Categories
Life Style

Dozens of Brazilian universities hit by strikes over academic wages

[ad_1]

Protesters with a large banner outisde the National Education Conference at the University of Brasilia.

Tensions over university funding in Brazil have been simmering for a while. In January, a Lula administration official visited the University of Brasília and was met by protesters asking for better pay.Credit: Leandro Chemalle/Thenews2/Zuma via Alamy

Academic workers, including many professors, are now on strike at more than 60 federal universities across Brazil. Having faced more than a decade of declining budgets, they are demanding higher wages and more funding to pay for crumbling infrastructure, among other things.

Now in their fourth week at some institutions, the strikes have halted classes on many campuses, although scientists contacted by Nature say they are maintaining research laboratories and field projects. The strikes present a major test for President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, a long-time labour leader who entered office last year and promised to boost funding for science and education. The Lula administration has unlocked new financing for research grants and fellowships and is rolling out a new — and controversial — initiative to coax thousands of Brazilian scientists who have moved abroad to return home. Salaries remain flat, however, and base funding for universities has continued to fall, owing in part, some scientists say, to opposition from conservative politicians in the Brazilian Congress.

The question of whether to strike has divided academic workers, as well as students, and many professors have opted to keep teaching, even at institutions where their colleagues have voted to walk out. Many of those striking, meanwhile, hope their actions will give the Lula administration some leverage to negotiate a better deal with lawmakers in Brasília.

“We are not against the government,” says Thiago André, a botanist at the University of Brasília. “We are in negotiation with the government.”

Going down

Public funding for higher education in Brazil has generally been decreasing for more than a decade, with significant cuts enacted under Lula’s conservative predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro. Many academics had hoped that the situation would change under Lula, who expanded investments in the federal university system when he was last Brazil’s president, in 2003–11.

Lula has succeeded to some extent in making changes. For instance, his administration has more than doubled the spending from Brazil’s National Fund for the Development of Science and Technology (FNDCT) to 12.8 billion reais (US$2.52 billion) in 2024, says Ricardo Galvão, a physicist who heads the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, one of the country’s main science agencies. The FNDCT is a core research account in Brazil and is fed by taxes collected from various industries.

Thus far, however, the administration has failed to boost broader funding for universities, including salaries for professors and other staff members.

Since 2014, base funding for federal universities has dropped by around 38%, to an estimated 5.9 billion reais (US$1.16 billion) in 2024, after adjusting for inflation, says Luiz Davidovich, a physicist at the University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and a former president of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences. The result, Davidovich says, is that many universities cannot afford to pay for basic maintenance to keep buildings safe and functional.

For his part, Davidovich joined the majority of professors at his university in voting not to go on strike. “We thought about the students: for them, it would be a disaster” to have their education derailed and graduations delayed, he says. But he sympathizes with those who decided to strike and hopes the situation will raise public awareness and put pressure on the administration and Congress to act.

Galvão acknowledges the challenge ahead. “We need to put much more money in the university system,” he says, but it was perhaps “naive” to expect that the Lula administration would be able to immediately solve the problem.

Continuing talks

It remains unclear how and when the strike might end. One of the the last major strikes by workers at federal universities was in 2015 and lasted around six months. The main union representing professors during the current strike estimates that inflation has reduced the purchasing power of their salaries by around 50% since 2015; union negotiators are asking for a salary increase of nearly 23%. The administration’s latest offer is to boost salaries by 9% in 2025 and another 3.5% in 2026, with no increase this year, according to André.

“It’s not enough,” André says, stressing that professors are not looking for a raise so much as an adjustment for inflation to help them to pay rent and put food on the table. “I think we will stay on strike.”

For botanist Adriana Lobão, the vote to go on strike took place at her institution, Fluminense Federal University in Niteroi, on 29 April. She was conflicted and did not vote, but is now following her colleagues’ decision to strike. Lobão acknowledges that the strike will cause delays in graduation for many students, and others will need to make up for lost time as schedules are readjusted once the strike ends. But she says the situation worsens each year, and thus far most of her students seem supportive of her choice.

“Every day, I hope that the government will make a better offer, so that we can finish this strike,” Lobão says. There’s no end in sight, but she is willing to hold out for now. “I think it’s fair.”

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

Expat grants won’t fix Brazilian research

[ad_1]

On 16 April, the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) announced a bold initiative to combat the brain drain in Brazilian academia. Over five years, the talent-repatriation programme will invest 1 billion reais (US$190 million) into encouraging expatriated scientists to return to Brazil and expanding collaborations with Brazilian researchers overseas. In 2023, more than 35,000 academics were expats, or 14% of those active in research in Brazil.

As one such researcher, currently a biologist in the United Kingdom and a honorary professor in Brazil, I welcome these grants. But I know that a temporary injection of money alone will not solve the problem. What will happen after the five years? Brazil has too few tenure-track positions to sustain the returnees’ careers.

Short-termism has hampered previous initiatives to internationalize science in Brazil. For example, from 2011 to 2017, Brazil’s Science without Borders programme provided more than 100,000 scholarships to Brazilian students to study overseas. I was an early recipient, using it to pursue research in Italy and the United Kingdom. But there was no guaranteed position afterwards.

In my view, expats will not return in numbers until the Brazilian academic system is reformed. Achieving change in Brazil’s polarized political landscape is challenging but essential for fostering a vibrant academic environment.

The two streams of the repatriation programme demonstrate the problem. The first, with an 800-million-reai budget, covers salary and project costs for up to five years for academics and industry professionals seeking to return to Brazil. It is clearly aimed at researchers who are not yet established, but neither the CNPq nor public universities guarantee support after the term. The second stream, with a budget of 200 million reais, aims to foster partnerships between expatriate and resident researchers or industry partners. This might appeal to tenured academics overseas, but it offers no incentives for their permanent return.

In a wider context, it seems likely that the repatriation programme might have another aim — to lower the litigation costs relating to CNPq international scholarships. Brazil regards international scholarships as benefits that must be repaid. On signing the contract, recipients commit to returning to Brazil to further its science. If they do not fulfil this obligation, the CNPq can pursue legal action, requiring them to repay the scholarship amount.

Since 2016, the CNPq has offered an alternative pathway to returning, called ‘Novation’. Scholarship holders outside Brazil can substitute their obligation with approved activities that benefit Brazilian science, such as supervising and teaching students in Brazil — as I do. Some expatriates do neither, resulting in heavy costs (millions of reais per year) for the CNPq and other funding bodies.

In 2023, the CNPq reached out to expatriates to explore other ways to enforce these obligations. In this context, I interpret the repatriation programme as a way for the CNPq to financially help expatriates seeking to rectify their status to avoid legal action and contribute to Brazilian science. In this regard, the CNPq’s programme is generous. However, the initiative does not address the reasons many academics move abroad, including inadequate support for researchers in Brazil and the lure of higher salaries elsewhere.

A scarcity of tenure-track positions in public institutions — staff members with such positions being responsible for more than 95% of Brazil’s scientific output — compounds these issues. In 2022, the ministry of education estimated a deficit of around 11,000 jobs for technical and tenured staff. Bureaucratic and opaque recruitment processes for tenure-track roles, known as concurso publico, exacerbate inequity. Individuals who are not fluent in Portuguese, including Indigenous and international researchers, are rarely hired.

Although exceptions exist, such as the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) with its generous budgets, funding in Brazil is scarce, and awards are often modest. Public-university infrastructure is underfunded. Low salaries have triggered a national strike among public university staff, and postdocs lack basic employment benefits such as pensions. Collectively, these factors contribute to an insular academic system that aspires to be globally competitive but lacks the institutional processes and support to do so.

If Brazil recruited researchers in a more equitable and transparent way — as is done in the United States, United Kingdom and European Union — it would be better able to attract returning expats. It could issue fairer wages and benefits to postdoctoral researchers. The influx of ideas, perspectives and experiences would benefit academia and society.

A stronger research system would also attract international funding and strategic partnerships — two of the CNPq’s goals. The CNPq could look to FAPESP’s international partnerships with the US National Science Foundation and UK Research and Innovation, for example.

Brazil’s government has promised more funding for science and technology. A constitutional amendment, led by former minister of science and technology and astronaut Marcos Pontes and presented to the Senate last July, aims to double the allocation of resources to science and technology, to reach 2.5% of Brazilian gross domestic product by 2033.

To reap the benefits, action is needed now. Collective effort from academics, ministries and research councils to solve these challenges will pave the way for meaningful change to benefit all Brazilian scientists.

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

Danelo Cavalcante, in the opinion of the Brazilian prosecutor, fled from jail in Pennsylvania to be tried in ‘lenient’ Brazil.

Cavalcante is serving a life sentence in the US for killing someone. He is also accused of killing a man in Brazil, where he can’t get a life term.
The judge in charge of Danelo Cavalcante’s murder case in Brazil said he thought the convicted killer was on his way to his home country when he escaped from a jail in Pennsylvania last month.

Cavalcante was caught on Wednesday after being on the run for almost two weeks. He had left Brazil in 2018 after reportedly killing a guy who owed him money. Rafael Pinto Alamy, the state prosecutor for Tocantins, told The Associated Press on Thursday that his sentence in Brazil for killing his girlfriend in 2021 will be much lighter than the life term he got in the U.S. for the same crime.

Alamy said, “I thought he wanted to run away to Brazil.” “He would have to follow the much less strict rules of the prison here.”

If he is found guilty in Brazil, Cavalcante could spend up to 30 years in jail. Since Brazil does not have life sentences, he could get out after about 12 years if he is good.
In Brazil, Cavalcante is accused of killing 20-year-old Valter Jnior Moreira dos Reis on November 5, 2017. He is said to have shot him five times outside a restaurant in Figueiropolis, a small rural town in the state of Tocantins. A witness told police that after the killing, Cavalcante yelled at his car and drove away.

According to a police report seen by The Associated Press, the victim’s sister later told police she thought Cavalcante attacked him because he owed money for damage he did to a car.

The AP said that Brazilian authorities started looking into Cavalcante and a judge ordered his arrest within a week, but the police never found him.
A Brazilian TV show called Fantastico that looks into crimes said that Cavalcante went to Braslia in January 2018. It’s not clear if he used his own ID to travel, but Alamy said that he was only on the run in the state of Tocantins until June 2018, when he was added to a national warrant information system.

In Brazil, Cavalcante has a court date on Oct. 11 for the case, which is likely to go to a jury “probably next year,” according to his lawyer Magnus Lourenco and Alamy.

Lourenco also said that the October date might be pushed back because he doesn’t know if Cavalcante will know about it in time.

Similarly to how the American media covered Cavalcante’s escape and eventual capture, the Brazilian press also covered the story, and his eventual capture was on the front page of many Brazilian newspapers.