for example, mould interchange). This flexibility is particularly beneficial when needing to adjust geometric requirements, such as when fabricating precise ratios of heterogeneous mixtures of polydisperse particles (Fig. 1d).
To demonstrate the scalability afforded by r2rCLIP we fabricated approximately 30,000 hollow cube-shaped particles of 200 µm width and high reproducibility (Fig. 1c; 96 ± 1% fabrication success rate, n = 300; −10 ± 20% average relative error from nominal strut feature size, n = 300). Whereas optimized particle array (up to 16.4 mm2 for 2 µm or 147.5 mm2 for 6 µm resolution) fabrication speed is subminute, gram-scale production (thousands to millions of particles) necessitates the removal of time-consuming, manual manipulation steps. Previously the slow step of particle production involved the manual replacement of build substrate (requiring 4 ± 2 min for manual manipulation between high-resolution CLIP print jobs, n = 6,436; Supplementary Note 5). Replacing this manual manipulation step with mechanical substrate translation shifts the rate-limiting step to particle fabrication time—an inherent advantage of the r2rCLIP technique. For instance, fabrication of 1 million 200-µm-unit octahedrons (equal to approximately 1.4 g) would require just over 1 day with demonstrated array fabrication speeds of up to 38 s print duration with 26 s interprint delay (Supplementary Note 6). The r2rCLIP platform thus enables a new design application of particle fabrication in a wide range of accessible geometries, materials and batch sizes. r2rCLIP is a modular process that can thus be adapted to include additional steps in series such as coating, filling or sterilization, as well as additional postharvesting treatments such as devolatilization, electroless deposition or functionalization. The high throughput of r2rCLIP has direct implications for industrial-scale production of microdevices such as microrobots and cargo delivery systems.
As an example, this system is amenable to the production of ceramic materials. Preceramic resins can be used to mass produce technical ceramic particles, with potential applications in chemical mechanical planarization techniques as slurry components, conductive particles, in microtools, microelectromechanical systems or waveguides, enabling industrial applications such as electronics, telecommunications and healthcare13. As an example, we created 200 µm particles from a HDDA–preceramic mix and pyrolysed them in nitrogen at 800 °C to produce 103 µm hollow ceramic particles of feature size 25 µm (Fig. 4a). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of these particles showed uniform composition distribution of O, Si and C (Fig. 4b). With subsequent annealing up to 1,400 °C in nitrogen, phases including Si3N4 and SiO2 can be achieved depending on the precursor material and processing conditions (Extended Data Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 7). Future research can investigate the effectiveness of this process with different preceramic formulations and explore their potential applications.
Fig. 4: Particles fabricated via r2rCLIP enable a range of applications including ceramic particles and drug delivery.
a, Hollow ceramic cubes formed from pyrolysis of HDDA–ceramic mix resin. b, EDS analysis of the surface of a hollow ceramic cube (top left) showing uniform distribution of silicon and oxygen, quantified as 30 ± 1% silicon, 35 ± 1% oxygen and 35 ± 2% carbon by normalized mass. Elemental distribution of O, Si and C (top right, bottom left and bottom right, respectively) overlaid on secondary electron image of the hollow cubes. c,d, Drug-delivery cubes may be designed to meet the goals of payload volume, release profile, material and so on (c) and fabricated via r2rCLIP (d) (PEGDMA550 material, for example). e,f, Devices may be then filled, as demonstrated with trypan blue dye for visualization (e), and subsequently capped (f). Scale bars, 100 µm (a), 5 µm (b, top left), 100 µm (b, other three images), 3 mm (d,e), 200 µm (f).
One further application enabled by r2rCLIP is the creation of hydrogel particles, which can be used as drug-delivery vessels. These particles can be filled to achieve adjustable, gradient or pulsatile-release profiles in a singular injection, as previously demonstrated for the SEAL process4,45,46. Previous studies have explored the development of suitable photopolymer resin systems and the impact of materials biocompatibility, cytotoxicity, shape and size on localization and delivery, enabling the creation of bioscaffolds and delivery manifolds5,15,23,25,28,45,46,47,48,49. This opens new possibilities for the fabrication of hydrogel particles for drug delivery but lacks a permutable, scalable fabrication process. As a proof of concept we have fabricated hydrogel cubes of 400 µm unit size, manually filled with around 8 nl of representative cargo postprinting and subsequently topped with a hydrogel cap (Fig. 4c). Future research can build on previous studies on drug-delivery vehicle kinetics, leveraging the adjustable properties of molecular weight and wall thickness to achieve a programmable pallet of cargo release.
Furthermore, amine-functionalized polymer end groups could be added to facilitate postfunctionalization with fluorophores, enabling the potential to integrate single-particle, one-pot analytical techniques to localize signal for better detection. Smaller unit scale geometries and additional materials such as metals may even be achieved through thermal conversion postprocessing that could lead to roughly 70% reduction in feature size50, which would bring our current xy resolution onto the nanometre scale. Future system improvement work can explore print and speed optimization, soluble film coatings, cleaning and particle-harvesting methods.
The mechanical and material versatility, ranging from hard ceramics to soft hydrogels, could support the creation of Janus particle properties and smart materials and aid in fundamental studies in materials and granular physics. Although the system requires a photopolymerizable component, it can accommodate weak, green-state particles enabling mixed, dual-curing systems containing a non-photopolymerizable component addressed in postprocessing. This flexibility allows for tunable particle materials properties dependent on the resin system, enabling a variety of particles with different mechanical properties to meet application requirements.
Herein we present a new, roll-to-roll, high-resolution, continuous liquid interface production technique capable of mass production of particles up to 200 µm at up to 2.0 µm feature resolution. Optical design of both printer and resin optimization enables printing of objects with up to single-digit-micron unsupported z resolution. Rapid permutability, complex 3D fabrication capabilities and inherent amenability to a wide variety of resin chemistries are demonstrated in the fabrication of mouldable, multistep mouldable and non-mouldable particle geometries. Moreover, rapid particle production enables gram-scale potential yield within a period of around 24 h for sub-200-µm units. This scalable particle production technique has demonstrated fabrication potential over a wide range, from ceramic to hydrogel manifolds, with subsequent potential application in microtools, electronics and drug delivery.
3D printing enthusiasts may be interested in a new method is making waves among manufacturers and hobbyists alike. Known as stack 3D printing, this technique allows for the simultaneous creation of multiple objects, which can significantly boost efficiency and productivity in the production process. For those looking to adopt this method, it’s essential to grasp the nuances of the technology and apply the appropriate print settings to achieve the best results.
When setting up your 3D printer for stack printing, the configuration plays a pivotal role in the success of your prints. It is recommended to use three wall perimeters and a 15% infill to maintain the structural integrity of your objects. Moreover, employing the ironing technique is crucial for achieving a smooth top surface finish. This technique involves a heated nozzle that carefully smooths out the top layer, eliminating any imperfections and giving your object a professional look.
A key factor in stack 3D printing is the ability to separate the layers easily once the printing is complete. To facilitate this, maintaining a 0.2 mm gap between models is essential. This gap helps to avoid the use of supports, which can be difficult to remove and may damage the print. The strategic spacing not only makes the post-printing separation process easier but also enhances the overall quality of the final product.
Stack 3D printing tutorial
Learn more about stack 3D printing as well as the pros and cons of the process and how you can accomplish it on your own 3D printer thanks to the team over at Keep Making.
Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of 3D printing, new technologies and fabrication:
Things to consider before using the stack 3D printing method
Despite meticulous setup, you might still face challenges with layers that do not separate easily. In such cases, a gentle prying technique can be employed, using a small tool like a nail or screw. This method requires a careful approach to prevent any damage to the printed items.
It’s important to consider the aesthetics of your final product. While the ironing technique ensures a smooth finish on one side, the other side may show a pattern, which is a distinctive characteristic of stack printing. This aspect should be kept in mind when planning the design of your objects.
The preparation of your printing files is a critical step that should not be overlooked. Design your files with the 0.2 mm layer gap in mind and optimize them for 0.2 mm layer height printing. This precision will allow the printer to accurately replicate the necessary gap, ensuring that the layers can be separated without any issues.
Stack 3D printing presents a powerful approach to producing multiple objects in a single print cycle. By adhering to the recommended print settings, ensuring proper layer separation, and carefully preparing your files, you can tap into the full potential of this advanced printing method. Engaging with the 3D printing community will not only enhance your own skills but also help others in their quest to master stack printing. As this technology continues to develop, it opens up new possibilities for innovation and creativity in the field of 3D printing.
Image Credit : Keep Making
Filed Under: Guides, Top News
Latest timeswonderful Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Over the past decade 3D printing has advanced from simple plastic objects to creating intricate designs with multiple materials to bioprinting living tissues, the possibilities are expanding rapidly, reshaping industries and sparking creativity. One of the most intriguing breakthroughs is Rapid Liquid Printing (RLP).
Rapid Liquid Printing (RLP) is an innovative 3D printing technique that significantly differs from conventional 3D printing methods. Unlike traditional 3D printing, which often involves building an object layer by layer from the bottom up, RLP involves printing within a gel suspension. This method allows for the creation of complex, soft shapes that were once thought impossible to produce. Unlike traditional 3D printing, RLP doesn’t require support structures, which means less material is wasted, and the process is more efficient. This could lead to a significant reduction in production costs and time, making it a valuable asset for manufacturers.
Rapid Liquid Printing
Rapid Liquid Printing is a groundbreaking technique from MIT’s Self-Assembly Lab. It’s a new way of 3D printing where you create objects in a gel, making them in three dimensions. The great thing is, as the object is made, it hardens and becomes ready to use almost right away, with hardly any extra work needed. This method is super fast at making big items out of top-notch materials like rubber, foam, and plastic. Traditional 3D printing can be slow, only make small things, and sometimes the materials aren’t that great. But Rapid Liquid Printing changes all that, allowing for the quick making of big, stretchy, airtight, and high-quality items.
Here are some other articles you may find of interest on the subject of 3D printing :
Here’s a breakdown of its key aspects and benefits compared with more traditional 3D printing technologies.
Printing Medium: The gel-like medium in which RLP operates serves a dual purpose. Firstly, it supports the printed material during the printing process, eliminating the need for additional support structures typically required in traditional 3D printing. This feature allows for more complex and intricate designs to be printed. Secondly, the medium significantly reduces the effects of gravity, enabling the creation of smoother and more precise structures. The composition of the gel is carefully formulated to balance viscosity and density, providing an ideal environment for the printing material to solidify correctly.
Materials: RLP’s ability to work with a variety of materials like plastics, rubbers, and foams broadens its application scope. This versatility is crucial for industries that require specific material properties, such as flexibility, durability, or lightweight structures. For instance, in the shoe industry, the use of different materials can lead to the production of custom footwear tailored to individual comfort and performance needs. Similarly, in furniture design, the use of varied materials can result in innovative, ergonomic, and aesthetically pleasing products.
Speed: The speed of RLP is one of its most significant advantages over traditional 3D printing methods. While standard 3D printers may take hours or even days to complete an object, RLP can produce the same in a fraction of the time. This efficiency is achieved through the continuous extrusion of the printing material and the rapid curing process facilitated by the medium. Such speed is particularly beneficial in a commercial setting, where time efficiency translates to cost-effectiveness and quicker time-to-market for products.
Precision and Scale: RLP offers remarkable precision, which is a critical factor in applications where detail and accuracy are paramount. Moreover, the scalability of RLP is notable, as it can create small, intricate objects as well as larger items, like furniture pieces. This scalability is a significant advancement over traditional 3D printing technologies, which often struggle with larger sizes due to limitations in printer bed size and structural integrity issues.
Applications: The diverse applications of RLP span across various industries. In the fashion industry, it enables the creation of custom-fit apparel and accessories. In furniture manufacturing, RLP can produce unique, ergonomic designs that are both functional and aesthetically appealing. Additionally, its application extends to the automotive and aerospace industries for the production of customized, lightweight parts.
Innovation and Future Potential: RLP is a groundbreaking development in additive manufacturing, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in terms of design complexity, material diversity, and production speed. Its future potential includes the possibility of even more materials being compatible with the technology, further increasing its versatility. There’s also potential in combining RLP with other manufacturing technologies and automation to create highly efficient, integrated production systems. The environmental impact of RLP, particularly in terms of material usage and waste reduction, is another area of future exploration, potentially making it a more sustainable manufacturing option.
Another innovation that’s catching the eye of experts is Multimaterial 3D Printing. Imagine printing a part that combines the hardness of metal with the flexibility of plastic in one seamless process. Researchers have developed a way to do just that, using a laser scanning system that works with slow-curing polymers. This could revolutionize how we create customized components for various applications, from medical devices to automotive parts.
In the realm of biotechnology, the 3D Bioprinting of Hair Follicles stands out as a significant achievement. Scientists have succeeded in bioprinting hair follicles within lab-grown skin, a development that could transform skin grafting procedures and potentially reduce reliance on animal testing. This is a big step forward in regenerative medicine and could lead to new treatments for burn victims and those with hair loss conditions.
The field of electronics is also benefiting from 3D printing, particularly in Micromanufacturing. A new metal 3D printer can create custom probes and test pads for microchip designs with incredible precision. This technology is essential for the development of smaller, more powerful electronic devices and could accelerate the pace of innovation in the semiconductor industry.
In the world of design and entertainment, Generative AI is transforming 3D modeling. A new tool can create realistic 3D human models from a single photo, which has vast implications for gaming, virtual reality, and online shopping. This technology could make digital content creation more accessible and personalized.
Lastly, the ability to produce DIY Optical Lenses using 3D printing is a testament to the technology’s versatility. Enthusiasts and professionals can now craft custom optics at a fraction of the traditional cost, opening up opportunities for innovation in photography, filmmaking, and scientific research.
These advancements in 3D printing and technology are reshaping our world in profound ways. They are not just fascinating; they represent a shift towards a future where innovation continuously pushes the boundaries of what’s possible. As we explore these developments, we can expect to see even more remarkable applications that will influence how we live, work, and play. As always we will keep you up to speed on all the latest technologies and advancements in 3D printing and AI technologies as well as gadgets and more.
Image Credit : MOSFET
Filed Under: Technology News, Top News
Latest timeswonderful Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
A new innovation in the world of 3D printing has been launched via Kickstarter this month in the form of the Co Print ChromaSet. Capable of transforming your 3D printer into a color multifilament printing system, as well as adding a wealth of new features. At the heart of the ChromaSet ecosystem lies the ChromaPad, a device that redefines the 3D printing experience by offering advanced features such as speed, control, and compatibility with multiple printers.
Equipped with a powerful Amlogic S905X3 processor, 4GB RAM, 32GB ROM, and 5Ghz wifi support, the ChromaPad color 3D printing system is a powerhouse that can accelerate print speed up to 300+ mm/s, making projects three times faster. This device is not only about speed, but also about control. With the ChromaScreen software, users can control multiple extruders and manage multiple printers at once, offering a level of convenience and efficiency previously unseen in the 3D printing world.
The ChromaPad is designed to be compatible with many popular printers that support Klipper software. This compatibility allows for hassle-free upgrades and straightforward plug-and-play, making it a versatile addition to any 3D printing setup. Furthermore, the ChromaPad can remotely control up to 8 printers from any device, further enhancing its versatility and convenience. Early bird rewards are now available for the imaginative project from roughly $299 or £246 (depending on current exchange rates).
The ChromaSet color 3D printing ecosystem also includes the ChromaHead, a toolhead designed for multi-filament 3D printing. The ChromaHead is engineered to minimize issues such as jamming and clogging, which are common in multi-filament 3D printing. With a compact design and unique rail plug system, the ChromaHead ensures compatibility across different mechanical setups. Its filament cutting mechanism achieves a success rate of 99.9% in clean cuts, significantly reducing the chances of printing errors.
The ChromaSet ecosystem also includes the KCM (Klipper Chroma Module) and ECM (Extended Chroma Module). The KCM offers all the features of ChromaPad for users who already have a Klipper-based 3D printer, while the ECM increases extruder limits, allowing the addition of up to 4 extruders into a single output via USB. These modules are designed to increase compatibility and versatility, making the ChromaSet a comprehensive solution for all 3D printing needs.
Assuming that the ChromaSet funding campaign successfully raises its required pledge goal and the project progresses smoothly, worldwide shipping is expected to take place sometime around March 2024. To learn more about the ChromaSet transforms your 3D printer into a colour multifilament printing system project delve into the promotional video below.
Last but not least, the ChromaSet ecosystem includes the CX-1 Extruder, a component engineered with Titanium gears, a dual-drive system, and high-torque features for the smooth movement of the filament. The CX-1 Extruder offers robust grip, pushing force, and outstanding torque for excellent performance, making it a crucial part of the ChromaSet ecosystem.
Color 3D printing
Other articles you may find of interest on the subject of 3D printing technologies and systems :
The ChromaSet ecosystem offers a comprehensive solution to upgrade your 3D printer with color multifilament printing and more. With advanced components like the ChromaPad, ChromaHead, KCM, ECM, and CX-1 Extruder, ChromaSet provides an unmatched 3D printing experience. Whether it’s speed, control, compatibility, or versatility, ChromaSet delivers on all fronts, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in the world of 3D printing.
For a complete list of all available backing options, stretch goals, extra media and product specifications for the transforms your 3D printer into a colour multifilament printing system, jump over to the official ChromaSet crowd funding campaign page by inspecting the link below.
Source : Kickstarter
Disclaimer: Participating in Kickstarter campaigns involves inherent risks. While many projects successfully meet their goals, others may fail to deliver due to numerous challenges. Always conduct thorough research and exercise caution when pledging your hard-earned money.
Filed Under: Hardware, Top News
Latest timeswonderful Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.