Categories
Business Industry

20th Century Studios dudaba en elegir a Justin Long para Dodgeball

[ad_1]

En una aparición en el podcast Dinner's on Me de Jesse Tyler Ferguson.Long reveló que el estudio no estaba del todo interesado en elegirlo, a pesar de que Thurber escribió el papel específicamente para Long porque era fanático de su trabajo en “Ed” de NBC. Como Long le dijo a Ferguson, sintió la presión desde el principio:

“El nombre del personaje era Justin y… Ben y Vince Vaughn eran dos de mis personajes favoritos. Los admiraba mucho. Eran mis ídolos, ya sabes, así que era surrealista y estaba muy nervioso leyendo la tabla porque Pensé que esta parte era mía y podía perderla.” “

Long, quien creo que comenzó a toda velocidad con su debut cinematográfico en la obra maestra de Dean Parisot de 1999, “Galaxy Quest”, no era ajeno a ser la taza de té de Fox. “Ha habido una disminución”, dijo. “Querían a alguien más joven porque yo era demasiado mayor para interpretar el papel. Tenía, como dije, 24 o 25 años”.

Los instintos de Thurber estaban claramente acertados. Estoy realmente sorprendido de que no se refirieran a una parte como esta como “tipo Justin Long” en ese momento. De todos modos, Fox cedió y Thurber consiguió a su hombre.

No iría tan lejos como para decir que no puedo imaginar “Dodgeball” sin Long; Es sólo que no puedo imaginarme a ningún actor de esa época interpretando ese personaje mejor que él. Cuando los estudios cometen errores, realmente cometen errores. Dudo que se nieguen a contratarlo para la película “Dodgeball 2”, que supuestamente se estrenará pronto, si su personaje regresa..

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
Life Style

Bring PhD assessment into the twenty-first century

[ad_1]

A woman holding a cup and saucer stands in front of posters presenting medical research

Innovation in PhD education has not reached how doctoral degrees are assessed.Credit: Dan Dunkley/Science Photo Library

Research and teaching in today’s universities are unrecognizable compared with what they were in the early nineteenth century, when Germany and later France gave the world the modern research doctorate. And yet significant aspects of the process of acquiring and assessing a doctorate have remained remarkably constant. A minimum of three years of independent study mentored by a single individual culminates in the production of the doctoral thesis — often a magisterial, book-length piece of work that is assessed in an oral examination by a few senior academic researchers. In an age in which there is much research-informed innovation in teaching and learning, the assessment of the doctoral thesis represents a curious throwback that is seemingly impervious to meaningful reform.

But reform is needed. Some doctoral candidates perceive the current assessment system to lack transparency, and examiners report concerns of falling standards (G. Houston A Study of the PhD Examination: Process, Attributes and Outcomes. PhD thesis, Oxford Univ.; 2018). Making the qualification more structured would help — and, equally importantly, would bring the assessment of PhD education in line with education across the board. PhD candidates with experience of modern assessment methods will become better researchers, wherever they work. Indeed, most will not be working in universities: the majority of PhD holders find employment outside academia.

It’s not that PhD training is completely stuck in the nineteenth century. Today’s doctoral candidates can choose from a range of pathways. Professional doctorates, often used in engineering, are jointly supervised by an employer and an academic, and are aimed at solving industry-based problems. Another innovation is PhD by publication, in which, instead of a final thesis on one or more research questions, the criterion for an award is a minimum number of papers published or accepted for publication. In some countries, doctoral students are increasingly being trained in cohorts, with the aim of providing a less isolating experience than that offered by the conventional supervisor–student relationship. PhD candidates are also encouraged to acquire transferable skills — for example, in data analysis, public engagement, project management or business, economics and finance. The value of such training would be even greater if these skills were to be formally assessed alongside a dissertation rather than seen as optional.

And yet, most PhDs are still assessed after the production of a final dissertation, according to a format that, at its core, has not changed for at least half a century, as speakers and delegates noted at an event in London last month on PhD assessment, organized by the Society for Research in Higher Education. Innovations in assessment that are common at other levels of education are struggling to find their way into the conventional doctoral programme.

Take the concept of learning objectives. Intended to aid consistency, fairness and transparency, learning objectives are a summary of what a student is expected to know and how they will be assessed, and are given at the start of a course of study. Part of the ambition is also to help tutors to keep track of their students’ learning and take remedial action before it is too late.

Formative assessment is another practice that has yet to find its way into PhD assessment consistently. Here, a tutor evaluates a student’s progress at the mid-point of a course and gives feedback or guidance on what students need to do to improve ahead of their final, or summative, assessment. It is not that these methods are absent from modern PhDs; a conscientious supervisor will not leave candidates to sink or swim until the last day. But at many institutions, such approaches are not required of PhD supervisors.

Part of the difficulty is that PhD training is carried out in research departments by people who do not need to have teaching qualifications or awareness of innovations based on education research. Supervisors shouldn’t just be experts in their field, they should also know how best to convey that subject knowledge — along with knowledge of research methods — to their students.

It is probably not possible for universities to require all doctoral supervisors to have teaching qualifications. But there are smaller changes that can be made. At a minimum, doctoral supervisors should take the time to engage with the research that exists in the field of PhD education, and how it can apply to their interactions with students.

There can be no one-size-fits-all solution to improving how a PhD is assessed, because different subjects often have bespoke needs and practices (P. Denicolo Qual. Assur. Educ. 11, 84–91; 2003). But supervisors and representatives of individual subject communities must continue to discuss what is most appropriate for their disciplines.

All things considered, there is benefit to adopting a more structured approach to PhD assessment. It is high time that PhD education caught up with changes that are now mainstream at most other levels of education. That must start with a closer partnership between education researchers, PhD supervisors and organizers of doctoral-training programmes in universities. This partnership will benefit everyone — PhD supervisors and doctoral students coming into the research workforce, whether in universities or elsewhere.

Education and training in research has entered many secondary schools, along with undergraduate teaching, which is a good thing. In the spirit of mutual learning, research doctoral supervisors, too, will benefit by going back to school.

[ad_2]

Source Article Link

Categories
News

Mid Century Dining Chairs: A Blend of Style and Comfort

Introduction to Mid Century Design

Imagine stepping into a room with sleek lines, warm woods, and a fusion of both organic and geometric forms. Feels nostalgic, right? This imagery is at the heart of mid-century design.

The allure of mid-century furniture

Why do we find ourselves drawn to mid-century furniture, especially the dining chairs? It’s simple. These pieces embody both style and function. Their clean, uncluttered look paired with a touch of vintage flair makes them timeless beauties that still capture hearts today.

Why mid-century designs are still relevant today

Mid-century designs have an uncanny ability to remain fresh and contemporary, even decades after their inception. How? Their focus on functionality, combined with an unpretentious and stylish aesthetic, makes them seamlessly fit into modern interiors.

Features of Mid Century Dining Chairs

Ever sat on a chair that’s just as comfortable as it’s visually pleasing? That’s the magic of mid-century dining chairs.

Characteristics of design

Mid century dining chairs typically feature streamlined shapes, tapered legs, and an emphasis on horizontal and vertical lines. There’s an air of simplicity, but don’t be fooled; every curve and angle is meticulously thought out.

Popular materials used

Teak, walnut, oak, and rosewood are often the woods of choice. But it’s not all about wood. You might find chairs upholstered with vibrant fabrics or those that incorporate metals or plastics, showcasing the period’s innovative spirit.

Unique functionality

Apart from their look, what makes them a favorite? Their ergonomic designs! Mid century dining chairs were made for comfort, ensuring that long dinners or extended chats over coffee felt cozy.

Incorporating Mid Century Dining Chairs in Modern Homes

Blending with contemporary décor

Think mid-century chairs only fit in vintage settings? Think again! Their neutral palettes and adaptable designs make them ideal for contemporary homes. Whether it’s a minimalist apartment or a boho-chic loft, these chairs add a touch of classic elegance.

Tips for selecting the perfect chair

Look for pieces that resonate with your style.

Ensure the chair complements your dining table.

Consider the chair’s size and scale in relation to your space.

Love luxury bar stools? Click here to see more.

Taking Care of Your Mid Century Dining Chair

Invested in a stunning mid-century dining chair? Here’s how to ensure it stays pristine.

Cleaning and maintenance tips

Regular dusting and occasional polishing with a soft cloth can work wonders. If upholstered, vacuuming and spot cleaning are the way to go.

Protecting their value and longevity

Avoid placing them in direct sunlight to preserve their vibrant colors. Also, it’s wise to use felt pads beneath their legs to protect flooring and the chair’s finish.

Where to Buy Authentic Mid Century Dining Chairs

Trusted retailers and markets

Local antique stores, specialized furniture shops, or even online marketplaces like eBay can be goldmines. Just ensure authenticity before purchasing.

What to look for in a genuine piece

Seek out distinct markings, labels, or stamps that indicate its origin. Also, researching the period’s popular designers can give you a keen eye for spotting genuine pieces.

Conclusion: Bringing Timeless Elegance to Your Dining Space

Incorporating a mid-century dining chair into your space isn’t just about aesthetics. It’s about celebrating an era that championed simplicity, functionality, and timeless beauty. Why not invite a piece of history into your home today?

FAQs

What is the mid-century design period?

Typically, it refers to the design movement from the mid-1930s to mid-1960s.

Why are mid-century designs expensive?

Authentic pieces are often made of high-quality materials, and their timeless appeal increases demand.

Can I reupholster my mid-century dining chair?

Absolutely! Just ensure the new fabric aligns with its aesthetic.

How do I verify the authenticity of a mid-century chair?

Look for markings or consult with experts in vintage furniture.

Are reproductions a good alternative?

They can be if you’re looking for the look without the vintage price tag. Just ensure quality construction.