Galaxy users are seeing green – literally. Several reports have recently cropped up online from people complaining about a vertical green line appearing on their smartphone. It’s unknown if this is a widespread issue or just a localized problem. What is known is it is affecting multiple models. News site Android Authority in their report says they found social media posts of the line appearing on the screens of the Galaxy S21 FE and the S21 Ultra. SamMobile, in their coverage, calls out even more devices including the Galaxy A73, M21, and the entire S22 series.
Luckily, the phones still function as normal. The device isn’t dead, but a big green line is cutting down the middle of the screen, which is annoying. No one really knows what’s causing the error in the first place, but the finger is being pointed at a recent Samsung patch: either the “One UI 6.0 or the April 2024 security update.” It could be some sort of glitch, although pinning it on the software is a little dubious.
Green lines are typically the symptom of a faulty connection between the display and the hardware. They can show up as a result of physical damage either from someone dropping their phone or bending the screen way too far. Overheating is another possibility.
Recurring problem
Normally, blaming a bad connection due to damage is enough to call the case closed, but it is not the first time green lines have appeared on Galaxy phones. You can go back months or years and find people running into the same problem. A Facebook poster back in 2023 saw the issue arise on their Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Earlier in the year on the official Samsung forums, user Qu1JcMmacCO shared the experience of seeing the line on their Galaxy S24 Ultra. What’s interesting is these two as well as others all claim they received the screen defect after updating their smartphone.
So, what gives? This many people blaming firmware updates can’t just be a coincidence. Well, one theory argues the green line is caused by both the software and hardware and that these patches cause Galaxy phones to run so hot that it damages the connection between the display and the chipset.
Possibly fixable
It’s important to mention Samsung isn’t the only manufacturer guilty of this. Green lines have also been seen on OnePlus devices, though the problem seems to be more pronounced on Galaxies.
If you run into the glitch, you can try to fix it yourself. Another user on the Samsung forums posted a guide on how to get rid of the line with multiple solutions, one of which involves rebooting your phone in safe mode. You can try to ask Samsung for repairs, although the company or its partners may not be willing to help. One customer tried to receive assistance with the green line on their Galaxy S24 only to be met with unhelpful support.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
We reached out to Samsung for comment, but have yet to hear back. We’ll update this story if we learn anything new.
Be sure to check out TechRadar’s list of the best phones for 2024 if you’re in the market for a new mobile device.
Amid the latest reports that Samsung is working on a pricier and more premium Galaxy Z Fold 6 variant, two intriguing screenshots have emerged through the land of X (formerly Twitter). They suggest that Samsung is developing cheaper versions of its foldable devices under the Fan Edition brand.
How legitimate are these “leaks?” We’re unsure, so we can’t put too much faith into them. The source doesn’t seem to have a spotless track record, and these screenshots raise some unusual questions, so keep all that in mind as we explore further.
These alleged Samsung foldable phones mentioned in the image gallery above are called ‘Galaxy Z Fold FE’ and ‘Galaxy Z Flip FE.’ The Flip FE appears to have 8GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, and possibly a Snapdragon 7-series chip.
The alleged Galaxy Z Fold FE is a bit of a red flag. If you look closely, the blurred-out screenshot indicates that the phone isn’t powered by an Exynos 2200 or Exynos 2400 chip but another unknown Exynos SoC that starts with “2.” It could be the non-existent Exynos 2300. It could be an old “leak” that no longer reflects Samsung’s current plans.
Furthermore, according to this X user citing their sources, only one of these Fan Edition foldable phones will be released. Exactly which is unclear.
Needless to say, these screenshots come with a big caveat, and we don’t recommend taking them at face value. However, they are not the first to suggest that Samsung might be working on a Fan Edition foldable phone, so maybe there could be some truth to them. We can’t be too sure and wouldn’t bet on it, but take the information for what it is with a proverbial pinch of salt.
Samsung is expected to host its next Unpacked event in early July. As we get closer to the unveiling, Samsung’s real intentions will be reflected through leaks and rumors with a higher degree of accuracy. Stay tuned.
With these broadband speeds, it’s a fantastic choice for small to medium households with three to four active broadband users. The connection will allow you to play games online, stream on several devices in UHD, and use cloud storage all at the same time. This offer is also boosted by Vodafone’s excellent ‘WiFi Hub’, which works to optimise your broadband connection.
You even get a landline included in the deal and Vodafone promises to fix this offer price until April 2025. You may also be offered the opportunity to upgrade to a ‘Pro II’ broadband package, which is priced at £40 a month. This will give you a more powerful router, dedicated support and automatic 4G backup should you suffer a broadband outage.
This offer expires on April 3, so you’ll need to be quick if you want to make the most of it. Another consideration is that you’ll only be able to get this fibre broadband deal if you can access Vodafone’s fibre network – although you can check this when you look to sign up. Lastly, if you have a Full Fibre connection at your property, you might be offered the ‘Full Fibre’ version of this deal, which offers slightly faster download speeds.
Why should I choose Vodafone Broadband?
Vodafone is now one of the UK’s best broadband providers, but we aren’t surprised by this, as it has plenty to offer customers.
As you can see from the deal above, it has some great value packages available and it’s even won awards for its affordability. What’s more, these range from slower fibre speeds, through to ultrafast Full Fibre options, which ultimately can suit the online needs of pretty much every household or business.
It’s current selection of packages includes:
– Fibre 1 – 38Mbps
– Fibre 2 – 67Mbps (a Full Fibre version is also available)
– Fibre 100 – 100Mbps
– Fibre 200 – 200Mbps
– Fibre 500 – 500Mbps
– Fibre 900 – 910Mbps
As we also mentioned in our featured deal, Vodafone can also offer phone lines, mobile phone services and upgrades to its ‘Pro II’ tariffs that come with a wealth of extras. On certain deals, you can also get Apple TV 4K with 4K Dolby Vision.
Vodafone also offers a quick and easy switching service if you’re moving to its broadband from a provider that uses the same network.
Where Vodafone might fall down for some consumers is that its broadband and TV offering isn’t as strong as providers like Sky and Virgin Media. Plus, it does receive some criticism for its customer services – according to its Trustpilot scores – although these are largely positive.
So if you still want to shop around or you just want to see how Vodafone measures up against the competition, just enter your postcode into our widget below. We’ll then bring up all the best broadband deals in your area.
Apple is widely expected to release new iPad Air and OLED iPad Pro models in the next few weeks. According to new rumors coming out of Asia, the company will announce its new iPads on Tuesday, March 26.
Chinese leaker Instant Digital on Weibo this morning claimed that the date will see some sort of announcement from Apple related to new iPads, but stopped short of calling it an official launch date. Instead, Apple could announce pre-order availability, with shipping dates to follow.
Separately, Chinese website IT Home claimed that March 26 will see Apple release new iPads. However, the outlet appears to have interpreted this as a launch date based on when several Amazon listings for third-party protective cases for the new iPads go live, rather than specific information from a trusted source.
According to Bloomberg‘s Mark Gurman, Apple plans to release new iPad Pro and iPad Air models around the end of March or in April. That said, the well-connected reporter now seems to be leaning more towards the possibility of an April release.
Writing in the latest subscriber edition of his Power On newsletter, Gurman said he wanted to clear up confusion about when he believed Apple would release new iPads (specifically new iPad Pro models).
Gurman reiterated that a new variant of iPadOS 17.4 designed for the updated models won’t be complete until the end of March or even sometime in April. “Once the OS is finished, Apple needs to send it off to the factories to be installed on the new hardware. That process could last a couple weeks, probably taking us deeper into next month,” he wrote.
Two new iPad Pro models are expected to feature a new M3 chip, OLED displays, a thinner enclosure, a landscape-oriented front camera, a redesigned camera bump, and possibly MagSafe wireless charging.
The two new iPad Air models are expected to feature Apple’s M2 chip and a landscape-oriented front camera, including a first-ever 12.9-inch model.
Other announcements expected in the March-April window include a new Magic Keyboard for the iPad Pro with a larger trackpad, and a new Apple Pencil.
Gurman previously ruled out an Apple Event for the new iPads. Instead, he believes they will be announced in a press release on the Apple Newsroom website, like the new 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air models were earlier this month.
Avi Loeb and his team say that metallic balls found near Papua New Guinea could be of extraterrestrial origin.Credit: Avi Loeb’s photo collection
The Woodlands, Texas
A sensational claim made last year that an ‘alien’ meteorite hit Earth near Papua New Guinea in 2014 got its first in-person airing with the broader scientific community on 12 March. At the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas, scientists clashed over whether a research team has indeed found fragments of a space rock that came from outside the Solar System.
An ‘alien meteorite’ probably didn’t slam into Earth — how will we know if one does?
The debate occurred at a packed session featuring Hairuo Fu, a graduate student at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who is a member of the team that found the fragments. Team leader Avi Loeb, an astrophysicist at Harvard who did not attend the conference, has made other controversial claims about extraterrestrial discoveries. Many scientists have said that they don’t want to spend much of their time analysing and refuting these claims.
During his presentation, Fu described tiny metallic blobs that Loeb’s expedition dredged from the sea floor near Papua New Guinea last year, and said that the spherules have a chemical composition of unknown origin1. He then faced questions from a long line of scientists sceptical of the implications of extraterrestrial material. “At the very least, it is something different from what we know,” Fu responded.
New work questions the team’s findings. In a manuscript posted on the arXiv preprint server on 8 March2, ahead of peer review, a researcher argues that the debris collected by Loeb and his co-workers is actually molten blobs generated when an asteroid hit Earth 788,000 years ago.
“What they found has all the characteristics of microtektites — little pieces of melted Earth that came from this impact,” says preprint author Steve Desch, an astrophysicist at Arizona State University in Tempe.
Meanwhile, other studies are challenging different aspects of Loeb’s claim, such as whether the meteor that reportedly produced the fragments was on the trajectory Loeb says it was. Together, the findings show how the broader scientific community is engaging with Loeb’s extraterrestrial claims, in spite of reluctance to do so.
A unique find?
‘Interstellar’ objects remained in the realm of theory until 2017, when astronomers spotted the first known celestial object to be on a trajectory that meant it could only have come from outside the Solar System. Loeb made headlines when he speculated that the object, a comet-like body named ‘Oumuamua, was an artefact sent by an extraterrestrial civilization.
‘Oumuamua passed through the Solar System far from Earth, but Loeb hoped to find another interstellar object that had hit the planet. He later proposed that a bright meteor that appeared in the sky north of Papua New Guinea in January 2014 had an interstellar trajectory and could have scattered debris in the ocean.
Avi Loeb (in hat) and colleagues recover particles from a magnetic sledge on their 2023 expedition.Credit: Avi Loeb’s photo collection
In June 2023, Loeb led a privately funded expedition to the site that used magnetic sledges to recover more than 800 metallic spherules from the sea floor. About one-quarter of the spherules had chemical compositions indicating that they came from igneous, or once-molten, rocks. Of those, a handful were unusually enriched in the elements beryllium, lanthanum and uranium. The researchers concluded that those spherules are unlike any known materials in the Solar System1.
However, Desch counters that the spherules could have come from an asteroid impact in southeast Asia. Key to his proposal2 is a kind of soil called laterite, which forms in tropical regions when heavy rainfall carries some chemical elements from the topmost layers of soil into deeper ones. This leaves the upper soil enriched in other elements, including beryllium, lanthanum and uranium — similar to the composition of the spherules collected by Loeb and his colleagues. Desch says that an asteroid known to have struck the region around 788,000 years ago3 probably hit lateritic rock and created the molten blobs found by Loeb’s team.
In an e-mail to Nature, Loeb argues that spherules from an impact 788,000 years ago should have been buried by ocean sediments. Desch counters that sedimentation rates are relatively low in the offshore area where the spherules were collected.
But others are sceptical of Desch’s proposal, too. Scientists have yet to find any confirmed tektites from lateritic rock, notes Pierre Rochette, a geoscientist at Aix-Marseille University in Aix-en-Provence, France, who is not affiliated with either team. And very few tektites are magnetic, he says, so it would be difficult for Loeb and his colleagues to have pulled up hundreds from the sea floor.
Fiery critiques
Desch was not the only scientist to challenge Loeb’s work this week.
How two intruders from interstellar space are upending astronomy
After Fu’s conference presentation, Ben Fernando, a seismologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, spoke and took aim at claims concerning the 2014 meteor. Fernando and his colleagues, including Desch, analysed seismic and acoustic data gathered by ground-based sensors at the time the meteor hit the atmosphere4. Data from a seismometer on nearby Manus Island, which Loeb and his team studied as they were deciding where to dredge, show no characteristics of a high-altitude fireball — but do indicate a vehicle driving past, Fernando said. “This is almost certainly a truck,” he told the meeting. A second set of observations, made using infrasound sensors that listen for clandestine nuclear tests, seems to have detected the meteor hitting the atmosphere, but suggests it happened around 170 kilometres away from where Loeb’s team calculates.
Loeb told Nature that such critiques do not take into account US Department of Defense data that he says confirm the exact trajectory of that fireball. But because those data are held by the government, they have not been independently cross-checked by other scientists.
As conference-goers poured out of the room after his talk, Fu told Nature that Loeb’s team is working on further analyses, such as isotopic studies, that could shed more light on what the spherules are. After that, Fu said, he is looking forward to graduating and working on a new project — on how the Moon was formed.
We revealed a few days ago that Samsung will launch the Galaxy Z Flip 6 and the Galaxy Z Fold 6 earlier than usual. The phones will be unveiled in July 2024, and they will come with faster processors and improved screens. A wild rumor now claims the Galaxy Z Flip 6 will have an even bigger cover screen.
The new rumor also claims that the phone will have a 50MP + 12MP dual-camera setup on the rear and a Gorilla Glass Armor for the cover screen. The 50MP primary camera setup aligns with expectations, but seeing Gorilla Glass Armor on the Galaxy Z Flip 6 is a bit hard to believe.
The Galaxy Z Flip 6 is expected to use the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 For Galaxy processor. Rumors claim the phone could come with 12GB RAM and a better cooling system. It reportedly features a 4,000mAh battery, an improved hinge, a better internal layout, and seven years of Android OS updates.
Watch our review of the Galaxy Z Flip 5 in the video below.
Author’s Note: The tipster who made these claims, @TheGalox_, has been wrong plenty of times in the past, so we would advise you to take his claims with a pound of salt. While the Galaxy Z Flip 6 could have the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 For Galaxy processor, a 50MP+12MP camera setup, a 6.7-inch internal screen, and a 4,000mAh battery, it is hard for us to believe that the foldable phone could have a 3.9-inch cover display, 12GB RAM, and Gorilla Glass Armor protection.