Tag: Severe

Categories
News

ASUSTOR Severe Vulnerability Detected – update Surveillance Center now

ASUSTOR Severe Vulnerability Detected - update Surveillance Center now

ASUSTOR has released an emergency update for its Surveillance Center software after discovering a severe vulnerability that could allow attackers to gain elevated privileges and execute malicious code on the ADM platform. The company has released an urgent security update for its Surveillance Center software, which is a critical move to address a serious vulnerability that could potentially allow cyber attackers to gain unauthorized access and control.

This vulnerability is particularly alarming because it could enable attackers to gain elevated privileges within the ADM platform, which is the core of ASUSTOR’s network storage systems. If this security gap were to be exploited, it could lead to the introduction of harmful code, resulting in malware infections that could compromise the integrity and security of the system.

The risk posed by this vulnerability cannot be overstated. It could allow for unauthorized manipulation of surveillance systems, leading to significant security breaches. ASUSTOR’s proactive release of the emergency update is a clear indication of the company’s commitment to protecting its users’ data from such threats.

ASUSTOR Severe Vulnerability Detected

To further enhance the security of your system, ASUSTOR recommends that users take several additional steps. First and foremost, it is crucial to update your passwords. Passwords should be strong and unique, avoiding simple combinations that can be easily guessed. A good password typically includes a mix of letters, numbers, and symbols, making it much harder for attackers to crack. ASUSTOR strongly recommends taking the following actions to ensure your data is secure:

  • Change your password.
  • Use a strong password.
  • Change default HTTP and HTTPS ports. Default ports are 8000 and 8001 respectively.
  • Turn off Terminal/SSH and SFTP services and other services you do not use.
  • Make regular backups and ensure backups are up to date.
  • Turn on and update snapshots if available.
  • Enable the AbuseIPDB risk detection greylist.

Another important security measure is to change the default HTTP and HTTPS ports. These ports, which are often set to 8000 and 8001, should be changed to less common numbers. This simple change can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorized access attempts, as it makes it more difficult for attackers to target your system.

Users should also consider disabling services that are not regularly used, such as Terminal/SSH and SFTP. These services can act as potential entry points for attackers if they are left enabled without proper security monitoring. By disabling them, you can close off these vulnerabilities and make your system more secure.

Update Surveillance Center

Regular backups are a cornerstone of data protection. It is essential to perform backups consistently and verify that they are up to date. In the event that your system is compromised, having a recent backup is invaluable for restoring your data quickly and efficiently.

Adding another layer of protection, ASUSTOR suggests implementing snapshots. Snapshots can capture the state of your system at specific intervals, which can be incredibly helpful for a speedy recovery process if your system encounters any issues.

Lastly, enabling the AbuseIPDB risk detection greylist can provide an additional layer of defense. This service helps to identify and block potential threats by cross-referencing a database of known malicious IP addresses. By using this service, you can prevent many known threats from ever reaching your system.

The emergency update from ASUSTOR is a critical response to a significant security threat. By following the company’s guidance on password security, port adjustments, service management, backup practices, snapshot maintenance, and risk detection, users can significantly enhance the security of their ADM platform. It is imperative for users to take immediate action to ensure the continued safety and reliability of their surveillance systems.

Filed Under: Technology News, Top News





Latest timeswonderful Deals

Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, timeswonderful may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Categories
News

Woman Sues McDonalds for ‘Severe Burns’ Following Coffee Spill.

A woman in her 80s is suing a San Francisco McDonald’s for allegedly failing to assist her after she received “severe burns” from a hot cup of coffee.

According to court papers obtained by NBC News, Mable Childress filed a case in San Francisco Superior Court on September 14. The complaint claims that the workers at the San Francisco branch owed the plaintiff a “duty of care” and failed to uphold it by failing to secure the lip of the coffee cup she purchased via the drive-thru, among other things.

As a result of the incident, Childress alleges she suffered major burns, disfigurement, emotional suffering, and medical expenditures.

Peter Ou, the franchise’s owner and operator in San Francisco, shared his concerns with TODAY.com.

“My restaurants have strong food safety standards in place, including educating employees to ensure lids on hot beverages are secure,” he says in an official statement. When Ms. Childress notified us about her experience later that day, our staff and management team reached back to her within minutes, as we do with every customer complaint. We are actively investigating this new legal allegation.

According to Childress’ complaint, an incident occurred on June 13 at 1100 Fillmore Street in San Francisco. According to the lawsuit, when Childress attempted to take a drink, the lid sprung apart and “scalding coffee poured out of the cup,” leaving her with major burns and scars in her crotch.

In her case, Childress alleges she told three McDonald’s employees, including managers, what transpired. According to the lawsuit, the three defendants “ignored” her and “refused to help her” until she left to seek medical care for her injuries.

When TODAY.com contacted Childress’ lawyer for comment, they did not respond right away. Dylan Hackett, her attorney, told the San Francisco publication SFGate that the coffee was boiling hot because the cup wasn’t “properly” covered.

“She’s an elderly lady, and she was waiting for over an hour to speak to a manager, and a manager never spoke to her,” Hackett told SFGate. “They treated her as if she didn’t exist. No one moved forward to assist her. She needed to go to the emergency department.

According to Childress’ court records, this is a civil case with possible damages in excess of $25,000.

Which McDonald’s coffee lawsuit has received the most attention?

This is not the first time McDonald’s has been sued over its coffee. Stella Liebeck is one of the most well-known McDonald’s lawsuits.

In 1992, a McDonald’s coffee spilled on Stella Liebeck’s lap, inflicting third-degree burns, according to NBC News. She was hospitalized for more than a week after suffering severe burns to her crotch and legs. Liebeck first requested $20,000 from McDonald’s. This amount was intended to support her medical expenses. When McDonald’s refused to settle, she brought the case to court, where a jury awarded her $2.7 million in punitive damages.

A jury once ruled that McDonald’s coffee was served at a temperature nearly 40 degrees higher than that of rival restaurants, according to the American Museum of Tort Law.

The parties struck a confidential settlement after the court reduced Liebeck’s initial $2.7 million award to $480,000.

Was McDonald’s ever sued over a sizzling chicken nugget?

The family of a 4-year-old girl who allegedly received major burns from a Chicken McNugget at a McDonald’s restaurant in Florida was awarded $800,000 in July.

The parents of 4-year-old Olivia Caraballo, Philana Holmes and Humberto Caraballo Estevez, have launched a lawsuit against McDonald’s and its franchise owner, Upchurch Food. Olivia’s leg was allegedly burnt to a second degree after a “unreasonably and dangerously” wedged nugget in her car seat caught fire.

Both McDonald’s and Upchurch blamed the sufferer for the burns.